Einstein was wrong and Bohr was right. (Light can have either particle or wave form, but those forms cannot exist in the same time)

 

Einstein was wrong and Bohr was right. (Light can have either particle or wave form, but those forms cannot exist in the same time)

“Schematic of the MIT experiment: Two single atoms floating in a vacuum chamber are illuminated by a laser beam and act as the two slits. The interference of the scattered light is recorded with a highly sensitive camera depicted as a screen. Incoherent light appears as background and implies that the photon has acted as a particle passing only through one slit. Credit: Courtesy of the researchers.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“MIT physicists have performed the most precise version of the famous double-slit experiment, using ultracold atoms and single photons to reveal the strange dual nature of light as both wave and particle.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“This quantum balancing act—long debated by Einstein and Bohr—was tested without traditional “spring” components, instead relying on atomic “fuzziness” to confirm Bohr’s view: you can’t observe both properties at once. The experiment not only showcases the subtleties of quantum mechanics but also revisits and resolves a historic scientific rivalry.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

MIT proved to be one of the most interesting quantum problems. We cannot observe light as both particles and waves simultaneously. We can see light as particles or waves, but it’s impossible to see those things at the same time. That thing is very interesting if we want to create things like a quantum internet where photons transport data. The photon can act as a particle, and it can also have a wave movement form. But those two positions cannot exist in the same photon, or light quantum, at the same time. An observer can see photon particles and waves at the same time, but those waves and photons are separated, independent light quantum. 

The test is called a double-slit experiment, used to prove that light has particle and wave forms. In 1801, British scientist Thomas Young proved that light has a dual identity. The photon can be a particle or it can have a wave form. But those things are always separated. So a photon is either a particle or a wave. But those forms cannot exist at the same time in the same photon. We can introduce photons as light quanta. That means a photon can stretch to a wave or it can wrinkle to a particle. When a photon stretches, that means the photon turns flat. The stretched photon is the thing that we can see as wave movement. 

“Nearly a century ago, the experiment was at the center of a friendly debate between physicists Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. In 1927, Einstein argued that a photon particle should pass through just one of the two slits and, in the process, generate a slight force on that slit, like a bird rustling a leaf as it flies by. He proposed that one could detect such a force while also observing an interference pattern, thereby catching light’s particle and wave nature at the same time. In response, Bohr applied the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle and showed that the detection of the photon’s path would wash out the interference pattern.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

Einstein defended his idea of light to Niels Bohr. Einstein’s model was that the photon can have wave and particle forms at the same time. Bohr's model was that the photon can have either a particle or a wave form. And as we know, Bohr was right. The knowledge of how photons act can be key to fundamental internet and data transportation models. The system that could input data into the waves and then wrap those waves into photons can open new paths to ultra-secure data transmission. When a photon arrives at the receiver, that thing can open the package and read data from that package. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mit-just-proved-einstein-wrong-in-the-most-famous-quantum-experiment/

What does an electron do in its tunnel? (Quantum tunnels and electrons)

"Scientists have finally glimpsed what electrons do inside a quantum tunnel, revealing a surprising hidden interaction that rewrites our understanding of a fundamental physical process. (Artist’s concept). Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Century-Old Quantum Mystery Solved: Scientists Finally See Inside the Electron’s “Tunnel”)

One of the most interesting things in the quantum tunnels is that light travels faster in those tunnels than around them. The reason for that is that quantum fields that fall into those quantum tunnels move. And the speed of light is relative to its environment. So if a photon travels in a fast-moving quantum field. 

That photon travels faster than it does in a slower traveling field. Quantum fields are the environment. The speed of light is relative to the speed of the environment. Two photons in the same field travel at the same speed. But if another photon travels in a slower field, that photon in faster fields seems faster to a photon that travels in a slower field. 

The quantum tunnel is like a tube. All particles can make a quantum tunnel. And all quantum tunnels are wormholes. The Einstein-Rosen bridge is only the ultimate version of those things. Things like electrons and other particles can also make quantum tunnels.

Finally, researchers see what an electron does in its tunnel. And that opens new visions into quantum technology. When an electron travels in the medium, every single medium is a potential wall. And the electron tunnels itself through those walls. When an electron travels through the potential wall, it releases or receives energy.

So when an electron travels in the potential field, it pushes fields away and makes a tunnel through the potential wall. The tunnel that electrons make in the electromagnetic field is quite similar to the tunnel. Things like black holes are created in gravitational and quantum fields. In quantum tunneling, particles travel through the whirl-shaped potential wall. That potential wall is like a quantum tornado. 

And the thing that makes this quantum tunnel interesting is that the quantum tunnel can inject energy into that particle. The quantum tunnel sends radiation into itself. The quantum tunnel that spins like a whirl turns a higher energy level than the environment inside it. If that quantum whirl pumps enough energy into that particle, it can turn the particle into a black hole. Whether that happens depends on this: can a particle release its energy? 

If a particle is in a long quantum tunnel, energy that falls into the tunnel can push the particle to move deeper and deeper in the tunnel. If that particle cannot push energy out from the tunnel or break the tunnel around it, that means the particle's mass rises. That continues until the particle's energy level rises so high that it can break the whirl around it. Or it can push those fields behind it back. The third version is that the quantum tornado’s energy level decreases so low that particles can break it. That means the particle's energy level turns higher than the quantum tornado around it. 

"Spatiotemporal trajectory of an electron tunneling through Coulomb barrier under strong laser field. Credit: POSTECH" (ScitechDaily, Century-Old Quantum Mystery Solved: Scientists Finally See Inside the Electron’s “Tunnel”)

One of the things in the electron tunneling is that the electron's position must be stable. If an electron wobbles, it cannot make the quantum channel that is tight enough to it can pull an electron into it. 

"Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature." (Wikipedia, Meissner effect)

The idea is that the fast-spinning electron can form an effect. That looks like the Meissner effect. The spinning particle pulls a quantum field like a roll or a whirl. And if the particle can form a whirl that is long enough, that whirl can pull the particle through it. Quantum tunneling through walls happens when a particle makes a whirl through the wall. The whirl can form a quantum channel through an atom's quantum fields. And then the particle can push those fields away from its path. The particle will not interact with those quantum fields. And that makes it possible to teleport positrons through that channel. That thing can have at least military applications.

In a quantum internet, information can travel in electrons. Or the quantum tunnel around it can also transmit data. So, the system can send information impulses connecting them to electrons. Or it can send those energy waves in the quantum tunnel's or quantum whirl's walls. The third way is to transmit information in the form of wave movement through the quantum tunnel. The quantum tunnel can also offer the possibility of making quantum entanglement through that tunnel. That tunnel protects information that travels in the superposition. 

The idea in quantum mechanics is this. All particles make basically similar interactions with their environment. But the scale of the interactions between particles and the environment is different. That means beta radiation is basically a similar phenomenon to the wind, but the thing that moves in beta radiation is the electron. And in the wind, the thing that moves is the air molecule. But then we can think about the electron and its interaction with the environment. 

The big question is what makes the electron move. In beta radiation, the atom’s nucleus starts to send gamma radiation. That radiation makes an electromagnetic shadow in front of the particles. And that shadow pulls electrons into it. 

The answer can be in the thing that is similar to the Meissner effect. When the electron spin is high enough, that thing makes the electromagnetic whirl around it. Or the structures on the electron's shell touch the quantum field and start to roll it around the electron. When that channel starts to grow long enough and the energy level on the other side is higher than the other, that makes electrons travel in the channel or tunnel. 

That makes it possible to create a quantum internet that is more effective and secure than anything before. The electron can transport information between two points. But the problem is this: if researchers don’t know all parts of its interactions, and an electron touches its tunnel, that destroys information immediately. 

https://scitechdaily.com/century-old-quantum-mystery-solved-scientists-finally-see-inside-the-electrons-tunnel/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

Researchers created an artificial cell that can move using its own chemical reactions.

 

Self-replicating machines, or Von Neumann machines, are artificial cells. 

The artificial cell, or biological nanomachine, is an organic structure that can make a copy of itself using polymerase reactions. So, we can say that the polymerase molecules that can duplicate themselves are the artificial cells. The nanopolymer that can self-replicate is the simplest possible artificial cell. If that kind of polymer travels in the desired cells, it can simply fill those cells. That means those molecules act like ricin. The nanomachine can also destroy the cell so that the gangrene will not spread. 

Those organic polymers can also be used to close blood vessels. In ideal cases, those molecules can make copies of themselves using molecules that are in their environment. So the nanomachine can benefit similar proteins that form cells. That makes those polymers suitable for surgical operations. But those things can also have military applications. The artificial cell can produce those molecules. The cell can release them through its ion pump. 

"The terms "artificial cell" and "synthetic cell" are used in a variety of different fields and can have different meanings, as it is also reflected in the different sections of this article. Some stricter definitions are based on the assumption that the term "cell" directly relates to biological cells and that these structures therefore have to be alive (or part of a living organism) and, further, that the term "artificial" implies that these structures are artificially built from the bottom-up, i.e. from basic components. As such, in the area of synthetic biology, an artificial cell can be understood as a completely synthetically made cell that can capture energy, maintain ion gradients, contain macromolecules as well as store information and have the ability to replicate. This kind of artificial cell has not yet been made." (Wikipedia, Artificial cell) 

That is the nanotechnical version of the artificial cells. Technology advances, and AI can read DNA quite well. That means the DNA-controlled nanomachines, like cells that produce medicines, travel in the body, search for the right cells, and then inject those medicines into targeted cells, can be a reality quite soon. Those cells might have a self-destruction mode. When they do their mission, they will destroy themselves. Those cells might not have the ability to decay. But there is always the possibility that some retrovirus can destroy that self-destruction mechanism. 

The macro-size version of those things is the automated factory that uses robot swarms and robot groups to make a copy of itself. Those automated, AI-controlled systems can play a vital role in space exploration. 

The automated factory utilizes robots to source materials for new robots and other products that can be manufactured using advanced 3D printers. That system can create a fully functioning copy of itself. So that means the Von Neumann machines, or self-replicating machines, are some kind of macro cells. The nano-sized artificial cell is the nano-sized Von Neumann machine. 

But the artificial cell can also mean that DNA is cleaned of unnecessary sequences. That means those artificial cells can make only things that their creators want. The artificial cell can create many things, like artificial spider silk, which is one of the strongest materials in nature. The hollow fiber of nanosilk can be used to destroy targeted cells. Those nano-silk fibers can lock the targeted cells' ion pumps. Or they can be used to inject things like biologically produced medicines into the desired cells.  Artificial cells are like physical versions of distilled AI. Those cells can do only things that their creators want. 

The polymerase chain reactions make it possible to create lots of those systems. The self-replicating molecules can make new types of medicine possible. And they can also be used in self-assembly structures. But the artificial cells required outside energy sources, until now. The internal power source makes those cells more independent. That allows them to travel in the body and search for things like bacteria and cancer cells. 

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/first-artificial-cell-chemical-navigation

https://phys.org/news/2025-05-artificial-cell-mimic-reproduction-polymeric.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_cell

Water crystallization in low gravity and temperature can open new ways to model water.

"The Universe’s most abundant ice isn’t formless—it’s secretly laced with crystals. And that might change how we think about water, planets, and life itself. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com

Scientists have uncovered a hidden structure inside the Universe’s most common ice—found on comets, moons, and interstellar dust—challenging decades of belief." (ScitechDaily, Tiny Crystals Hidden in Cosmic Ice Could Rewrite What We Know About Water and Life)

The new observations about the water crystallization can open new models for water and life in the universe. When water crystallizes at a very low temperature and under weak gravity it can form microcrystals. Those microcrystals are something that doesn’t form on Earth. The microcrystals can form a structure alone or with some liquid gas that makes it look like liquid. If there is liquid nitrogen or helium between those microcrystal bites that thing can cause a situation where those crystals can form the “icy quicksand”. 

That means those crystal ice bites behave like sand in quicksand and the liquid gas acts like water in quicksand. There is a possibility that the extremely small nanocrystals could form the liquid-looking structure on icy planets. Those new observations about water behavior open the road to making models about the lifeforms. Or, sharper saying the DNA, or mRNA controlled icy crystals can exist on some distant worlds. In those ultra-cold conditions, the DNA or RNA can make those crystals act like cells act in our planet. 

The image of Pluto from the New Horizons probe. The white structure near the pole seems to be some kind of geyser or “icy volcano”. That means Pluto's low gravity along with the Kharon moons' gravity effect and tidal forces can keep water from moving on that strange world. If there is liquid water on that dwarf planet. 

“In this image of Pluto’s surface, the red luminance corresponds to the infrared data acquired by the Ralph/MVIC instrument carried by New Horizons. Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute/ZLDoyle” (ScitechDaily, New Horizons Reveals Dunes Made of Tiny Grains of Solid Methane on Pluto)

That doesn’t mean. The undersurface ocean must cover the entire planet. There can be small “lakes” on that dwarf planet. Maybe most of the liquid is methane, nitrogen, and other gases. Those lakes that can hold water can be below the white cap near Pluto’s pole. 

The theory about quantum water is also interesting. 

On distant planets, water is at the minimum energy level. The hydrogen and oxygen atoms are in their maximum size. And those atoms form the Bose-Einstein condensate. There is a possibility that the weak gravity along with other effects can turn those water molecules straight and make them spin very fast. In that case, the water molecules that are very low can be unable to make bonds with the other water molecules. That means in the low temperature and low gravity it is possible that the water remains in a form that looks like liquid. 

This kind of liquid water is nothing that we see on Earth. This kind of phenomenon can be possible only in a low-pressure, lowest possible temperature, that is near 0K. And the third thing is the ultra-low gravity field. The low gravity field can keep water liquid far below zero. The thing that keeps water in liquid form is the whirls that move the water. 

If we think of dwarf planets like Pluto and Eris and their moons, their gravity is very low. And the other thing is that those objects are very thin. The third thing is that the gravitational effect of their moons like Kharon is stronger than on Earth. That can cause conditions where the whirls can keep the water liquid even in those extremely low temperatures. Tidal forces of those moons are more powerful because the dwarf planet's gravity is not very strong. 

https://scitechdaily.com/new-horizons-reveals-dunes-made-of-tiny-grains-of-solid-methane-on-pluto/

https://scitechdaily.com/tiny-crystals-hidden-in-cosmic-ice-could-rewrite-what-we-know-about-water-and-life/

CERN found a new meson called toponium.

"This illustration shows toponium, made of a top-antitop pair of quarks, bound together into a meson rather than the (more typical) situation where they decay away before forming a bound state. Toponium wasn't initially expected, but observations from the CMS and ATLAS collaboration have revealed evidence for such a bound state, showing that it very likely does exist. Can the top quark, the shortest-lived particle of all, bind with anything else? Yes it can! New results at the LHC demonstrate toponium exists." (BigThink, The top quark isn’t a loner after all: “toponium” is real!)

In normal conditions. Electrons. And composite particles protons and neutrons form atoms. In a simplified model, two up and one down quark form the proton. Two down and one up quark form a neutron. The lifetime of a neutron is about 14 minutes and 40 seconds. The reason for that is that energy travels from the down quarks to the up quark and that forms a reflection or standing wave that destroys the neutron. The lifetime of a proton is not known. Protons and neutrons are hadrons. A  hadron that involves three quarks is called a baryon. 

"In particle physics, a baryon is a type of composite subatomic particle that contains an odd number of valence quarks, conventionally three. Protons and neutrons are examples of baryons; because baryons are composed of quarks, they belong to the hadron family of particles. Baryons are also classified as fermions because they have half-integer spin." (Wikipedia, Baryons)

The name "baryon", introduced by Abraham Pais, comes from the Greek word for "heavy", because, at the time of their naming, most known elementary particles had lower masses than the baryons. Each baryon has a corresponding antiparticle (antibaryon) where their corresponding antiquarks replace quarks. For example, a proton is made of two up quarks and one down quark; and its corresponding antiparticle, the antiproton, is made of two up antiquarks and one down antiquark." (Wikipedia, Baryons)

Sometimes hadrons involve more or less, than than three quarks. Those hadrons are known as mesons. Unlike baryons, mesons' existence is very short. And the reason for that is the standing wave that forms between those quarks. Unlike in neutrons where that standing wave form between the neutron shell and the up quark the standing wave that puts those quarks pushes each other away from those quarks. Unlike in baryons, in mesons, the standing wave has no space where it can go. Energy can travel to the meson's shell and destroy that quantum field. Or it can push the quarks away from each other with its full power. 

"A hadron is a composite subatomic particle. Every hadron must fall into one of the two fundamental classes of particle, bosons and fermions." (Wikipedia, Hadrons)

"In particle physics, a meson  is a type of hadronic subatomic particle composed of an equal number of quarks and antiquarks, usually one of each, bound together by the strong interaction. Because mesons are composed of quark subparticles, they have a meaningful physical size, a diameter of roughly one femtometre (10−15 m),which is about 0.6 times the size of a proton or neutron. All mesons are unstable, with the longest-lived lasting for only a few tenths of a nanosecond. Heavier mesons decay to lighter mesons and ultimately to stable electrons, neutrinos and photons." (Wikipedia, Meson)

"Outside the nucleus, mesons appear in nature only as short-lived products of very high-energy collisions between particles made of quarks, such as cosmic rays (high-energy protons and neutrons) and baryonic matter. Mesons are routinely produced artificially in cyclotrons or other particle accelerators in the collisions of protons, antiprotons, or other particles." (Wikipedia, Meson)

Toponum: the meson with top quark and its antiquark 

"Of all the particles in the Standard Model, the heaviest one is also the shortest-lived: the top quark (and antiquark), which lives for just half a yoctosecond. Based on the range of the strong force and the top quark’s short lifetime, it was predicted that the top quark could never bind together with other quarks, simply decaying too quickly to do so. But in rare cases, quark-antiquark pairs involving top and antitop quanta can indeed form a bound state before decaying: toponium. Both CMS and ATLAS have now validated toponium’s existence at the LHC." (BigThink, The top quark isn’t a loner after all: “toponium” is real!)

Toponium is one of the quarkoniums. "In particle physics, quarkonium (from quark and -onium, pl. quarkonia) is a flavorless meson whose constituents are a heavy quark and its own antiquark, making it both a neutral particle and its own antiparticle. The name "quarkonium" is analogous to positronium, the bound state of electron and anti-electron. The particles are short-lived due to matter-antimatter annihilation." Wikipedia, Quarkonium)

The existence of the toponium is almost certain. That thing is a new type of particle. It’s the composite particle involving the top quark and its antiquark. The existence of toponium remains only for a very short time. The top quark must not touch its antiquark or the toponium turns into energy. That very high-energy composite particle can open a view into the top quark behavior. 

And maybe that thing can tell researchers about the possibility that somewhere at the beginning of the universe were composite particles that involved some other than up and down quarks. Those particles' existence is not possible in our universe. The top quark’s large mass makes those particles very unstable under normal conditions. In the same way if the top quark touches it anti quark that causes annihilation. 

The existence of the top and bottom quark-based baryons is not possible in the modern universe. But maybe in a very young universe conditions like energy level were high enough that the highest energy quarks could form material. But when the temperature in the universe decreased, the outside energy could not push those high-energy particles against each other. When the energy level in the universe decreased, those composite particles decayed. And the quarks jumped away from that structure. 

The toponium is not the bound state of charmium or bottonium. The top quark has no time to hadronize or make the bounds with charm or bottom quarks. An interesting thing is that toponium will involve particles and its antiparticle pair, the antitop quark. When toponium annihilates that reaction releases energy and those quarks turn into wave movement. If toponium is someday confirmed, that will open new paths to particle physics. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/top-quark-loner-toponium/

https://home.cern/news/news/physics/cms-finds-unexpected-excess-top-quarks

https://indico.cern.ch/event/1444046/contributions/6216409/attachments/2966217/5218739/intro-toponium-maltoni.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quarkonium

The String theory and the 5-plet problem.

"Concept image of strange particles in an atom." (InterestingEngineering)

The 5-plet is a strange 5-particle group detected in the Large Hadron Collider that can challenge String theory and give answers for Dark Matter problems. The problem is that the 5-plet must not exist in the String model. But it still exists. When we think about String theory itself, that theory seems to give answers to every problem in the universe. String theory has the same problem with the Big Bang theory. That theory is commonly accepted, even if it's incomplete. String theory is made for filling the Big Bang theory giving answers to where the material that formed the Big Bang came from. The purpose of String Theory is to answer the question: What “exploded" in the Big Bang? 

String theory is not the same as the Grand Unified Theory, GUT. Some people think that the String theory gives answers to all problems in the universe. 

That is not even close to the truth. The String theory handles small parts of the entirety. And the thing that supports some kind of superstring’s existence is the cosmic web. The main idea of the String theory is that the internal superstrings or energy channels form a dimension. And the universe is like a bubble in one extremely large superstring. Those strings also form material and everything. And every single particle is a bubble in a superstring. We often forget that the Superstring theory is a repair tool for the Big Bang theory, which should explain where the material and energy came from. 

(InterestingEngineering)

The problem with the Big Bang theory is this: it doesn’t answer one of the most critical questions in physics. Where did that energy that formed the Big Bang come from? The Big Bang theory's basement is in the wave-particle duality, WPD. That means wave movement can turn into particles and particles can turn into wave movement. But without wave movement, there are no particles. So there are many updates in the Big Bang theory. The most modern model is that time itself formed the Big Bang. And the Big Bang was rather the Big Burst than the single Bang. That means in modern models the Big Bang was a series of events that formed the material in the form as we know it. 

That means the Big Bang was some kind of annihilation, but it doesn’t answer where those particles that formed the annihilation came from. One of the suggestions for that question is that there formed a giant black hole that exploded.  That black hole could have formed from wave movement that existed before the Big Bang. Or, another suggestion is that the hypothetical black hole was a remnant of the universe that existed before our universe. The multiverse model explains the space as a dimension where Big Bangs happen all the time. And universes form in the crossing points of other universes' radiation. That radiation pushes particles or wave movement into the points where their gravitational effect starts to form new universes. 

But proving that the model is not a very easy thing. If there is material outside the universe, that material is so cold that we cannot see it. But the multiverse is a logical conclusion that begins from the galaxies, galaxy clusters, and superclusters. The idea is that the universe itself is part of a larger entirety. But then we face another way to answer the problem of where everything came from. That answer is written in a very incomplete Brane theory. The idea is that the dimension or third dimension simply collapsed. That opened the channel from the fourth dimension straight to the second dimension. That energy channel formed the event called the Big Bang. If that model can be true the 3D material cannot close that channel because its energy level is too high. 

https://interestingengineering.com/science/ghost-particles-that-could-snap-string-theory

https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/things-know-can-data-large-hadron-collider-snap-string-theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

Hunting the fifth force.

"Physicists are pushing the boundaries of the Standard Model by investigating the possibility of a fifth fundamental force using ultra-precise measurements of calcium atoms. By comparing subtle energy shifts in isotopes, researchers hope to uncover signs of new physics that could help explain the universe’s hidden mass. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Physicists Close In on the Fifth Force That Could Unlock the Mystery of Dark Matter)

Researchers search for the fifth force. The fifth force can be the thing that we know as dark energy and dark matter. There are four known interactions or forces in the universe. Those forces are gravity, electromagnetism, and weak and strong nuclear interactions, or, forces. There is a possibility that the fifth force is the opposite of gravity. So that causes a question: can there be material without the fifth force? 

That fifth force can be the mirror-gravitation. Normal gravity has only pulling ability. And that means the fifth force can have only a pushing effect. There is a model that the color charge, or, using other words, we can say quantum colors can have similar interactions with the fifth force. 

The quantum color between gluons in the strong interaction can open the fifth force to us. That means there should be something that causes the repelling effect between quarks. The model goes like this. If we use the weak interaction as a model we can say that there are two gluons between quarks just like there are W and Z boson pairs between protons and neutrons. That gluon pair creates the quantum low pressure between those quarks. When those gluons orbit each other they simply harness energy fields into them. And then they transfer that energy into the quarks around them. That electromagnetic low-pressure can be the quantum gravity, or gravitational quantum dots. And the quantum gravity model goes like this: the gravity forms of the quantum dots and those quantum dots are entirely called gravity centers. The number and density of those quantum dots determine the strength of gravity. 

“Color charge is a property of quarks and gluons that is related to the particles' strong interactions in the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Like electric charge, it determines how quarks and gluons interact through the strong force; however, rather than there being only positive and negative charges, there are three "charges", commonly called red, green, and blue. Additionally, there are three "anti-colors", commonly called anti-red, anti-green, and anti-blue. Unlike electric charge, color charge is never observed in nature: in all cases, red, green, and blue (or anti-red, anti-green, and anti-blue) or any color and its anti-color combine to form a "color-neutral" system. For example, the three quarks making up any baryon universally have three different color charges, and the two quarks making up any meson universally have opposite color charges.” (Wikipedia, Color charge)

(Wikipedia, Color charge)

"An animation of the interaction inside a neutron. The gluons are represented as circles with the color charge in the center and the anti-color charge on the outside." (Wikipedia, Color charge)

“Quarks have a color charge of red, green, or blue and antiquarks have a color charge of antired, antigreen, or antiblue. Gluons have a combination of two color charges (one of red, green, or blue and one of antired, antigreen, or antiblue) in a superposition of states that are given by the Gell-Mann matrices. “ (Wikipedia, Color charge)

When a quark takes enough energy it releases that energy as wave movement. That means the fifth force is the force that destroys the atoms. There is a possibility that somewhere is a force that interacts directly between quarks without gluons. Or there is also the possibility that quarks can repel gluons. And what happens if quarks push gluons away from their position? 

Can quantum color hide the fifth force? In quantum chromodynamics, CQD quarks and gluons have a so-called quantum color. Gluons can have one of three quantum colors blue, red, and green. Anti-quarks have opposite quantum colors anti-blue, anti-green, and anti-red. The strong interaction is the interaction between quarks and gluons. The gluon is the boson that connects the quarks together. And transmits the strong nuclear force. The gluon’s color charge is a little bit different from the quark’s color charge. 

The gluon’s color charge is a superposition of the quantum color and anti-color. The green and anti-green for example cannot form gluons, or they cannot exist in the same gluon.. So gluon has two heads, for example, blue and anti-green. So the quark is blue-antigreen. As you see in the diagram below. When we see that the blue quark emits the blue-antigreen gluon we can ask if the fifth force release happens in that process. 

This is why the strong nuclear interaction is also known as the color force. That color is similar to the electromagnetism in electrons. That means the quantum color is one thing that keeps quarks in their entirety called hadrons. In traditional models, the atom’s core and electron shell interactions are described as a whole. There is a possibility that the neutron’s interaction with electrons is different from that of protons. That means a neutron sends some kind of energy impulse to the electron and pushes it away. That means some of those quantum colors can interact with electrons. 

https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-close-in-on-the-fifth-force-that-could-unlock-the-mystery-of-dark-matter/

https://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/particle-physics/content-section-6.2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_charge

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_matrices

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

Tachyons, the hypothetical faster-than-light particles, are still under research.

If tachyon exists it can send information to the past. 

New tachyon research aims to determine if tachyons exist. And another thing is can tachyons exist in our 3D universe? The model of tachyons is that those particles are 4 or even more dimensions. That makes it impossible to see them from the 3D universe. So tachyons can exist only in higher dimensions or in energy levels where particles cannot exchange information with 3D particles. 

The only place where tachyon can exist in the form we can see is the black hole. There is a possibility that tachyons exist behind the event horizon. If tachyons exist in the black hole, that hypothetical particle can cause the black hole’s evaporation. 

And, if tachyons form in a black hole when ultimate gravity and energy press particles like electrons and photons. And those particles could escape from black holes. The tachyon can also explain dark energy. When this hypothetical particle comes to the third dimension it releases energy. That can explain why nobody has seen that particle yet. The tachyon that falls to the 3rd dimension can turn immediately into photons or some other particles like Higgs bosons. 

The problem with tachyon measurements is this. Those particles can: 

A) Turn into photons

B) They can form photons if they come out from higher dimensions. 

So if tachyon is a particle that exists in higher dimensions its energy level will be so high that it jumps out from the 3D universe. And if tachyon falls to the 3D universe. That means it sends an energy impact around it. In that model, the tachyon forms a photon by sending a shockwave into the space around it. That model means that a photon is the shockwave in the base energy- or base quantum field in the third dimension. The image of a photon can support that model, because the photon has a hole that the ring- or donut-shaped quantum field surrounds. That ring-shaped structure is similar to when somebody throws a stone in the water. 

And tachyon can form that kind of energy field, if it falls from the 4th dimension. And releases energy into its environment. If researchers someday can exchange data or wave movement with tachyons that bring unlimited power sources in their hands. 

But that requires. That the tachyons can exist. And another thing is that those particles should exist as tachyons in the 3D universe as long as they can release their energy to the receiver. Or they must interact with 3D particles in some other way. The superposition and entanglement with 3D particles bring a lot of energy into our universe. The main problem is that tachyon is the dominating part in that process. The system cannot control tachyons that is in the 4th dimension. 

So the system must adjust the receiving particle so that the dominating particle causes resonance in it. And then starts to send data to that particle. The thing is similar to finding channels on the radio without knowing any radio frequency. The system must adjust the spin and energy level of the particle and hope that it finds a frequency that is the same as some tachyon. 

The problem with superposition and entanglement with 3D particles is that they must reach so high energy levels that they can force tachyons to oscillate and resonate. Then those particles must start to pump information into them. 

There are tests where the particle will be driven as close to the speed of light as possible. Then that particle can be put to spin. There is a hope that the energy that a spinning particle pulls from its environment. 

That can pull tachyons into the third dimension. When the energy level of the spinning particle decreases it should pull tachyon to the 3D universe. Theoretical tachyon engine just pulls tachyons from their tachyonic space. And that opens the channel where other tachyons can arrive in the 3D universe.  When tachyons come to our universe that particle releases its extra energy. The engine uses that energy to create energy. If, a particle can make a superposition with tachyons that brings energy into the universe. If that thing is possible, that is the biggest revolution in history. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/new-tachyon-study-could-unlock-the-secrets-of-time-travel-and-reality/ss-AA1HBksF

https://phys.org/news/2024-07-physicists-tachyons-special-theory.html

https://scitechdaily.com/faster-than-a-speeding-photon-how-tachyons-challenge-modern-physics/

https://thedebrief.org/bizarre-tachyons-that-may-be-able-to-send-data-back-in-time-could-be-reconciled-with-special-relativity/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon