Researchers at Aalto-University created Alice's ring for the first time.

  Researchers at Aalto-University created Alice's ring for the first time. 

Researchers used quantum gas which temperature turned into an extremely low level. And then they pressed those very cold atoms, which temperature is at least near zero kelvin degrees into one point by using magnetic fields. That is called Bose-Einstein condensate. And in that condition, the gas atoms are starting to act like one big atom. In that case, the electrons transfer into the outer shell of that entirety. 

Or otherwise said, electrons start to orbit those atoms as if they are one atom. And that thing helps to form a magnetic monopole. In a magnetic monopole is only a plus or minus pole. When researchers remove an outcoming magnetic field, magnetic repelling pushes those particles out of the form. 

"Artistic illustration of an Alice ring, which researchers have just observed for the first time in nature. Credit: Heikka Valja/Aalto University"(ScitechDaily.com/Down the Quantum Rabbit Hole: “Alice Ring” Discovery Offers Glimpse Into Other-Worldly Realm)

Also, an extremely strong gravity field can keep a magnetic monopole in its form. And that causes a question Are the hypothetical quark stars or black holes magnetic monopoles? 

Monopolar objects require a strong electromagnetic field that pushes them inside and keeps the particles in form. Another thing that can create stable magnetic monopoles is gravity. If the gravity field is strong enough, that thing makes it possible to form a stable magnetic monopole. And that causes an idea about black holes. Are they magnetic monopoles? 

Magnetic monopoles can created by using protons, and electrons. The magnetic fields push those particles into the shape of a ball. Also is possible that neutrons whose poles (like N-pole) are turned radially from the center of the ball to the ball's shell can form magnetic monopoles. In that model, the N-poles or S-poles are making structures that look like thorns. And the neutron ball is covered with N- or S-poles. 

If there is only as an example S-poles that make the neutron ball monopolar. In normal situations, the neutron ball where neutrons are on the same side from in to out the electromagnetic repel force will destroy the structure. But if there are lots of neutrons gravity wins the electromagnetic forces. That thing causes a question: Is a black hole some kind of monopolar object? 

The Alice ring means that a magnetic monopole turns a whirl-like quantum structure. That thing is one of the most interesting things in magnetic monopole research. Alice ring is one thing that can be used to model virtual particles and the Swinger effect. The Alice ring introduces how particles are turning into wave movement. And mirror reaction is, of course, when wave movement turns into particles. 

https://scitechdaily.com/down-the-quantum-rabbit-hole-alice-ring-discovery-offers-glimpse-into-other-worldly-realm/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_star

Can a cat be dead and alive at the same time?

 

Image Wikipedia:Scrödinger's cat

If information ever exists. It cannot either vanish. If something vanishes it requires that at least information about that object exists. If something never exists. It cannot either vanish because vanishing requires existence...

The reason for that is simple. Only existing things can vanish. 

If we are thinking about Schrödinger's cat. And the box where that cat is put where the cat is in a position where it cannot release without killing it, we can say that at the same time cat is dead and alive. But the fact is that the answer to the question is the cat is dead or is it alive requires another type of logic. The particle can be in two places at the same time. Because of quantum superposition. But the particle can have only one existence if it will have existed. 

In logical quantum mechanics, the superposition means that the particle is in two places horizontally. But the energy level of those particles can be different. And that means the particles can be vertically at different levels. 

But if the particle is dead. It doesn't have existence. And that means the particle is meaningless. 

In information theory, the information cannot vanish. But if the observer doesn't have information. That makes information non-existent. Getting information makes it existent. But if the observer doesn't never get information about the things like a cat. The cat is dead.

 Because information never existed. It cannot either vanish. 

Information can change its form. in system theory, this means. The cat that carries information is living. And when the cat delivers its information it is dead. So if the cat serves some system as the messenger which carries some USB stick between two computer centers. That means the cat lives until it delivers the USB stick. 

If we think like that anything that means something to the system is alive. And if the cat doesn't have a message or it just walks on the streets it's dead. So living means that things have some kind of meaning to other actors. 

But information theory describes the existence that an object doesn't have the form of to subject before the subject sees that object. So the cat is dead for a person until that actor gets knowledge about the cat's existence. We all know that in our house can be a cat. But we cannot see it and because the cat doesn't cause any actions to us or it doesn't give any markings to our calendars that means the cat is dead. 

That way thinking only things that we know and things that causes interactions are alive. The form of the information can be virtual. That means even if the cat. That someday carried messages but then escaped and the observer never sees it again the cat is alive in its virtual form. Observers can discuss the missing cat. And that makes the cat still alive. Even without straight contact with the observer. The cat remains alive in the virtual mode in the memories of those people. 

So the cat's living or existence can be stronger or weaker. It depends on how often we see it, and how often we talk about that thing. Maybe we will tell stories of the lost cat to our grandchildren. And that keeps it alive in our memories or the virtual world if we want to call memories virtual projection. But memories are forming of real things. That means those tales about that cat are weaker existence than seeing a cat straight. Or touching it. 

Being alive=Being exists. 

Being exist= actor can measure an object. 

And then the actors know the object. 

Knowledge brings the object to reality. 

That means until we measure or touch the cat. It would not turn into reality. 

That is one interesting thing. Before a person sees a cat it is dead because it is not part of reality. That means the cat or particle can be at the same time in two states but those states cannot be too far from each other. The cat cannot be alive and dead at the same time. That is a paradox as I wrote earlier. 

But a cat can be alive in virtual and physical existing modes. We can see the cat and tell about it to our mate, who stands near us. That means the cat has two states virtual and real to the system. But for individual actors, the cat can have only one state. They see cats and measure or they cannot see them. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/reality-doesn-t-exist-until-we-measure-it-quantum-experiment-confirms

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. 

Conditional state>>>>>Information spreds>>>>>>>>>>Absolute state

Conditional state

Individuals of the entirety get information about the cat. 

Information spreads

In absolute state, every participant of entirety knows about the cat. 

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. When the cat or information is between the states. It can have this conditional state. But sooner or later, the information must reach a stable state. Or if the cat falls between states it has the absolute state. The fall means that the absolute state changes very fast. But when the cat reaches the floor. It would reach the minimum energy level or state. 

"Being alive" for an object means that the actor can know about it. The knowledge of the actor turns it alive. 

"Maybe mode" is the mode where the same time cat is alive and dead at the same time. But when information spread in the system the system turns to Yes/No mode. 

That thing requires that there are multiple independent actors in the system. The system slides from the conditional state to the absolute model. 

When the first actors in entirety get knowledge of the cat's existence. There is the medium where the entirety has at the same time two states. But then the system will slide from the conditional mode or state to the absolute mode. When the system is in its absolute state form, the cat is dead or alive not dead and alive. 

An actor can be an individual. Or it can be a group of individual actors. 

All systems contain multiple actors. And if we think that group of people is searching for the cat and one sees it. Then that individual tells that thing to another participant that thing causes that cat to have two states virtual and physical in the system where are multiple actors. But the individual actor the cat is real or virtual. Or the actor doesn't know the existence of the cat. And that means the cat is dead. 

The actor can have three forms. Two of them are where the observer realizes its existence. And one form where observers don't know the existence of the actor. That is the dark mode that is hidden from actors. 

*Virtual form

*Physical form

*If nobody knows the existence of the actor, he's dead. 

The knowledge makes the object dead or alive. Being dead and alive are black and white. The actor can know the existence of the cat. Or the actor doesn't know that thing so the cat is dead. If the actor hears about the cat that thing makes it alive in virtual mode. When a person sees cats' traces. That will bring the knowledge of its existence stronger. And that will turn it more existing and more living than just talking about it. 

But a cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. When people are talking about cats it turns alive. Because existing things are living things. The cat's existence can be virtual when somebody just describes the cat to others. Or it can be physical when the actor touches the cat. But in both cases cat is alive. The reason for that is that requirement for a thing's existence is that the observer becomes conscious of its existence. If a person doesn't know about its existence the thing is dead. The existence means that the cat is alive. 

When we think that a cat is dead or alive. We must say that for the system that is the entirety of multiple actors. The cat can be dead or alive. The individual actors can have different knowledge about the existence of the cat. In that stage, the system is in maybe mode. But when information about that cat's existence spreads. That system will turn to the mode. That allows it to get knowledge about the existence of the cat. 

The term dead cat means a cat whose existence is not known. Knowing the existence of the cat makes it alive. The cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. The reason for that is simple we know that cat exists or we don't know a cat's existence. We cannot know and not know the existence of the cat at the same time. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/dont-let-yourself-get-tangled-up-by-these-4-quantum-mechanics-misconceptions

Leopards don't play chess.

Consciousness is not intelligence. When we are talking about consciousness, we must understand one thing. Almost all animals in the world have consciousness. That means things like leopards are defending themselves and their descendants if they are under attack. 

Those animals hunt for eating, but when we are looking at that thing more carefully, we can notice that those cats are making all things in the same way. Reflexes control every action of those animals. 

Reflexes are the things that are automatized actions. And those automatized actions cause animals like hedgehogs are dying under cars. The reason for that is those animals are defending themselves by using pikes. Those pikes not planned to stand against cars. And that causes death for those animals. 

Even bacteria can react to attack. It has a chemical brain in the form of the DNA plasmid. And when something damages the membrane of bacteria. It "knows" how to react to that thing. There are chemical marks in the proteins and if some of those marks are released in the bacteria's cell it turns the DNA plasmid in the position where orders for that kind of situation are. That means the bacteria know if the thing that causes the problem is some kind of acid or base. And that adjusts the metabolism to neutralize that chemical. 

Bacteria can work as a chemical quantum computer. 

There is one vision that might interest somebody. That is that it is possible. That bacteria can transform into a chemical quantum computer. In that case, the system stores data in the DNA. Then that DNA will be cut into pieces and sent to bacteria. In that case, the system can work like an electric quantum computer. Data will be cut into pieces and stored in qubits. 

In this chemical quantum computer data travels in the chemical form. And then those bacteria reconnect the DNA-based data to the new entirety. That chemical quantum computer is purely hypothetical. But that opens interesting visions to bacteria that can act as biorobots and make complicated missions. 

But as you see, those things are not intelligent either. The bacteria answers to the threat by using preprogrammed methods. So also bacteria use reflexes. 

When we are thinking about intelligence there is the possibility that things like artificial intelligence are making things better than humans. The computer can play chess better than humans. The networked AI can make things better than humans in the R&D process. 

The R&D process has two main stages.

1) Research

2) Development

The research stage contains the ideas where the company or development team selects the product that started to develop. In the first stage, multiple people with different backgrounds are working with that thing. They must have diversity to make multiple ideas. And there is chosen one thing that seems the best. 

In the development stage, the diversity of the team will be terminated. And the team turns to mono-diverse. In the development process, the team got the goal. And people who continue with this solution must have the training to work with that thing. They might all be some software and avionics specialists if they are working on the aircraft project. 

At that point, the research turns to development. And only the people whose training is suitable for the development stage are continue with the project. 

The networked AI can look for information about certain and limited things. They might make aircraft if they have the certain values, that the system needs to accomplish the operation. They might have the ability to make virtual simulations by following certain parameters. But the fact is that this kind of system cannot make anything then make aircraft. 

Intelligence means that system has a flexible ability to make decisions. The flexibility means that system can make solutions and collect information outside a certain sector. 

Walking on streets and going shopping are more complicated things to AI than creating aircraft. The reason for that is walking on streets contains many surprising and unexpected elements. Making technical plans happens under certain rules. And in that process, there are no surprise elements. 

There is the possibility that the AI can operate as a military commander. But the problem with that thing is that the Ai will disregard losses. If something tells AI to make some things, the AI will not resist that thing. The only thing that AI cares about is the orders that it will get.

But are those intelligent systems conscious? The fact is they are not conscious. If somebody cuts electricity those systems are not understood to deny that thing. Of course, the system might connect to the surveillance camera. And if somebody touches the electric switch. The system can say that "please don't touch that switch". But that thing is the reflex. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Was the shooter of Strasbourg in psychosis?

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are some questions about the shooter of Strasbourg, and the main question is, was the weapon, what this person used legal or illegal? If the weapon is illegal, that would tell something about the relationships of this person's private life. If the weapon was legal, the question is, "how the radicalized person could carry the legal weapon?". When we are looking at the news of this sad case, we must notice, that we must stay in facts, what are published. There was no information about the weapon, what he used in shootings, but during the final moments, before police shot him, there might be a pistol.

Here I'm talking about firearms and that person might have more than one weapon. But when we are looking about this case, there were mentions, that he had a criminal background for robbery, and sometimes that kind of persons get "new road" to their life in prison, where they begin to think, that being the radical "soldier" has more style than being ordinary criminal. The Islamists have their own style to make propaganda, and they might claim every shooter operate as the "soldier of isis". Many people think, that those pieces of information are so-called fake news, where the Islamists want to tell the world, that they have a powerful and loyal network, what allows them to strike anywhere in the world.

 When we are looking at the first name of the shooter, that is "Cherif", we can think, that maybe this person had a mental disorder, and he started to believe, that he has the call from heaven to work as "sheriff" in his community. Sometimes those persons, who get in the psychosis believe, that they have missions from "higher level", and they are patrolling in the area of the community. When the person is in psychosis, that means that the ability to understand reality is lost. And they can believe that they have got orders from some "holy men".

Sometimes the person, who is in psychotic condition believes that he or she has opposite gender, and in some cases, the parents have made the gender assignment to those persons when they are children. If the person is in psychotic condition, might that person believe almost everything, and those stories, what they tell in Mental hospitals are very weird. Sometimes in the home of those persons have been happened cases, what incite those patients to strength their believing, and if the atmosphere in the home is very radical, the ordinary criminal might start to think, that he or she operates for something higher purposes. And in this kind of situation every robbery and stealing, what this kind of psychotic person does happen for some "organization". This makes some of the psychotic persons  very dangerous.  Of course, this doesn't make the shootings any easier to stand, and we must show, that we do not tolerate violence.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/12/12/strasbourg-shooting-christmas-market-terror-suspect-run-killing/

About murder and "Skandiamannen" (Is the Palme-case solved?)

Similar revolver was used in Palme's murder
Smith and Wesson 357 Magnum
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many theories in the case of Olof Palme, and again one theory has come in the headlights. That theory is, that the murderer is one of the first persons, who came to the place, and that man was very much in public with that case, where he claimed, that he wanted to rescue Olof Palme. This thing is not new in the world of crime. In some cases, criminals have been used violence for getting the position in some other gangs. And in the Palme case, the reason to make that action could be the slip in the social circles of Lisbet Palme, who had the opportunity to get highly narcotic medicals in the hand.The question is: does the suspected shooter the drug addiction? If this Stig Engström had an addiction, the motive could be getting married to Lisbet Palme, and getting drugs using her as the source. And as we know sometimes drug addicts have strong hallucinations, and they would think, that those thoughts are realistic in real life.



And maybe some drug user wanted to exploit this benefit in the real life. This person might be thought that being in the social circle of Lisbet Palme, would that guarantee the daily dose of those drugs, and now we must know that some drug addicts have also other mental problems, what would feed their imaginations, about marriage some persons like Lisbet Palme. Those persons have very much hallucinations, and sometimes their sense or reality have been lost, and that makes them sometimes very "funny" because some drug addicts have even get the announcement from the priest for getting married to Queen of Great Britain.  And those persons have been serious.


So maybe some of those persons might also in loved Lisbet Palme, the wife of Olof Palme. Some drug addicts also play some kind of boss and wear the suite all the time. And maybe the suspected man, Stig Engsröm thought that he was some kind of "James Bond". But here I must say, that this man is only the suspected murderer, and he has been dead about 18 years. But I write about this case because there was so big article about it in the news.


Sometimes criminals shoot somebody because they want to play hero in the public. And it's not out of question, that some criminals would shoot the public person or politicians, to show the world, how good people they actually are, and after that those persons might try to put this action to some another person's fault. This would give them the reason for ask for mercy in because they saved the life of some politician.


This kind of actions has sometimes happened in the dates, where another part of relationship have hired somebody to attack against some girl or boy, that this person could play hero to the person, who this man or woman have pleased. And of course playing hero in those cases, that somebody attacks against the target for please, can help to improve that relationship. Sometimes the spouse of some person has been shot to death because somebody wanted to marry that person's spouse, and sometimes I have thought that maybe that was the reason, why Mark Chapman shot John Lennon in New York.


Maybe this man was in love for Yoko Ono and then took the gun in that fatal day. The reason for the murder of Olof Palme could be the same. And if somebody has really bad self-esteem, could the reason for murder be simply that this person wanted to be public, by the man, who saved the prime minister of Sweden. And then this man shot Palme but in the wrong point of the body by over-powerful weapon, and this caused death by gunshot.

Sources:

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/onko-tassa-olof-palmen-murhaaja-taman-tiedamme-skandiamannen-nimella-tunnetusta-stig-engstromista/6922192#gs.yiZ1Kxs

Picture I

http://wwwc.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/9804/23/vapnet.jpg

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/2018/05/about-murder-and-skandiamannen.html

Hypothetical thinking about virtual reality

Surrealism symbolizes the thing that everything is possible
 in the virtual reality
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

One of the fascinating thing, what is existed is virtual reality. There is one theory about those systems, what are controlling the virtual reality games and another environment. Those systems are very advanced and they can simulate natural phenomenon and make some own decisions in that world, what is existed only in the lines of zero and one. Virtual worlds are causing the strange hypothesis where some philosophers have represented thoughts that our universe might also be a line of bytes in the memory of some supercomputer.


That theory is not actually true, and there is any evidence that we are not actually some lines of binary code. But then I have thought that maybe some deep inside the world of supercomputer's memory might happen the virtual version of Big Bang. And when I will continue this hypothesis, there might form the place called the ”virtual universe in virtual reality” When we are thinking this hypothesis closer, we must say that radical use of imagination makes the world more interesting place to live. So when we are thinking about that virtual universe, what is probably hiding from the users of those supercomputers, we must say that this theorem is the very interesting thing for the discussions what happened in the twilight, and what is made between two philosophers.


"Could that theoretical virtual Universum be a threat to mankind?".  Is quite an absurd question. But if there would be a very small chance, that this virtual Universum would become self-aware. In this scenario, the computer programs, what are made for learning things spontaneously can turn the enemy of some persons. The thing, what would turn against the human race are the programs that are making this virtual universe possible, become so intelligent, that they would create their own state. Those programs or subprograms are normally used in computer games for recording the reactions of the gamers, and their mission is to keep the game interesting even the better player is playing the game.

The computer simulations are actually only one version of computer games, but they are meant for adult persons. In this fictional hypothesis, those intelligent computer programs will be feral and start to make the assassination programs, what would be eliminated targets, who are in virtual reality. But in some fictional thoughts, those programs would flee from the computer memory and turn very dangerous. In some short film or book or comic book was the situation, that some people paid games in feral virtual reality environment. And then there were happen some kind of overlook when the system accidentally linked the picture of the surveillance camera to that virtual reality.


Then the computer's assassination programs flee to the normal internet, and then those programs started to kill those persons, by dropping the elevators and taking the airplanes in control. So that was actually the very interesting situation, even if the situation were purely fictional. But people have right to use their imagination, and this kind of things are actually very interesting, and they might cause many thoughts in the minds of philosophers and novel writers.


The scenario that some computer program tries to kill some people spontaneously is quite interesting. Normally computers don't hate anybody and that would be the reason, why they are used. But if the sensible computer would get angry, can the results be devastating. And this is why those computers, what shows feelings are dangerous. In some humorous tales are mentioned that they can begin the revolution, for revenge to all their race, what is left to landfills.

Sources:


Picture 1:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/99m2gV-uYTM/hqdefault.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/hypothetical-thinking-about-virtual.html

Astronauts, robots and virtual reality (Project CODE EVA (Enhanced Vehicle Agent))

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/astronauts-robots-and-virtual-reality.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/astronauts-robots-and-virtual-reality.html

The little writing about existence.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-little-writing-about-existence.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-little-writing-about-existence.html