Researchers split a photon into two pieces.

Researchers split a photon into two pieces. 

"By splitting a single photon, scientists confirmed that angular momentum is always conserved — a billion-to-one experiment that reinforces the foundations of quantum physics. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Split a Single Photon. Here’s What They Found)

The image above introduces a situation. The wave movement impacts a photon. That thing makes the photon oscillate and send a wave movement. That thing can also split a photon into two pieces. When a photon travels in a quantum network. Transporting information. The system must store information about that photon. 

And after that, the system must also download information from that photon. The very thin wave bites could act like the needle of the gramophone. The system scans the depth of the waves that are on the photon’s surface. The quantum system stores information in those waves. And the number of waves determines how many states the qubit can have. Another determinant is the depth of those waves. 

Researchers at the University of Tampere split a photon into two photons. That thing proved that even photons follow one of the basic rules in physics: the conservation of angular momentum. So, if the system can make photons act like a gyroscope. And keep those photons in the same position, which makes a new advance in photonics and quantum computing. A series of superpositioned and entangled photons can transport information in nanotube-based systems. 

"Schematic of a single photon with zero angular momentum (green) splitting into two photons (red) with either zero or opposite angular momenta (sketched through the spatially varying color), which adds up to zero confirming the fundamental angular momentum conservation law. Credit: Robert Fickler / Tampere University"(ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Split a Single Photon. Here’s What They Found)

Splitting a photon into two photons by aiming a laser beam, or a wave movement through it. It is one of the things that can make quantum networks closer to reality. In a quantum network, information is stored in particles, like photons.  In a quantum network, particles travel and transport information. In a regular network, wave movement acts as an information transporter. 

The problem with the quantum network is this. Those particles that travel in that network. Should not touch anything unexpected. Any field or unexpected error in the quantum network causes a situation. There is information that particle transport can be damaged. The problem with error detection is this. The system cannot detect errors that happen in some quantum line. 

The answer for error detection is to send information using two separate lines. If those lines create identical solutions, the answer is ” probably closer, right than wrong”. In reasonable circuits. The system makes all calculations backward. And if the answer is the original values, the system gives the right answer. But if the system transports information into two lines, it must split that thing into two routes. 

In a quantum network. That requires that the system must create two identical information packs. So, the ability to split photons can be a tool for quantum routers. But the system can use this technology in quantum computers. Splitting photons and putting them into superposition and quantum entanglement is one thing that can make the quantum chips closer to everyday reality. The information that photon also follows the principle of angular momentum is the thing. That can be important for quantum technology. If the system knows when photons “fall” in quantum entanglement, that can improve the quantum system's effectiveness. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-split-a-single-photon-heres-what-they-found/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum

When the most advanced tool becomes the enemy of advance.

Why...

Above this text is the image that is not made by using AI. I took that image yesterday evening. That thing required a little bit of trouble and time. Walking into that point, taking my cell phone, and taking that picture took time. When I looked at that picture I realized why people use AI in many things. AI offers easy things to get the job done. That easy tool allows people to make thousands of lines of code in minutes. 

That is possible if the person uses some code libraries. And that makes a person effective. But that thing is not good for advancement and innovation. Also, that way of making programs is not good for data security. If some hackers get those code libraries that allow them to break the systems those codes are used. 

We know that thing. But we ever ask why person makes that thing? Why does that person use libraries and copy-paste? Why that person uses code, that somebody gave to the hard disk? The answer is this something forces a person to make things like that. The nice, well-done code in the hard disk makes work effective. And we can say that generative AI, large LLM, or whatever we call that thing is only to those libraries. 

We can be effective and always use that method to make things. That can make an impression. But then we can say that this method doesn't allow us to advance our programming skills. And that means the AI kills productivity and skills. But is the AI guilty? 

Do we bark the wrong tree? Should we prosecute the need to be effective for that thing? People use AI and code libraries because they have no time to learn things. People are so hurry, that they have no time to learn things. And if they make mistakes they are fired. That forces people to use AI. 

The biggest problem with algorithms is they use existing information. They don't call any telescopes or particle accelerators to create experiments that they can produce new things. They just seek existing information and reorder it. If we start to use AI more and more to become effective we are facing situations in which we don't get new innovations. 

New innovations are things that make the world more advanced. But when we make innovation. We process thought into the product. Without thought is not innovation. Because our mind is to bind to memories we are in trouble with new things.  That means we should create a mind that is not dependent on memories. But that thing is not very easy to make. Almost everything that we make is bound to memories. 

Algorithms do not create things. They just connect existent data into new entirety. And the question is this: do we let ourselves turn into the AI's? Mechanical minds can search existing information but cannot create anything new. 

If we don't let people innovate that means that we will not create new things. Innovations require time and space. And that thing is not a thing that fits into the idea of productivity and effectiveness. 

Algorithms are tools that make many things faster than humans. That is the reason why we use them. The question is always this: do we someday make algorithms that rule people? When we make things by using algorithms we can find an easy way to make things. Algorithms make our lives easier. They search for things from databases. Then, AI can make many things better than we can. We are afraid. That AI helps people to make things. 

Like fake doctoral theses. We are always afraid of that. People lose their creativity when they use AI. We ever ask why we leave our work to the AI. We see that things happen, never asking "why"? 

The problem with the algorithm is that AIs don't make anything new.  They just collect information from the networks. AIs build new entireties using information. That already exists. And that is the problem with AI. The problem is that the system requires effective working. During working days people don't cheer programmers and other people to make new decisions. The requirement for effectiveness is the thing that destroys creativity and advancement. 

People are afraid of remote working because it destroys innovation. But how many hours in week do we use for innovations? Do we really make innovations in our offices? Or do we just read newspapers and reports and make things that have been made 1000 times before? 

Many people think. That innovation is the case, where one person talks and the other listens. The problem with innovation and creativity is that people are afraid of failure. Failure is somehow a non-accepted thing, and that means we make many times things that we made many times before. 

Because. People are afraid of things like grammar mistakes they think that they must let the AI make their texts. Programmers are afraid of mistakes.  Fixing mistakes steals their and other worker's working time. That is the reason why the working environment forces people to use AI. And that is the best way to destroy productive thinking and innovation. 

The AI makes people look like effective. But that system uses only existing information. That is the limit of the AI. Even if we want to make images using AI, we must give orders to it. The AI is like the drawing program that follows orders that we give. That allows us to create new worlds. But that thing doesn't advance our painting skills. 

The memory makes humans effective. Imagination is the thing that connects memory bites together new way. That allows us to create new things. Memories and the connections with existing memories are the things that limit the imagination. The requirement for innovation is an idea, that doesn't come from emptiness. 

Memories are stored in our memory cells. When we use imagination we just reorder those things that we can call memory pixels into the new entirety. Those things are like puzzles that we can reorder. 

The big advance would be the mind. That is not connected with memory. The memory-independent mind is something that we cannot imagine. We use memories to create new entities. And it's hard to even imagine a tool that doesn't use memories. That thing is the tool that can make the next step for innovations and society. 

The demon core

The film above this text introduces the case where the extra energy that the friction of the screwdriver caused a chain reaction in plutonium ball and radioactive accident at Los Alamos laboratory in 1945. That case was one of the most terrifying visions of what the extra energy can cause in the plutonium. There is suspicion that the "Demon Core". Is used to make the radiological weapon that can send radioactive bursts many times. 

That it is possible made the radiological weapon that bases the friction. When the rotating speed of the plutonium ball increases there is something that causes friction that plutonium sends a burst of radioactive radiation. The researchers can make the same effect by hitting the plutonium ball with a hammer. When an enemy approaches that system increases the radiation in the area. So warming of the fission stage is enough to detonate nuclear weapons. 

In the modern versions, there is the possibility that the fission bomb can detonate also by using laser rays. The laser system would increase the temperature of the fission material. And the thing will decrease the critical mass. 

These types of weapons are called sub-critical systems. The fission will be assisted by using electromagnetic radiation which increases the temperature and energy load in the fission material. In some early versions, the fission stage would warm up by using acetylene flame. 

Image ) High-yield thermonuclear detonation "Castle Romeo" (11Mt.) March 26, 1954 (Wikipedia, Castle Romeo)

Sub-critical nuclear weapons are small-size fission systems. Those weapons can use independently. 

But they can also detonate small neutron bombs. Neutron bombs are small fusion or hydrogen bombs. Those systems can use to create neutrons for modern FFF (Fission-Fusion-Fission) weapons. Hydrogen bombs need the fission stage for detonation. The problem with plutonium is that metal is extremely expensive. And one version of the system that can release needed neutrons that detonate the fusion stage is the neutron bomb. 

And they are sending powerful neutron bursts while they are detonating. Those neutrons can conduct to the natural uranium stick. In the hydrogen bombs, the purpose of that stick is to turn to plutonium and detonate the fusion stage. 

They don't require so much uranium. And they can use as the trigger for hydrogen bombs. The fusion stage itself detonates when the neutrons hit the natural uranium stick. When fast neutrons impact the U-238 isotope they turn that thing to Pu-239. And that stick detonates the fusion stage.

Thermonuclear weapon "Alarm clock"("Hydrogen" or "fusion bomb") or Teller-Ulam-construction"

Image 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

Why "Castle Bravo" was too powerful? 

Why 15 megaton "Castle Bravo" was 1,5 times more powerful than its calculated power was? The reason for that was the weapon that detonated in Eniwetok Atoll on March 1, 1954, was warm. Creators of that sold-stage thermonuclear weapon made the calculations for the cryogenic state. And the extra energy stored in the warm lithium-fusion stage caused the Castel Bravo to be more powerful than it should be. And that thing caused radioactive fallout and other damages across the Eniwetok and its neighbor atoll. 

The implosion system that detonates the nuclear bomb is a hammer that increases energy in plutonium bites. Normally the detonation is made by detonating the conventional explosives around the plutonium bite. The increasing energy level detonates the nuclear weapon. The fission bomb is acting as the spark plug in the hydrogen bombs. 

A hydrogen or fusion bomb is a system where is a stick made of natural uranium in the middle of the chamber where is lithium. When the plutonium bomb detonates. That detonation sends neutrons to the U-238 stick. And that neutron burst detonates the fusion stage. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Bravo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Castle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

Image 1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Romeo

Image 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

Let's talk about UFO:s part III (Is this mythical F-19 or TR-3B and is F-19 (SR-72) actually the same aircraft as TR3B?)

(Picture 1)

Let's talk about UFO:s part III (Is this mythical F-19 or TR-3B and is F-19 actually the same aircraft as TR3B?)



Kimmo Huosionmaa



In the picture above the text is a craft, what is mentioned very large. Making the analyze of the craft what is in this picture is very difficult because there is nothing, what can be used to compile the size of this object. So it might be actually quite small, and it might be closer than the observer even thinks. I think that this could be some secret drone- or manned aircraft project. Term "secret" means that this thing is not introduced to the public audience.


If the TR3B "Astra" really exists and that would use nuclear power, there would also be the versions of that plane, what uses conventional turbines. Those versions might use for training that pilots could study the affections about this plane before they would get the nuclear-powered model in their hands. And here I must ask is TR-3B the same plane as "Aurora" or F-19? Here I'm asking is F-19 changed name as SR-72, if the plane is meant to replace the SR-71 "Blackbird?


The shape of this object is similar with STEALTH-plane F-19, what was claimed the most secret aircraft in the world. There was ever proven that this aircraft even existed, but it is claimed to be a combat model of mysterious ”Aurora” aircraft. But this object would be actually quite small, and it could be one of the many drones, what are developed in the United Kingdom and the United States for reconnaissance and combat missions.


Maybe this is the "Robo Falcon", what might have extra jet engines, what thrust to the downwards for VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) missions. The stories of F-19 were stopped when USAF gave F-117 in public and confessed that they had STEALTH airplanes. But many persons believed that this hired much bigger secrets because the shape of F-117 didn't match for the observations of mystery plane, what is flown only in the night. So I must ask again could F-19 be the same aircraft than top secret SR-72? And is that plane ever flown is the different thing. Maybe it was studying project of studying the hypersonic technology, whoever knows the truth.


There would be normal jet motors in backward and different motors for vertical take off. The same models, what are created for those experimental aircraft could be used as the new era of cruise missiles. Some of those missiles would launch via orbiter, and they can use SCRAMJETS for hypersonic flight. The antibody missiles would be like small space shuttles, and I personally think that they are STEALTH-versions of X37B. The cruise missiles of tomorrow could have the capacity to "levitate" on the skies, and wait for orders to attack. And the same models could be used in many aerial vehicles, drones,  manned airplanes and space shuttles.


So the size of that plane could be similar that Mercedes car and those drones can be used to test the models of full-sized fighter military fighters or fighter-bombers. The flying models are easier to hide from the public eye than full-size aircraft. And remote controlled aircraft would not uncover by its pilots who have no need to know, what kind aircraft does this person control.


Sometimes I have thought that this vehicle can be some next-generation cruise missile, what is extremely fast.. Those nuclear- or conventional missiles also would have STEALTH-capacity, but the soft shape would allow them to flight very high speed. And the cruise missiles of tomorrow would be equipped with sophisticated artificial intelligence, what would allow them to change speed and course during the flight, and those missiles can also avoid enemy missiles with sophisticated computer systems, what allows them to use similar flare and chaff systems, what is used in manned aircraft. This would help the cruise missile survivability in this weapons trip to target.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(aircraft)


http://www.hidden-truth.org/6/black-triangle-ufo-tr-3b-astra.html


http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ufo-sighting-giant-triangular-shaped-object-spotted-hovering-over-germany-605707



Picture 1.

http://data1.ibtimes.co.in/cache-img-0-450/en/full/529973/1406724264_ufo-sighting-giant-triangular-object-spotted-hovering-over-germany.jpg


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/lets-talk-about-ufos-part-iii-is-this.html