Information warfare is a bigger problem than cyber warfare

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The information warfare is one of the major problems in the world. For this kind of warfare is no need for any special equipment. Only blog and writing skills are enough for making successful information operations. Basically, the information warfare is simply delivering false or one-way information about the situations or for some other reasons. One of the most important reason might be that somebody would want to decrease the value of the companies, that this actor could buy this company at a low price and sell it with good profit. This is one version of influence on some company price and the criminal version of the information operation.


Even without any special skills information warfare is dangerous, and that can be used to deliver false information about the political situation in some countries. Or it can be used to destroy the career of politicians, by claiming that they are made crimes like assaults, what are hidden from the public, and the purpose of those operations could be influence the political control.  The thing, what makes information warfare so difficult to defy, and the reason for that is, that every homepage can be claimed as information warfare. The censorship is one version of information warfare because it can filter the information, what is uncomfortable for the people, who control the censorship.


Of course, there are many people, who are talking about flash pictures and other subliminal messages, what is delivering in those films, what is involved in those pages, and those flash pictures are only one frame inside the film, and they can put in movies by using some film editing program. This is why that kind of programs are dangerous in wrong hands. In the real world, that kind of usage can be controlled, and those films, where is the subliminal frames can be removed.


But normal homepages are difficult to delete, and there are many discussions, does the western military or security authorities should have the right to change the information, what is on some fundamentalists homepages. In those cases, the information like bank account numbers could be changed, because security service would want to track the people, who give money to those organizations. Also, the meeting points can be changed, and when some terrorist candidate comes to meet the contacts, would that person arrest immediately.

Censorship and the rescue for the political career

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many politicians on the Earth, who don't ever make their own speeches. Why they should make them because there are many good writers on the Earth, who would make texts against little payment. And this is the thing, what makes life easy. But the problem with that kind of things is that those politicians don't want their voters to get that information.


They don't want to tell people, that their speeches and texts are made by somebody else. When we are thinking about the things, what many times rescue those politicians, we are facing the thing, that many times politicians say, that they are not experts in some things. And of course, media would support that kind of things, because many journalists or the owners of newspapers have political destination and connections to political movements.


And those persons offer many times their services to political candidates, who want to be parliamentarians. The thing, what those politicians would not remember is, that this makes them only the frontman of the movement. The situation is similar as with musicians, who buy  texts, what are made by another person. They cannot work independently and those persons have always addicted the support of those writers. If those writers would not make their job, the speeches would not be forming.


Of course, that thing addicts politicians, or musicians because that offers an easy way to make things.  But when we are facing the social media, that is very problematic for the politicians. In social media, the comments can be given immediately after some news, and if the politician cannot make texts independently, that would cause the very embarrassing situation, when the politician is giving the speech, and the update for social media comes in the front of the people during the speech. And this makes social media problematic. This situation is similar to the case when some ice-hockey player would update their social media from the ice during the game.


If we are writing something, we can make mistakes. But if we are not doing anything, we cannot make mistakes. This is true, but if somebody makes our texts and writes our speeches and we would portrait them as our own production, would that be a little embarrassing. If some person gives speeches and shares opinions, would people right to believe, that they are those persons own production. Sometimes in politics, the parties have asked people about their opinions about foreigners or some other things, and then the politicians have made their speeches to please the opinions of the biggest group of people, and that thing has guaranteed the votes for that politician.


Of course, politicians might say, that censorship or moderators have removed their texts from the social media. This is the very good point when the next elections are coming. In a long time, ago the newspapers and TV were very good friends for politicians. They would claim that the media did not publish their opinions and this was the very good argument also for many other persons who were working in the public workplaces.

The professors, who didn't make their jobs could claim, that they have sent their texts to newspapers and scientific magazines, but those media were not published in those texts, because the readers were not interested about them. Censorship is the thing, what allows hide behind the back of some faceless authorities, who would want to drive their own benefits on the Internet.

More worlds about censorship and moderation.

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the world is two kinds of censorship. Another is governmental, and it has one benefit for the other censorship. That thing is this kind of censorship exists, and the line of that kind of authority is always similar. The use of that thing is crushing the opposition. That thing denies the publications of the opposition. And everybody who would not please the censors would be deleted in the public media.


But another censorship is the private censor, what is known as "moderator". The moderation has always explained the need of denying aggressive and illegal writings and other kind publications from the Internet. The moderation can also use for the advantage of the political or financial objectives. In the worst case, the political or financial actor would bribe the moderators of some social network for removing the competitor's websites and publications. That kind of thing could cause very big losses for that company. And I don't know have somebody got prosecutions about that kind of moderation.


Also, those moderators would operate on their own idea. There are a couple of cases, where the moderators have left the very bad looking messages in the public media. That has happened in the television text programs and the Internet. In the worst case, the friends of the moderators have allowed publishing their very frighten and racist messages, but those moderators have not reacted that thing. All their time left for deleting some ordinary person's messages.


This would be the very interesting thing because the moderator can be profiled by using the messages, what this person would let thru the censorship. And the messages, what this person would delete tells what kind of people does this person don't want to see. If there is only one person, whose messages would be deleted some law enforcement would read the papers of the moderator and the target. And then they come to visit to meet those persons, and they would find out, what is the reason for the hate. And if the censorship is targeted at some firm, the reason for that would be found in the money transfer to the bank accounts. If somebody would pay the moderation,  that would mean prosecution in the criminal prosecution process.

About the line of censorship in Facebook

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Do you know that the last writing was against Facebook's group policy, and that would not help to make that thing safer place for people, who are hanging in there? So I'm wondering about the line of that discussion forum because there is allowed to operate some kind of nazi- and racist groups, This feels very interesting, because not other my texts or links have not been removed because they seem like garbage. Some of them are actually garbage, but as I have written before, I don't make those believing in my mind. But there is the night of the art today, and id the censorship so high by this reason?


Strange thing, that publishing the autopsy films, Nazi stuff, conspiracy theories, UFO:s  and the things that are against morality are not causing that reaction. But the writing about political control over the party limits caused the reaction, that the writing seemed like garbage. Interesting line in that organisation is that the racistic and other fanatics are allowed to operate in there freely, but that writing was removed by some moderators. And at the same time, some ISIS and another kind of organizations can deliver their opinions freely.

Good theme for the book about Meyerling-case 1889

Meyerling lodge 1889
(https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/mayerling-lodge)

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

As we might know, the Meyerling- lodge's case was the double suicide of the eldest son of Franz-Joseph, The  Crown-Prince Rudolf and his lover Mary Vetsera. This case is very well known, about the happens, where the bodies were removed from the crime scene before police arrived. And the only thing, what proved that case, was the telegram, what was send to Franz-Joseph by the Criminal commissar Johann Habrda that the orders from the Emperor were followed and bodies were terminated. After that Frans-Joseph ordered to remove all pictures of Rudolf from official photographs.


The thing what was remembered the existence of the Rudolf was the white blanket in the official photos, what was not able to retake. Somebody claim that Franz-Josef murdered both persons because he was drunk, and then some argue started with the father and son, and after that, the pistol came to the hand of the emperor, who shot his son and his lover. So this would look like the normal domestic violence, what was caused by too much alcohol, and bad relationship inside the family.


And the shame caused that crown prince's pictures have been removed. The Emperor could look his dead son's picture. But there is another way to think about this case. The reason for the censorship and the change of political line in Austria-Hungary can be explained, that somebody has murdered the real Franz-Josef, and changed the man in the power of Austria.


This explanation has not very much support, but the reason why Franz-Josef changed the most liberal policy in Europe the eldest fashion and toughest policy what is found in Europe. That change could be caused, that this man would want to create hate above Hapsburgs. Maybe the censorship caused, that nobody actually has seen the real emperor, and powerful police order made sure, the identity of the Franz-Josef have ever uncovered.


But this is only one of the theories, what happened in Meyerling castle 1889, where he withdraws for drinking and keeping the fun. The Meyerling castle or hunting lodge was bought by Rudolf, and I'm not sure did Franz-Joseph actually know about this place. And if the place were bought without knowledge of Emperor, it's possible that Rudolf was moving there without security men, and if that would be true, the crown prince was there without protection.


Maybe this lodge was shown to the emperor, but the friend count Joseph Hyos was introduced as the owner of that place. And here we are going to think, what kind of relationship the crown prince had with Hyos? Was it only the friendship or was it more? In that kind of friendships has one thing, those higher rank officials would sometimes forget to ask if the other person would want to spend all the time with him, what caused hate sometimes.  And if that was the homosexual relationship, the best way to everybody was that the emperor would not know about this thing. And the security men were given their reports to the emperor.


So if the murdered would find that thing could that person go to Meyerling lodge, and hide in the house. Then this person must only shoot the crown prince, and tell that to Franz-Joseph, who would come to the place, and after that kill the emperor. There were many men, who hated Hapsburgs, and if the crown prince was forced the count to that relationship, would it cause enough hate that this man or somebody else shot Rudolph and Mary Vetsera.


And then if our imagination goes high, that person would shoot the emperor and destroyed the body by burning it or that could be eaten to Tasmanian Devil if that is found in some place in Austria. If the bodies were served to Tasmanian Devils, there would be no sign left for that and the fire would not be necessary. This could be the good topic for some Sherlock Holmes-style detective story.

https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/mayerling-lodge

http://www.historynaked.com/the-mayerling-incident/

Why this statue was in window of national poet of Finland, J.L Runeberg?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Here you see the picture, what is taken to the window of the home of the National poet of Finland Johan Ludvig Runeberg (1807-1877). You might see the small statue in the window, and this kind of art is the mark of belonging some kind of secret societies. Those societies mark their members with paintings or statues, and maybe also Mafia does that. Secret societies were very common in 19th. century academic community and they were places where people might talk about things that were too radical for the people who were in the control of the state.


In 19th. century censorship was very usual in Europe, and almost every state kept political prisoners, and Finland what was the autonomic area of the Russian empire was not the exception to that rule. The reason why in this land was many societies like “Saturday club”, (Lauantaiseura) where many cultural people of influences belonging, was that the Finnish language is quite difficult, and there is also the sauna tradition. So in 1880’s those persons, who were members of this cultural club, were claimed that they were in sauna symposium. And if a member of “Okhrana” the political police of Russian empire tried to slip in that society, must that agent work naked, and those meetings continued all night long.


This society was established in 1830, and I believe that Runeberg was a member of this cultural society. The statue in the window of Runeberg's home at Porvoo symbolizes purity and naturalism. The element what are represented in national romantic paintings. Those wealthy characters were also the road to genetic purity, what has driven humans the most horrifying actions in history. There is nothing wrong with national romanticism itself, but those statues that are made in the same style as ancient Greek statues also were predicted the ideology of “Aryan race”. In this ideology, only strong persons are allowed to live. And this ideology was given an idea of “over human theory”.

The memory plate  of Runeberg in Porvoo

In this theory, what was created by Friedrich Nietzsche the group of “superhumans”, what has higher moral, higher intelligent level and what is stronger than others would become the leaders for other people or nations. The reason why Finnish people started to hate Russians was censorship. Many publishers were got a trouble, when they published texts, what was against the policy of the Russian authorities. And when the Saturday club was established, the time from 1809 was in in the fresh memory. There were only 21 years from the moment when Finland was connected to Russian Empire, and there were of course people, who wanted to connect this area back to Sweden. And of course there were people whose cousins or family members died in that war, and the rumors were living in that time.


The rising power of Europe was Germany, what wanted to create protective area against the Russians, and of course, it wanted to grow its influence in the Baltic Sea. So this state started to provocate all other nations for requiring the independence. And the best way to make that was to wake up the nation proud of the nation. In 1815 German General Blücher was in the big role when Napoleon lost in Waterloo, and that rose the national spirit in that area, what was connected in the command of Prussia in 1870. But there were also willing of extending that area before this. And of course, Prussians provocate the national spirit in Finland. When we are talking about the “Saturday club” those evenings might be spiced by alcohol, and that might cause the situation, that articulation turned very patriotic.

And if somebody was talked about penalties, what was got by cheapening the Russian authorities, that might cause hate against the Russians. Those penalties were taken as the rule of the man even in that time. The penalty caused to denying the officers position in the Russian Empire, and maybe some of those students or teachers were planned themselves as an officer. This was caused hate because in that time symposiums the voices were the rise, and minds were started to heat. I don’t know what happened, but in those societies rise also the Fascism and Nazism, what was used national romanticism as the “turbine”, when they were provocating people in fanatic hate against other individuals and nations.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/why-this-statue-was-in-window-of.html