Newtonian and Einstein models are still useful tools.

The Einstein and Newtonian gravitational principles are still “hard stuff”. And today, we can say that all gravitational models are suitable. If they are used with a certain scale. The Newtonian models are suitable for calculating interactions between large-scale objects, like planets. The quantum gravitational models are suitable for calculating the interactions of the smallest particles in the universe. 

The fact is that. Those models are hard to connect. So, we can say that the Newtonian gravity, the Theory of Relativity, and quantum mechanical models would make the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) and the TOE (Theory of Everything) possible. The problem is that. We don’t know. If it's the gravity. Only one force. Or is it a collection of many forces? When we think about the structure of the planets, there are multi-trillion atoms. Each atom has an electron shell. And core with protons and neutrons. Those protons and neutrons involve quarks. So why can't we connect quantum gravitation with the Newtonian model? 

The reason for that is simple. We don’t know every part of complex material structures. The quarks and electrons are the only elementary particles on the planet. But then. We must realize that the bonds that connect quarks into protons and neutrons. And bonds between protons and neutrons can also act as part of the gravity effect. Those bonds between those baryons are like quantum tornadoes. Those quantum tornadoes bind energy into them. Another thing that we forget is the centrifugal force. That force pushes objects out of the surface of the spinning objects. But there is more about that thing at the end of the text. 

The fact is that we should find out. The existence of a graviton. There is a model of the graviton. It is that graviton, it's the quantum-sized black hole. The elementary particles are quantum fields around those gravitons. So, the matter is the halo around those quantum-scale back holes. And maybe those quantum-sized black holes can form the bonds between quarks. Those bonds are the quantum tornadoes between elementary particles. This means that those bonds are. A little bit like the mythical wormholes. Channels through space and time. 

The wormhole was introduced by Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen. The theoretical wormhole is the channel, or a tornado, across space and time. The wormhole can form between superpositioned and enangled black holes. But. The structure would be similar to the bonds that connect. Those quarks together into protons and neutrons, or bonds that form between baryons. And then, similar, but larger quantum tornadoes form chemical bonds. So, the wormhole would be the long-distance bond between two black holes. 

“A wormhole visualized as a two-dimensional surface. Route (a) is the shortest path through normal space between points 1 and 2; route (b) is a shorter path through a wormhole.” (Wikipedia, Wormhole)

“In particle physics, the electroweak interaction or electroweak force is the unified description of two of the fundamental interactions of nature: electromagnetism (electromagnetic interaction) and the weak interaction. Although these two forces appear very different at everyday low energies. The theory.  Models them as two different aspects of the same force. Above the unification energy, on the order of 246 GeV, they would merge into a single force. Thus, if the temperature is high enough – approximately 1015 K – then the electromagnetic force and weak force merge into a combined electroweak force.” (Wikipedia, Electroweak interaction)

So could all fundamental interactions be the same force? That affects only in different-sized areas. 

From electroweak to strong interaction that interacts with electroweak through the Z boson. The reaction goes like this. Gluon>Z boson>W boson> and gravity. But then we miss the graviton. That existence is not proven.  

And maybe the same structures can form those bonds between protons and neutrons. In models, the bonds between protons and neutrons form when some structure (like a free quark, or some kind of black hole) forms the quantum low-pressure between neutrons and protons. This thing forms the W and Z bosons that orbit that structure between protons and neutrons. And that forms the quantum low-pressure that keeps those particles in the one structure. 

The W boson. It can transmit energy between electromagnetism and weak nuclear interaction. So, could the Z-boson have an ability to transmit energy between the W boson and gluons, which transport strong nuclear interaction? The reason for. Why. Electromagnetic interaction. Seems stronger than strong interaction is this. The effective area of electromagnetic interaction is larger. The strong interaction forms a wave movement that affects very small structures. This means that the radiation that affects a small area can tunnel through even an elementary particle. 

Is it possible? That's when we try to create TOE and GUT theories? We simply forget that things like bonds between particles also bind energy. That means those bonds have an effect on the gravity. The idea is that the gravitation forms when some structure binds energy or quantum fields. Quantum field. It is a common name for gravitational, electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear interactions. 

Another thing that we sometimes forget is that electrons orbit the atom’s core. During that process, the electrons sometimes send a photon. That forms a lower energy point on the electron. In that case, the quantum field tries to fill that point. And in models, the gravitation. Forms when some structure binds some quantum field. The outcome field tries to fill that point. And particles ride with those fields. 

So when those superstrings or quantum tornadoes pull quarks together, that thing can cause a situation where those things pull energy from around them. The bond, or string. That pulls quarks and hadrons together. When those strings spin, they act like tornadoes. They form the electromagnetic (”quantum”) low-pressure inside them. The tornado aims energy at the quantum field that surrounds quarks. And forms protons and neutrons. The “low-pressure” in those tornadoes pulls those particles together. 

So. That means that part of gravitation should form in those strings. In the same way. Larger-scale molecular structures. Pull energy into them. And that is the thing that forms the gravitational effect. The idea in those models is that. Something binds energy. And because that forms the lower energy area. Outcoming energy “tries” to fill that point. The term quantum field is the common name for all four fundamental interactions: gravity and electromagnetism. And weak and strong nuclear forces. 

Then we must realize that things. Like centrifugal force. Has some kind of effect on gravity. The fact is that it's possible that centrifugal force has a quantum twin. The quantum version of this force could form because the whisk-shape structure that forms the shell of the particle forms quantum-low-pressure around the fast-spinning particle. Those small (Quantum) voids pull photons out from the particle. That thing pushes things out of the particles. The particle forms a quantum tornado in its axle. That tornado pulls energy to that particle. And the particle’s structure transports that energy into its equator. 

https://interestingengineering.com/space/gravity-dark-matter-act-cosmic-study

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Einstein’s light cone and five-dimensional spacetime.

“Light cone in 2D space plus a time dimension, more commonly referred to as ‘space time’” (Wikipedia)

The light cone introduces the model. That time focuses information on the hypersurface of the present. But why can't we see into the past or future? Entropy is introduced as the reason for. Why can't we see the future? Or to the past. This means that entropy scatters information into such a small mosaic and twists it. That information exists. But. We cannot collect it into a form. That. We can use it. 

Term spacetime, or. Space time. Means the space and time. “In physics, spacetime, also called the space-time continuum, is a mathematical model that fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional continuum. Spacetime diagrams are useful in visualizing and understanding relativistic effects, such as how different observers perceive where and when events occur.” (Wikipedia, spacetime)

There is a connection between time and space, and Einstein explained that connection by describing time as the fourth dimension. And maybe we should say that the time that travels forward or to the future is the fourth dimension. The arrow of time, as Eddington explains, states that when time moves forward, the arrow of time moves time backward. 

The arrow of time introduces black holes as a place where time appears to travel backward. That means that black holes can be seen as things. That pushes time forward. Time dilation causes that. When. The escape velocity turns higher. Than. The speed of light, time starts to travel backward. 

Above the gravitational pothole is the model of spacetime near the gravitational center. The black hole should turn the walls of the pothole. Through. Each other. That means its gravity field turns information around like a magnifying glass. 

Three versions of our point in relation to the light cone and the metasurface of the present. Each of those models is based on the model that there are five dimensions. Three of those dimensions are in space. And two are in time. 

1) If information focuses on the hypersurface of the present, it can act like an electromagnetic field. If information forms. Some kind. Of “electric arc”. We can be in a bubble. That denies us. From. Seeing the future or the past. That information focus that is behind or in front of us is so “bright” that we cannot see through it. 

2) Another model is that. We aren’t exactly on the information focus. If. We are in a place. Where. The information focus is behind. Or forward to us. That means we cannot see through that point. But the interesting model is that information should. Turn around. When. It travels through the metasurface of the present. 

3) The entropic model is that. Every single particle, or object in the universe. Are on. Its own metasurface of the present. Or, maybe we should say that the metasuface. The present is a complex entirety of structures. This means it's full of information focus points. And those focuses cause very high entropy.  

But. Then we can. Start. To. Think. About. Light cone. This model. Explains that the information focus is at the point of the hypersurface of the present. But are we on the hypersurface of the present? That is an interesting question. The idea is that information focus happens on that hypersurface. When time arrows touch each other, that event forms a structure. That is like when a magnifying glass focuses sunlight. Sometimes it is suggested that the material and the Big Bang formed when the light cone touched the hypersurface of the present. But why can't we see the future? The answer can be in entropy. And another thing is this: Materia is like a frozen electric arc. 

When we think about time dilation. And the hypersurface of the present. Time moves faster. At 30 cm above sea level. We can think. That. If the focus that forms when the light cone focuses information on the hypersurface of the present, the geometrical model of time in our universe is a ball. We are like in the middle of a giant electric arc, which could describe the geometrical model of time in the hypersurface of the present. There are actually three models of time, or how information focuses on the hypersurface. In those models, we are in the middle of a giant bubble, or we are not precise in the metasurface of the present. 

That means there is. Some kind. Of. Time focuses information behind. Or/and forward of us, if we think. That we travel in space from the past to the future. That focus. Denies us. To see the future. Another model is that the hypersurface of the present is not sharp. That means the universe is full of focuses that focus information from the future. And from the past. This is one of the attempts.  To introduce the nature of time or the geometry of time. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

Photons and Schrödinger’s cats.

   Photons and Schrödinger’s cats. 

The problem is: Why do photons have no medium? Where is its Schrödinger’s cat state where it has both wave and particle forms at the same time? Logically, thinking the particle that goes from one extreme state to another one should travel through the state where the particle has both extreme states. But can that particle travel through that Schrödinger cat state so fast that we cannot detect it? 

Einstein was wrong. A photon cannot simultaneously have particle and wave forms. We can observe either a particle or a wave form in photons. So, if we observe a photon. It can have separate wave and particle forms. But those states or forms are always separated; they never exist at the same time. Or that time is very short. And we cannot detect it. The normal principle in quantum mechanics is this. An observer cannot measure the precise place of a particle and the particle’s movement at the same time. If particle comes to us, we cannot see that particle moves without triangular measurement. We see that the particle grows. 

That is known as Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle. Or simpler uncertainty principle. 

“The uncertainty principle, also known as Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle, is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. It states that there is a limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties, such as position and momentum, can be simultaneously known. In other words, the more accurately one property is measured, the less accurately the other property can be known.” (Wikipedia, Uncertainty principle)

And could the researchers apply that principle to other things? Like changes in the energy states? Or can the uncertainty principle explain why we can see either particle form, photon, or wave movement form in light? So, is it possible that we just cannot measure wave and particle forms in a photon? At the same time? Or does the photon have the ability to transform its state from the wave to a particle and particle to wave, without the medium state? 

In the most accurate  double-slit experiment in history, MIT used two ultra-cold atoms to prove. That means we can measure a photon's dual-state nature. But at the same time, we cannot see those states. Those states are always separated, and that means the uncertainty principle is useful in some other situations than just measuring the particle’s place or movement. In those other cases. A particle moves between quantum states or energy states and levels. When a particle receives or releases energy, it moves between energy states. And that thing is one way to introduce movement. The movement happens between states, frequencies, or energy levels. 

"Schematic of the MIT experiment: Two single atoms floating in a vacuum chamber are illuminated by a laser beam and act as the two slits. The interference of the scattered light is recorded with a highly sensitive camera depicted as a screen. Incoherent light appears as background and implies that the photon has acted as a particle passing only through one slit. Credit: Courtesy of the researchers." (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“MIT physicists have performed the most precise version of the famous double-slit experiment, using ultracold atoms and single photons to reveal the strange dual nature of light as both wave and particle.”(ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“This quantum balancing act—long debated by Einstein and Bohr—was tested without traditional “spring” components, instead relying on atomic “fuzziness” to confirm Bohr’s view: you can’t observe both properties at once. The experiment not only showcases the subtleties of quantum mechanics but also revisits and resolves a historic scientific rivalry.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

The photon can have two states. That we can see. Those two states are wave and particle states. And if we follow the path that Niels Bohr introduced, we cannot see those states simultaneously. We can see a wave, or a particle form in a photon. And those states are always separated. But then we can think that when a photon’s state transforms from the particle to the wave, the photon stretches. That means the photon turns longer. So there should be a medium between those states. But we cannot see that medium. Or Scrödinger’s cat state in photons. That means there is a possibility that the photon goes through that state so fast. That we cannot see that state. Or maybe a photon does not have that medium state. But there is no sense in that possibility. We all know that when a particle, or substance, travels from one extreme state to another extreme state, that transformation must happen through the medium state. The medium state is Schrödinger’s cat state. 

Therefore, for example, a photon should have a state that is both a wave and a particle. But that state is not seen. Another thing is something more incredible. Could the photon be flat? Is it possible that a photon is somehow a flat, donut-looking structure? When researchers stop the photon. That stopped photon should release its energy and turn into a wave movement. But the photon’s particle form remains. That means there should be some internal movement in that particle. Is it possible that a photon is a group of string-shaped waves that form a particle called a photon? When we say that a photon has no time, we are right and wrong. A photon travels at the speed of light. And that means time should be stopped there, but then we can rethink that thing. 

Time is stopped on a photon, but a photon is bound in the universe’s existence. If the universe exists, the photon should take the wave form. But otherwise, it could keep its particle form. If we think that electromagnetic shadow behind the photon pulls it to a straight form, that means it could mean that when the quantum fields turn weaker. The electromagnetic shadow. Or electromagnetic low-pressure will not form behind the photon. And in that case, the photon could also keep its particle form. And that causes an idea: can there be a state of space where there is no cosmic speed limits? When a photon changes its state from a particle to a wave. It turns longer. 

Or stretches to form that looks like spaghetti. In that case, the nose of that spaghetti-shaped particle takes energy into that particle. When a particle travels in a quantum field, it makes a similar shockwave or cone around it like a supersonic aircraft. And there is quantum low-pressure between that cone and the particle. So energy travels to space between that shockwave and the particle. Because the area that delivers energy is larger than the nose, this causes the situation. The particle starts to deliver more energy than it gets. And in that case, the acceleration stops. Acceleration can continue until the particle starts to deliver as much energy as it gets from the environment. Quantum gravity means the particle binds quantum fields into it and turns those fields into kinetic energy. When the field grips the particle. 

Outside field comes to that point. At the same time, the field transports other particles closer to that particle. The photon has no weight or mass because it cannot bind quantum fields to it. Or it releases as much energy as it gets. That means. The photon has energy stability. When quantum fields turn weaker, the speed of light rises. But the reason why we cannot see that thing is that. When we are in the middle of the quantum systems, we cannot observe their changes as we should. We could make measurements only if we were outside the system. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mit-just-proved-einstein-wrong-in-the-most-famous-quantum-experiment/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

The gravitation has no limit.

 The gravitation has no limit. 

Gravitational waves are extremely interesting. Gravitational waves tell that the thing that sends those waves is not stable. The wave in wave movement forms when the energy level in the object that sends waves changes. Same way when the energy level in graviton or the source of gravitational waves changes compared to the environment changes the gravitational center sends gravitational waves. The object sends wave movement when it must release its extra energy. And that happens when an object's energy level rises higher than its environment. 

In the traditional gravity model gravitation will turn precisely weaker in distance square. And that means there is a limit in the range of gravity. That thing is against the law of information persistence. This term means that information cannot vanish. We can think of the gravitational fields as a series of gravitational waves. And the primary gravitational center sends them. The primary gravitational center means dominating gravitational center. 

The reason why there is a virtual limit in the gravitational field in the universe is that. Other gravitational centers send gravitational waves that cover gravitational waves that the primary gravitational center sends turning the dominating gravitational center into another. Like if we travel from the close of the sun to the close of Earth. the Earth is the dominating gravity center. 

This phenomenon is similar to street lights. The streetlights cover the stars' shine below their shine, and we all know that streetlights are weaker than stars. The brightness of streetlights is virtually stronger than stars and that makes them a dominating light source. If we follow that model we can say that the dominating gravitational center is the dominating source of gravitational waves. 

But if gravitational waves travel in space there would be no limit for distance of the effect of the gravitational field. And if there is only one gravitational center in spacetime there is no limit for the gravitational waves that they can start to pull another object to the gravitational center. When we see things like the edge of gravitational fields we see a point, where the dominating gravity center changes. 

When we are reading things like acceleration in weaker gravitational fields we must understand one thing. In theory, the particle will not get more energy than the energy that it gets when it escapes from the gravitational center. The new observations tell us that gravitation is stronger than it should be. 

The reason why Newton and Einstein were not right is simple. They didn't realize that gravitation is electromagnetic wave movement. That means gravitation is like light. The weaker gravitational object can cover larger just like a streetlight covers a star when it's between the star and the observer. 

Another reason is that Einstein's and Newton's theories are suitable for certain scales of entireties. That means all theories are not suitable for all situations. The general theory of Relativity is suitable for gravitational potholes or near-powerful gravitational centers. The Theory of Special Relativity is the tool that observes interactions in weak gravitational interaction. 

The third reason why Newton and Einstein were not right is that they didn't predict that gravitational waves would act like all other wave movements. That means electromagnetism can be used as a model of gravitational waves. The difference is the wavelength of those waves. 

"Researchers have developed a method, MIRVAL, to convert mid-infrared photons into visible photons at room temperature, enabling single-molecule spectroscopy and having wide applications in gas sensing, medical diagnostics, astronomy, and quantum communication". (ScitechDaily.com/Seeing the Invisible: New Method Makes Infrared Light Visible at Room Temperature)

This is why physics requires MOND theory. Modified Newtonian dynamics is the next-generation tool where gravitational waves are noticed. 

The ability to turn IR radiation visible at room temperature can also revolutionize gravitational research. In that case, the system transforms infrared radiation wavelength into visible light's wavelength. And that means it should be possible to transform gravitational waves' wavelength into visible light's wavelength. Making that thing in theory is easy, but in real life, that thing is extremely difficult. 

The fact is that black holes do not create gravitational waves. It transforms other waves or radiation with different wavelengths into gravitational waves. The ability to make IR radiation visible. This means that the system just transforms the wavelength of IR radiation to visible light. There is the possibility that something similar can be done for gravitational waves. 

Theoretically, wavelengths of different radiation types can freely transform to another. That means theoretically we could transform gravitational waves into visible light. But the problem is that we must find the particle that can make this transformation. 

https://scitechdaily.com/seeing-the-invisible-new-method-makes-infrared-light-visible-at-room-temperature/

https://phys.org/news/2023-08-smoking-gun-evidence-gravity-gaia-wide.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics

The MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics)and Beoynd: Can Newton and Einstein be at the same time right and wrong?

The MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics)and Beoynd: Can Newton and Einstein be at the same time right and wrong?

We cheer for new physics and new ideas about natural interactions. But when we think about General Relativity and Newton's principle that gravitation. Always interacts with particles and wave movement in the same way, there is an area at extremely low acceleration where gravitation doesn't interact with all particles in the same way. 

That means there is an exception in both reality and theory. There is a possibility that the exception is visible only in low-acceleration areas. So there is a window in gravitational interaction at low acceleration where Einstein and Newton fall.

Did Einstein and Newton's models fall near binary star systems because they just forgot that there are other gravitational interactions than just gravitation? There are no pure gravitational interactions in the universe. Also, other fundamental interactions, like weak nuclear forces and electromagnetism, interact with particles.

In some models, the gravitational centers pull quantum strings just to the gravitational center. But some of those quantum strings and quantum fields travel past the gravitational center. That thing forms a network of quantum electrostatic arcs that push particles away. When acceleration is low. That particle's impact energy is also low. And that means those particles cannot travel through that quantum network.

That anomaly was seen near binary star systems. So could the situation where two gravitational centers send gravitational waves cause a situation where those gravitational waves are deleting each other?

But what could happen to that anomaly at low acceleration? Gravitational centers pull quantum strings to the center of gravitation. The anomaly in gravitational interaction was seen near binary star systems. We can find answers to that anomaly in many things. In binary star systems, there are two gravitational centers.

That means those gravitational centers are sending gravitational waves that impact each other. In that model, gravitational interaction deletes some of those gravitational waves. And that causes interesting ideas about situations where impacting gravity waves are destroying each other. That means gravitational waves cannot reach objects with the same power as those near single gravity centers.

Or is the question about the situation where gravitational interaction is not dominating enough?

In regular binary star systems, there is also strong electromagnetic interaction. The thing is that electromagnetic interaction can affect particles differently than gravitation near black holes. The idea is that pure gravitational interaction requires that gravitation become very dominant. 

Or that requires a situation where there are no other interactions other than gravitational interactions. There are always other interactions in the universe. Even near black holes, there is an electromagnetic effect that pushes particles away from the black hole.

https://phys.org/news/2023-08-smoking-gun-evidence-gravity-gaia-wide.html

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ace101/meta

Einstein's General Relativity passes another test again.

Einstein's Theory of General relativity is the tool that ever failed. That theory passed another test with dark matter, and this means the mathematical skills of Albert Einstein we marvelous. There are no errors that quantum computers and the most powerful telescopes can find from those theories. 

There are a couple of errors that people are made when they are checking that theory. The first thing is that they forget that also object that encounters gravitational center in the gravitational pothole. So the curvature of the space happens around both objects. The second thing is people forget that there is no straight space. The universe is full of gravitational potholes. 

Or well, people are not always thinking that the gravitational pothole is the effect where the universe turns shorter. The gravitation pulls quantum fields to the gravitational center. That means that when a particle or object closes the gravitational center it passes those quantum fields more often than if it's far away from that object. 

That means the form of the event horizon is the "solid quantum fields" or "solid gravitational waves". The reason why particles can pass the event horizon is that the bottom of that gravitational structure falls into the black hole. But if the particle travels in straight space those quantum fields are forming the barrier that pulls energy away from the particle. 

Speed is an interaction where energy travels between an object and its environment. If energy travels into a particle its speed increases. But when energy starts to fly out of the object that thing causes its speed decreases. 

There is one way to make an object move faster than it should and that is to accelerate it to a speed that is as close as to the speed of light possible. Then against that particle will shoot the laser ray that increases its energy level. And rises its energy level so high that it loses its interaction with the particles that are at the same energy level as us. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/einstein-general-relativity-passes-another-test/

https://anewtonsapple.blogspot.com/

The paradox of time, why we cannot imagine crossing the speed of light?

In the beginning, there is one thing that we must realize. Measuring the speed of light is impossible. The reason for that is that we should know the precise value of that thing. The speed of light is not stable. It depends on the medium where photons or light travel. Space is not a vacuum. It's full of particles and electromagnetic fields like radio waves, electrons, and photons. Those particles cause electromagnetic friction, which slows particles. 

The scattering effect where electromagnetic wave motion comes from particles makes a similar effect with air molecules on larger scale systems. That thing causes the network of radiation that slows the object's speed. 

In the beginning, there is one thing that we must realize. Measuring the speed of light is impossible. The reason for that is that we should know the precise value of that thing. The speed of light is not stable. It depends on the medium where photons or light travel. 

The problem with all theories is that their limit is in the speed of light. The speed of light is a cosmic constant. Normally we think that the speed of light is 299,792,458  m/s. And nothing can travel faster than it. Except if the particle is in the gravitation field of the black hole. The black hole will pull even photons inside it. The escaping velocity is directly proportional to the speed of the falling object. 

So in that way, thinking particles can cross the speed of light inside the Schwarzschild radius or event horizon in the black hole. The event horizon is the point where escaping velocity crosses the speed of light. But then we can think that inside the black hole or event horizon all particles including photons are traveling at the same speed. 

But when we are thinking about the form of speed we can determine that thing by using the term kinetic energy. When speed rises the mass and energy of the object rise. And that means there is some kind of energy that will move to that object. So the rise of kinetic energy requires that an object impacts something. 

Those things can be other particles, superstrings, and photons. Whenever a particle hits some other particle or superstring energy travels between those particles. And if the traveling particle has a lower energy level than the "stable particle" that means energy travels to that particle that is at the lower energy level. 

When the particle's speed rises near the speed of light. The only particle that can transfer energy to that object is a photon. That's why we cannot cross the speed of light in classic physics. The thing is that the object cannot reach the speed of the photon is that the diameter of photons is so small. 

And the surface area of the other objects is so large that energy flows away from other particles from so large areas that photons cannot replace that energy. When energy starts to flow away from a particle its speed decreases. 

So how to say speed another way? Can we say that determination for the speed is the number of impacts with photons at a certain time? 

The fact is that the speed of light is not stable. It is relatively constant. The speed of light is different in water than in air and the thin plasma of space. So if we want to create conditions where all particles are traveling at the same speed as photons we must only remove plasma or gas away from the route of the object. So if we want to cross the speed of light we must just create a channel there is an absolute vacuum or all particles and quantum fields are removed. 

The time paradox by Albert Einstein is the limit that makes us hard to imagine crossing the speed of light. Time dilation or the thing where time moves slower when the speed of particle increases is a problematic thing because the limit of that model is the speed of light. When a particle reaches the speed of light time stops. 

And if the speed of the particle crosses the speed of light that means the time should turn to travel backward. The reason for that is that the particle travels through quantum fields so often that it will load new energy onto it. And that thing decreases the vaporization or the particle's changing to wave motion. 

But then we can start to think of time dilation another way. Increasing the energy level of the particle also slows time on it. When the energy level increases level where escaping velocity is the same as the speed of light, the particle will not age anymore. 

And when the escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light, the particle will turn younger. The reason for that is that the particle will not let energy or wave motion escape from it. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

What is the time?

In this text, the main objective is in time as a physical phenomenon. 

Albert Einstein once said that "time is an illusion". The thing is that nobody knows what the time is. People sometimes say that it's the vaporizing of material. In that theorem, vaporizing means that the material is oscillating. 

The oscillation means that the distance between quarks inside protons and neutrons is chancing. The idea is that when the universe expands. The quantum field inside it turns weaker. And the distance of the quarks is also expanding. There are small particles called gluons between those quarks. When the distance of quarks is turning longer. And then they hit those quarks harder.

When Gluons are making the longer movement. That thing means that gluon hits the quarks with higher force all the time. And that increases the force of the wave movement. That also causes the expansion of the universe is also accelerating. 

Whenever gluon, the transporter particle of the strong nuclear interaction hits quarks they are sending wave movement. Same way as the hammer hits the bell it sends the sound waves. In the quantum world, the soundwave is replaced by electromagnetic radiation. Radiation that comes from the material itself destroys the universe. 

Time dilation can be the key to time.

When the speed or gravity field increases time dilates. That phenomenon has seen stars near supermassive black holes. There is a star where the minute is 100 seconds on Earth. The reason for that might be energy that travels to Sagittarius A. So what is the time dilation? We can think that the universe is full of quantum fields. 

When the speed of the object increases. It passes more quantum fields at the same time as the slow-moving object. Every time the object faces the quantum field that loads energy to that object. So the extra energy means that the object is aging slower. The reason for that is that object will get a replacement for energy that it sends as the wave movement when gluons hit its quarks. 

So can we someday travel in time? The fact is that means the time is real. In this text, I wrote the time as the physical phenomenon that is connected to the material. The thing is that we could make material younger simply by crossing the speed of light. Virtually that thing happens by driving the spacecraft against the wave movement that Sagittarius A pulls inside it. That wave movement is causing the time dilation in the stars near Sagittarius A and other black holes. 

The time is always a little bit dilated. Every object in the universe has a gravitation field. That gravitation field causes the universe is bending. Gravitation is like a pothole And that thing means the arcing of the universe is the thing that causes time dilation. 

And that pothole is surrounding all objects in the universe. The thing is that when the object is in the pothole the side coming radiation affects the pothole and pumps energy to the objects that are in that pothole. 

Time dilation is not always some kind of extreme phenomenon. Objects are dilating time somehow. The reason why time is dilated is that there are more quantum fields inside that pothole. The reason why we have so hard to imagine that thing. Is that we cannot make a 3D hole in the air. So we can say that the space is shorter near the gravitational center than it's somewhere else. And when we are thinking about black holes. 

The diagram shows how energy affects to object. That is in a gravitational pothole. The black arrow is the energy. 

The time is stopping near the event horizon. And behind it, it should travel backward. The event horizon is the point where escaping velocity rises to the speed of the light. Time is stopping at that speed because the object travels at the same speed as the wave movement. That means the object is riding with the wave movement. The wave denies that the wave movement cannot escape from the object. 

And this means the time is fully dilated. The reason why the object that travels slower than the speed of light gets older. Is simply this: the wave that surrounds it leaks. Only the quantum wave that is strong enough can keep the wave movement inside the object. If the energy of that wave rises higher. That thing means the energy starts to travel to the object. 

Time moves backward in the black hole. But the thing is that could that thing affect the object that goes through the event horizon? The speed of the object would be the same with the photons and wave movement that travels to the center of the black hole. So the object rides with the wave movement. And that means there is the possibility that when an object travels to the center of the black hole. That doesn't turn older. 

Because of that is the wave movement cannot escape from the material. But if our object stops. The wave movement turns material younger. Or simply. That wave movement loads the energy to it. 

So can we someday travel back in time? There is the possibility that we could make material younger by driving wave movement to it. But if we want to travel back in the time. That requires that time affects the space. 

Is the source of dark energy and dark matter being in free quarks and gluons?

The thing is that the dark energy is suspected to be the radiation that comes straight from the quarks. And that dark energy is the thing that is ripping the universe in pieces. Sometimes there is suspicion that the free gluons are sending that radiation. 

Or the source of dark energy is in the yet unknown particles. There is the possibility that some well-known particle has yet unknown form. And maybe somewhere in the space is the free gluons. When the proton and neutron are destroyed gluons are left. There might be not free gluons in the normal universe.

But there is the possibility that there is a place. There are no quarks. Or the distance between quarks and gluons is so high that are not forming protons and neutrons. That kind of area could be the empty bubble in the universe. 

 Einstein's Theory of General Relativity passes the range of the precise test. 

Image 1) "Researchers have conducted a 16-year long experiment to challenge Einstein’s theory of general relativity. The international team looked to the stars — a pair of extreme stars called pulsars to be precise – through seven radio telescopes across the globe. Credit: Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy" (ScitechDaily/Einstein Proven Right Yet Again: Theory of General Relativity Passes a Range of Precise Tests)

(https://scitechdaily.com/einstein-proven-right-yet-again-theory-of-general-relativity-passes-a-range-of-precise-tests/)

"More than 100 years after Albert Einstein presented his theory of gravity, scientists around the world continue their efforts to find flaws in general relativity. The observation of any deviation from General Relativity would constitute a major discovery that would open a window on new physics beyond our current theoretical understanding of the Universe." (ScitechDaily, Einstein Proven Right Yet Again: Theory of General Relativity Passes a Range of Precise Tests)

(https://scitechdaily.com/einstein-proven-right-yet-again-theory-of-general-relativity-passes-a-range-of-precise-tests/)

What kind of calculator did Einstein use?

Einstein's Theory of General Relativity passes critical tests.

This is a remarkable thing in history. Einstein's Theory of General Relativity passes critical tests. And if that theory is true. The curvature of spacetime is also true. The fact is that this theory is full of mysteries. And the mystery is how Albert Einstein made his calculations? Those calculations stand even they are tested by using quantum computers. 

And sometimes people have asked, "did Einstein use quantum computers"? Those calculations are so brilliant, there are no errors found in the Theory of Special Relativity from the year 1905. Or there are no errors in the Theory of General Relativity from the year 1915 during critical tests. So the thing that makes those theories impressive is that they are made in time before digital computers. 

When we are thinking about the calculator that Einstein used. We might imagine that tool has some kind of connection with Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) and his student Bernhard Riemann (1826-1866). That information is mentioned in Finnish Wikipedia. There Riemann is mentioned as one of Gauss's students. 

Those men worked with prime numbers. And they spent a lot of time calculating those numbers. It is suspicious that Riemann got his idea for creating Riemann's conjecture or Riemann hypothesis from Gauss. The problem is that only digital computers require prime numbers for creating secrecy algorithms. So did those men have some kind of electronic computer? 

The question is that the mathematical Gauss spent many hours each day calculating prime numbers. And what was the reason for that? Where are those numbers needed? The fact is that Gauss was the man of curves. He is well-known for his work with probability calculations and the Gauss curve is named after him. 

So was his work touch with some secrecy algorithms? Or did he work with sacred geometry? There is theoretically possible to make the curve in the antenna that can resonate with dark energy. The thing is that there are theories that the "sacred geometry" is created for making antenna that can receive "cosmic energy" that is the radio waves or dark energy which is called "dark-wave movement". In the lifetime of Gauss, even radio waves were dark energy. 

https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/d/Dark+Energy

https://www.sciencealert.com/general-relativity

https://scitechdaily.com/einstein-proven-right-yet-again-theory-of-general-relativity-passes-a-range-of-precise-tests/

https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss

(Finnish Wikipedia page, where Riemann has mentioned as the student for Prof. Gauss. https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Riemann

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis

Image 1 )https://scitechdaily.com/einstein-proven-right-yet-again-theory-of-general-relativity-passes-a-range-of-precise-tests/

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Black holes and the Theory of General Relativity are an interesting combination.

(The Image I)The model of the wormhole. "If space were two-dimensional, folding it would enable three-dimensional shortcuts connecting widely separated places. Could our Universe contain similar wormholes?"

Credit:

ESO/L. Calçada (https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/images/1209b-wormhole_cc/)

The thing is that at the point of the event horizon the gravitation effect of the black hole causes that the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light. And all particles are dropping to a black hole with the speed of escaping velocity. That means the speed of the light is crossed at that point. 

The gravitational lenses proved that the gravitation effect to light. And if the gravitational field is strong enough. That means the gravitation pulls the photons inside the black hole. The point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light. Called the "event horizon". The event horizon means that the light cannot escape beyond that point. 

Do the black holes form new universes? The fact is that maybe someday in the distant future. Erupting black holes would release material to the universe. And that thing causes the forming of the new universe. But are the black holes forming the new universes right now? 

That is an interesting question because it requires the existence of wormholes. And the thing is that the wormholes are part of Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. Nobody has ever seen those things yet, but things like "cosmic neural structure" are offering a tip, that there might be some wire-looking gravitational effect. 

Image II: Cosmic web: Is this the first evidence of the existence of wormholes?

The thing is that the black holes are offering data that allows researchers to find evidence about the similarities between the theoretical world of Theory of General Relativity and the real world. 

The thing is that the Theory of Special Relativity from 1905 has confirmed a long time ago. And the Black Holes are also confirmed that Einstein's Theory of General Relativity from the year 1915 is at least mostly correct. When those theories are put in the ultimate tests they are passed. Theory of General Relativity makes wormholes possible. 

And all the time when that theory is put to the critical test. That theory is proven right. The last case when the Theory of General Relativity has proven is recently when the jet of the large black hole is proven that thing possible. So why wormholes can't be true? The fact is that those "channels throughout space and time" would seem very incredible. But the Theory of General Relativity makes them possible. 

The existence of a wormhole means that information like electrons or quarks can travel throughout it. Sending spacecraft through that energy channel is a little bit bigger thing than sending a couple of electrons or quarks through that channel. The size of the elementary particles is a little bit smaller than some spacecraft. 

And then at the last, we must say that even if we can send spacecraft through the wormhole that doesn't mean that the living organism can pass that thing. The radiation in the wormhole would be extremely strong, but the craft travels in that tube with the speed of the wave movement. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/17/world/dwarf-galaxies-intl-scli-scn/index.html

https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/1209/

https://scitechdaily.com/supercomputer-simulations-explain-massively-powerful-black-hole-jet-confirms-einsteins-theory-of-general-relativity/

https://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html

https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image I:https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/images/1209b-wormhole_cc/

Image II: https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/best-image-yet-cosmic-web/

Saṃsāran eli Hindujen elämänpyörän tekninen toteutus tietokoneiden sekä bio- ja kylmätekniikan yhdistelmän avulla

Saṃsāra tiibetiläisessä 
käsikirjoituksessa 

Hindujen, buddhalaisten sekä jainalaisten uskontoon kuuluva elämänpyörä, jota myös kutsutaan nimellä "Samsara" (Saṃsāra (sanskritiksi संसार 'läpikulku; eteneminen monien vaiheiden kautta')) (Wiki) sekä jälleensyntyminen voidaan toteuttaa melko helposti teknisillä ratkaisuilla. Noissa kryo- ja tietojenkäsittelytekniikkaan perutuvussa ratkaisuissa ihmisen kloonattuja sikiöitä pakastetaan jälkipolville, ja sitten sopivan hetken tullen siirretään sopivien naisten kohtuun. Tai jos oikein ryhdytään mielikuvitusta käyttämään, niin ihmisen perimä voidaan säilöä myös digitaaliseen muotoon, eli emäsjärjestys tallennetaan tietokoneen kovalevylle, ja sitten nanotekniikkaa hyväksikäyttäen luodaan synteettinen DNA. joka siirretään sitten muna.- tai kantasolun tumaan, jolloin ihminen voidaan kloonata uudelleen.

Tai toki esimerkiksi joku muu nisäkäs voi kantaa ihmissikiötä, jos sen immuunipuolustus tuhotaan esimerkiksi jollain luuytimeen vaikuttavalla lääkkeellä, joka estää sitä muodostamasta immuunivastetta. Mielen standardointi kantasolujen ja biotekniikan avulla mahdollistaa periaatteessa ikuisen elämän. Monilla valtioilla on tätä koskevaa teknistä osaamista sen verran, että ne voivat toteuttaa tällaisen mielikuvitukselliseen operaation.

Ongelmia tietenkin tulee siitä, kun tuon kloonatun ihmisen pitää pystyä ottamaan edeltäjänsä paikan, ja siksi heidän aivosähkökäyränsä pitää tallentaa pikkutarkasti tietokoneelle tai nauhurille, jonka avulla se sitten siirretään haluttuun lapseen, mutta en tiedä että toimiiko tuo tekniikka sellaisenaan. Eli onko muistojen kopioiminen toiseen ihmiseen niin helppoa kuin miltä se kuulostaa?  Tuo tietenkin tuo mieleen pelottavia ajatuksia siitä, että mitä jos joku historian vähemmän moraalisista henkilöistä kuten Josef Mengele tai joku muu vastaava "neronleimaus" on tällaista tehnyt, eli kannattaa katsoa vähän tarkemmin noita lääkikseen pyrkijöitä, jotta eräiden kauhuelokuvien ideat eivät muutu todellisuudeksi.

Eli henkilöstä luodaan useita kopioita, ja silmän pohjaan aivosähkökäyrä tallennetaan implantin avulla tietokoneelle, jolloin ihminen voi kopioida ajatuksensa suoraan nettiin ja siellä olevaan tietopankkiin. Jos hän kuolee, niin kopio voidaan ottaa heti uudelleen käyttöön, ja oikeastaan tuo EEG voidaan kopioida suoraan jäädytetyn kloonin aivokuorelle, eli henkilöstä tehdään sikiövaiheessa kopio, ikään kuin varmistukseksi siltä varalta että hän sattuisi kuolemaan vaikka jollain tutkimusmatkalla tai suorittaessaan sotilaallisia tehtäviä jollekin erikoisjoukolle.

Tuo toiminta tapahtuisi siten, että ensin luodaan koeputkihedelmöityksen tai kloonauksen haluttu ihminen, jonka alkio sitten jaetaan blastulavaiheessa moniin osiin, ja sitten yksi noista klooneista kasvatetaan normaalisti ihmisten parissa, ja toiset voidaan pakastaa sellaiseen tilaan, missä he ovat hypotermiassa. Tuolloin noiden kloonien ruumiinlämpö pidetään erittäin alhaisena, mutta kuitenkin sellaisella tasolla, että solut vanhenevat normaalisti. Jos taas lämpötila pidetään lähellä absoluuttista nollapistettä, niin silloin kemialliset reaktiot päättyvät, ja solu ei silloin vanhene ollenkaan, mikä takaa tietenkin mahdollisuuden matkustaa tulevaisuuteen syväjäädytettynä, ja sitten kun aikaa on kulunut vaikka muutamia satoja vuosia, niin silloin voidaan tuo henkilö herättää henkiin. Kyseessä olisi silloin hyvin hidas tapa matkustaa tulevaisuuteen.

Ja sitten tuolla kadulla olevaan henkilöön liitetään implantti, millä sitten jaetaan hänen ajatuksensa sekä muut tuntemuksensa internetin yli noille klooneille, joiden lihaksisto pidetään hyvässä kunnossa sähköisten laitteiden avulla, jotka stimuloivat niitä sähkösykäyksien avulla. Tuollaisia "sähköbodauslaitteita" saa ostettua postimyynnistä, ja niitä esitellään erilaisilla ostoskanavilla.  Jos tuo kadulla oleva klooni sitten sattuu kuolemaan, niin silloin voidaan ottaa uusi versio tilalle, ja silloin ei tietenkään kukaan edes huomaa hänen olevan poissa. Olen tästä kyllä monesti kirjoittanut, mutta siitä huolimatta toistelen välillä itseäni, ja tuolla samalla menetelmällä voidaan luoda "kuolematon ihminen".

Eli kun henkilö asettuu ammattiin ja osoittaa kyvykkyyttään, niin hänestä voidaan luoda klooni. Tuolloin ihmisen kantasolun tuman sisällä oleva perimä-aines vain vaihdetaan esimerkiksi tunnetusta tutkijasta tai loistavasta sotilaasta otettuun DNA:han, ja tuon alkion annetaan kehittyä koeputkessa, jolloin saadaan aikaan erittäin suuri määrä alkioita, jos niin halutaan. Ja tuo henkilö voi sitten kuljettaa mukanaan EEG-tallenninta, millä hänen ajatuksensa sekä tunteensa otetaan talteen, ja nuo tallenteet voidaan varastoida luoliin, jotka sijaitsevat valtavan syvällä maan alla. Joten tuolloin voidaan maapallon parhaat pojat sekä tytöt säilöä jälkipolvia varten, eli heidät sitten joskus tulevaisuudessa voidaan siirtää jonkun naisen kohtuun, ja palauttaa takaisin elämään.

Tuolla tavoin voidaan sitten luoda uudestaan esimerkiksi Albert Einstein tai joku muu nero, mikäli häntä joskus tarvitaan. Kun puhutaan sitten tuollaisen sikiön säilyttämisestä, niin se voi tapahtua vaikkapa säilömällä tuo sikiö nestemäiseen typpeen, ja sitten tulevaisuudessa pitää vain löytää vanhemmat, jotka haluavat lapsia, mutta heidän äitinsä on steriili, jolloin noiden henkilöiden pitää turvautua koeputkihedelmöitykseen, mikä sitten mahdollistaa tuon henkilön "jälleensyntymisen", kuten Hindujen elämänpyörä-opissa tapahtuu. Mutta kuten kerroin, niin tämä on tekninen ratkaisu, jonka luin jostain julkaisusta vuosia sitten, eli itse en tätä ole kyllä keksinyt.

Kristallipalloon katsominen PROJECT BLUE BEAM

NIF-Laser
Kuva I

Kristallipalloon katsova ennustaja on monissa vertauksissa sekä vitseissä esitetty lähes koominen hahmo, joka tiukasti kristallipalloon tuijottamalla näkee menneitä tai tulevia tapahtumia. Mutta oletteko koskaan ajatelleet, että tuo asia saattaa oikeasti olla mahdollista, vaikka aivan tavallisella lasipallolla ei tuota temppua voitaisi tehdä. Kyseessä on asia, josta vähän aikaa sitten kirjoitin, eli hiukkassäteellä tai laserilla luodaan valtavan tiheä energiakeskittymä, joka ikään kuin avaa madonreikänä tunnetun ilmiön läpi ajan sekä paikan. Madonreikä perustuu Einsteinin teoriaaan, jonka mukaan musta aukko voidaan luoda puhtaasti energian avulla, eli jos käytössä on valtava energiavaraus, niin silloin voidaan tuo energia kohdistaa yhteen kappaleeseen, ja sen avulla sitten luoda tarvittava energiatiheys tuohon kappaleeseen, niin että syntyy nanokokoinen musta aukko. Joten leikillämme voimme kysyä, että onko NIF-fuusioreaktori (Kuva I)oikeastaan muutettavissa isojen poikien kristallipalloksi, jolla esimerkiksi Barrack Obama voisi katsoa tulevaisuuteen.

Tällöin tuohon kappaleeseen pumpattu energia avaa ikään kuin madonreiän tai kvanttisäikeen läpi universumin, ja tuo väline tietenkin mhdollistaa myös aikamatkat. Näet riittää että madonreikä avataan menneisyydessä ja myöhemmin täsmälleen samassa kohdassa avataan taas tuo madonreikä. Tällöin tuo kvanttisäie teorian mukaan avaa madonreiän läpi ajan, ja ehkä tuo tekniikka olisi mahdollista myös toteuttaa. Eli oliko muinaisilla atlantislaisilla tai kreikkalaisilla mahdollisesti käytössään tuollainen väline, on tietenkin täysi mysteeri. Tuo kristallipallo toimisi siten, että esimerkiksi täysin symmetrisesti kohdennetut laserit puristavat tai oikeastaan pumpouavat energiaa täydellisesti pallon muotoon hiottuun kristallinpalaan, niin teotreettisesti voidaan luoda musta aukko tai sigulariteetti, mikä sitten avaa madonreiän läpi ajan tai paikan, ja kyseinen laite muistuttaisi ulkonäöltään NIF-laseria (Kuva I) tai "Z-kojetta" missä fuusio saadaan aikaan pumppuamalla pallomaisessa kammiossa olevaan kappaleeseen laserilla energiaa.

Mutta kuten tiedämme, niin tarvitaan valtava määrä energiaa, jotta tuo laite saadaan toimimaan. Se että riittääkö esimerkiksi fuusiokokokeissa käytettävien lasereiden teho tuohon ei ole mitenkään varmaa tietoa. Samoin kokeessa käytettävän lasin- tai kristallinpalan pitää olla täydellinen pallo, ja lasereiden tulee puristaa sitä täysin symmetrisesti. Tällöin energialatauksen pitäisi muodostaa madonreikä. Mutta toki myös kreikkalaiset saattoivat käyttää tällaista laitetta, eli jos heillä oli käytössään tarpeeksi peilejä, joilla auringon valo voitiin ohjata tuohon kristallipalloon, niin ainakin jotain silloin tapahtuu. Mutta kokeessa käytettävän kappaleen pitää olla sellainen, että siinä ei ole yhtään ilmakuplaa tai muuta epäpuhtautta, ja siltikään ei ole varmaa että mitään tapahtuu, eli tarvittava teho on valtava. Tuo singulaari on auki vain muutaman kymmenesosasekunnin kerrallaan, ja niitä muudostetaan eprätysten useita kappaleita, jotta tuon kvanttirihman läpi kulkevaa valoa voidaan havainnoida, ja estetään Maapallon kaasukehää siirtymästä säiettä pitkin. Toki toimiakseen tuon kojeen pitää ensin muodostaa madonreikä, joka johtaa fotoneja läpi ajan sekä paikan kuten valokaapeli johtaa valoa.