Where is the center of the universe?

The universe is weirder than we can even imagine. And many times, people say that there is no center in the universe. Or otherwise thinking. If we want to make borders for the term "universe" and think that the universe is the entirety where all known material exists. We can say that the universe has a center. The universe expands to the great emptiness. We can say that there is no clear border even if we limit the universe to visible material. But that means we would notice only 5% of the universe. 

So if we think like this, we should separate material or the bubble that the Big Bang formed, from space, where that bubble is. So we are living in a bubble. That consists of a small part of known matter. We know that there is more dark matter than visible matter in the universe. But we don't know can the dark matter be outside the bubble of visible material. Nobody has ever seen dark matter, and we cannot be sure how much dark matter is outside the bubble that forms all visible matter.

And it's a remnant of the Big Bang. This means we are living in the Big Bang, where the temperature decreases all the time. We think that the Big Bang was some kind of explosion. We forget that this explosion continues all the time, and the shine from that event is seen as a cosmic microwave background. The newest tool in cosmology is the cosmic gravitational background.

But is the point where the Big Bang happened at the center of the universe? The thing is that in the young universe, the Big Bang was in its entirety. All matter that we know formed in the Big Bang. And that means we are still living in the Big Bang. The temperature of that event decreases.

But does the universe have a center? If we think that the universe is the only thing that we know, we know that there is a center in the cosmic bubble where we live. But if we think that there is also space or dimension behind most long-distance objects, We must say that there is no center in the universe.

https://www.astronomy.com/science/ask-astro-where-is-the-center-of-the-universe/

The toughest material on Earth.

"These images, generated from scanning electron microscopy, show the grain structures and crystal lattice orientations of (A) CrMnFeCoNi and (B) CrCoNi alloys. (C) and (D) show examples of fractures in CrCoNi at 293 K and 20 K, respectively. Credit: Robert Ritchie/Berkeley" (Phys.org/Say hello to the toughest material on Earth)

Today the toughest material on Earth is a combination of chromium, cobalt, and nickel (CrCoNi). The thing that makes this material so tough is the low temperature. And in 20 Kelvin that material turns stronger than a diamond. The problem with that kind of material is that their strength needs extremely low temperatures that the crystallization that makes those materials hard can form. 

Mainly that kind of tough metal alloy that turns tougher in low temperatures can be the perfect material for superconducting systems. The superconducting wires must connect to something. And regular materials are turning fragile in extremely low temperatures. 

So metal alloy can use in superconducting systems if there is some kind of mechanical stress. The problem with regular superconducting systems is that they are not resistant to mechanical shock. And that metal which turns tougher in low temperatures gives the low-temperature systems new abilities. The spacecraft that operates in extremely low temperatures can use that alloy as armor.

There is an article in the Phys.Org about that material. But even if the metal alloy turns harder than diamond only in low temperatures there could be used in that kind of material that extremely tough metal alloy can be used as the armor in spacecraft that travel to the edge of the solar system. There is a possibility that the spacecraft has armor that is protecting it against micrometeorites. And that extremely tough metal alloy can protect spacecraft in that area. 

https://phys.org/news/2022-12-toughest-material-earth.html

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/

Can information escape from a black hole?

The superstrings are extremely thin energy fields. They are pieces of quantum fields. And the wave-particle duality can turn those superstrings into particles. 

When a black hole stretches material it turns it into a superstring-looking form. But in that case. There forms an electromagnetic vacuum in the middle of that particle. 

When the pull of the black hole ends, that thing would remove the stretch of that material. That means the material can take back its regular form because both ends of that "spaghetti" pull them back together. 

Can information escape from a black hole?

It seems that this thing is possible. The information can escape from the black hole. There is a piece of evidence that one black hole spat out a star that turned into spaghetti and ate it three years ago. But how a material or information can escape from a black hole? 

The answer can be in the whirl that pulls information inside the black hole. When a star closes to the event horizon it turns into a spaghetti-looking formation. So the black hole stretches the star. And when the star's remnant falls to singularity, it follows the trajectory that looks like a whirl. 

After the information crosses the event horizon or the point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light, falling material continues to travel by following the spiral track to the center of the black hole. There is the possibility that the spaghetti or stretched material would hover near the event horizon. In that case, the material is forming a string-looking formation. 

If there is a small gravitational vacuum or gravitational shadow above that string it may start to flow inside the black hole. In that case, the hovering string is the stable object. And if a black hole moves a small part of that string can go outside the main singularity. That forms the quantum protuberance that conducts energy out from the black hole. 

The black hole is like a yarn ball. Inside the event horizon gravitation, itself forms the string-looking formations. The massive gravitation pulls gravitation that is like radiation to string-looking structures. And sometimes one of those strings would go outside the event horizon. That forms gravitational flares that bring energy out from the black hole. 

In the most exciting models, the particle that orbits inside the event horizon could form quantum entanglement with another particle. That is deeper inside the black hole. The quantum entanglement is impossible to press to size. There is also no limit to quantum entanglement. 

So, when two particles are forming quantum entanglement through different layers inside black holes energy travels to the outer participant. Also, the energy channel between those particles acts like an antenna. If that energy channel forming by gravitational waves. 

Or gravitational radiation can push the other gravitational waves away. Gravitation acts like all other wave motions. And if the energy level of that kind of gravitational pillar is higher it repels other gravitational waves. If that gravitational or energy pillar forms from outside the event horizon, it conducts energy out from the black hole. 

That thing will extend the length of quantum entanglement. If that thing happens to a string-looking particle it can form an energy-low pressure above it. That thing can rise the particle through the black hole's event horizon. 

https://astronomy.com/magazine/greatest-mysteries/2019/07/19-can-light-escape-from-black-holes

https://www.livescience.com/black-hole-pukes-up-star-three-years-later

https://scitechdaily.com/most-extreme-wobbling-black-hole-ever-detected-exotic-phenomenon-predicted-by-einsteins-theory-of-gravity/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Schwinger effect and the Big Bang

1.) The cosmic gamma-ray background

The idea of the Big Bang is that material formed from nothing. And maybe the Big Bang was a giant Schwinger effect where a strong electric field formed material. 

The idea of the so-called Schwinger effect is that material is formed because of the strong electromagnetic field. And the thing is that the wave-particle duality supports that theory. 

Before we will go to analyze the Big Bang more carefully we must understand one thing. The first thing that formed in the Big Bang was two opposite polar electromagnetic fields. Then those electromagnetic fields traveled through each other. And then that case where two electromagnetic fields crossed each other. Wave-particle duality formed the first particle pars. 

Those pairs were particle-antiparticle pairs that were annihilated. That radiation formed the first quark-gluon plasma. The idea of the Schwinger effect is that when electromagnetic fields form material. There is always particle-antiparticle pair. 

When we are looking at the cosmic gamma-ray image that is over this text, we can see that gamma rays are coming from a belt-like structure. And that thing means that there could be two energy rays that traveled through the universe. 

If we are thinking about the animation in the next image there is a possibility that when the high energy electromagnetic fields traveled through each other those fields started to push the particles and antiparticles ahead of them. Or maybe those particles traveled behind those two fields. 

2.) "As illustrated here, particle-antiparticle pairs normally pop out of the quantum vacuum as a consequences of Heisenberg uncertainty. In the presence of a strong enough electric field, however, these pairs can be ripped apart in opposite directions, causing them to be unable to reannihilate and forcing them to become real: at the expense of energy from the underlying electric field. We do not understand why the zero-point energy of space has the non-zero value that it does." (BigThink.com/70-year-old quantum prediction comes true, as something is created from nothing)

That thing could form an electromagnetic vacuum. Or a channel where quantum fields were extremely weak. Then that vacuum adjusted the energy level of particles around it. So that channel can be one reason why the universe is like we see it. 

There is introduced an idea. That the oppositely shot particles can use to adjust the size of quarks and that thing can make it possible to create low-energy areas in the material. Those two particles can be used to transfer energy away from the structure. So that thing can make the ultimate stealth possible. 

3.) Casimir forces on parallel plates

Casimir effect. 

"In quantum field theory, the Casimir effect is a physical force acting on the macroscopic boundaries of a confined space. Which arises from the quantum fluctuations of the field. It is named after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir, who predicted the effect of electromagnetic systems in 1948". (Wikipedia, Casimir effect) 

Sometimes is introduced that those two electromagnetic fields acted like Casimir plates. The Casimir effect creates virtual particles between two plates that are very close to each other. Sometimes is introduced that the Casimir effect makes energy from emptiness. 

Well, the Casimir effect doesn't create energy from emptiness. The idea is that when two plates are extremely close to each other the movement of electrons creates a bubble in the quantum fields of atoms. Then another quantum field or radiation affects that bubble increasing its power. Or maybe there is forming a curved electromagnetic field between Casimir plates. When outcoming radiation hits that bubble it aims that radiation at the plates. 

Of course, the electron can also jump over the plate. And in that case wave motion pumps energy to that thing. Or electrons can send photon quantum. This effect is interesting because it can use to create energy also in dark places. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

Image: 

Image 1: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/GLAST/news/gamma-ray-census.html

Image 2:) https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/something-from-nothing/

Image 3:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

What was the ultimate beginning of the universe?

The most common theory for the beginning of the universe is the so-called Big Bang theory. That theory explains the birth of the universe as the Big Bang. The universe is the entirety, where the entire material and energy that we know exists. 

There is suspicion about the past universes or multiverse. But today we have confirmed the existence of only one universe. The thing is that there should be other universes outside our universe because there is the possibility that there are other Big Bangs. 

Those other universes can be dark matter. That means we cannot see those dark universes. The real fact is that nobody has seen other universes yet. 

There energy and material are released to space and time. But where do that energy and material come from? Was the source of that material be the other universe? If the Big Bang was some kind of white hole. That means there must be a source of that material somewhere. 

In some theories, the Big Bang was erupting black hole. The question in the Big Bang theory is that. Where does that released material come from? Material cannot form from nothingness. The same way the wave movement must have a source somewhere. 

Could that black hole form of dark matter? And if that thing is true. The dark matter would release into time and space at different times when the material is released. 

The first thing that was released in the Big Bang was energy. The wave movement. That turned quarks and electrons. So maybe the beginning of the universe should be the moment when the first photon came to space. When we are thinking about the young universe the time moved slower in that quantum mush. The universe's age is predicted to be something like 13 billion years. 

What formed the black hole that detonated when the energy started to travel from it to zero energy space? Was the Big Bang some kind of white hole? The problem with this theory is the origin of that black hole. In some other ideas, there was wave movement. Before the universe started to form. Then that wave movement faced another wave movement that crossed the track of the first wave movement. 

Then the crossing wave movement wrinkled to elementary particles. And that thing caused the form of material. So the source of that crossing wave movement could be in the black hole. Sir Roger Penrose has introduced that the material in our universe formed in the past universe. 

So if we think like that. The ultimate fate of that universe was the Big Crunch. And when the entire material dropped in the black hole. That thing caused the eruption of that black hole. The past universe and multiverse would easily explain the Big Bang. 

The source of crossing wave movement would locate in another universe. The thing that makes this kind of thing problematic is that the wave movement and material cannot form from nothingness. So there must be some kind of source that sent the wave movement. Or the material of the black hole must locate somewhere. 

But there is no evidence about those things. In a very young universe, the energy level of particles was so high that the elementary particles should repel each other. At the first, the oscillation of quarks must get weaker that they can form protons and neutrons. And after that, the form of molecules must begin. So the universe must get cooler than the oscillation of the atoms would make it possible to form molecules. And of course, the elements must be formed inside the stars. There must be other elements than hydrogen for forming things like planets. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

"The Phoenix universe theory".

The "Phoenix universe" means the closed or spheric universe that ends its life in the Big Crunch. And when all material is dropped in the black hole. That thing makes the Big Bang possible. The black hole starts to erupt in absolute emptiness and forms the new universe. 

That new universe could be far different than the past universe was. The size or energy level in that new universe could be different. But otherwise, if the entire energy and material are traveling through that hypothetical black hole. That new universe could be similar to the last one. 

That means the reborn universe can be antimatter to its ancestor. And there is also the possibility that the new universe is dark to its ancestor. But the idea is that the universe would reborn again and again. But for proving that theory there is needed to determine the geometrical form of the universe. That Phoenix universe theory requires that the universe is spherical. And if the universe is spherical. The ultimate fate of the universe will be the Big Crunch. 

The rebirth of the universe is an inevitable phenomenon. In this case, the black hole falls into a complete vacuum because it pulls the entire material of the universe inside it. When the black hole is in the complete vacuum. It will begin to erupt, causing a new Big Bang.

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

Can the fall of the Higgs Boson destroy the entire universe?

The idea of that hypothesis is that when the Higgs Boson falls no quantum field can fill that hole. So the energy level of the material would turn lower. That causes that the quantum fields around atoms would turn weaker. That thing causes that the material would start to unload. 

The fact is that even if the size of the quarks will turn higher there is a possibility that the form of the material turns to "Higgs material". The size of the quarks of the hypothetical Higgs material. Could be different than the size quarks of the present material.

And that should make it invisible to us. But if the Higgs Boson causes energy flow that turns material to "Higgs material" that happens inside the universe and affects everything inside the universe. 

There is a possibility that we would not recognize anything. The reason for that is we are all. And the material around us turns to Higgs material. So there is the possibility that we are turned to Higgs material many times. But this is the hypothesis. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

What is the ultimate fate of the universe?

What is the end of the universe? Or does the universe have some kind of end at all? The thing is that the ultimate fate of the universe. Is always the end of material in the form as we know it. The big Crunch or the Big silence means that the material and the wave movement which source is the material is turning straight. The thing is that the wave movement would still exist in the form of superstrings that are waiting for impacting together. 

The black hole crunches material in the case. That the Big Crunch is the ultimate fate of the universe. But in the case of the Big Crunch, there is the possibility that all wave movement would not drop to a black hole until it detonates. So some part of the information could travel froward of the shock wave. That is called the edge of the universe. But that thing requires that the universe would be infinity what reborn and then drops black to black hole again and again. 

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200117-what-if-the-universe-has-no-end

https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-debate-hawkings-idea-that-the-universe-had-no-beginning-20190606/

https://www.sciencealert.com/how-did-the-big-bang-explode-out-of-nothing-this-could-be-the-way

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Galaxy without dark matter

   

 Galaxy without dark matter

Image: Dark matter concept art.

The galaxy without any trace of dark matter is more interesting than people are normally thinking. The dwarf galaxy AGC 114905 has no dark matter at all. And that observation confirms the thing that the location of dark matter is not connected with the visible material. So there are two universes. The dark universe is invisible to us. And the visible universe that has the minority of material. The thing is that we don't know. Is there only one or maybe two or three or even more types of dark matter? 

The fact is that the gravitational interaction between dark and visible material is the only confirmed thing. But when we are thinking about the standard model of physics the "empty squares" below the Higgs boson. Are giving a tip. That may be, the particles of the dark matter are bosons. Those are not seen before. 

So, could the legendary anomaly in the Muon G-2 test be the reason that the particles in the particle accelerator impacted something that we cannot see? There is the possibility that the fifth force causes that anomaly. Could that thing be some kind of particle that is invisible to us? The thing is that the tests in particle accelerators are made for a reason. 

The makers of those tests want. That the particles would impact to dark matter. That kind of impact will tell about the form of dark matter. And the galaxy AGC 114905 without any trace of dark matter is confirming that the locations where dark matter is found don't depend on the visible material. 

That thing means there is no other than gravitational interaction between dark and visible material. So could the reason that be dark matter has a different origin than visible material. There is the possibility that the dark matter is released before and after visible material. 

In wildest imaginations, the source of dark matter is somewhere else than in our universe. So could some part of dark matter come from past universes? The thing that made me think about that is that Sir Roger Penrose has seen that very old black holes are sending radiation that source could be universes that existed before our universe. 

Or maybe the source of that strange "vapor" is the universe outside our universe. If somebody can prove that thing, it would prove the parallel universe theory. The idea is that there could be black holes that are formed before Big Bang. 

And those "skeleton black holes" might send radiation that is from the time before Big Bang. There could be a couple of candidates for that role. But confirming the age of the black hole is hard to see. That thing is happening by measuring the age of particles that orbit black holes. There is no other way to measure their age.

Because the black holes are not themself sending other than Hawking Radiation. Or actually, Hawking Radiation is the thermal radiation that comes near the event horizon. There is introduced an idea that Hawking Radiation is the emission that forms when the radiation that comes out from black holes impacts with material or energy that drops to the black hole.

The hypothesis about dark energy is that dark energy is electromagnetic radiation which source is in the particles of dark matter. The hot dark matter sends the hot dark energy. And the cold dark matter sends the cold dark energy. 

Wavelengths would separate the cold and hot dark energy. The hot dark energy would be the electromagnetic radiation that wavelength is very short. And the wavelengths of those two types of dark energy position that strange wave movement opposite sides of the electromagnetic spectrum. The hot dark energy could have a shorter wavelength than gamma rays. And cold dark energy has a longer wavelength than radio waves have.

So theoretically, there are two types of dark matter. Cold dark matter is the majority of the dark matter and the most dominating effect in the universe. Hot dark matter would be the minority of dark matter. But it's easier to observe. The thing is that there might be also other types of dark matter than just those two predicted types. 

http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2018/08/roger-penrose-still-looks-for-evidence.html

https://dailygalaxy.com/2021/03/hawking-points-the-corpses-of-black-holes-from-before-the-big-bang-weekend-feature/

https://www.livescience.com/63392-black-holes-from-past-universes.html

https://muon-g-2.fnal.gov/

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hawking_radiation

https://scitechdaily.com/galaxy-discovered-with-no-trace-of-dark-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/galaxy-discovered-with-no-trace-of-dark-matter/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Is the cat dead, or is it living? Thoughts about superpositions

Scrödingers cat and how we see it in real life?

Is the entire Universe like Schrödinger's cat? The short tale of material goes like this. 

Every single particle in the Universe formed in the Big Bang. The existence of material depends on its energy level. And all the time energy travels out from the Universe. After the Big Bang, the material started to travel in space and time. And in the ultimate end, its existence is not ending. Material is just turning to wave movement. 

The material will deliver all its mass outside the universe. So material formed in Big Bang. And after that, it travels to the ultimate fate of the Universe. 

Schrödinger's cat is the model of superposition. The cat is living in medium, where it is in a box. It dies if it will come out of the box. And if the box is opened the cat dies. There is also the clock that will launch the poison capsule. Or if that will not work, well cat dies anyway. The Schrödinger's cat is a model of the thing that we know exists. But we cannot touch that thing. 

We can see if the box is made of glass. But we cannot be sure that if the cat has even existed. The thing is that there is the possibility that the cat that we see in the glass box is the hologram. That means the cat exists, but it's virtual. We could open the box. But if that cat dies. The Scrödinger's cat is the symbol of the material. Sooner or later the material turns to wave movement. When the material is turning to wave movement it will not lose anywhere. 

It just forms its form. We could say that "ball turns spaghetti". When we are thinking about the positions of the material there is a normal position. And then there is superposition. In superposition, the particle is in two places at the same time. So traveling from point A to point B the material requires the third position called trans-position. 

So all material is like Scrödinger's cat. The end of the entire universe will come. And even the universe itself and its black holes cannot escape the ultimate fate. The thing is that the universe and material in the form as we know it travels from the Big Bang or begins to the Ultimate fate. And even the universe reborn in the new Big Bang the form of new material is not necessarily the same with material that formed our universe. 

We are using gravitation energy in everyday life. The hydro plant transforms gravitational energy into electricity. But before that process happens the gravitational energy transfers to water molecules of the river. And in that process gravitation takes a new form called kinetic energy. The river moves kinetic energy to the turbines.

When the ball is rolling downhill the earth will transfer gravitation energy to the ball. That transfers its kinetic energy. And then that energy transfers to air molecules and back to the ground. The friction or friction heat means that the ball is transferring energy to its environment. 

In that position, the particle moves between those points A and B. When we are thinking about that thing on a larger scale we can think about the ball that rolls from one position. To other positions. The ball is transporting kinetic energy. Theoretically and simplifying saying. if the downhill continues enough long time our ball turns to the black hole. This thing is not possible in real life. The reason is that the energy is moving out from the ball to some other structure when it touches another structure.

So all the time, when the ball rolls on the downhill. The energy travels between the ball, ground, and air. When the ball rolls the energy travels to the ball. And the reason why it cannot turn to the black hole is. That energy always travels from the higher energetic area to the lower energetic area. 

This interaction means that the ball cannot turn a black hole because it requires that the energy level of the ball rises higher than Earth. And that causes that energy or sharper saying kinetic energy travels to earth. We can hear the ball is rolling. The thunder what the ball causes are the reason that the energy is transferring to the ground and air. So when the ball is rolling downhill. It delivers energy to the air and ground. The movement turns to heat energy that is seen as friction. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%a

https://visionsofbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

Antimaterian realiteetteja sekä suuria uhkakuvia

Antimateriakäyttöinen aurinkopurje
Kuva I

CERN on paikka, missä tehdään suurienergisiin hiukkasiin liittyvää tutkimusta, ja tuossa tutkimuksessa käytetään hyväksi äärimmäisen voimakkaita magneettikenttiä. CERN:in hiukkaskiihdytin on syklotroni- eli moninkertainen rengaskiihdytin, jossa hiukkasia siirretään paikasta toiseen äärimmäisen voimakkaiden magneettien muodostaman ketjun avulla. Noiden supervoimakkaiden magneettien valmistaminen on ennen ollut ongelmallista, koska sähkövirta saa niissä aikaan pyörteisiä sähkökenttiä, jotka saavat ne kuumenemaan. Tuo kuumenemisen ongelma on ratkaistu jäähdyttämällä nuo magneetit suprajohtavaan tilaan, jossa johtimen värähtelyn loppuessa pääsee virta kulkemaan ilman vastusta, mikä tietenkin eliminoi kuumenemisen ongelman. 

Myös tarpeellisen tehon aikaansaaminen on vaikeaa, koska CERN vie saman verran sähkövirtaa kuin kaupunki, Tuo ongelma on ratkaistu erityisillä kondensaattoreilla, joihin varastoidaan sähkövirtaa, joka sitten johdetaan kiihdyttimeen, kun tarvitaan tuota huipputehoa.Hiukkasia törmäytettäessä toisiinsa äärettömän suurella nopeudella. Tuolla kiihdyttimellä tapahtuva törmäytys tehdään siten, että ensin CERN:issä luodaan muutamia antimateria-hiukkasia, jotka sitten varastoidaan erityiseen varastorenkaaseen.

Antimaterian luominen on teoriassa melko helppoa, eli hiukkasen spin, eli pyörimissuunta vain pitää muuttaa, ja tämä tapahtuu sitten valtavan voimakkaassa magneettikentässä. Tuo magneettikenttä aiheuttaa sitten taivaalle melko erikoisia ukkospilviä, ja siksi tuosta kiihdyttimen aiheuttamasta uhasta esimerkiksi sähkölaitteille keskustellaan erittäin paljon, koska se voi vaarantaa lentoliikennettä. Samoin pelkona on se, että tuo kiihdytin luo keinotekoisen mustan aukon Maan pinnalle, ja teoriassa tuo musta aukko voi saada ilmakehästä ainetta, ja imiessään materiaa itseensä se saa tarpeeksi energiaa muuttuakseen stabiiliksi.

Tai sitten tuo musta aukko imee materiaa itseensä täysin symmetrisesti, jolloin syntyy fuusioreaktio, mitä kutsutaan termillä ”vapaafuusio”, mikä tarkoittaa sitä, että Maapallon ilmakehään syttyy aurinko tai keinotekoinen tähti, joka saa energiansa typpifuusiosta, ja koska tuon tähden sisällä on musta aukko, niin se saa siitä gravitaatioenergiaa, mikä aiheuttaa stabiilin tai kasvavan fuusion syntymisen. Eli vaikka teoriassa tuo tapaus olisi äärimmäisen harvinainen, niin silti se on ehkä mahdollinen.

Antimaterian ongelmana on sen tavattoman voimakas reaktiokyky, eli kohdatessaan tavallisen aineen hiukkasen muuttuvat molemmat niistä energiaksi reaktiossa, jota kutsutaan annihilaatioksi. Tuota reaktiota on ajateltu hyödyntää esimerkiksi aseteknologiassa tai tähtienvälisissä avaruusaluksissa, ja tämä tekniikka tietenkin on vielä ainakin osittain teoreettisella asteella. Antimaterian energiapitoisuus on niin valtava, että kilo tuota ainetta riittää viemään avaruusaluksen Alfa Centauriin, ja gramma antimateriaa räjäyttää koko Maapallon kappalaeiksi. CERN luo vain muutamia antimateriahiukkasia kerrallaan, ja ne varastoidaan varastokiihdyttimeen, missä niitä kuljetetaan hiukkaskiihdyttimen renkaassa, ennen kuin ne päästetään varsinaiseen kiihdyttimeen reagoimaan tavallisen aineen kanssa, kuvassa yksi (Kuva I) on muuten taiteilijan näkemys siitä, miltä antimateriakäyttöinen aurinkopurje voisi näyttää. 

Antimateriaa voidaan myös varastoida ionimuodossa magneettiseen pulloon, missä magneettikenttä pitää sen erossa puollon pinnasta. Toki tuo pullo voi olla myös varastokiihdytin, mikä toimii kuin CERN:issä oleva esikuvansa. Kyseiseen välineeseen perustuu myös kammottava teorreettinenmassatuhoase, mitä kutsutaan nimellä ”Tellerin pommi”. Siinä antimateriaa varastoidaan magneettiseen pulloon, ja sitten tuossa pullossa oleva venttiili avataan, jolloin nuo hiukkaset pääsevät annihiloitumaan normaalien atomien kanssa. Joissakin kirjoissa on kuvailtu eräänlainen ionitykki, joka laukaisee antimateriasuihkun kohteeseensa, ja tuollainen ase voisi olla erittäin tuhovoimainen sekä hiukan liian tehokas todelliseen käyttöön. 

Tuon pommin valmistusta rajoittaa tietenkin sen valtava tuhovoima, mutta se voisi joskus myös pelastaa Maapallon, jos planeettamme joutuisi törmäyskurssille toisen planeetan kanssa. Silloin antimateriapommi voidaan ohjata tuon planeetan pinnalle, ja sillä voidaan helposti tuhota koko kohde. Tekniikka siihen on jo olemassa, mutta antimaterian valmistuksen korkea hinta rajoittaa tuon laittteen luomista. Samoin sen valtava tuhovoima voi olla kohtalokas koko Maapallon elämälle, jos tuo laite joutuu vastuuttomiin käsiin.

Antimateriaraketti toimii siten, että antimateriaa ohjataan sen polttokammioon, ja samalla sinne ajetaan normaalia materiaa,, mutta ongelma sitten on siinä, että tuo antimateria pitää ensin valmistaa, jotta sitä voidaan käyttää polttoaineena. Ideaalista tietenkin olisi että tuo alus voisi itse tuottaa antimateriaa siihen asennetun kiihdytinlaitteiston avulla. Tuo kiihdytin perustuu siihen, että alus ensin imee magneettikentän avulla avaruudesta vetyä, joka sitten ajetaan tuohon kiihdyttimeen, joka voi olla kuin rengas sen ympärillä. Tämä avaruusalus voisi sitten päästä 99% valon nopeudesta, mikä takaa neljän vuoden matka-ajan Alfa Centauriin. Mutta antimateriaa käyttävän avaruusaluksen ongelma on tietenkin tuon moottorin antama valtava tönäisy, joten sen pitää ensin kiihdyttää vaiheittain ioni- sekä fuusiomoottoreilla, ja vasta viimeksi käynnistetään antimaterian suihkutus raketin polttokammioon, jotta sen valtava kiihtyvyys ei painaisi aluksen sisällä olevia esineitä tai ihmisiä pannukakuiksi.


hkimmo.blogspot.fi