Scientists found out that so-called "junk DNA" plays a vital role in brain development.

This thing proves one thing. There is no junk DNA. The thing that makes some parts of the DNA "junk" is that the cells don't very often read that part of the DNA. And that means there must be something that is not needed very often. Things like neurons would not renew very often. And that means the DNA parts that are controlling the development of that kinds of cells and neural structures don't require that those parts of the DNA are not needed very often. 

DNA involves many interesting things like sequences that are programming species and avoiding certain species like snakes. Those heritable phobias are making some researchers think that things. Like information about the outfit of the dinosaurs can be stored in the DNA. That information could drift through the species and history. And maybe someday we can find out what dinosaurs look like if that data is stored in the DNA. 

Because researchers found the DNA sequences. That are controlling things like the development of the brain structures. That gives a possibility to control the intelligence level of the individuals across the borders of species. This thing makes it possible to create intelligent pets. The dogs and cats are making complicated things for their masters. But there are always problems with this kind of research. 

Intelligent species are more complicated to control than so-called dummy species. That means the higher intelligence level causes a scenario that Orwell's novel Animal Farm turns true. The ability to think means the ability to rebel. If a pet is intelligent that thing requires strict rules on how to treat that pet. Of course, regular pets require well treatment. 

But intelligent species require that thing more than anything else. If the intelligence level of the pet is high enough we must call that thing a family member. Human rights are basing the intelligence level of humans. And if we are creating a new species that are more intelligent than their ancestors. 

That means we must re-estimate human rights. The ability to control things like the intelligence level of another species gives ultimate change. But it also gives ultimate responsibility. If we are making some kind of research, we must realize that genetics is not a game. We can make new creatures but we must remember that evolution has created the need to defend itself for all creatures. 

If we are transforming the DNA of the species the result will not be the same species that it was before genetic engineering. The species that we see might look the same but it is not the same. This is why we must think about things like cloning dinosaurs very carefully. If we accidentally create things like intelligent T-rex, we are in really big trouble. Or at least some people are in big trouble. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-unravel-the-mystery-of-junk-genes-that-are-key-to-brain-development/

The problems of genetically manipulated food

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Monsanto corporation has created new genetic manipulated corn, known as "Roundup". This corn is immune against that corporation agricultural chemicals, and this makes this technology very dangerous and also interested in the military. When the food supply of some government would cut, that government has the only chance for survival to ask for foreign aid, and resistant corn species allows to poison the other corn away. This would cause the hunger in some area.


When we are thinking carefully the same technology, what made possible to create corn and rice species, what are immune against the chemicals like "Roundup" makes possible to create humans, who are resistant against nerve gasses or some other chemical agents. The nanotechnology allows us to connect other genomes in our own DNA and give us change to improve our skills and abilities. But in the world of the food supply, we must remember that the food is the vital element of the environment advancing, and life of mankind.


When we are thinking about the situation that someone wants to addict even some state for the own corn, we must confess that targeted state, that they must buy that corn. And it would be done by using normal bugs, what are made resistant against other chemicals. That would make the very terrible loss for the harvest. The other version is to make genetically manipulated bugs, what are resistant to the agricultural chemicals, and another way is to make normal bugs resistant against chemicals by using the small dose of those poisons and improve the tolerance level of the bugs by that way.


The chemicals would be delivered to the air and those extremely small doses would make the bugs tolerate those chemical agents. The resistant population of the bugs is very dangerous, and that means that if the bugs or mushrooms are immune against chemicals,  that chemical must be used more and more.  The urban legend of the "chemtrail"s tells that the poisons, what should kill the bugs is delivered to the air in that purpose. And many of those poisons are causing cancer. The chemicals are an extremely good way to control the people.


Technologies what are made for the roundup can be used for genome transfers and genome therapies, what is extremely dangerous. The genome therapies allow creating persons, who are mentally handicapped, that their nervous system would not advance normally. In the worst nightmares, those genetically modified handicaps can use as the "biorobots", what is totally against the morality. Those handicapped persons could equip with the controlling implants, what stimulates the brain core and makes that person the robot. The genome therapy, what is increasing the muscle mass. or change the muscle type can make person extreme powerful, and if the muscles all around the body would be similar to the heart muscles, and that would make the person extremely strong.

More about the plants and their co-operation between together

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are walking in the forest, we are hearing the buzz, what is caused by leafy of the trees and grasses. The purpose of that sound is quite interesting. Nature would not do anything without the purpose, and the structure of leafy is the result of the long-term evolution. That buzz has actually covered the sound of the predators, and those predators are more wanted by plants, than veggie animals. Veggie animals are actually welcome because they would transfer the seeds from some place to another place.


But those animals are harmful to plants, and this is the reason, why predators are very welcome in the forest. In fact, all those species, what is found in forests are needed for keeping that ecosystem in balance. If some species would be too dominating the result would be devastating. And that's the reason why in the forest should be more than one type of trees. That is called as biodiversity. Because if there would become some illness, the biodiversity guarantees, that there would be found trees after the infection. The trees need grass on their bottom because grass denies growing of competitors.


Veggies are always harming those plants, and that is the reason why trees are keeping that sound, what is typical for forests. The grasses are sometimes keeping the sound, what is meant for cover the warning signs of the snakes, and those grasses are complying because they cover the snakes, what is hiding under them, and those snakes are very lethal for other animals. Sometimes people think about the telescope shape of the flowers.


That shape if helping them to track the pheromones, what other flowers send. And if in some direction is coming the very large number of those chemicals, that flower starts to favor the bugs, what are coming from that direction. If the flower is dying those cells would receive other kinds of pheromones, that would tell that there is no water in that area. This is one version of the complicated symbiosis of some species. That symbiosis is not actually proven, but the reason for some kind of behavior of the plants and animals is the very interesting thing.


When the seeds are forming, those flowers would create the nectar, where is more acetone, and that would make the wasps and bees more aggressive than before that. In this case, those flowers would use bees as the protectors, what is protecting their seeds. This is the very interesting thing about the plants and ecosystems. Those very interesting connections between species are opening a scenario, what has ever been in the mind of humans.


If we would find the certain species, we could communicate with animals. But this is the only hypothesis. There is no proof, that there would be the species, what can speak to humans. They should understand, the language for making translations. And there have no animals found, what are capable to do that. So in some theories, the anthropologists have tried to create human, what could speak with animals by leaving the child for the animals.


Maybe feral children are the cause of the so-called "Greystoke test", where the feral child has grown with animals, and then the specialists would tech that person the human behaviors. Those anthropologists hope, that those feral children could talk with animals and translate the communication. Those kinds of tests are strictly prohibited, but when we are looking about the cases like Victor from 18th. century are caused the feel, that somebody tried to hide something in that case.

Thoughts about the movie "Species", social problems and hybrid people.

http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/thoughts-about-movie-species-social.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about monsters or hobby the things like UFO:s, we have heard the stories of the biological experiments, where the cells of the person have been stolen. Those things have made the rumors, that some scientists have tried to connect human with other species. In the Auschwitz-concentration camp were rumors, that Dr. Mengele and other medical staff, what worked with human experiments tried to make the combination of the dogs and humans, for creating the perfect nazi-soldiers, but those things are only rumors.


Genome investigations are an extremely difficult thing because that investigation is targeting the human history, and it uncovers many things, like what is the connection with criminal behavior and growing methods, what parents are used. Here I must say that there are millions of people, who are abused and violated in the home, but many of them would not become criminals. Actually many children of alcoholists would choose absolutism in their lifestyle. But when we are thinking about alcoholists and home violence, there is one very good thing, where we can recognize that person. It is the so-called shortsighted way of life.


That way of life means, that those people would want everything right now, and that's why alcoholists and other misusers of the narcotics would not go to school and finish their studies. They would not want to wait for the graduation, and that's why those persons are making cleaner's jobs because they don't want to wait for graduation. And of course, everybody, who is not drinking or party all the time is stupid.


Drug addicts have problems to handle the situation, that somebody has different opinions than they have. And the hypothetical and abstract way of thinking is the strange thing for them. They always are "real persons", and they want just to live here and now.  Have you ever seen a movie named "Species"? It brings to my mind situation, where human being or some intelligence officers think that they have contact with aliens. That story could be more interesting and exciting with another type of timeline.


This story would be a good example of "hoax", what could be very dangerous. The original movie bases the "wow" signal, what radio astronomers got in 1977. I sometimes thought that the "wow" signal what was captured by "big ear" telescope might be "hoax" what have done on purpose, and what kind of purpose would that?   And sometimes I have thought that so-called "Alien contacts" might be something else than contacts with another civilization. In this scenario, there would be the group of scientists, what makes the awesome combination with the human and other species like reptilians.


Those scientists would send the database with USB-stick or C-cassette of their work to space for hiding their identities and then send their work to the team, what would start to operate with that thing. In this scenario, the scientist team would be separated from other operators. C-cassette would work if that thing would be absolutely dry, that there would not be the ability to icing that thing.


And then those people would make the brutal experiment. There always have been rumors, that in some military bases would try to make genetic experiments, what purpose would create superhumans for military purposes. Those experiments would be strictly against humanity and the laws. And that's why those scientists, who are working with those projects must hide their identities because that kind of things would bring troubles for those people if they are taught about this kind of experiments.


This text might be fiction, and I hope it would be. And it would not have any connection with the real life, but we have all heard the stories about "Montauk-monsters", and some scientists and investigators are suspected that there would be made some secret genome-investigations in some closed areas. You might google those things by using worlds "monsters", "mysterious sea creatures" and "Montauk monsters"  but maybe they are the things, what just ate some chemical waste, but somebody believes other things.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montauk_Monster

Maybe some civilizations have two kinds of individuals, what doesn't even look like same species.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The degeneration and focusing on increase brain capacity might cause the situation, what the mankind ever thought as possible. In this scenario, the increasing of individuals brain capacity would cause the separation of the society of those things from the real community. In this scenario, the species would take two lines for evolving themselves.


The first line could be “workers”. The individual members of the community what would have normal muscles, and what makes all works in this hypothetical society. Their mission would defend the “thinkers”, the leaders of this society. Or maybe those “thinkers” would not be leaders. They might be only the “computers” what mission would generate the products for that hypothetical society.


Another line could be “thinkers” the individuals, what might have extremely large brain capacity, but those persons might be handicapped by another way. Their muscles might be extremely weak because that maximizes the nutrition transferring to brains. If those individuals would have weak muscles, they would not need to feed muscle cells, and all available food can be used in brains.


“Thinkers” would be unable to defend themselves against physical attack, and they would need the “workers” help in any actions. When we are thinking this hypothetical society as the result of brutal genetic engineering, we must say that there are many things, what could make this kind of act of sorting very attractive way to generate the species.


I had sometimes the very dangerous vision of the space station or greenhouse, where those  “thinkers” would live. The greenhouse would first come to my mind because that allows the skin to product D-vitamin. Their skin might be sterilized because that makes them impossible to escape. And here I’m thinking about the situation, that those members of the society would be handicapped because of their weak bodies.


Their heads could be extremely heavy, and the neck would not able to hold them head up, and that would be good for information security. When I’m thinking about the secrets of the government, the persons who make strategies and equipment for the government would be advantageous to be handicapped. Those “thinkers” would need the support from “workers” or they must build robots, what serves them. Even those individuals could be extremely weak, they could operate on the surfaces of planets by using remote-controlled robots.


Landing on the planets is extremely dangerous because there might be microbes, what can be put all crew in danger. The reason for that is no species would not have an immune system, what can fight against organisms, what have different amino acids in their layer. Or maybe some humanoids might have the immune system, what would be fully controlled by their brains, but we don’t yet have contact with those civilizations. But as you see we might use our imagination for creating that hypothesis in our brains.


The handicapped individual doesn’t flee away, and they are easier to control. The problem with society is always that those individuals might step at the front of the car. And that could cause the death of those individuals. If those thinkers would sit in a wheelchair, they can be kept always in control.


But if they were locked in some space station, they would need food from the planet. And their work can be controlled by other members of the community. The space without gravity would make those persons extremely weak, and they would not able to land on the planets because the gravity would kill them. This would be a very effective way to handle information security, and it could be compiled with the methods of some security police-organizations like NKVD and Gestapo.


This method would be effective but totally unethical. And remember that this writing is only the production of images. But maybe in future, we will face the situation, where human race would be separate in two lines. Another line would live on Earth and maybe on some other planets and another would live in giant space stations. The last ones could be physically weak, and they might be different than the people, who live on planets. But this would happen in distant future.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/maybe-some-civilizations-have-two-kinds.html

The problem of the asteroid ark. "When there is nothing to do, and days are boring"

Asteroid ark by David Hardy
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I have written about “Universe 25” two times earlier, and I must say that name of this box or dystopia of the rats is very uncommon, and I believe that one of the missions of that test was test how many generations were needed, until those rats became too degenerated for accomplishing their mission. In some theories that data was collecting for some kind of spaceflight, that could be targeted to some other planet or solar system. And it shows that there would be things, what will happen when people will have nothing to do. And in the long term spaceflight would nothing to do in the spacecraft. This will cause the social problems if the population is in the wake when they are traveling in the Universe.


In the mission could be used two very slow spacecraft, what would fly to the target over 400 years or more, and in those spacecraft would generations follow together, and of course this theoretical spaceflight was out of the question. But the philosophy is the way of thinking, and in this kind of writing, I must not prove anything. So in this theoretical spaceflight, would the journey begin with two different spacecraft, where would be two different populations. When the spaceflight turns to the end, those crews would be combined.


This might be made “superrace” for the colonization of the targeted planet. I sometimes thought that this experiment would make by the MAJESTIC-12 group, and here we must say, that the results of those tests and experiments are done for many reasons. So the results of this kind of tests would use in the multiple places and targets. And I think that the world of science is so fascinating, that I must say that we have right to believe in what we want. The test of “Universe 25” was very brutal. It shows how the enemies keep the population strong, and when the enemies were gone, like in this box, the behavior what allows rats to survive in the natural environment lost. But one solution for the boring time could be "the war", where the "Cylons" would attack against the colony. This would keep them in action and sharp condition. Those "Cylons" might be like some "computer game" what creates outer enemies for the colony.


This is one reason, why so-called asteroid-arks are very problematic. If the population in some environment doesn’t face enemies, the result could be devastating, when this ark will land on some planet. Those aliens would never face any kind of attack, and they probably don’t know how to act, if something attacks, those individuals would probably know how to defend themselves. But the asteroid arks would have many more problems. The hierarchy in that colony would become very stressful for the individuals, who are down in the hierarchy. The children of the captain of the ship would be on the top of the hierarchy, and that would make possible to create absolute monarchy in this spaceship.


When somebody grows on the side of the top person of the society, this causes the behavior that will hurt other. This causes hate. And this is the problem of the societies. The individuals who are top of the hierarchy always resist the changes. They would ever be tired by the work, and they want the stable societies and everything is always fine in their opinion. The thing that wants the changes are always workers and the personnel, who are down in the social pyramid. And if the people don’t know another system, they don’t postulate the change. This is the reason for censorship. But when somebody says, that there would be another way to make things, then let one person rule all things in society.

Sources

Picture 1

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bd/9c/7e/bd9c7eb86684479cf77cc3dd7574db8c.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-problem-of-asteroid-ark-when-there.html

The Alien lifeforms in the television.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-alien-lifeforms-in-television.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-alien-lifeforms-in-television.html

Mietteitä siitä kannattaako meidän muokata perimäämme vai ei, ja vaikka vastaamme mitä hyvänsä tähän kysymykseen, niin tuloksena on ongelmia

Elokuva ”Species” tai ”Peto” on oikeastaan hyvin paljon samanlainen tieteistarina, kuin mitä esimerkiksi Carl Saganin teoksen pohjalta tehty ”Ensimmäinen yhteys” on. Mutta toisin kuin ”Ensimmäisessä yhteydessä” niin ”Pedossa” tietenkin on synkkä pohjaväre. Siinä ihmiskunta on saanut yhteyden toiseen sivilisaatioon, joka lähettää sitten meille tiedon siitä, kuinka valmistetaan keinotekoinen DNA-pätkä, mikä liitetään viruksen avulla meidän ihmisten perimään. Tuo liittäminen tapahtuisi sikiön ollessa blastulavaiheessa, jolloin virus liittyy kaikkiiin soluryhmiin, mitä ihmisen kehossa on.

Kyseisessä elokuvassa tietenkin tuo DNA-pätkä liitetään ihmiseen, ja silloin alkaa tapahtumaketju, mikä johtaa useiden ihmisten kuolemaan. Tässä vaiheessa voidaan huomauttaa, että SETI-ohjelman tutkijoilla pitäisi olla erittäin hyvät paperit, ja ei kovin lahjakas ihminen tarvitse olla kyseessä, kun hän tajuaisi, että esimerkiksi oman perimämme muuttelu sitten saa aikaan sen, että tutkijaryhmä kerjää oikeasti ongelmia. Mutta onneksi tämä "Species"-elokuva on vain mielikuvituksen tuotetta, eikä sillä toivon mukaan ole mitään tekemistä todellisuuden kanssa. Eli tämä kirjoitelma on vain pohdintaa siitä, mitä vastuuton geeneillä leikkiminen voisi saada aikaan.

Kun mietitään tuon kokeen realistisuutta, niin silloin kyllä itselleni tulee mieleen sellainen kysymys, että kuka tiedemies oikeasti ryhtyisi tutkimaan jonkun DNA-pätkän toimintaa liittämällä se planeettamme vaarallisimpaan sekä älykkäimpään lajiin. Varsinkaan kun tuo humanoidi ei hänelle varmaan ole kuitenkaan kertonut täsmällisesti sitä, mitä tuo DNA-pätkä sitten tekee oliossa, mihin se on siirretty. Tuossa elokuvassa tietenkin vilisee hallituksen agentteja sekä muita vastaavia henkilöitä, ja sitten eräänä päivänä koe päätetään lopettaa.

Tuolloin hallituksen agentit määräävät koekaniinina käytetyn olion tuhottavaksi, jonka jälkeen elokuva muuttuu varsin mielenkiintoiseksi, koska nuo agentit tietenkin käyttävät olion tuhoamiseen kaasua. Kun mietitään tuota tappovälinettä, niin silloin kyllä varmasti alkaa jokainen ihminen hiukan hymyillä, koska tuo määräyksen antaja ei varmasti ole koskaan ajatellut, että tuo olio voisi olla immuuni esimerkiksi hermokaasuille tai syanidille.

Monet ihmiset eivät varmaan ole koskaan miettineet sitä, että esimerkiksi Kobrat sekä merikäärmeet kehittävät oikeastaan samaa myrkkyä, mikä on hermokaasun vaikuttava ainesosa. Sen takia on eläimiä, joihin ei tuo botoksiini-niminen hermomyrkky vaikuta ollenkaan. Ja silloin ei tietenkään myöskään esimerkiksi VX- tapa noita olioita. Kun taas puhutaan syanobakteereista, niin niiden tiedetään olevan immuuneja esimerkiksi syanidille. Syanidi vaikuttaa ihmiseen siten, että se estää solujen hapen saannin, jolloin uhri kuolee erittäin nopeasti. Kuitenkin jos puhutaan siitä, että joku oikeasti tekisi tällaisia kokeita, missä ihmisalkioon siirretään täysin outoja DNA-paloja, niin uskoisin, että he eivät tätä koetta mitekään erityisen kevyin mielin tekisivät.

En usko että tuota DNA-pätkää muutenkaan lähdettäisiin tuottamaan missään laboratoriossa, koska itseasiassa kaikki maailman DNA-pätkät ovat viruksia. Jos ihmisen tai minkään muun eliön perimää lähdetään muuttelemaan tieteen nimissä, niin tuloksena voi olla olento, joka käyttäytyy hieman eri tavalla, kuin mitä on totuttu näkemään, ja vaikka tuossa elokuvassa tietenkin kyse on kauhuolennosta, niin kuitenkin voidaan sanoa niin, että ihmisen toiminta varmaan edesauttaisi tällaisen hyvin ikävän tilanteen syntymistä. Näet uskoisin itse että jokaisella lajilla on tietenkin myös jonkinlainen itsesuojeluvaisto, mikä sitten varmasti ilmenee vihan tunteena noita ihmisiä kohtaan, jotka ovat sitä halunneet vahingoittaa. Tällä tarkoitan sitä, että tuo ihmisen luoma olio varmasti käyttäytyy sen jälkeen vihamielisesti meitä kohtaan, ja tietenkin pelko ilmenee myös luonnossa aggressiona.

Esimerkiksi käärme voi iskeä isompaa eläintä peloissaan, vaikka se ei tätä muuten söisikään, ja se johtuu siitä, että tuo eläin pelkää toisen vahingoittavan sitä. Vaikka miten haluaisimme olla luomakunnan herroja, niin silloin tietenkin pitää silti muistaa sellainen asia, että mikään eläin ei tuolla luonnossa ole sitä varten, että muut söisivät sen. Toki joillakin eläimillä on sellainen tapa, että niiden toukat voivat käyttää niiden ruumista ravintonaan tai koiras syödään perittelun päätteeksi, jotta rukoilijasirkkanaaras saa tarvitsemaansa proteiinia munintaa varten. Tai jotkut etanat sitten antavat jonkun lokin syödä itsensä, ja niitä ympäröivä limakerros sitten suojaa tuota pientä eläintä lokin vatsahapoilta.

Ja sitten tuo etana matkustaa ikään kuin vapaamatkustajana tuon lokin sisällä, ja jos se sitten haluaa pois, niin tietenkin botoksiini tai joku maksamyrkky varmasti saavat tuon lokin laskeutumaan Mutta varsinaisesti mikään eläin ei tarjoile itseään puhtaasti ravinnoksi toisille eläimille. Kun puhutaan tuon elokuvan juonesta, niin tietenkin tuo olio tappaa ihmisiä, mutta toki tuossa toiminnassa on paljon itse aiheutettua väkivaltaa. Jos taas tuollaista elokuvaa ajatellaan puhtaasti tieteelliseltä kannalta, niin niiden esittelemä tiedemiestyyppi on erittäin lapsellinen tai huonosti koulutettu, koska mitään perimän muuttamisia ei pidä lähteä tekemään, jos ei olla varmoja siitä, mitä tuollainen DNA-pätkä sitten tekee ihmisen tai jonkun muun lajin käytökselle.

On olemassa esimerkiksi kasvissyöjiä, jokta purevat suuttuessaan, vaikka eivät pureman kohdetta muuten söisikään. Yksi näistä on rotta, joka nurkkaan ahdettuna hyökkää vaikka karhun päälle, vaikka ei tätä muuten ravinnokseen käytä. Mutta kuonon päähän tuleva purema ei varmaan kontiosta mukavalta tunnu. Kuitenkin voidaan tehdä kauhuelokuva sellaisesta tilanteesta, missä joku tiedemies jalostaa geeniterapian avulla lihaa syövän rotan.

Eli hän liittää näädän hampaiden sekä käytöksen määräävän geenin rottiin, ja käy niiden avulla rottasotaan. Siinä voi sitten jollekin tulla itku, kun tuollainen supersosiaalinen näätälauma lähtee liikkeelle. Tällainen käsikirjoitus voidaan tietenkin julkaista myös esimerkiksi ”Like”-kustantamon toimesta. Siinä sitten nälkäinen rottalauma muuttaisi kaupungin maanpäälliseksi helvetiksi, jossa olo on kuin teurastamolla. Tuossa elokuvassa esitellään muuten geenimanipulaation avulla luotu superhiiva, joka syö pari tutkijaa laboratoriossa.

Muuntolajisten eliöiden luominen on vaarallista, koska niitä usein hyljeksitään luonnossa. Se tietenkin vahvistaa epäsosiaalista käytöstä, ja kun puhutaan tilanteesta, missä joku geeni saa aikaan sen, että esimerkiksi kasvissyöjä hyökkää jonkun muun eläimen kimppuun, niin silloin tietenkin unohdetaan se, mitä tuo sama geeni tekee esimerkiksi ihmisen kaltaisessa lihansyöjässä. Kasvissyöjä ei käytä puremaansa muuta kuin itsepuolustustilanteessa, mutta lihansyöjä metsästää hampaillaan, joten tuollainen geeni voi saada aikaan sellaisen asian, että lihansyöjästä tulee väkivaltaisempi.

Kuitenkin ihminen on planeettamme kehittynein sekä väkivaltaisin laji, joka sitten varmasti osaa itseään puolustaa. Vaikka tällainen ihmisen perimän muuttaminen on tietenkin moraalisesti väärin, niin tietenkin esimerkiksi Pentagon varmasti on kiinnostunut sotilaasta, joka on immuuni hermokaasuja vastaan sekä vahvempi ja nopeampi sekä älykkäämpi ja ryhmätyökykyisempi kuin muut maailman sotilaat ovat.

Sen takia puhutaan siitä, että USA:n ja venäjän asevoimilla on laajoja geneettistä perimää koskevia tutkimuksia, joiden avulla pyritään luomaan täydellisiä sotilaita, joiden avulla nuo laitokset sitten pyrkivät luomaan ideaalisia sotilaita, joilla ei olisi vaikeuksia totella saamiaan käskyjä. Esimerkiksi MONTAUK-ohjelmassa epäillään testatun ihmisen geneettisen perimän muuttelua, niin että saadaan aikaan tehokkaaseen sekä kurinalaiseen ryhmätoimintaan kykenevä olento, joka pystyy sitten myös itsenäisesti hoitamaan saamansa tehtävät kuten ne halutaan hoidettavan.

kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi