What kind of things were the first moments of the universe?

The form of the Big Bang is interesting. Wave motion that formed material came from emptiness. There is suspicion that two crossing wave motion fields impact each other. And that thing made the wave-particle duality possible. The problem is that wave motion cannot come from emptiness. There must be some kind of source for that thing. 

In some other theories, the Big Bang formed the gravitational wave motion. Or actually, so tight gravitational shockwave that was so tight that it moved other gravitational fields away from it. So in that case, the gravitational wave motion formed the cavitational ball or WARP ball there were no quantum fields or no gravitational waves.

There introduced the idea that the Big Bang formed when two sources of gravitational waves reached the same frequency. That made it possible. The gravitational waves crossed and formed the first material. 

The major problem with all theories about the universe's begin is that they require two sources of wave motion. There is one version of the Big Bang theory. That could explain why material is formed. 

And the reason for that is the Big Bang released two fronts of superstrings or gravitational waves. Because those two gravitational wave fronts are pulling each other together that causes the internal wave motions can reach the outer wave motion front. 

Then there was another front of the wave motion that came behind that shockwave. Because nothing could limit the speed of gravitational waves or the speed of the gravitational superstrings. 

Those follow-up gravitational waves hit the gravitational front which moved slower than the follow-up front of gravitation. The reason for that is that the superstrings that followed the first front were slowing its speed. 

When those strings of gravitational waves hit together started to turn into yarn balls that turned into quarks and other elementary particles. Then we can start thinking about the very first universe where only extremely high-energy quarks, electrons, and gluons existed. The temperature was extremely high. 

And the energy level of those elementary particles must turn lower so that the wave motion is. That those particles sent didn't push them away from each other. 

When quark-gluon plasma sends radiation it acts like all other quantum systems. The energy level of the universe must decrease enough that energy can start traveling away from those quarks. In quantum mechanics, energy flows to the system that is a lower energy level. 

The difference between quarks-gluon plasma and modern material was that quark-gluon plasma was more homogeneous than modern material. So that thing can mean that there were small and short-term warp bubbles around the quarks-gluon plasma. 

That electromagnetic- or quantum vacuum around the quark-gluon plasma caused the vaporization of material was not stable. And there is a possibility that time ran differently than we expected. Time runs slower in the high-energy universe than it runs in the modern universe. But the vaporization of material was faster at the edge of the universe. 

Cosmic inflation existed. But it affected only the edge of the material that was released in the Big Bang. Cosmic inflation is the thing that destroys the universe. But the same cosmic inflation caused the universe's temperature to decrease to the level that the gluons and quarks combined and turned into protons and neutrons. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The form of the Big Bang is an interesting question.

The reason, why researchers and developers are interested in the Big Bang is that event is the gate to endless energy sources. There is a possibility, that the Big Bang was the interaction between superstrings or wave motion. So were the first particles formed when the gravitational waves impact each other? And was the extremely high energy level in that case formed when superstrings impacted each other? 

That means the superstring's curvature formed energy that formed the universe. But in that case, there should be some kind of quantum- or electromagnetic fields that are forming interaction. In that model particle-wave duality formed material or particles by wrapping superstrings. But there must be something, that puts superstrings turning into material or particles. 

In this model, there must be superstrings that are impacting each other. If there are no superstrings, there are no impacts and no material can form. In this text superstrings are the thing. That forms wave motion. 

So if impacting wave motions are forming the material there must be some source for those wave motions. In this model, the natural explanation for that impacting wave motion is that the universe or proto-universe where only wave motion was on the core of the giant bubble. 

Then on the opposite side of that bubble was something that send two groups of wave motion to journey. And that thing formed the universe. This is the most unbelievable model for the Big Bang theory. 

But we know that there must be some origin for that wave motion. So were there some other universes where those wave motions came? This is one interesting thing. We know that material or energy cannot come from emptiness. And also we know that there must be crossing wave motion that forms the conditions where wave-particle duality is possible. 

If wave motion travels in one direction there is no wave-particle duality. There must be some kind of disorder that puts wave motion or superstrings turn into yarn balls called elementary particles. 

The Big Bang was an event that caused the formation of the universe. In the past, people thought that it was some kind of explosion. Today we think, that the Big Bang was an event where the material or group of particles reached a certain energy level. 

And that energy level is the third dimension where we are living. In this third dimension, the particles have a certain size and a certain energy level. And that thing allows them to interact with each other. Without that interaction, we cannot observe those particles. 

And when the energy level of the particles turns different. That means the interaction between particles turns weaker. When we are talking about the size of the particles we should talk about their brightness. When the energy level of the particle turns extremely high the size or domination area of those particles turns larger. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Does the universe expand faster than light?

The answer is yes and no. The material can travel outside our universe faster than it travels inside our universe. The reason for that is that there is no scattering effect and other kinds of electromagnetic quantum fields that can decrease the speed of material. So the speed of the two first photons released from the Big Bang is faster than photons inside the bubble called the universe. 

Two forces are affecting the universe. The energy flow outside the universe causes the expansion of it. And the internal gravitation effect that is pulling particles to the center of the ball-shaped structure. We don't know the real geometrical shape of the universe. But because the Big Bang might look like erupting black hole. That thing causes suspicion that the shape of the universe is spherical. 

The fact is that shape of the universe could also be flat or hyperbolic. And hyperbolic universe causes theory that during the Big Bang. 

The form of material could be of an hourglass. The visible material would be in two hyperbolic-shaped forms in the ball-shaped structure. The other layer would be the universe where we live. 

And another would be the anti-universe. Antimatter can form large objects. But its mirror material to material that forms our universe. 

And the only thing is that object would detonate immediately when it touches the material. The universe would be two layers of visible material. There could be a dark matter between those layers. 

The anti-universe would be similar to our universe. But its forms of antimatter. The idea of the hourglass-shaped structure is coming from the hourglass nebula. 

Poles of the supernova caused the material to travel opposite ways. And that effect can be possible also in the erupting black hole. But there is a possibility. That mainly material released from the equator of the poles of the object that formed the universe. 

Image 2) "The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1.

From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space". (Wikipedia/Shape of the Universe) 

If  Ω > 1, this means gravitation wins. And the universe will end its existence in the big crunch. Otherwise, the end of the universe would be a "big emptiness". The problem with determining the shape of the universe is that we cannot see dark matter. And we cannot see the universe from outside. 

This is one way to see things. When we think about the edge of the universe there is no quantum field outside it. That means the radiation pressure from inside the universe is the reason why the universe expands. Energy travels from the higher energy universe to emptiness. There are lower energy fields. And the energy flow is the thing that will destroy the universe someday. 

Image 3) Hourglass nebula has caused an idea that maybe the universe is two balls or two hyperbolic layers. 

When energy is traveling out from the universe it goes to the area where is nothing. The energy flow would be a monotonic wave movement outside the universe. There is the possibility that some kind of wall of wave movement would form the shockwave that travels in space. That shock wave formed in the Big Bang. And it travels at the front of the material. 

So if there is some kind of particles that wall of wave movement would travel faster than light at the front of the universe. There is possibly an electromagnetic or quantum vacuum behind that wall. And energy travels to that small vacuum and pushes the shockwave ahead.  

And that means the universe is actually in the giant WARP bubble. The things that are outside the universe are a mystery. There are possible other bubbles that are remainings of other big bangs. And other universes. But there is the possibility that those other universes are so distant that we cannot see them. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

Image 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

Image 3) Redditt

The dark matter and the "Big Bang" theory (What was before the Big Bang?)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The parallel universe theory could be only the academical "joke" without one thing, what astronomers have found. They have discovered the thing, that there is too much matter in the universe and this dark matter, what would not send any kind of radiation makes one thing happen. There is also found the thing, called "dark energy" in the universe, and that means that the dark matter exists. There were actually found also the "dark energy, and this was sometimes explained that at the beginning of the history, just in the time of "Big Bang" was too much energy in the universe.


The "dark energy" is actually the gravitation, what caused by this dark matter, what is actually mostly atomized hydrogen, or there is a theory, that the dark matter is something more exotic. But normally I have thought that this dark matter is hydrogen or some other things like protons, what means ionized hydrogen or electrons. If the dark matter would be electrons, that thing would be noticed as the radio signals, that comes from nowhere. And maybe the "three-kelvin radiation" is part of the dark matter.


But when we are thinking about the source of that matter, what we cannot see straight, but we can see the gravitation of this so-called "dark matter", because of all calculations, what is made for calculating the universe movements are sometimes very inaccurate, what means that something disturbs metering of the objects. And when we are thinking, where that matter is coming from, there is one explanation for that. This is that just after "Big bang" the universe were full of quasars and black holes, what just exploded. In the theory of the "Big Bang", the universe was actually the hypermassive black hole, what was started to send photons.


The origin of that black hole would be in the universe, what was existed before our own universe. This supermassive particle would involve all material, what was in that past universe, And it was in the middle of nowhere in the empty space, and if the supermassive particle  would not get anything in it, would that thing cause that the black hole starts to pull the material away as a "Hawking's radiation", and because the black hole would lose its mass the steaming if the black hole would go faster and faster. And suddenly it would explode.


Somebody like me has sometimes thought that maybe "Big Bang" was caused by the impact of two hypermassive black holes, and another of those particles were antimatter, wah caused the very huge explosion. Sometimes I have seen theories, about the "Big Bang" that this very rough phenomenon, what can actually be caused by the thing, that two interplanetary nebulas were impacted together, and if another one was antimatter cloud, would the released energy level be very huge.


 When we are thinking about that theory, the different electric charges would drive those clouds together, and the annihilation would cause the born of the universe. And because annihilation, what happens when antimatter and matter touch together and the origin of dark matter could be explained that at the beginning of the universe was too much energy, and that caused that there is a matter what was not calculated.

When those clouds of antimatter and matter touched together, the annihilation caused the very big explosion, and in this case, That phenomenon would be known as the "Big Bang"  But there is another theory about the existence of the dark matter. That is that there is another universe in somewhere, and the wormhole or singularity would transfer material between another universe and our universe. This theory is very often passed in the TV-programs, but if some matter comes from another universe, would it increase the mass in our universe.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Radical theology and other thinking about the modern religion

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Yesterday I had a day when I thought about religion and what kind creature the God might be. And this writing continues the same line. In the modern world, we have right to write and think also theological question freely, and we also can say, that maybe the God is a creature from the cosmos, what was existed before "Big Bang". There are many things in Holy Bible, what are meant for salvation. And one version of salvation is when some older man loses argumentation against the younger person or doesn't know the answer to some questions, like "why we are on the Earth", what children normally ask, can this patriarch say, that "In the Holy Bible reads, that everything was created by the God".


The thing what disturbs about the Religion is that there is always some other person, who tells us how we must believe. If we are talking about self-cutting and ripping and harming ourselves or other people in the name of religion, we are talking about sickness and disturbed behavior. They are things that must be reported to police and psychiatrists. That kind of behavior is a sign of personal problems, and they must investigate by trained medical personnel, not by some "Holy man".  So Holy Bible doesn't replace medicals and vaccines, and this is the thing what everybody must realize.

What means that Jesus is the salvation? One answer would be that some patriarchs can say that “Jesus said that". This might be true. But what means “release us from evil"? This might explain by using the words “Jesus have told us, that we must make other people the Christians without care of methodology". In this text would be things, what could be the little bit too revolutionary for accepting by the Christian theologists.


When we are thinking about the God and what is the God, we can make the theory about who is this person. In this theory, we can connect the “Big Bang"-theory and theology. In this theory, there was universe before our Universe. And it would collapse like in “Great crash"-theory. In this very radical think the God was an alien, who left outside the “Big crash".


And in this cosmos theological thinking the “Big Bang" happens just after “Big crash". This alien was outside the influence-area of this “Big bang", and that was giving that thing the very great advantage for another species. That theory could make the explanation for god. This alien could have billions of years advantage for another species.


In this thinking process, the advanced civilization could modify their bodies by using nanotechnology. That technology allows those creatures to change their shape anytime when they want. In this theory, the body of those aliens would be the concentration of nanomachines, and that technology would give the possibility that this alien could be like the amoeba, what changes the shape anytime as this alien wants. Or maybe those aliens have portable protective shield generator.

The term “Aquarius" might mean the man or organism, what can change the shape of the body. This alien would be the very flexible organism, and it might mean that it would be like some liquid metal robot from the movie Terminator. The “Aquarius" would transfer it body like glass, and that would make it very hard to locate. But this writing shows again a little bit too materialistic morale and ethics. I know that there will be some persons, who will not like this writing, but this is the text, what could the God be nothing more or less.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/radical-theology-and-other-thinking.html