Fermilab scientists are close to finding the fifth force.

  Fermilab scientists are close to finding the fifth force.

There is a possibility that the fifth force is separated from all known fundamental interactions. But there is another model that also makes sense. In that model, the fifth force is the combination of four fundamental interactions. The model is conducted from a model where the researchers can connect things like electromagnetism and weak nuclear forces to electro-weak forces.

The idea of that model is that all fundamental interactions have the same source. That thing can be a hypothetical graviton, which transmits energy to gluons. Then gluons transmit energy to quarks, and quarks share that energy with quark groups which are protons and neutrons. Then those quark groups send wave molecules into electron orbitals.

So when an energy impulse travels through a bigger particle, like when a gluon sends an energy impulse to a quark, that bigger particle transforms the wavelength of that wave movement. That means the hypothetical graviton would be before the gluon. The graviton would be an extremely small, high-energy object that sends wave movements with a very high frequency. And because the wavelength of the gravity waves is so short and the height of those waves is so low, those waves are hard to detect.

In some models, there are superstrings between those gravitational waves. Those strings are pushing those waves away from each other. It is also possible that there is no space for other wavelengths between those gravitational waves.

Expansion of the universe. 

Standard model of particle physics. 

That means there is probably an electromagnetic vacuum or low pressure between those waves. And those small vacuum areas are what cause the pulling effect of gravitation. The radiation that travels to gravitational centers just pulls objects with it.

So if it is possible to create an energy level that is high enough that it can connect all fundamental forces into one string, that string has such a high energy level that it pushes all other quantum fields away from it.

The idea of the fifth force is simple. There is an idea that the base of all four fundamental forces is one force that splits into gravity, strong and weak nuclear forces, and electromagnetism. All known fundamental forces are wave movements. The transmitter particle called the boson, sends wave motion, which means every fundamental force has its wavelength and frequency.

So the transmitter particle's size determines the wavelength of the fundamental interaction. And because gravitation is an interaction, that means it also has the transmitter particle, the hypothetical graviton. The idea of the fifth force is that theoretically, it is possible to lens all four known interactions into one point.

And that thing should push all wave motions into one entirety. But pushing all wave moments or fundamental interactions into one entirety requires lots of energy. That energy level existed somewhere before quark-gluon plasma formed. So if there is so much energy that it can form the entirety of the fundamental interactions that form "lightning" or the superstring, where all fundamental interactions are the entirety, and the energy level of that entirety is so high that it sweeps all other quantum fields away from it, then the superstring that forms the fifth force, which is the entirety of all known forces, makes a hole in spacetime.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66407099

https://www.space.com/standard-model-physics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

Could graviton be like a bag, that surrounds objects?

Could graviton be the field outside the particle?

There is the possibility that gravitation is the quantum field outside or around the particle. The idea of this model is that all particles have a similar radiation pike with black holes. And that radiation pike pulls quantum field or quantum strings to the poles of the particle. 

Those quantum strings behave like Archimedean screws or buckets in belt pumps and aim the quantum fields to the poles of the particle. That causes the quantum low-pressure that pulls quantum fields to the particle. 

That means if this thing is true the radiation pike at the pole of the particle is the repelling or pushing component. And the other quantum fields are pulling components. That means the pushing component's diameter is so far smaller than the pulling component.  

The gravitation is special because it will not increase the object's temperature. But it can turn into kinetic energy. Or increase the kinetic energy of the particle. And it affects all objects, including photons same way. 

The thing that makes gravitation interesting is that things like gravitational slings that crafts like Voyager probes show that the gravitation can load energy to particles and objects. But the problem is what kind of energy is transferred to that object when it passes the planet with a hyperbolic trajectory. We all know that energy cannot be lost. It can just change its form. 

So what is the form of energy that turns to kinetic energy during gravitational slinging? Of course, we can say, that gravitation energy is the thing that increases the energy of things like voyager probes. But is that gravitation energy some kind of wave motion or superstrings that increase the object's kinetic energy without warming that thing? The thing is that gravitational sling bases the centripetal force. But what type of thing causes that effect? 

When we think about the universe. It's full of quantum fields. Those quantum fields are like fog. Droplets of that fog are atoms, molecules, and wave motion. When the object travels in that fog its speed determines how many droplets hit it in the time unit. When an object hits those things load energy on them. And around the gravitational centers is more droplets than in another environment. 

The gravitation itself is wave motion. And the source of that wave motion is the predicted hypothetical graviton. 

But the location of the graviton is a mystery. The graviton could exist in the middle of particles that have a mass. It can be between the superstrings that are forming the elementary particles. So the graviton would be an extremely small particle. 

Or it can be outside the atom and every particle. The idea of this model is that graviton is like a bag that surrounds atoms and subatomic particles. The idea is that every single particle has a jet that comes out from it. The jet is similar to a black hole's jet and gamma-ray pike. But in regular material that pike is weaker. 

When the radiation or wave-motion pike takes energy out from the "bag" around the particle the wave motion that forms the quantum field around atoms and subatomic particles travel to that pike. The wave motion will pull other wave motion to that particle. If we are thinking that wave motion travels to the poles of the particle it acts like a bucket in a belt pump and pumps also wave motion from around the particle to its poles. That thing explains why gravitation is so different force than other fundamental interactions.  

A small piece of writing about the Higgs boson and its strange qualities

 

 

 

Is the spin of the Higgs boson equal to zero really or virtually? 

When particle accelerators are uncovering the Higgs' boson. They don't create it. They are releasing it by removing wave movement from around that boson. 

There is the possibility that Higgs's spin of Higgs's boson is virtually equal to zero. One version of that idea is that the Higgs's boson is in the extremely large quantum field. 

That means that the quantum field just slides over the other quantum fields. Or the spin of that particle is so high that we cannot recognize the changes in the wave movement. 

Theoretically, particles are like yarn balls. The particle is wave movement, turned to a ball-shaped form. There is "hair" on that particle. And when that "hair" is touching the outside quantum field it would slow its spin. During that moment the particle sends wave movement. 

If there is no hair on that particle it would not be slowing. And that means it would not send wave movement or the wave movement is straight or monotonic like some "OOOO". So we cannot detect that wave movement because it's monotonic. Changes in the particle's spin speed are the thing that causes the wave movement that sends wave movement and turns the particle detectable. 

Another version is that the particle's spin is extremely high that its hair makes the electromagnetic vacuum around it. That thing causes the phenomenon, where the particle has two quantum fields. The outer and inner quantum fields. 

If the quantum field is too large, the wave movement from the inner quantum field disappears. Or the observers cannot separate it from the shaking or waving of the larger quantum field.  If the quantum field of the small particle is too large it collapses. Because the energy from outside pushes it to a smaller size. 

Why Higgs' boson is so dangerous?

Higgs' boson is the only known scalar boson. The spin of those bosons equals zero. That means there is no side-moving wave movement. And that means the Higgs' boson is extremely hard to see. There is the possibility that Higgs' boson involves in all other particles. So if some kind of energy load is coming through the Higgs' boson that causes the phenomenon where the energy load that comes from Higgs' boson is ripping all other Higgs' bosons into pieces. 

That thing will erase all material from the space. The term scalar boson means that they are like the nucleus of all (or almost all) other elementary particles. And the other particles are the superstring, wave movement (or information) that is accumulated at the surface of those bosons. And the hypothetical graviton particle is the tensor inside Higgs' boson. 

But there is another possibility that can explain the strange behavior of the Higgs' boson. The spin of the particle can equal virtually zero. That thing means that the particle is smooth, as I wrote many times. The idea of the virtually zero spin means that there is no interaction or changes in the energy level of the quantum field that surrounds the Higgs' boson. 

The term "spin" doesn't only mean that the particle is rotating. That term can also mean the interaction between the particle and quantum fields around it. If there is hair on the particle, that hair causes changes in the quantum field around the particle. If the spin of the particle is very high we cannot detect the changes in energy level in the quantum field of the particle. 

Or actually, the hair must be high enough that it can come out from the particle's quantum field. The hair of the particles is sending radiation to the particle's quantum bubble. And that causes interaction between the outside quantum field. The thunder that makes it possible to see particles are coming from the particle's quantum field and outside quantum field interaction. 

So if the hair of the particle is inside the particle's quantum field its quantum field is smooth. That means the interaction between particles and outside quantum fields is like interaction with smooth surfaces. So the interaction is silent. If the Higgs' boson is released from other elementary particles. It hovers in the extremely large quantum field. That quantum field makes it impossible that the hair of the particle cannot reach the edge of its quantum field. 

And if the only thing that sends some kind of wave movement or chancing wave moment is only the nucleus of that Higgs' boson. That thing means that this radiation resonates only with other Higgs's bosons or the interaction happens only between other nucleuses Higgs' bosons. But that interaction requires that the Higgs' boson is released from its core. And it would very fast collect superstrings around it and form the new particle. So, that means Higgs' boson is in all other particles but only the highest energy levels can release it by removing superstrings around it. 

See also:

Higgs boson

Scalar boson

Standard model of physics

Could the standard model of physics crack?

In the image above the hypothetical graviton is connected to the Standard model. It forms the new group of bosons. And that group is tensor bosons. The scalable bosons are proven when the Higgs boson is found. But we know that there might be many unknown particles. 

And in some visions, the graviton is a particle that orbits other elementary particles. The graviton would be the particle form of the gravitational waves. And it forms because of the wave-particle duality of the gravitational waves. 

So what is the direction of the gravitation? 

If we think that the gravitation is like a light that has the particle and wave movement form we might understand the direction of the gravitation. 

When the wave-form gravitation hits the graviton. That is the particle form of gravitation. That causes scattering in the wave-form gravitation. 

That scattering makes the electromagnetic or quantum shadow between that graviton and particle. And then that thing would just pull the quantum field of the particle that could be quark or any other particle. That movement moves the quarks to that quantum low-pressure area. And because the graviton moves the quarks that thing moves atoms. 

The graviton could be the orbiter of quarks and electrons. (Or maybe it orbits all elementary particles). 

There is the possibility that the graviton orbits other elementary particles. If that thing is true. The companion particle that orbits other elementary particles could explain the Muon G-2 anomaly in Brookhaven and Fermilab. It can also explain why W-boson is 0,1 times heavier than it should be. If we think that all elementary particles have an orbiter. That thing causes an anomaly in the trajectory of high-speed electrons and muons. 

If we are thinking that the small particle is orbiting electrons and other elementary particles we can understand why mysterious gravitons are hard to detect. So graviton would be a similar elementary particle with electrons and quarks. The origin of the graviton would be in the wave-particle duality in the gravitational waves. 

And if we think that graviton is the companion particle that orbits quarks and electrons. That thing means that when gravitational-wave impact those particles. They are starting to stretch the quantum field of the particles. That thing makes the quarks move in a certain direction. If the graviton is the companion particle with almost all of the elementary particles. That explains why its effect is neutral. 

Also, the electron's ability to send the photon or light quantum while it is changing its direction. Can be explained by the companion particle. The quantum field of the fast-moving electron turns strong. And then the particle that follows the electron would act like a car trailer when the car moves at high speed on a curved road. The particle that follows the electron touches the quantum field of the fast-moving object and then it sends the light quantum when the energy level of that particle turns too high. 

The graviton could be the "dark photon". 

That thing means that it probably cannot move electrons. But it can move the quarks inside protons and neutrons. So the graviton might have a similar shape to photons. It might have wave- and particle forms. 

If the speed of the particle raises near the speed of light. That causes an electromagnetic vacuum behind it. And that hypothetical but predicted particle would follow the particle. During the collimation of electrons and positrons, the small particle is extremely hard to detect because the impact causes energy and particle cloud where that extremely small-mass particle is hard to separate.

The case that some particle is following the electron or some other elementary particle in the particle accelerator could explain, why electrons are stretching when they are traveling in that magnetic trajectory. The following particles along with electromagnetic or quantum vacuum make it possible that the quantum field of the electron and other elementary particles is starting to stretch backward. 

What is the origin of dark matter? Is it graviton?

This thing is an endless question. Dark matter is the gravitational effect that is dominating the universe. Sometimes researchers are thinking that dark matter is the source of dark energy. But let's talk a little bit about the origin of dark matter and how its source could be gravitation itself. The fact is that. We almost know that gravitation is wave movement. Or at least gravitational waves exist. So the particle-wave duality is possible in gravitational waves just like it's possible in photons and quarks. 

And that means that gravitational waves can turn into a particle called the graviton. So why graviton is so hard to detect? There is the possibility that graviton is orbiting some elementary particles like electrons and quarks. Or it can orbit each of the elementary particles. The companion particles of the elementary particles can explain the Muon G-2 anomaly in Fermilab and Brookhaven. 

https://www.livescience.com/heavy-w-boson-measurement-cracking-standard-model

https://www.quantamagazine.org/fermilab-says-particle-is-heavy-enough-to-break-the-standard-model-20220407/

https://www.space.com/dark-matter-origin-gravity-theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

Why connecting quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity is so difficult?

Is there some particle that is orbiting electrons missing? Do electrons have an orbiting particle? Or why we cannot connect the theory of relativity to quantum mechanics?

When we are trying to connect the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, we are facing some problems. There seems something that is missing in the atoms. Is there some unknown force that is causing the thin that the theory of relativity is not able to connect with quantum mechanics? Or is there something that causes the effect that the quantum mechanics differs from the theory of relativity? 

The thing that makes building the completed model of the universe so difficult is that the gravitation seems to affect oppositely than other forces or interactions. When other forces or interactions are pushing things away from each other. 

Gravitation acts another way. Gravitation is making the objects fall unlike things like electromagnetism which has a push and pull effect. The gravitation has only a one-way effect. 

Could the sub-electron, or the particle that orbits electrons possible? We don't know if there are some sub-structures in the atom that we don't know. 

But when an electron changes its trajectory it releases a photon. So could the source of that photon some, yet unknown particle that orbits the electron. 

That photon is the particle form, not wave movement. And that thing causes an interesting question. Is it possible that the electron has the companion particle? The extremely small-sized particle that is orbiting electrons could be possible. 

The electrons have an extremely small size. And that hypothetical sub-electron would have more extremely smaller size and mass. If that particle will exist. It would be the most revolutionary thing in the history of physics. 

The wormhole inside the laser ray can be a suitable tool for making quantum computers. 

There is one way to make the wormhole or the channel that removes the quantum fields from the limited range. The idea is that if inside the laser ray will put the particle is put the practice that thing forms a shadow or otherways saying, short-range synthetic wormhole. The electromagnetic wave movement will close the particle in it. 

And also the particle denies that the laser ray cannot travel through it. That thing forms the channel where is no wave movement, because laser rays will protect it against the outcoming effects. And that thing makes it possible to make the superposition between two photons inside that channel. 

That kind of thing can make also it possible that the exhaust gases of the futuristic spacecraft can travel faster than the speed of light. 

That thing can be the system where an electron will be put in the laser ray. When a laser ray covers the electron there is a shadow where are no quantum fields at that point. That allows the photon can travels faster than it travels outside that channel. 

If the particle is used to make a shadow has a larger size than the electron. That thing makes it possible that the electron can reach the same speed as the photon. Because there is no quantum field in that shadow that is slowing the speed of electrons. And that thing makes the new type of rocket engines possible. 

Fundamental interactions

Quantum mechanics

The standard model of physics

Theory of relativity

Wormholes

Does the dark matter has a particle form at all?

Dark matter means the mystery gravitational effect. The thing that forms this effect can be the material. Which elementary particles have a different size than the elementary particles of visible material have. 

That thing means that the wave movement that those particles are sending has the wavelength that makes it invisible. Another version of dark matter is that thing has no particle form at all. That means dark matter is the wave movement called dark energy. 

Image 2 is the neutron. The gluons jump between quarks. Neutron is formed of two down quarks and one up quarks and gluons. The image could portray a proton. Because it has a similar internal structure with a neutron. But the proton is formed by one down quark and two up quarks and gluons. 

The wavelength that those quantum tornadoes or rotating quantum channels are sending. Would be different than other particles sending. That thing makes the wave movement invisible. And maybe axions are hiding in those quantum tunnels. There is the possibility that there is a quantum vacuum in those tunnels. And that means outcoming energy pushes those quarks to one entirety. 

Image 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

The mass of hypothetical axion-particles could tell the form of the dark matter. The thing is that the cosmology is that the dark energy is one of the mysteries that can solve another mystery. The mysteries of the dark universe is the thing that can solve where the material came from. 

The name axion of that theoretical particle is coming to an idea that the form of that thing could be elongated. Theories are telling that material is formed in wave-particle duality. That was caused by the mysterious event called  Big Bang. The question about the Big Bang is interesting. Was that thing released only energy that impacted with wave movement that already exists? And that impact caused the wave-particle duality that formed the visible universe. 

The thing is that dark matter is the mysterious gravitational effect. That means that there is the possibility that dark matter has not necessarily have a particular form. The dark energy or a dark wave movement that affects some extremely small particles can cause mysterious gravitational effects. That wave movement can affect the gluons and make them heavier or put them to a higher energy level than they should. 

The form of Dark matter is interesting. And maybe quite soon the researchers can answer two questions.

1) Is dark matter similar material with the visible material? That means the dark matter could turn to wave movement and otherwise. But if dark energy is the same thing as dark matter. That means the dark energy could create the gravitational effect. 

So that means the dark matter would not necessarily have the particle form. The dark wave movement that affects the gluons or some superstrings could cause the mysterious gravitational effect called "dark matter". 

2) And can the dark matter form atoms or molecules? Like visible material? The galaxies where is no dark matter is an interesting detail. 

That tells that dark matter can form the structures like visible material. But are those dark matter structures some kind of clouds of nebulas formed of dark matter? Or is there some kind of more complicated structures that are formed of dark matter? 

The weakness in the Big Bang theory is that it doesn't answer where the thing that exploded came from? 

The Big Bang theory is always the solution for the origin of the material. But where did the material or wave movement  Big Bang released come from? The moment of the Big Bang is point zero in the universe's history. But what happened in the point minus one (-1)? 

There was something that released the material to the universe. Or is it so? If we think that dark matter is the dominating form of material. There is a possibility that the crossing wave movement turned the dark matter into visible material. 

So if the dark matter is similar material with the visible material. The answer for the Big Bang can cause because of the wave-particle duality. But getting acceptance of this theory dark matter should have a similar particle form with the visible material. 

There is the possibility that the wave-particle duality forms when the quantum fields of the particles will touch each other. That thing can cause quantum friction or quantum spark. That thing will turn the quantum field or the superstring that forms that quantum field turns to a roll or yarn ball-shaped structure.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

The new sensors try to find differences between the Theory of General Relativity and the Standard model.

"Illustration of two orbiting black holes warping spacetime and generating gravitational waves". (ScitechDaily/Gravitational Waves: LISA and the Detection of New Fundamental Fields – Is General Relativity Correct?)

The Theory of General Relativity is one of the most brilliant theories in the world. The Standard Model is the first theory that is made by using computers. And that thing means that they both are fundamental and powerful tools for researchers. The thing is that the gravitational waves give a new way to detect things like Dark Matter. The gravitational waves can uncover many things from the universe that we cannot observe. 

There is suspicion that gravitational waves are the energy waves that travel between particles of dark matter. So when energy impacts dark matter particles that increases their weight. And that thing could be seen as gravitational waves.

The gravitational waves are the mysterious energy waves that are traveling in the universe. The thing is that the gravitational waves can be the energy waves that are traveling between particles of dark matter. When radiation hits the particles of dark matter that radiation turns it heavier. So the radiation has a similar effect to visible and dark matter. 

It will increase its weight. And maybe that kind of radiation is the key to dark matter and gravitational waves. The thing is that gravitation is the only known common interaction between visible and dark matter. And that means the dark matter would be similar material with visible material. 

The dark matter would transmit radiation that has a wavelength that is the same as the diameter of the particle that sends it. The thing is that the proof that all galaxies don't have dark matter has caused an observation that dark matter forms similar clouds and maybe other structures as visible material. When we are thinking about dark matter. 

That thing is only invisible material. But if we would think otherwise and there would be an observer that is a form of dark matter. That observer cannot see us either. Dark matter is a mysterious state of the material. In some theories, dark matter is only the certain energy state of the material. 

And there is an interesting theory that the Big Bang just transformed some part of dark matter into material that we see. The size of particles of dark matter would be different than visible material. And that thing means that dark matter would not be observable because it transmits radiation that is invisible to us. In some wild theories, dark matter could form even stars. And solar systems. 

Those structures would interact with visible material only by gravitation interaction. Maybe gravitational waves can prove that kind of structure real. If researchers could find the gravitational field that comes from the emptiness. That thing can be the first evidence of the invisible universe. That is similar to our universe. But we cannot see that universe because it is formed of dark matter. 

https://scitechdaily.com/gravitational-waves-lisa-and-the-detection-of-new-fundamental-fields-is-general-relativity-correct/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

Image:)https://scitechdaily.com/gravitational-waves-lisa-and-the-detection-of-new-fundamental-fields-is-general-relativity-correct/

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Beyond the standard model and curving spacetime

 Beyond the standard model and curving spacetime 

Image 1:

The splitting photon along with the Muon G-2 anomaly caused a situation. Re-estimation of the entire standard model of particle physics is needed. The question is that what if the photon is not an elementary particle? The photon or every other elementary particle can be superpositioned. But they cannot split in two. What if the photon is some kind of meson? And that thing causes another thought. What if there are some other particles like quarks that involve other particles. 

The thing is that we should look for the particles that are connecting the photons. Like gluons are connecting quarks. So is the particle that makes photon stay in one piece some very small and very energetic particle that looks like gluon. The splitting photons are giving a tip that the Majorana-particle exists. 

But could that mysterious "Majorana Particle" or "Majorana fermion" actually be a hadronic boson? Could it be possible that some Fermions are bosons? 

And could that "Majorana Boson" be the graviton. Graviton is the hypothetical transportation particle that transports gravitation. So if the graviton is the thing that keeps the photon together. It should be a very small, and at the same time high energetic particle. 

The thing that photons are splitting means they cannot be elementary particles. The elementary particles are not splitting. The term elementary particle means that there are no other particles in it. But if even a photon is not an elementary particle. That means that there might be some other particles that are just believed to be elementary particles. But they involve something smaller particles. 

So could there be other yet unknown particles inside quarks and even gluons? Or is it possible that we don't know any real elementary particles? There is predicted an exotic six-quark particle by using supercomputers. But is it possible that there are super protons or super neutrons where are seven or more quarks? But are there sub-structures also in the quarks? understanding the interactions of particles and gravitation are required for making TOE(Theory of Everything). 

Image 2: 

x-x-x-x-x--x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

Is gravitation some kind of superposition?

The main question about gravitation is could the graviton exist? And the second thing is is it pulling or pushing force? And one of the questions is: could the gravitation be some kind of superposition effect. The idea is that the hypothetical gravitons are forming the strings between each other. And those strings are pulling or pushing the gravitons to each other. That graviton-connected string starts travel from the higher energetic object to the lower energetic object. 

Then those strings which are are wave-movement or energy start to pull those gravitons together. So the gravitation would be the wave movement that travels from the higher energetic area to the lower energetic area. Like all other forms of energy. The question is: does the gravitation travel the opposite way against the flow of those hypothetical gravitational strings. 

x-x-x-x-x--x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

Image 3: 

Curvature of spacetime

Measurements of the curving spacetime are the thing that is used to confirm Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. There have not been found errors. And that is the evidence of the extraordinary well-documented theory. The Theory of Special Relativity is the thing that can use in a straight universe. But the Theory of General Relativity is suitable for curving spacetime. 

When we are thinking about the curvature of spacetime in the 3D environment we must realize the thing that the curving spacetime is curving all around the object. So the rubber levels and iron balls are not helping us in modeling that phenomenon. 

When we are thinking that curving space around the massive object has the ball form. We should think that space is getting shorter in that area. The thing is that modeling the curvature in a 3D environment is very difficult. So when the object is curving spacetime we should think that there is a ball-looking pit in the spacetime. So the curvature of spacetime around the 3D object is more like a tunnel than the pit.

The Brane theory is one of the things that can model the curving spacetime in a 3D environment. The branes or layers are surrounding the gravitational center at a 360 degrees angle. And those layers are also surrounding the central object of gravitation from all directions. That theory is created for modeling the gravitation effect. But the problem is that researchers can just model the gravitational interaction between one layer and the gravitational center. 

The problem is that there might be one common gravitational center in the area. But there are also sub-centers. As an example, Sagittarius A is the gravitational center of the Milky Way but the local gravitational center in our solar system is the Sun. And if we increase accuracy the Earth is the gravitational center for the moon etc. 

The problem is that the gravitational center is not only a black hole or some other most massive object in the area. Every single object is turning gravitational center if we are using high-enough resolution. If we are using high enough accuracy.

Even a single electron is turning to a gravitational center if the zoom is high enough. And the gravitation is interaction. That means there is no straight universe at all. If we use high-enough resolution. And at that point, I must say that every gravitational center is acting the same way. But the pit that the gravitation is making is always depending on how powerful gravitation is. The black holes are extreme objects, but also other objects are curving spacetime. 

The gravitational interaction curves spacetime also around other objects than just the gravitational center. 

Above is the image of the curvature spacetime. There are three objects the Sun, the moon, and Earth. The gravitation of the Sun pulls Earth to the Sun. But the centripetal force keeps it at the trajectory. And then the moon is also pushing energy to the Earth. 

When the moon is orbiting the Earth. The direction of its gravitation effect changes. When the Moon is at the side of the Sun it pulls Earth stronger than when it's at another side. Also, the side-movement is chancing the energy transportation. 

And then that thing is pumping energy to the Earth. But the thing that makes energy transportation and modeling difficult is that gravitation and energy transportation is interaction. This means that energy travels also from Earth to the Moon. 

Also, things like gravitational waves are the thing that transmits energy. Maybe gravitational waves have no big effect in large systems. But they can affect microgravitational systems. And if the gravitational waves affect billions of years. They might cause some even large-scale effects.

Sources:

https://muon-g-2.fnal.gov/

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2301876-photons-could-be-split-in-two-to-create-a-weird-new-form-of-light/

https://phys.org/news/2021-12-exotic-six-quark-particle-supercomputers.html

https://scitechdaily.com/split-photons-new-research-predicts-the-existence-of-a-previously-unimaginable-particle/

https://www.techexplorist.com/new-groundbreaking-technique-reveals-new-details-long-theorized-fifth-force-nature/41165/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curved_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majorana_fermion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particle

https://www.zmescience.com/science/physicists-claim-that-a-photon-can-be-split-into-halves/

Image 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

Image 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

Image 3: https://forum.babylonjs.com/t/general-relativity-simulation-of-spacetime-curvature-due-to-mass/10731