DNA-based computing is a promising tool for high-power data systems.

DNA-based computing is a promising tool for high-power data systems. 

DNA and biochemistry with molecular biology are emerging and promising tools for high-power computing. The DNA-based computers can use the biochemical core along with DNA. And then, that system can communicate with regular microelectronics. The system can run over 100 billion programs, and that makes the system an interesting multi-tasker.

The DNA molecules can act as the programs for next-generation AI-based microchip-kernel applications. Chemical DNA computing uses nanotechnical systems to make the DNA that acts as the perforated tape in that system. In those models, the DNA transfers information between processors. In that model, DNA replaces electric wires in components as data transporter. But it requires fast-operating nanotechnology. 

The most futuristic visions of DNA-based computers are computers that use fast-operating nanotechnology. In that model, the system creates the synthetic DNA molecules by using nanotechnology. And those DNA molecules act like perforated tape of the old-fashioned computers. However, the system can use the DNA as a tool that can run complex AI-based software. And maybe the AI-based kernel architecture uses the DNA molecules as programs. 

There are three types of electric DNA computers. Or, the number of DNA-based computers depends on how we determine the use of the DNA in those systems. 

1) The computers that use DNA molecules as the microprocessors. Those DNA bites can act as part of regular-looking microchips. 

1a) The DNA can act as an information handler itself. 

1b) The DNA can act as a program for the ROM circuits. 

2) The computers that use DNA as the components like springs that control switches. 

3) Living cells that are used to process information. 

3a) Dummy systems, or systems that use dummy cells. Those systems can be bacteria which fibers can act as connectors. Those bacteria can be microchip controlled. 

3b) The systems that use intelligent cells like living neurons as data handlers.

In DNA-based computing, DNA is the tool that replaced regular microchips. If each base pair is one state of the DNA-based microprocessor. Data travels from the first vertical strand through horizontal base pairs to another main strand. That thing gives the DNA the ability to run billions of programs at the same time. The system can work like this. The microchip or some optical system transports data from regular microchips to DNA. 

The system can use miniature lasers that shoot photons to silicon bites. Those silicone bites are at the point of every base pair. Their mission is to transfer photons into electric impulses. Then data travels through those base pairs into the DNA's other side. DNA-based computing is a new and promising tool. The DNA computer's multi-tasking ability can used in quantum computing. That means every base pair acts as one qubit's state. This thing makes those systems even more powerful than nobody expected. 

https://www.britannica.com/technology/DNA-computing

https://futurism.com/worlds-first-reprogrammable-dna-computer

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/dna-based-computer-can-run-100-billion-different-programs/ar-AA1gF86Y

https://www.wired.com/story/finally-a-dna-computer-that-can-actually-be-reprogrammed/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_computing

A metaverse is an excellent tool.

Metaverse is the entirety of virtual worlds that are linked together on the internet. That thing means the world. Where people are interacting together as "avatars". Avatars are virtual creatures that would not have any match with the person that they represent. So the person who uses an avatar can take any creature like a dragon or Darth Vader that the person wants. The interacting virtual spaces can be interconnected together. Some of them might be offices. 

And some of them might be some kind of games or lectures. Each of those virtual worlds is like a room, there might be a different theme. And the metaverse is one of the most interesting things on the internet. When we talk about virtual spaces. That connected as the metaverse. We are talking about spaces that might have a connection with reality. 

Or they might be pure imagination. The user of the virtual reality-based metaverse can search things from the films that the rovers send from Mars. Or they can be at the space that is made by using the imagination. Those virtual worlds can involve modified reality like tables on Mars. And those kinds of things can use for research. Or just for fun like game platforms. 

The thing is metaverse is the interactive workspace. It can use by using VR sets. But any kind of screen is enough for communicating with computers by using metaverse. And the next-generation tool can be a GSM-mobile device that uses the VR set. Or it can be BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) that allows a person to connect with the virtual space anywhere where is a data connection. 

The metaverse can use for making many things. It can be used for just fun. But otherwise, users can control things like robots that are sending their data for the controller by using metaverse. When researchers are making a metaverse where they are making the 3D images of things like some land areas they can use multiple satellite systems for making that thing. 

The radar satellites can make the 3D computer topography and the satellites that are using optical systems like cameras can connect images to the radar map. The low- and medium-altitude aircraft can connect more high-resolution images for this map. The robots that are dropped from airplanes can be interconnected with those maps or top. That kind of system can use for research jungles that no man ever visited before. But the 3D metaverses can use for making routes for cruise missiles. 

The metaverse can also interconnect the data that is got from aerial vehicles like manned or unmanned aircraft, naval units, recon satellites, and ground units to one entirety. That makes metaverse an excellent tool for controlling military operations. That allows the high commander to connect the command system with helmet cameras of field operators. And the sensors of aircraft and naval units are also transmitting information to high-command. 

This system allows connecting intelligence like SIGINT, photo recon, and combat troops to one entirety. And when some soldier shoots with a rifle the field commander gets information about that thing. And the system can calculate how many bullets are left. The supply system can automatically send resupply when they are needed. 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

When we are collecting information, the focus is on the reason. Why do we make that thing?

Nice-looking data mean nothing in projects. Only honest feedback is a useful tool. For making an organization addictive. Negative feedback is the thing that gives the most useful information. That thing involves data that should make better or other ways. If the homepages of the organization are poor the people should say that. That thing is the signal for making them better. 

And if nobody tells that the homepages are bad. That information would not reach the organizations' directors. So if the leaders of the organization would not know. If there is something wrong, they would not make anything. The reason for that is that leaders need information for making decisions 

But negative feedback is hardest to receive. So the person who collects information should realize that the purpose of the information collection is to bring the right information. Information that is shaped to please the receiver is useless. Only useful information. Is not censored and honestly given. 

When we collect information for some project, we must think a couple of things about the data collection tools. The key element is in the type of information that is collected. There are two ways to handle collected information. And only one is the right thing. The one way to collect and handle data is to select the data that supports us. Selection of the data that pleases us might be a very nice thing to us. 

We get what we want is the thing that might seem very nice. When we want to make some project for the customer we might also give real and honest information. That information might not support the opinions and images that those clients might have. But the fact is that the project makers would not have anything to use with the data that is only what they want. So then we might think about the method how to select the data. Forms and other things are very good tools. 

But how to motivate people to fill out those forms? And to make sure that those people would give the right information. The thing that the organization needs are the right information. And the most useful information for making things better is the negative feedback. 

Honestly saying, that thing is the hardest to read. But the negative feedback is the thing that makes it possible to make the organization better. So we don't do anything about the forms that are filled in 10 seconds. Or we don't do anything about the forms, where is only the series of words "nice-looking thing". 

If we want to improve the additivity of the organization we can make the seminar. Or open some kind of discussion forum. And in that case, we must ask one question. That is "are those people typical users or members of the organization and its services"? 

The problem is that. The people who will participate in the seminars are the most active members or users of the organization. And if there are about 1000 users of the organization and 20 persons are participating we might ask are those people typical users of the organizational services of that precise organization? 

That honest and noncensored data is needed for making marketing applications for the organization. The key element in marketing applications is how to make people choose that organization and the services of that specific organization. So the key question is what that organization can offer that others cannot? 

And what is the benefit of the certain organization to the persons who are selecting services or solutions that they use? The collected data is needed to make the organization more addictive than others. But if that data is faked or it's not right. There is no help from it. Negative feedback is the hardest thing to see. But it's the most useful thing to show what must be improved. 

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

   

 What mean that AI understand?

Understanding is the answer to the question "why"? So that means that we should know how to make something. And then we should know why we should do things exactly some way. 

When we are turning our car to somewhere. We must follow certain rules. But then we must realize that those rules are made. That also other people who are outside our vehicle know what we are going to do. 

When we are researching AI we are facing the question. Does the computer understand things what it does? The thing is that understanding is something that even humans don't understand. When somebody asks "do you understand what material is"? 

Everybody can say. That material is consisting things like protons, neutrons, and quarks. Some person who has read a little bit more about the material. Can say that there are subatomic particles like quarks inside protons and neutrons. So that person is mainly right. Most of the mass of the atom is in protons and neutrons. But the contact layer of the atoms is in the electron core. 

The most out electron cores are in the main role in chemical reactions. But most of the atom is inside the electron cores. And that means the person who is saying that material is forming of protons and neutrons is same way wrong. The fact is that even 8 years child can tell about things like electron cores and quantum interactions if that person has some book about those things. The thing that is needed is the skill of reading. And then we have the person who knows everything. 

But then that answer of the electrons and protons can be wrong. The material can be written text that should publish on the net. So when we are asking about the material we should describe what that thing means today. The material can be protons or neutrons. But it can be something virtual like data that is collected from somewhere. 

Knowledge is:

How the actor does something? 

And understanding is:

Why the actor does something?

And if we are thinking about understanding it's simply putting data units one after one. The data unit is like a frame in the film. And they can connect to the endless film. That film can show some certain processes very accurately, but we know that projector doesn't know anything about things that it introduces. 

So if we have artificial intelligence that can read it can read every single article from the databases. We can use keywords and then the AI is searching an article. That connected to those keywords. Then the AI can read those articles to us. Of course, there can be some kind of parameters that the AI can use. Those parameters can be how many times a certain word is repeated in the texts. That thing helps to filter the searches. 

So what makes artificial intelligence maximize the number of clicks is filling your homepage with swear words and highlighting those words. It will bring in clicks. But perhaps the publicity of such a website would bring all sorts of sales to online stores

The thing is that when the AI creates some articles it can simply find texts. And then it can connect the parts of those texts. When the AI helps the writer to make more addictive texts. It can search things like what kind of words are the most clicked homepages include. It can use things like internet search indexes and find out what are the first words of the most clicked homepages. 

This is how the AI makes sure that is the homepage or text is interesting. That is written on the net will get the maximum number of clicks. And the clicks are the thing that is used indexing the interest of the text or homepages. For AI the maximum number of clicks is that people are interested in things. Those are published on the homepages. And we know that this is not true. The clicking of some homepage doesn't mean that somebody cares what there read. 

We can click on millions of homepages and spend about a second on those pages. So to make real analyzes of the information about interesting websites, artificial intelligence needs more information. It requires information on how many minutes or seconds each person will spend on this website. In the case of online shopping, the measurement of interest can be measured using the number of sales transactions as an index. When someone buys something. It is an expression of interest.

But when we are going to think about the understanding. We don't know does the AI knows anything. About the things that it does. The thing is that understanding is an interesting thing. It should be a simple thing to explain. But it's really hard to understand. 

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

The disinformation about things like the coronavirus spreads in the net.

  

 The disinformation about things like the coronavirus spreads in the net.

The question of why people believe disinformation is that disinformation is pleasing them. Another reason is that people are looking for social relations with people who are similar to them. And the information that is shared on social media is coming from people who we want to please. And those people please us.

So we are not saying that person shares information that is not relevant because we were afraid to lose somebody that might seem important to us. If our friends are sharing the disinformation. We might not dare to resist the hoax information.

Or say that information is not correct or the shared information might be dangerous. The reason for that is we are afraid to hurt somebody in our social network. If some people who we use to think like an authority or who is the central person in our social network are sharing disinformation, we might want to obey that person. That means we might follow that person even if we know that is wrong. 

1) Misinformation means "not correct" or false information. That is not shared in purpose. 

2) Disinformation means the information that is shared in purpose. That purpose might hurt or damage the trust of the authorities. 

Another name for that kind of campaign is propaganda. The military term for that kind of action is PSY-OP or Psychological Operation. 

The most important targets for disinformation are people who are in influential positions. And one of the groups where the disinformation is targeted is journalists. If journalists are affected the information that is shared will turn more powerful. People trust the media and if somebody cheats the reporter that will turn information more powerful. 

The normal way to resist vaccines is to criticize them. Critical attitude means of course the denial attitude. A critical attitude means that person is investigating the background. But in the disinformation campaign, the criticism means that person is against some things like vaccines. In the same way, critical attitude against the refugees and foreigners is turned to denial attitude in the public language. 

So how do we recognize is something disinformation? One version of that thing is that only negative things are collected in the article. I use the term "article" also for texts. Those are written on social media.  

We might analyze who is the person or actor, who is benefits the case that somebody doesn't take vaccines? The person who benefits from the action is often behind that thing.  The thing is that some vaccines are denying also the use of biological weapons. But that thing might not the reason why somebody is resisting the vaccines. 

If the person is vaccinated there is also impossible to die because of some illnesses. That means the vaccines are protecting people, but they also deny lies like being home in flu when a person has a hangover. 

One of the things that can use as the mark for disinformation is that the article or disinformation is driven by using humor or there are some other things like mentions of mental illness of the writer. Things like schizophrenia have not connected with the things like Game theory. 

But for some reason, the creator of the Game theory John Nash is always mentioned as being schizophrenic. 

When I read books about Game Theory there is one remarkable detail. In those texts is mentioned that Nash has that syndrome. So what the schizophrenia has to do with a thing called the Game Theory? Are those people estimating the Game Theory? Or are they estimating the mental condition of John Nash? That is a very interesting detail about writings of the Game Theory. 

Or the article is written in the spirit that something like a denial of vaccines is somehow "cool". Those texts are also appealed to the vanity of people. "Why I must take vaccines"? 

Other people are taking them, but why should I"? I have the right to say "no", and who cares about the hospital places that are reserved for me"? The corona-passes show that the person is taken the vaccines. But the deliverer of the disinformation appeals to selfishness and vanity. 

If we believe those people we should think like this: other people should sit inside. And all things must be closed because somebody doesn't want to take vaccines. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Forbes_Nash_Jr.

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Strange things about WikiLeaks

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

WikiLeaks has brought to the people know the things, what the government would want to hide, but there is one big mystery in this website: why it is not banned by DDOS-attacks? When the governments and private security corporations Emails were delivered to WikiLeaks, it was targeted the short period DDOS-attack, and in some claiming, some of the files were removed or changed during the attack, and in those files were some very interesting knowledge of the co-operation between governmental and private security corporations, what are actually intelligence agencies.


Somebody has even claimed, that the  CIA has been behind the WikiLeaks and the reason, why almost all the files, what are published in those sites are American origin, but the thing is made for confessing the audience, that the USA would be the primary target for those uncovered secrets. This means that the purpose of publishing those papers is meant for countenancing the persons, who want to steal the papers from the Pentagon or NSA send them to WikiLeaks, where counterintelligence has very easy to find those documents, and then I must say that those files can be used to track the information thief.


This means that in every single file may have the unique code, what is unseen for normal computers. But if the person has the right program, would the number of the handler be seen on the screen. And that number allows tracking the person, who has been downloaded that file, and also foreign partners have their own numbers, that the NSA can track the persons, who deliver the secret material to the Internet. That's why those papers must no be delivered to the Internet.


Those PDF-files seems like the normal, but the NSA:s main computer makes there the covered digital signature in those files. That's why everybody must know, that there are many secrets, what is very interesting, but those papers are meant for confidential. And in the real world, we must ask, is it better to track people by using electronic equipment, or is it more comfortable to make a very large police force, what comes to the people's home for searching the missing persons. This is one argument for supporting the surveillance of the people. But sometimes is clearly seen, that the terrorist attacks are supporting the growing security business.


Those corporations collect very much data, and that can be used for many things. If the information, that is collecting by using Trapwire, would contain business secrets, and somebody would sell those secrets,  some corporations will get very much benefits in their work. And this is one of the most concerning things in the world. If some private intelligence would sell those pictures and data, that would give the very good position for that corporation, that buys those pictures and data from the security corporations.


If some corporations would get too close cooperation with the government, that company would allow accessing the data, what is only reserved for governmental purposes. This means that the surveillance cameras can also collect data from the screens, and in those cases, there would be no sign of the security leak. So those servers data security, what operates surveillance cameras must be extremely highly secured. If the information would leak from secured areas, the benefits, what some company would get are extremely high.

What is the difference between bio- and genetic manipulation?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are some differences of bio- and genetic manipulation. Biomanipulation actually means to make artificial cell-lines, and actually, there would be no touch for genomes. One version of biomanipulation is to make artificial retina and surgically implant that retina in the eye, and the retina can be made by cell base, what is filled only with cone cells. Also, two type of vegetables can be connected mechanically, and those combinations make the saplings, what are from an upper vegetable.


Biomanipulation is effective, but it takes time. The modification of the organisms will not transfer to next generations. And mass production of those organisms is very difficult. Genetic manipulation is the more effective way to compile species and give them new features. The needed thing is an artificial virus, what has wanted genome, and that little DNA-bite would be transferred to the nucleus of the cell. The problem is that those manipulated organisms are that those features would transfer to next generations of that organism.


One of the possibility of genetic manipulation for improving some species like a human is to connect genomes to the cells, what makes possible to create chlorophyll in the cells of mammals, and in some visions, those manipulated humans may have roots or threads in the skin, what can take food and water from the air. Those threads might also have harpoon cells, what protects this creature. When we are thinking about the combination of the human and other species, we might face the situation, where we are creating an alien, the species with superpowers. That creature might have a similar nervous system like bugs. It can use only electricity, what means that neurons could connect together and close the synopses.


That would make the brains more effective. Also, those manipulated organisms blood might be poisonous. And the chlorophylls in the skin makes possible to produce sugars in the creatures own body. This might be the route of controlled evolution, and maybe tomorrow we can order the features, what we will have in our next life. In this futuristic scenario the human would record their life by using WLAN-implants, and of course, the body will be cloned. This might make the person live forever. The cloning of the creature will happen by changing the DNA inside the nucleus of just when fertilized ovum. And that would allow making modifications even to human body and mind.

Sources:

Picture 1

https://www.biology-questions-and-answers.com/images/Genetic-Engineering.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-difference-between-bio-and.html

How the Internet-observations officer chooses the individual, who is put under surveillance?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many people are thinking, that it is safe to avoid the hotel's WiFi networks because the operators can catch the data from the WiFi, but they are entirely wrong in this case. The reason why those persons are wrong is that if they don't use the free Internet, there might be something to hide with those people because they don't use that WLAN even with big laptops, and this makes the observers curious. They are looking for people, who use sophisticated and robust network security when that will compile in the things what they do on the Internet.


The situation, when the safety makes person suspected data criminal is like using the enterprise-level security solutions in-home network, and of course, if those solutions are expensive, could that cause that the interest of put this person under surveillance will grow extremely high. Those surveillance operators will not use only one method to break the privacy of the targeted person, and those operators use normally also telescopes, binoculars and small remote control helicopters in their missions. But the massive number of data will go thru the Internet Sockets all the time.


But somebody will know, that exception to the normal behavior will be noticed by the surveillance team. If some person normally uses credit-cards for paying, but suddenly will that same person starts to use cash, will that cause the reaction in the surveillance screens. And the reason for the change of behavior must be found. Another way to make the surveillance team very interested in avoiding some services.


One of the misunderstandings is just avoiding the franchise hotels, what belong to some ring. In the small independent hotels have the smaller number of information in those databases and the operators must just check the data.  If there were many more users, the data storage will be so large, that the systematical check of that information would be very long action. But in the big and small systems is small differences. Then somebody wants to keep the name as the secret, will this person choose small size system, where the "surface data" flow only in the hands of the small group.


But in the small system, the deep scanning of data will be possible and give more effective information for surveillance operators who work in this kind of system. In big systems, many operators will see "surface data" of the users, but deeper analyze of information will be difficult because there is the larger number of bytes and there are many same-ranked officers who are watching the system. In small system might have only one high-school trained operator or maybe that service is produced by some other actor. This allows those men to work alone without afraid that somebody even sees what is going on.

Picture 1

http://www.sifytechnologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/datacenterhosting_managedservice_taxialways_fod.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-internet-observations-officer.html

Data is the new oil for markets

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/data-is-new-oil-for-markets.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/data-is-new-oil-for-markets.html

The science of statistics can help to find criminals

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-science-of-statistics-can-help-to.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-science-of-statistics-can-help-to.html

What means the analytical form of the "big data"?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-means-analytical-form-of-big-data.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-means-analytical-form-of-big-data.html

What if the antivirus program transforms as the spying tool?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-antivirus-program-transforms-as.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-antivirus-program-transforms-as.html

Miniaturization of technology gives new ways to mark documents

RFID-chip inside person's hand

Kimmo Huosionmaa 

Print media is problematic for data security. Those print files could be put just in the pocket and after that thief of that data could walk out the building. But modern technology gives very effective methods to deny that kind of work. This method basis itself in miniaturized RFID-chips, what can put in the ink tanks inside ink liquid.

Those nanosize chips are so small that they can inject to a paper same times, where text and pictures are, and those chips are so invincible that they can't be separated from other text and that equipment can put in the normal ink tank. So even printer operator doesn't know that those systems are in the ink. And in that RFID-chip can save information about who printed that paper, and if the thief walks throw security gate, what might be covered in the doorframes.


Of when security personnel is looking for those documents they must only use GSM-phones, what will take near persons and their pieces of luggage, and after that security personnel can take that thief in the hands of the law. That reading application might be similar, what is used by ticket checkers in public transportation. And that application might send the report of those papers to firms security. And if I really want to think nasty, those applications might send report same time to the security police. It also might work as a ghost software, what is secretly installed in all that workplaces workers telephone, and if they don't see or know that application that might cause them lots of trouble if they steal papers from the workplace.

That system could be also metal detector and that magnetic field will be inducted electricity to that tiny little microchip, what will send data about the person who printed that document, and even what kind of is in the document. The printer or copy machine can also take PDF-copy of that document, and mark it with register number what will put in the chip. And if some prints will attempt to take out the building, they will alert chief of security and he will see what documents are taken out of the building.

After that, if a thief can slip off those documents will deliver to hands of patent officials and police. And if somebody will sell those documents or try to capitalize them, will patent authorities notice that. This is very important if stolen material consists research and developing the technology for company's tomorrow products. Those kind of stuff are in marketing at least couple of years and they might be wonderful equipment in many things. 

Small size implanted microchips might be put surgically in some people bodies, and that thing might read by airport's security gates. That kind of RFID-chips are put in dogs, but they can also implant in bodies of some special forces operators like NAVY SEAL- or other persons who the government doesn't want to go somewhere. And also dangerous prisoners must be implanted that law enforcement could find them in the crowd of people.



That other persons are technical and scientific specialists whose skills are that kind of that government ever let them go to the country what is hostile. Somebody thinks that some key members of some nations government and scientific laboratories are implanted with GPS-chips, what looks like pills and contains very long life batteries, that government can follow them around o'clock in every day of the year.


Yläkuvan osoite:  http://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/world-government/item/global-control-through-the-rfid-chip


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Miten datan kerääminen vaikuttaa jokaisen ihmisen elämään tässä maailmassa, ja kysymys siitä, miksi kaikki data ei voi olla avointa?

Data jota kerätään turhaan on kuollutta eli tarpeetonta dataa. Turha data kuluttaa kerääjän aikaa, mutta samalla se myös syö säilytystilaa, ja jos tarpeetonta dataa kerätään liikaa, niin se sitten lopulta täyttää massamuistit. Eli tutkimusten yhteydessä  kerättävällä tiedolla täytyy olla joku tarkoitus, jotta sen kerääminen kannattaa. Samoin datan kerääjä voi käyttää tuon turhan datan keräämiseen kuluvan ajan muuhun, jos hän välttää turhien turhien kyselyjen tekemisen. Termeillä ”big data” sekä ”small data” kuvataan tietoa sen lähteiden perusteella. Eli ”big data” tarkoittaa ryhmästä hankittua tietoa ja ”small data” tarkoittaa yksilöitä käsittelevää tietoa.

Kun puhutaan siitä, miksi Facebookin käyttäjät pitää Facebookia loistavana kommunikaatio- sekä kohtaamispaikkana, missä voi kohdata asiakkaita tai omia äänestäjiä, ja Twitterin käyttäjät ovat tuon asian kanssa paljon skeptisempiä, niin pitää selvittää ensin se millainen ero Facebookilla sekä Twitterillä on. Tuon eron kautta voidaan lähteä purkamaan sitä, minkälainen ihminen on Facebookin kaltaiseen mediaan skeptisesti suhtautuva henkilö?

Eli jos median käyttäjien ero on niin huima, että valtaosa Twitterin käyttäjistä ikään kuin vieroksuu sosiaalista mediaa yhteydenpitovälineenä, niin silloin tuota mediaa voidaan käyttää profiloinnin pohjana. Eli Twitterissä on rajoitetumpi viestinpituus kuin Facebookissa, joten Twitterin käyttäjä ei varmaan kovin suuria tai ainakaan pitkiä kirjoituksia esitä, joten tuolloin voidaan ilkeästi todeta, että henkilöt, joilla ei ole kovin pitkiä repliikkejä vierastavat Facebookia sekä sosiaalista mediaa.

Tuo saattaa merkitä sitä, että henkilö sanoo asiansa kovin lyhyesti, tai sitten hänellä on jotain muuta tuota sosiaalista mediaa vastaan. Eli se että jokin asia sosiaalisessa mediassa riepoo tiettyjä ihmisiä merkitsee sitä, että se koetaan ikään kuin uhkaavana asiana tiettyjen julkisuutta hyödyntävien tahojen kannalta. Facebookia on jatkuvasti esitetty ”mustalle listalle”, ja joidenkin ihmisten mielestä esimerkiksi nettisensuuri on sosiaalisen median kohdalla ainoa oikea tapa toimia. Kuitenkin sensuuri saattaa koitua ihmisen kohtaloksi hyvin nopeasti, koska noista rikollisten tietokoneista tehdään käyttäjäprofiili, mitä verrataan muihin vastaaviin tietokoneisiin kautta koko maailman.

Eli rikospoliisia kiinnostaa varmasti se, millaisia kotisivuja esimerkiksi ihmiskauppaan syyllistynyt henkilö on estänyt, tai miltä näyttää huumekauppiaan netinkäyttö ylipäätään. Samoin sellaiset asiat kiinnostavat profiloijia, että mitä esimerkiksi skinheadit sekä erinäiset rikolliset keskustelevat sosiaalisessa mediassa, joten he etsivät noiden henkilöiden digitaalisia jälkiä, ja sitten vertaavat niitä muiden ihmisten jättämiin jälkiin. Noin saadaan selville se, millainen asenne heillä on sitten esimerkiksi yhteiskunnallisiin kysymyksiin. Mutta ongelma on sitten se, että sosiaalisesta mediasta saatu tieto on yhteiskunnallisesti merkittävää, ja samalla se on noiden data- tai mediatalojen omaisuutta. Kyseistä tietoa kaupataan mainostajille, jotta nämä voivat sitten kohdentaa markkinointiaan ihmisille.

Kuitenkin tuota tietoa voidaan käyttää myös esimerkiksi poliittisten ääriainesten seulontaan, ja myös hyvin yksityiskohtaisten psykologisten profiilien rakentamiseen. Eli sieltä näkyy sellaisia asioita, mitä henkilö ei edes itse tiedä levittävänsä ympärilleen. Hänen jakamansa musiikki sekä valokuvat ja kirjoitelmat auttavat profiloijia selvittämään sekä henkilön poliittisen, sekä muun yhteiskunnallisen suuntautumisen, ja suhtautumisen kaikkiin vähemmistöihin. Eli tuo tieto sitten on mielestäni sellaista, mikä kuuluu viranomaisille, ja sen avulla voidaan ihmistä haavoittaa erittäin syvällisesti. Mutta kuitenkin tuo data auttaa esimerkiksi etsimään potentiaalisia ”höyrypäitä” Internetistä.

Eli tuota ”urkintatietoa” voidaan hyödyntää myös aselupia myönnettäessä, tai muuten seulottaessa esimerkiksi riskiryhmiin kuuluvia kuljettajia ratin takaa. Tuo tarkoittaa sitä, että esimerkiksi henkilön asenne rattijuoppoihin sekä vastuuttomaan liikennekäyttäytymiseen varmasti näkyy jotenkin myös hänen nettikirjoittelussaan. Samoin rikokselle myönteinen asenne auttaa poliisia seulomaan tuollaisia henkilöitä pois omista riveistään. Mutta kun puhutaan siitä, että joku teettää omat Facebook-kirjoittelunsa toisilla, niin silloin varmasti se kertoo jotain kyseisen henkilön osaamisesta ja kyvykkyydestä itsenäiseen ajatteluun.  Mutta samalla voidaan kysyä, että miksi kaikki tieto ei ole vapaata? Eli omasta mielestäni esimerkiksi terveystietoja voisi ihan hyvin julkistaa, jos näin saadaan huhuilta katkaistua siivet.

Ja samoin kysyisin että miksi naapureilla ei ole oikeutta saada tietää, jos rapussa asuu vaarallinen henkilö? Tietenkin tuo loukkaisi yksityisyyttä, mutta jos sillä sitten saadaan "jossittelut" sekä huhut loppumaan, niin silloin se voisi parantaa ilmapiiriä, ja auttaa esimerkiksi rikollista palaamaan tuomionsa jälkeen yhteiskunnan jäseneksi. Eli tuolloin voitaisiin kertoa tapahtumat sekä niihin johtaneet seikat esimerkiksi kotisivulla, koska silloin ei kenenkään tarvitse sitten takana mitään kuiskia eikä asioita levitellä. Tuolloin ei myöskään kenenkään tarvitse pelätä kiristäjiä, jotka sitten saattavat lähetellä uhkauskirjeitä pitkin kaupunkia. Eli kaikki saisivat toistensa tietoja käyttöönsä, ja tietenkin tuohon katseluun pitäisi ehkä olla henkilön itsensä lupa, mutta se oikeuttaisi samalla katsomaan tuon luvan pyytäjän omia papereita siltä osin, kuin hänen esittämänsä pyyntö koskee, jolloin toiminta on tasapuolista sekä myös asiallista. Tai miksi niitä ei voisi pitää kaikille avoimina, kun näitä asioita muutenkin levitellään tarpeettomasti.

pseudotiedetta.blogspot.fi