https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/
Kimmo Huosionmaa
There are always persons, who are telling about discussions with political leaders, and those discussions are sometimes very interesting. That person who tells interesting things is probably the director of some big company, but in this text, I use the politician as an example, what could happen if there is no evidence about some things, what are mentioned in the articles. And when we are talking about political leadership and the support from the politician, we must first realize, that the conclusion of the support would be made the politician self.
The first thing, what journalist must remember, is that the politician is responsible to his own electors. This is the reason, why they are not trying to please journalists. But when some journalist claims something, must this person realize, that if there is no evidence about the discussion, would that politician claim something else after the meeting. Political memory is very good, but it's selective, and if there is no so-called hard evidence about the meetings, will everything that is told about the discussions be claiming.
And this is why the words, what the politician says must not put to the newspapers. The question about this is that there are two sides in those meetings. And the opponent is responsible to voters. That means that if the journalist is writing something in the newspaper, the question is "who actually says that"? If there are no films about this kind of things, would the opponent claim, that other persons will be invented all story.
In the history of newspapers is always mentioned, that some business boss or politician is said something stupid. In those cases, the key elements are, is that person told truth to that politician? And the second one is, of course, are those words, what are printed in the newspaper actually said by those politicians, or are they invented by the journalist, who is writing about the article. If there is no evidence about it, would those words be only claiming, and in the worst case, that can bring prosecutions against that writer. The witnesses are not so-called "hard evidence". They can forget what is discussed about the thing, what is written in the newspaper, and also they would not probably hear the words, what are used.
Showing posts with label journalist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label journalist. Show all posts
Friday, August 10, 2018
Saturday, October 21, 2017
Journalist behind leak of Panama Papers have been killed
 |
| Who killed journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia? |
Kimmo Huosionmaa
Do you know, why some people still believe in the Nazi gold? The reason is that two journalists who investigated that rumor were killed by shooting them to head. Without those shoots that “Nazi gold" would be a myth. But after those shootings everybody knew a story of hidden gold, what was the sunk bottom of one lake in somewhere in Germany. Those shootings made that gold very popular.
Murders and other serious crimes make things public. They always fill the front pages of newspapers and other media. Reporters publish their information because they think that will protect them from the violence. And if a reporter who writes stories about Mafia, will be killed in purpose all investigators will check those texts to find a connection between mafia and that case.
Do you know what makes John F. Kennedy’s assassination so popular when people are talking about conspiracies? The shoot of suspect Lee Harvey Oswald gave wings to those theorists, and reason, why Oswald was under arrest, was first killing a police officer. He shot one police to death in one movie theatre and after that police found Mannlicher Carcano rifle in Oswald’s house. That connected him with the murder of JFK. But the last thing was the murder of Oswald in the front of TV cameras and mess was ready.
Before that people believed in one lunatic, but why that lunatic was shot by Jack Ruby, who was not a very patriotic person? Somebody thinks that Oswald was worked for Ruby in some cases, where the clients forgot to pay loans back to Ruby, and he was afraid that Oswald will speak to Police about what might be happened to some of those girls who worked for Ruby. Somebody else believes that Oswald was killed because he could connect president's murder to Sam Giancana and Mafia. And in both theories, Oswald is a murderer. At least shoot of that police officer in a movie theatre. But without shooting of Oswald, there will be not a conspiracy theory about that case.
But without killing that two young man would that case of gold only a myth. Why they did something like blow up a journalist, who made Clinton’s dirty campaign money public? This kind of action is the best way to put the focus on those cases, what that journalist investigated. If somebody writes about conspiracies and dirty business, and after that, he or she suddenly dies by violence, that text will be investigated by officers of the law. And if the cause of death is something like a car bomb, will the investigators begin that some of those texts are the reason for murder.
But why that journalist was killed by a car bomb? Did those persons who made that tried to set investigator’s eye to Clinton's persons, or was a reason for that kind of action in some other texts what that journalist published? So if that person investigated dirty money, what political persons have taken, must murder been a very unthinking person, if those articles were the reason for murder with a car bomb. Do you think that the person who is in the position of Clinton, can order an assassination? What would happen if newspapers will get pieces of information and proof that some leader of the USA will order assassinations from criminals?
Does press keep silent that time? Or what would be done if the president of USA will meet some Mafia guys in real life? That would be a scandal for all nation. If the reason for the murder was in Panama-papers, why murder made after the leak? Who’s idea was to murder that reporter, and does that murderer think that car bomb will not cause investigations because of Panama papers?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
“Timing delays in quasar light bent by massive galaxies offer a fresh way to measure the universe’s expansion, and the results deepen the ri... -
Can black holes be the key to dark energy? When we think that the black hole absorbs energy fields and matter inside it. That means the ene... -
“A 1977 theory known as quadratic gravity was long left to languish because of its negative-energy “ghost” particle. But the ghost might not...