Dart made its mission and impact on its target asteroid "Dimorphos"

Dart spacecraft impacted its target "Dimorphos"-asteroid. The NASA plan was to test planetary defense against asteroids. The biggest problem with planetary defense is that most of the asteroids that cause threats are quite small. 

The probe must use advanced AI for finding the right asteroid. Then it must find the position. That is the most effective for turning asteroids. And then impact in that precise target. 

The probe must use advanced AI for finding the right asteroid. Then it must find the position. That is the most effective for turning asteroids. And then impact in that precise target. 

That is also a lucky thing because turning the small asteroid away from its trajectory is easy. If that asteroid is located before impact. If that asteroid can push away from its trajectory that system doesn't need nuclear weapons. 

But if there is needed to use nuclear explosives the spacecraft can land on the surface of the asteroid. And then that system can drill the nuclear detonator to the center of the asteroid, where the heat expansion breaks its core. 

The images that the probe sends before impact are giving data of the gravitational field of "Dimorphos". There are small rocks on that asteroid. 

That tells there are no outside gravitational effects on that asteroid. That kind of gravitational effect could hover those rocks from the asteroid. Data that this probe sends could help to make models for microgravitational effects. 

A Swarm of miniature satellites can act as the ASAT weapons. 

If we are thinking of the Dart system as the base for the "Killer satellites" we can think that killer satellites are swarms of miniature satellites that are orbiting Earth. When those satellites see targets they activate their engines and impact their targets. 

Those satellite swarms can also soot to the trajectories. That the ICBM missiles are using. In that system, the idea is that the  ICBM impacts those miniature satellites. And those satellites can have guns that make them shoot warheads and MIRV-busses. 

That is a very simple way to make killer satellites. The idea of those systems is similar to drone swarms. A large number of simple satellites can shoot to the orbiter by using regular rockets. And then those swarms can take the trajectories there they can impact against their target.

(https://scitechdaily.com/see-darts-final-images-before-asteroid-impact/)

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Was there some primitive life on Mars, or are those things so-called fake fossils?

Was there some primitive life on Mars, or are those things so-called fake fossils?

The thing is "what if Mars looked like Earth" somewhere in the past? Was there some kind of primitive lifeforms on that planet during the short period before it freezes? Or are those images portrait so-called fake fossils? 

And even if they are portraying so-called fake fossils. Or results of some kind of chemical reactions that thing doesn't mean that this is not interesting. The thing that can form fake fossils is the proto-reactions that are forming the RNA and DNA molecules. 

The very first organisms on Earth were not DNA-based. They were like bacteria which genomes were in the form of RNA. And the energy for those organisms came from volcanic temperature. 

If we think that Mars lost its lithosphere and core in the cosmic impacts that mean there could be a short-time wonderful environment for forming the self-replicating molecules or pre-RNA and DNA molecules. But that period was quite short when the planet was starting to freeze and it lost most of its atmosphere. 

Before the first RNA-based cells. Or even the first RNA molecules formed there was a long series of chemical reactions on Earth. That means there were the proto-reactions that formed the first self-replicating molecules. And then the first RNA molecules formed. The most interesting of those images is the image bottom right. That thing can be the "proto-DNA" the molecule that started to turn to spiral. 

There is the possibility that those things are primitive bacteria. But are they formed on Mars? That is an interesting question. There is the possibility that the impacting asteroids brought those organisms to the Red planet. That thing means that there is one small possibility. The possibility is that some extrasolar asteroid impacted Mars. 

https://scitechdaily.com/life-on-mars-or-false-fossils/

Image:https://scitechdaily.com/life-on-mars-or-false-fossils/

There is a small possibility that Mars had an impact, with the extrasolar asteroid that could bring some kind of primitive fossils to that planet. 

The idea is that the giant iceberg was released from some water planet when some sun-type star erupted as a nova. Two white dwarf stars are quite near Earth. 

Those white dwarfs are Van Maanen's star (Van Maanen 2) and Sirius B the white dwarf that is orbiting Sirius A. The Sirius B and Van Maanen's star were once like Suns. If those stars had a solar system they crushed their planets. And the impact wave of the nova eruption sends debris through the universe. 

When we are looking at the age of Sirius B there is mentioned the age of Sirius B as the white dwarf. And the member or "pair" of the Sirius system. But once Sirius B was the sun-looking star that might have a solar system. Then that star lost its fuel grown to a red giant and erupted as a nova. Then it faced Sirius A and started to orbit it. So the originally Sirius B was an older star. 

Today we might not find the planets near those stars like Van Maanen 2 and Sirius B. And if Sirius A had some kind of planetary system Sirius B would destroy it. 

"Oumuamua was not nitrogen iceberg"

The fact is that "Oumuamua" is officially the asteroid that came from another solar system. Nobody ever landed on that cosmic traveler. And that means that the "Oumuamua" stays as the "possible asteroid". There is suspicion that some kind of eruption pushed that asteroid away from its solar system. 

So was Oumumua some kind of alien solar sail? The fact is that thing remains unknown. The fact is that there were no radio signals that came from "Oumumua". But otherwise, if we think that "Omumua" was some kind of recon craft or SETI-probe that craft might travel through the solar system and record signals. Maybe that kind of probe would be covered by ice that it remains stealthy. And then it can send the data to its senders. But was Oumumua that kind of thing? 

But when we are thinking the "Oumuamua". The visitor from the other solar system there is the possibility. That there is a large part of water on that asteroid. And then there is nitrogen on the core. The core of "Uomuamua" is covered by cosmic dust. And I don't know did somebody made the spectroscopic research of the surface of that asteroid?

So could the origin of the Oumuamua be near the Van Maanen 2 or Sirius B? The thing is that we believe that Oumumua was not alien spacecraft. But we are not sure about that thing. But we must keep our minds open. 

Before research is not completed we should not close away any possibilities. And nobody ever landed on Oumumua. And nobody ever took any samples of that interstellar traveler. 

That kind of visitor from other solar systems is always interesting. But even if it's the debris of a destroyed planet. Even if the entire Oumumua has not formed of water ice, there is always the possibility. There is the water has been stored in the small pockets of that asteroid. And in those pockets could be remains of the primitive or why not also advanced lifeforms that lived on some distant planets before its sun crushed that planet in nova or supernova eruption. 

https://www.universetoday.com/44985/sirius-b/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Maanen_2

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The man and walking thru the tube

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Walking thru the tube is the symbolic thing. When the walker is in the tube, this person sees only things that are ahead. The tube might seem very dark when the person is in it, but in the cold weather, it will offer the coverage to the walker. But the man cannot stay in the tube forever, and the world is waiting for our traveler. The end of the tube would seem the very cold point, but the traveler must know, that this person cannot stay in tube rest of the life.


The tube is the thing, there is only one possible direction, and as we all know, the only natural way to move is forward. When the person wants to turn around and return the point the trip began, this person must have the good explanation for that. There is not endless room in that tube, and behind our traveler is always other travelers, who want to walk thru this tube. Those other people would cause some kind of stress of the disturbing situation if the traveler talks alone or wants to do something, what is not accepted.


But there is one rule in this tube, the person must look forward, and that is the reason, why other travelers don’t recognize our traveler. What travels in the tube might be the person, but it can also be a human race. Mankind has one direction, and that is forward. When we moved to the house, there was only one direction for advancing. This direction is forward. The research and development of technology and other things like legislative would advance the human race, what is facing the biggest challenges in history.


The first time we will understand that there would be an asteroid, what is targeting to the earth. And this threat might be bigger than any humanoid interstellar cruiser can cause. We could talk to that cruiser, but the asteroid doesn’t care anything. There have been plans to connect the rocket motors to asteroids, and then pull asteroid against enemy capital. And that’s why we must be wake against those threats. And of course, humanoids could use those asteroids as the “STEALTH”-attackers.


Small size (10-20 meters) asteroids can push from their trajectory quite easily, and only thing, what is needed is the rocket, what push that stone. The equipment, what has planned to use, is the S-IVB or the most upstage of the Saturn 5, what has the feet like moon module. First, that thing would drive to the asteroid, and then the rocket motor would start. That would push that small asteroid in wanted directions.


The reason why this thing was interested in the Soviet and United States military, was that this kind of strike can be covered by the natural impact of small meteorites. The impact power of those things is very big, and all the city can be erased by this kind of vehicle. Also were plans that the kinetic warhead, what filled by concrete was first to shoot to orbit the moon. This would give that weapon very high speed, and the impact power to the earth would be enormous.

But if we think this strike carefully, the threat is not so big, if we will notice that incoming bite. There would shoot the salvo of small rockets to the one side of that stone, or the same technology, what is created to that strike, can be used to turn the asteroid. We could use the same kind of vehicle to push it another way, and the defense against impacting asteroids must begin years before it arrives. If the turning actions would begin beyond the asteroid belt, there would be the chance to use many vehicles and if one attempt fails, there would be time to send another probe to finish the job. 

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-man-and-walking-thru-tube.html

The new kind of combination of cosmos and theology

David Hardy's vision of asteroid ark
could be seen as the intelligence cruiser
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The new era of theology allows us to think anything that we want about the God. And we can connect our own ideas to those thoughts. This doesn’t mean that everything that we say and write has theological acceptance. But we can connect our thoughts about those things to other thoughts, and present also radical theories about the religion. In some of the most radical scenarios, the early Christians began to pray together for giving the God message to incarnate into those groups.


This would give ideas for some very fascinating scenarios, what have been seen in some SciFi series. In those series, the UFO will be tempted to some area, and then the military would shoot it down. The idea of the early Christians would be same, they would call the God to the middle of themselves, and then they would set the trap for him. In this part of the text, we must think, that maybe the God is actually a humanoid, what uses ”nobody” the human-shaped robot for intelligence missions and that technology allowed him to avoid the trap. This is one very nice theory for ”who is the God”. But we might ever proof is that theory true or false.


Of course, we can someday make contact with another civilization, but even if we would ask that civilization if they would know the guy, who claimed to be the God. But even in that situation we cant be absolutely sure, is that distant civilization actually the God, what we always pray. They can also answer that they are that thing, but this civilization can tell the lies to us. And at the first, we must make contact with another civilization, what is the very problematic thing. Because if we make contact with another civilization, we must be very careful, because that civilization might be hostile.


In the SETI-program the most important thing is to make a contact with other civilizations. And this will make that project extremely dangerous. Because if some very highly technical and powerful civilization will notice that it wants our planet, we would have problems to stop them. In many TV-series, the Aliens would land to our planet and begin to fight. But those super civilizations might not want to make ourselves the slaves. They might come near to our planet with some interstellar cruiser, and then they would open the fire with antimatter cannon to the Earth. This might look like the asteroid arc, but this version is made for combat.

In this scenario, the very technical civilizations have SETI-probes, what might seem like asteroids. If this imaginational spaceship wants to make recon missions in some planets atmosphere, it could drop very much small-sized drones to the operational area, and that equipment could be covered by ice, what can be suitable for the heat shield. Melting ice would be uncovered very sophisticated automated robots, what can look for marks of intelligent life on some planets. In this scenario, those humanoids might have own SETI-program, and they have the technology for long-term spaceflight.


I Don't know why nobody ever mentioned this thing, but the aliens might have the intelligence spaceships, what seems like asteroids. Those things are not even in some movies, what are made by George Lucas. The reason why some intelligence ship might look like the asteroid is clear. The builders of this device would want that it would not disturb normal life. Its mission should be Stealth, and even if it would look like an asteroid, that imaginational cruiser might powerful weapons like antimatter cannons, what it could use in defense and offense. This is only the writing about thinking the very complex thing, what is called ”religion”.


We all know that all of us have a different think about the religion. For some persons, religion is only a way to make philosophical writings, but for some else, the God could be aliens from another solar system. And for those people who say that there are not humanoids in any star system, I will give one question. Do you often spend your holidays at some other star? We know that there are billions of stars in the Universe, and we might ever be absolutely sure if there is there some other intelligent species in some other solar system. If those humanoids would be at some other galaxy, they might be harmless, because of the long-term travel time. But of course, they can make an artificial wormhole, and come here by in one minute. This is only theory.

Sources:

Picture 1.

https://fi.pinterest.com/pin/45036064999428753/

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-new-kind-of-combination-of-cosmos.html

The imagination is always freedom for thinking, so don't be so serious about those things.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-imagination-is-always-freedom-for.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-imagination-is-always-freedom-for.html