Showing posts with label networks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label networks. Show all posts

Thursday, March 10, 2022

Magnesium germanite can be the key to a new type of quantum computer.





"Working with magnesium germanate, Mg2GeO4, analogous to one of the mantle’s most abundant silicate minerals. The team was able to glean information about the potential mineralogy of super-Earths and other large, rocky exoplanets". 

"Under about 2 million times normal atmospheric pressure a new phase emerged with a distinct crystalline structure that involves one germanium bonded with eight oxygens. The new eight-coordinated intrinsically discorded mineral. Is expected to strongly affect". 

"The internal temperature and dynamics of these planets. Credit: Illustration is courtesy of Rajkrishna Dutta (Scitech Daily, What’s Happening in the Depths of Distant Worlds? Physics and Chemistry Fundamental to the Existence of Life)". 

Sometimes, when I see this kind of image. I noticed that these kinds of silicates are looking like neural structures.

So, could it be possible that on some planet, magnesium silicate forms quantum computers spontaneously? The structure of magnesium silicate is similar to a neural network. But is it possible that this kind of mineral would someday use in portable lightweight quantum-neural computers? 

The magnesium germanite is one of the molecules that can someday form the new type of quantum computers. Quantum computers can operate at room temperature but it requires extremely stable conditions. The idea is that the magnesium and germanium atoms can stress by electromagnetic radiation. 

Electromagnetic radiation can use to stress those atoms separately. So that kind of system can have two data handling lines or qubit lines. The idea is that those systems can make the error handling by driving the same algorithm separately. And if they get the same answer the answer is right. Magnesium germanite can use to create small-size quantum computers. 

The solid and compact quantum processors might not be as powerful as some computer centers. In that case, we must remember that our mobile devices and laptop computers are not so powerful as some central computers. So even in the quantum computing world, the different computers must not do the same things. The lightweight systems must not have the same capacity as factory-sized systems. 

But they are more powerful than most binary computers. The magnesium germanite can be cut into small 2D plates. But if that structure is 3D. It can use to make the quantum neural system that can have many internal data handling lines. 


The new research about underground lifeforms is going on.


When we are looking for alien lifeforms, we should first describe the term "lifeforms". Would the thing get the lifeform status because it can make descendants? Is the self-replicating molecule the thing that we can call a lifeform? Or could the lifeform be the crystal controlled by the DNA? Lifeforms like vegetables are not moving at all. Or should the lifeform interact with the environment?

There are found "ice flowers" on Mars near NASA rovers. Those things are not alien lifeforms. Ground frost forms those "flowers".

Carbon dioxide and other hydrocarbons are acting like water when the temperature rises. Those things turn to gas and cause expansion. That expansion causes the ground is starting to rise. Rising gas is decreasing temperature at the edge of sand particles. And that makes them freeze to interesting forms. 

Why are researchers researching exoplanets? And especially super-Earths. The mantle of super-earth is very thick and there is the possibility that some kind of organisms could live in the mantle of the large rocky planets. The volcanic temperature of those planets can offer the stable and safe conditions that some primitive organisms can live under the surface of the locked planet.  

The reason is that those distant rocky worlds are telling us what might be our fate. And then the data that is collected from the exoplanets can connect with data collected from Earth. The life in Earth's deep mantle is ever searched before. There is the possibility that deep in Earth are the lifeforms that can live by using volcanic temperature for energy production. 

If that kind of lifeform is found. That thing makes people rethink the origin of life. There is the possibility. That the Primordial Sea was the water vein deep underground. There were born the first procaryotes. And then some of them rise to the surface. The ability to make photosynthesis was the reason why the organisms came to the surface. 

When we are thinking about the form of the alien life. We forget one thing.  The alien life is not probably like our life at all. When we are thinking about primitive lifeforms. There is possible that those lifeforms cannot move at all. 

Silicon-based lifeform could be DNA-controlled crystals. Or it can be the ice crystals whose growth and form are controlled by the DNA. The thing is that the term "lifeform" can mean anything from some kind of little green man to some self-replicating molecules. But could the hypothetical silicon-based lifeforms some kind of computer? 


https://www.studyfinds.org/mars-flower-nasa-curiosity-rover/


https://phys.org/news/2022-03-life-earth-deep-mantle.html


https://scitechdaily.com/whats-happening-in-the-depths-of-distant-worlds-physics-and-chemistry-fundamental-to-the-existence-of-life/


Friday, February 11, 2022

Why are bigger neural networks better?




We can think that neural networks are like the social networks of humans. A bigger social network means that person gets more information. The large social network is making it possible to get information from many points. And if the social network is heterogeneous there are multiple different types of actors that keep the information versatile. In computers and AI, versatile sensors guarantee that the system can get information even if some sensors are unable to work. In the human world, versatile information guarantees. Those actors can find a solution. Even if one road to a solution is closed. 

First, we must describe the word "big". Word "big" can mean a large number of data processors. Or it can mean a large area where the network collects data. When we are thinking of big neural networks as the things like human brains. We must realize that the high number of connections between the high number of data processors called neurons is making human brains the ultimate tool. 

But there is one thing that makes a high number of neural connections problematic. And that thing is that the high number of neural connections is making systems slower. The reason for that is simple. Neurons must search for the right connections longer time. The thing that makes human brains so effective is that they can begin the computing process in multiple areas at the same time. And then they are connecting those processes to one entirety. 

In the cases of human brains, we can see that 200 billion neurons can make more things than 10 neurons. This makes human brains so powerful tools. 

If there are only a few neural connections the system has fewer connections to select. And that makes the system fast. But a large number of connections gives more skills to the system. That allows connecting multiple data bites by using more possibilities. Data that is stored in the neural system is like in a puzzle. Every database in that entirety can reconnect with other pieces. And that thing makes the system more independent than regular systems. 

Interconnecting databases means that in one database is an object. That object can be a screwdriver. The system can connect that tool for every single action where a screwdriver is needed. And those actions are a group of databases. If there is a lot of databases where that tool is connected. That means the system must not all the time ask for pieces of advice. That means the system is more independent. 

When we are thinking cases. Where robots are connected to one entirety we are talking about the multiple internal neural systems. There can be the macrosystem where the robots are connected with surveillance cameras and other things. But those robots are equipped with their internal neural networks. If the system can see things from longer distances it can make better decisions. It can get a larger data mass for operating. 

The large-area neural network that interconnects robots with fixed surveillance systems is effective for this reason. It can predict things better. In the cases that the entire city area is interconnected as a neural network, the system sees if there is a rush in somewhere. 

But if the system will get data about traffic from the 100 kilometers distance it has more time to calculate the optimal time for traffic lights. In ideal cases, the system would know where all users of roads are going. And it can create the shortest and the most economic road along with optimal time for leaving home for each person. But there is one problem with the AI-controlled world. 

The AI would not realize that we are doing something, because we want to do those things. If we think about the case where is no money and AI controls how many goods every person would get? We are facing one very interesting problem. What if we don't like some food? The AI can see that some food is a very popular thing. 

But there is always some person who cannot eat it. And that means the AI would cause a very interesting situation. If it faces the person who has an allergy to things like chocolate. We believe that everybody likes chocolate. But that allergic person would probably like that thing. So that kind of thing is making the AI-driven word absurd. 


https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/


Monday, December 13, 2021

The disinformation about things like the coronavirus spreads in the net.

  

 The disinformation about things like the coronavirus spreads in the net.



The question of why people believe disinformation is that disinformation is pleasing them. Another reason is that people are looking for social relations with people who are similar to them. And the information that is shared on social media is coming from people who we want to please. And those people please us.

So we are not saying that person shares information that is not relevant because we were afraid to lose somebody that might seem important to us. If our friends are sharing the disinformation. We might not dare to resist the hoax information.

Or say that information is not correct or the shared information might be dangerous. The reason for that is we are afraid to hurt somebody in our social network. If some people who we use to think like an authority or who is the central person in our social network are sharing disinformation, we might want to obey that person. That means we might follow that person even if we know that is wrong. 


1) Misinformation means "not correct" or false information. That is not shared in purpose. 


2) Disinformation means the information that is shared in purpose. That purpose might hurt or damage the trust of the authorities. 

Another name for that kind of campaign is propaganda. The military term for that kind of action is PSY-OP or Psychological Operation. 


The most important targets for disinformation are people who are in influential positions. And one of the groups where the disinformation is targeted is journalists. If journalists are affected the information that is shared will turn more powerful. People trust the media and if somebody cheats the reporter that will turn information more powerful. 

The normal way to resist vaccines is to criticize them. Critical attitude means of course the denial attitude. A critical attitude means that person is investigating the background. But in the disinformation campaign, the criticism means that person is against some things like vaccines. In the same way, critical attitude against the refugees and foreigners is turned to denial attitude in the public language. 

So how do we recognize is something disinformation? One version of that thing is that only negative things are collected in the article. I use the term "article" also for texts. Those are written on social media.  

We might analyze who is the person or actor, who is benefits the case that somebody doesn't take vaccines? The person who benefits from the action is often behind that thing.  The thing is that some vaccines are denying also the use of biological weapons. But that thing might not the reason why somebody is resisting the vaccines. 

If the person is vaccinated there is also impossible to die because of some illnesses. That means the vaccines are protecting people, but they also deny lies like being home in flu when a person has a hangover. 

One of the things that can use as the mark for disinformation is that the article or disinformation is driven by using humor or there are some other things like mentions of mental illness of the writer. Things like schizophrenia have not connected with the things like Game theory. 

But for some reason, the creator of the Game theory John Nash is always mentioned as being schizophrenic. 

When I read books about Game Theory there is one remarkable detail. In those texts is mentioned that Nash has that syndrome. So what the schizophrenia has to do with a thing called the Game Theory? Are those people estimating the Game Theory? Or are they estimating the mental condition of John Nash? That is a very interesting detail about writings of the Game Theory. 

Or the article is written in the spirit that something like a denial of vaccines is somehow "cool". Those texts are also appealed to the vanity of people. "Why I must take vaccines"? 

Other people are taking them, but why should I"? I have the right to say "no", and who cares about the hospital places that are reserved for me"? The corona-passes show that the person is taken the vaccines. But the deliverer of the disinformation appeals to selfishness and vanity. 

If we believe those people we should think like this: other people should sit inside. And all things must be closed because somebody doesn't want to take vaccines. 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Forbes_Nash_Jr.


https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Monday, July 30, 2018

The banking reserve and financial policy



When governments make their contracts of the structure like roads and buildings they act like other actors. Almost every budget in the building industry is calculated a little bit over the real costs, because of the unexpected catastrophes or disturbing the production. There is calculated the loss of building material, what can be replaced with new elements, and if the accident happens in the building site, would that replacement pay the contractor. 


But if there are no accidents, the money what is reserved for those replacements would leave to the bank accounts. Also, another reserve is made for repairings, but if there is no need for that the money would not be used. This would grow the money in the accounts, what are called the overbudgeting. 


The governments are working like big companies in this area, and one of the things, where that money is used is the financial buffer, what makes possible to make fast investments in the short period. This buffer is so-called "free money", and it is not connected to any special projects or other things. Why I'm writing about governments and corporations like mixing those things? The reason is that money buffers work basically the same way, are they governmental or private sector money. 


There is no difference between an actor in this case. And when we are thinking about the multinational corporations, we are facing the truth, that those corporations have very much money in their buffers. And if they want, they can use it in the thing, called currency investment. In this case, the investor would follow the value of currencies and then sell or change the money for another currency.  


Simply the way to explain, how this thing happens is to buy some currency, and then the value of the currency is rising that actor can sell that money for the better price. But normal way to use this methodology is to use the multiple currencies, what can give short period incoming and winnings for the investor. And if the investor would have billions of dollars in use, even the small change of the value of the currency would give big profits for that person. 


This requires the ability to follow the courses of currencies all the time, but the Internet would give the possibility for that. The change of the currencies value can easily to follow by using the Internet. This way to use currency as the merchandise can also cause the changes in the value of currencies. When somebody would buy money for billions of dollars, that will cause the raise if this targeted currency, and this is the way, where the investor would manipulate the value of the currency. 


If that would be translated into the normal language, that kind of investor cannot make losses, and in this kind of actions can this person use weak currencies. First, this actor would buy the weak currency by using dollars or euros, and this investor would use billions of units of money. And then this targeted currency would get more value. After that, the actor would just buy euros, dollars or yen, and then gets very much profit from that action. This causes, of course, the inflation in the weak currencies, but in this case, the thing would not mean. 


The reason why this kind of currency trader would choose weak currencies is that in this game would the thing, what makes profits is percents. If that investor can pull the currency up many percents, that person would get more profits. And if this tradesman would sell the currency or exchange it in the very short period of the time, would that give very good benefits. In the modern world, the computers can use to build the networks, where the sum would transfer by using many currencies, and that will maximize that profit.

Newtonian and Einstein models are still useful tools.

The Einstein and Newtonian gravitational principles are still “hard stuff”. And today, we can say that all gravitational models are suitable...