The strange story of the Triumphal arch in Paris and Georges-Eugène Haussmann

Arc de Triomphe
Picture I

Kimmo Huosionmaa

As we all know there are many stories about the famous persons and famous buildings. In the middle of Paris is the monument, what is called the Arc de Triomphe, what is called as Triumphal arch in this text. The monument is like the box, what is open for the four dimensions. And there is one very bad story about this monument. The architecture in Paris is basing the idea of the very wide streets and boulevards, what makes difficult to make barricades, and they would give the soldiers the ability to crush the rebellions.



Haussmann was not the architect of that building, but this man could use it in his own plans, for creating the new version of Paris after the Communards rebel in 1871, but the modernization of the city began in 1852, and Haussmann left the place in 1870. But in this case, I believe that this movement from the position was because Haussmann's name wanted to keep clean in this bloody battle. And maybe the plans of that rebellion were in the government's hand before it started.


And that's why Haussmann left the position because France was in the war against Prussia in 1870, and that was the loss for France. And this removing was planned to protect Haussmans identity. The making drawings for the Paris were excellent covert-story for making fortresses and other things for France. And because of that,  some people would believe that somebody wanted to take revenge for that man.  There were tunnels under the city, what the troops could use, and other traps, what was able to use against the occupation, if Bismarck's troops took long-term control in Paris.


But there is a story about this monument, that the idea of the Triumph arch is to explore the giant gas explosive, what would terminate all rebellious troops in seconds. The idea of this weapon is very simple. The gunpowder or some other powder would be dropped on the fire, what burns inside the building. In the small-scale use, that thing would make the powder explosion, what would cause very bad destructions in the area of Charles De Gaulle-square.


And at the same time, the sewer system of the Paris would be opened to the streets. Those sewers were full of methane at that time, and if the fire would be released in the Triumph Arch, would it advance in the air like the wall breaker. Because houses are in the same direction with the boulevards, they would drive the pressure impact like canyons. And this makes also volcanoes more lethal if the pyroclastic gas would travel inside canyons.  I don't know the truth about this story, but as we know, many things in Paris are made for security purposes after the Communard rebellion.


During that rebellion, many parts of this city were destroyed, and the rebuilding of the Paris was very important. And the parliament hired the architect, named Georges-Eugène Haussmann for making the plans for the new city, what is known for its boulevards and streets. But the main purpose of that action was to make that city more peaceful, that was before the rebellion. The ideas what Haussmann used in the Paris taken in the architecture of many other cities.


But as we know, this man was the little bit different than others, and this caused rumors about some kind of super weapons. And if Haussmann would be allowed to accomplish this idea, that would be most extreme FAE (Fuel Air Explosive) on Earth. The reason, why the Triumph arch is not in the middle of the city was, that the army would stand at the west, and it would be in the sap, and then wait for the explosion.


Haussmann's biography

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges-Eug%C3%A8ne_Haussmann

Franco-Prussian war 1870

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Prussian_War

Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_de_Triomphe

Picture I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_de_Triomphe

Writing about political "Illuminati" and the power across the party limits

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The term political "Illuminati" is normally meaning the political power across the party borders. Behind that group of politicians is claimed to be some economic groups, what supports politicians across the political field, for creating comfortable laws. Those politicians normally ride with some international conflicts, but those conflicts cover the tax-laws and customs, and who wants to talk about taxes and money when our boy is dying. But those laws are in the political control of senates and parliaments. And those laws are more important for economic life than some war.


The internet is full of stories about political corruption and "Illuminati", what means high-class politicians, whose families have been members of the parliaments and senates in generations. Those families have "brandy" how to get votes, and they would get very much political power inside the governments. There are reasons, why people believe that. Sometimes the thoughts about political conspiracy are caused because of mistakes. One of those mistakes has been McCarthy's case. Joseph McCarthy (1908-1957) was the senator of Wisconsin, and well known about the persecutions against communists.


Eugene McCarthy (1916-2005) who had the similar family name with Joseph McCarthy was against Vietnam War, and I don't see anything special about the people believe that those men were members of the same family. In real life, those persons probably were not known together, and the namesake is the total coincidence. The same family name makes people believe all kind of stuff, and sometimes some persons claim, that the Eugene McCarthy's policy against Vietnam war was only acting or playing some kind of role. In this theory member of the same family would want to keep political control by playing different roles in different areas.


Those politicians would ask the people, what they think about some actions, and after that politician would fix the speeches for supporting the majority of the people. That guarantees very much votes.  Maybe they would represent different political parties, but if they are popular enough, would that guarantee that the votes come to the same family, and if another would be dropped from the political elite, would another person allowed to continue. That model would use some kind of economical groups, what want to guarantee, that their men are in the parliament.

There are many interesting things in the world

(https://www.technischesmuseum.at/object/bagdad-batterie)

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many things, what are interesting people like me, and when we are thinking about the ancient aliens, super weapons of holy bloodlines, we might sometimes see, that there are many times the same thing in many times at the Internet. If somebody writes too much about bombers and weapons, that would make the blog seems like some gun bazaar. That kind of things brings sometimes burglars to home and that will be the very disturbing thing if they destroy the lock or door.


Of course, the military equipment is the very interesting thing about writing some stuff, and when we are honest, we would not know, what kind of systems those weapons include. But as we might know, that the missiles and other weapons are governmental secretive things, and normal people would even know about their homing systems.  Those systems are normally top secret, but the principles of that equipment are actually "open information".  The details of the system are classified, but the system works in a similar way as the automatic traffic control system works. The system what scans the registration plates from cars can also use to recognize the houses, and then the weapon tries to do, what it's the main computer wants it to do.


This means, that replying the same things, again and again, would that seem very boring. The problem of many writers is that they would not let their ideas to fly. They don't dare to use imagination when they are writing something. When we are thinking about ancient batteries or some other miracles of the world, somehow we always think, that if some ancient Sumerians would have the battery and they could make electricity, would that automatically mean, that they had the lamps and computers.


Maybe the Sumerians used the electricity only for galvanizing the metal statues by the gold layer. Or they might know the electric arc lamp, but that is not probably true. Making the electric arc is very easy if the person has multiple batteries in use. Maybe those Sumerians would only use the electricity in some holy rituals because if you would put the electrodes to their tongue, that would give a strange feeling. But the battery could be also the fake.


When we are thinking about writing about some things, what are looking supernatural, we are facing the situation, that many of those things are getting the natural shape. And one of those things is why number 666 is the number of the beast. The reason is, that this number is very easy to remember, and the judge must remember when he would give hard punishments. Also, the number could be marked for people, in what house some people have put the gunpowder cask, what was meant for some hated people. That kind of thins made the number 666 the number of the beast.

Why we afraid artificial intelligence and new killer-drones?

(Picture I)

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/p/why-we-afraid-artificial-intelligence.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is a writing about the paradoxes of war and militarism. The militarism and war are things, what is strictly out from normal people head, and there are many things, why is not very tolerated to speak about the military systems. One of them is that the national security is limiting the comments about those things. And when we are looking very sharply to the militarism and army, we are seeing that our religion has been against violence in 2000 years, and we still fight together by using weapons.


And even if we are against violence, many people are getting their salary from military forces their equipment, and the weapons industry around them. War is good business for the weapon dealers, who offers more and more lethal and advanced weapons, what suits for many missions. Also, support equipment like GPS systems is a very good article, because the owner of those satellites can cut the location signals of those weapons, and that's why they cannot use against the deliverer of GPS-system, and that ties the clients more effectively to the influence of another actor in the field of international politics and strategies. Strategies have always depended on the politics, and that's why the political support for weapon trade is extremely important.

We must say that using killer-drones would create the military, where doesn't serve a single man. But here we must know, that if there would be autonomous killer robots, what replaces the places of the military personnel, we would come to the situation, that there would be no work for the men, who serve in those military forces. And one of the first group. what would be lost their jobs, are the fighter pilots, who serve in the war against terrorism. Those missions can be done by using drones, what just fly to the target, and then drop their weapons.


The human's advantage in comparing with robots is that human would make surprising movements for those aircraft. And that's why human pilots still win the drones, and this is the thing, what keeps those pilots in the cockpits. When we are thinking that the use of missiles and drones is somehow cowardly action, we must say, that the leaders of the terrorist organizations and military forces would not be in any danger in those operations. If some Tornado or Sukhoi-pilot would drop the bombs from the high altitude like 10 000 meters, there would not have the single missile, what could harm that aircraft, if the opponent is some kind of Isis-terrorist.


The smart bombs, what have satellite guidance are extremely sharp, and in those operations, they could destroy targets very effectively.  The civilians are not suitable to comment those things, because that would be harmful to the reputation of military forces. If those pilots would be replaced with the artificial intelligence, there would not be heroes in another side, what is, of course, our side. But when we are going to speak about the fighters, we could act like some children at the sandbox, who are asking each other, whose car is the best?


In this case, when we are talking about multipurpose-fighter contracts, we can ask the question, what is the best, 4th,5th or 6th. generation fighter or multirole aircraft? And in this case, people have the right to talk, which one is the best, Super-Hornet, Gripen or SU-27? And if the writings have no influence or expertise, why those people would not have right to write about those things? Of course, somebody says, that I'm writing this for revenge because I didn't have promotion in the 100th. anniversary of the  Finnish defense forces, and that's why I' writing about this thing.  But people have right to their opinions.

Sources:

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/kotimaa/artikkeli/siviilin-ei-kannata-tehda-paatelmia-havittajakaupan-huutelijat-harmittavat-puolustusministeri-niinistoa/6936626#gs.wCcrRNM

Picture I
http://nationalinterest.org/files/styles/main_image_on_posts/public/main_images/testflyging_av_forste_norske_f-35_-_22492943335_14_0.jpg?itok=1NsSjsUW

Complex political triangle in the international politics, authoritarian governments, great natural resources and nuclear weapons

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Most of the wars are reasons the economic conditions.The war of natural resources was also Hitler excuse for Barbarossa. And before that for the attack to Poland.Lebensraum was the excuse for the attack to Poland. But real reasons were the oil of Bessarabia. For that object must German army open the door to the Soviet Union. And the German people were told that those attacks are caused by the need to connect those areas, where was living German people in Germany. If the oil fields would be attacked by nuclear weapons, what would use against troops what are fighting in that area, would the destruction be very total, the troops that are serving in that area would be eliminated, but the infrastructure would also be destroyed. That would because many problems when the oil production would be restarted. Those problems would be that this area is polluted by radioactive material, and also the oil production systems what have been in that area should rebuild.


Those nations that are targeted to strike have many times dictatorship or the authoritarian way to control the people in their model of leading the state. The situation of the political leadership, the model of leading the nation is not so simple as people normally thinks. Many people ask why those governments would not be fallen by military forces, but those actions would make many deaths in those areas. And of course the western pilots and other military personnel, who operates in that are are always in danger. If the nuclear weapons are used in those countries, would those weapons sweep the opposing military forces out of the area, but those weapons would also destroy the oil refineries from those areas.


Dictatorship is the model of the state in many nations, what have very much natural resources. And that makes them perfect target for military actions, but also we must remember that those countries are independent nations, and the great natural resources of their area are always causing the problems because those national leaders can choose their own supporters. The problem of those authoritarian leaders of the nation is that those governments are actually confessed in United Nations.


And this makes the situation very difficult and complex. Those nations the social and economic differences are very strong. And some cases normal person, who lives in those countries cannot even write their own name. And the only book, what they have ever kept in their hands is Koran. That makes those people very good target for provocateurs, who would promise them the place in paradise if they would join terrorist groups.


The problem with dictatorship is that those nations have no opposite force for their leaders, who would not get information of the consequence of their orders. Or they would get information, what involves only positive things about their decisions. They would not see the other side of their orders, what could cause something, what they won't even think. If the maker for decision would not see every side of the thing, the decision would be someway unthinkable.


Every leader of the nation needs the opposition, that those leaders see another part of the problem, what might be more complex than the rulers ever thought. Then we are thinking of the situation when the Soviet Union was a collapse, the world was tuned right. There was not socialism anymore, and workers were lost their supporter, was the message, what was told to people. When we are starting to think the opinions of the working people, they would not get support from the Soviet Union as much as people thought. The reason for turning right was that the fear of the Soviet Union was dammed many things in the society to the left wing, and in rumors, every mayday parade was caused by the Soviet Union.


The laws changed to right, and the society works like some kind of water. When people would transfer the water to another side of the pool,  there would be a giant wave. The collapse of the Soviet Union released the wave, what fell to the right side of society. In that time the socialism was fallen, and this thing caused the social room, where the only real ideology was marketing economy. That thing caused the situation, where nobody had power in parliament to say nothing against the right wing laws, what was not very well organized.


Because opposition was weak, there would be no reason to listen to their opinions. Many persons believe, that left-wing opposition presenters were protected by Soviet nuclear weapons. Why the government should ever hear other opinions of the laws, what it has right to adjust? In that situation, many people saw, that opposition was led by the Soviet Union, and when that supporter was left, there were no reasons to listen to opposition arguments. Now we can see the results of that kind of politics. In that time the Soviet Union was gone in history. There was not the boogeyman for media, what would use as the silencer. There was an intuition, that nothing was allowed to say against the Soviet Union, because if the leaders of that country would start nuclear attack immediately if some writings don’t support it.


This is left the very bad thing in our political commonwealth. The fear of nuclear strike has given us the journals, where is sometimes glamorize the Russian nuclear arsenal. That arsenal is of course very large, but in those writings the only thing, what is mentioned is that Russia has the world's largest Nuclear weapons, and that’s it. If the leaders of that nation would not like the writings, it would use its nukes immediately. And this is very short-term way of thinking. The war is the cause of the economic situation or attempts to get economic advantages of those areas.


And if somebody would use nuclear weapons against the targeted country, the results would be, that all infrastructure of that nation would be destroyed. In this case, the nuclear weapons would cause the situation, that all cities of the opponent are rumbled to dust. Also, large land areas would be polluted, and that causes that the nuclear weapons make those land areas dangerous to use. The cleaning of those areas would take very long period, and the economy of that area would be the break. So the financial advantages could be very small from those areas where nuclear weapons have been used. So this limits sometimes the will of using those ultimate weapons against some nations.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/complex-political-triangle-in.html

About the truth and lies, what is written by poets and historians

Kimmo Huosionmaa

None historian ever told the absolute truth, and the history has been faked from ancient Greece. The reason, why historians told lies about the leaders was practical. If the leaders of the nations didn’t like the texts, what historians wrote, their fate was very painful death in the mouth of emperors pet crocodile or lion. In the real world, the politics have been the ruling element when historians wrote their texts.


When we are observing the familiar books like Julius Caesar’s ” War in Gallic” we must consider, that there are many things, what makes us to suspect that this book is some kind of ”better version” about the things, what claimed to happen, when Julius Caesar was head of the legions in Gallic. I believe that some of those texts are written in some European courts in the medieval period, or they can be made later.


The part of the book, where Caesar tells about the invasion of Britannia is a part, what is not written any master of poems and rhetorics. And when we are looking at the pictures of Dover straight, we must see that the horses are not suitable in that place because the crag is so high. So did somebody made that mistake on purpose? Another part of this column of the text is full of errors, and all story feels like they were in some taverna.


So if the writer made those errors on purpose, we must ask does he lived at the same time as Caesar. In this case, that part of the text has been written for making Caesar suspected as the liar. But if it is written after Caesar’s time, we must consider, that this text might be written in somewhere in Danmark, and it might be portrayed the coast of Sjelland or some other island.


We must say that there is no evidence, that Caesar ever visited north as Danmark. But when we are talking about his book, we must say that even this book is not probably written by Caesar himself. Or part of that book is maybe written by himself, but there might be many columns, what are written after Caesar’s death. And if he hired some professional writers, those persons might make mistakes on purpose, for making Caesar seem like the liar.


Many writers have also been writing false things, because of they afraid that if the emperor doesn’t like them they would be executed. This fate was faced Cicero, the famous Roman poet, and historian. He was killed by Antonius, and his tongue was nailed to the wall. It’s very sad end for great writer and speaker of history. In this case, we must say, that Marcus Antonius was not able to handle critics what he faced as the rank of the emperor.


And if the writings of some persons were not satisfied rulers, those men were executed. Even in the modern era, there are people sitting in jail because they have written something, what was uncomfortable for the rulers. When we are talking about leaders of the nations, they sometimes think, that every problem will be handled by arresting journalists and writers. But when we are thinking about the role of media, we must say that there are cases in history, that reporters start to publish texts, what would protect authoritarian and support censorship.


This is called ”official press”. Some countries like that they have freedom of speech, but only persons who have right to publish their texts are the ”official reporters”. In those countries, the press is in the main role to justify the political police control, and arresting what is targeted for the members of the opposition. So the press could also be a part of the authoritarian government and support the persecution what is targeted to political resistance.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicero

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-truth-and-lies-what-is-written-by.html

Thoughts about the Revolutionary war of the United States of America 1775-1783

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When America began to plan independence, there was a small problem with those men, they needed the army to make those plans true. And if those independence activists meant to win the war, they must train their army in somewhere. The British army would ever let anybody train military forces in their area. And that’s why the army must be trained in somewhere, where the British military would not attack against the rising force. If the military forces would not be ready, when the real fighting begins, there would be problems in battle. So where the rebels got the skills to find the way to win British army in that area?


In the world were not many men, who dare to train the military forces, who would resist British empire. So where those men trained their military for tactics, what can be effective against British. One possibility is that those men were trained somewhere in Russian forests. But who was trained those men? I sometimes ask one very silly question: could those trainers were been Swedish or Russian officers? This is only the thinking about the independence war of the United States, there will be no document about the truth of these things except John Paul Jones’s strike in England. One question about J.P Jones is, why he changed the country, and began Russian admiral? I sometimes think that was John Paul Jones actually Henry Morton?


And if Morton was from Finnish area, was he the link between the willing trainers and Americans? In this model, only the leaders of the rebel army would be trained at out of British area, and then they would train rest of the army. When we are thinking the famous attack to Whitehaven, England on April 22, 1778, what was made by John Paul Jones. Maybe that attacking role was to evacuate the men, who were working in sabotage role in the land of Great Britain. In this cases, those saboteurs were sent to Britain from the direction, what nobody ever suspected.


If the spies would become from the Atlantic direction, they were been suspected as Americans. Maybe the purpose of that strike only demonstrated that Americans were attacked in Britain. And of course, British officers were scared that some Americans could slip in Britain during this battle. If there were American fighters in the British land, they could even kill the head of army if they wanted. And the personal threat, what is targeted to the head of state would be more effective than thousands of soldiers died in somewhere behind the Atlantic.


So where were you would bring those men to the British Isles? If the saboteurs would bring from Swedish area, they would not be suspected. So was that strike, what J.P Jones made was accomplished because that was covered the existence of American independence cell in England.  There is also some more things in the independence of America what might seem like very strange. One of the strangest things was the paper, what is known as the declaration of independence. Men who signed that paper were in danger, and then we must say one thing. They were very proud men, but how dare they to give their signatures for that paper? How they knew that they would not arrest, and hung as rebels.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Paul_Jones

http://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/american-revolution-history

Picture 1

http://img.dotmsr.com/2017/11/large-d_2841205497097680897.jpg

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When America began to plan independence, there was a small problem with those men, they needed the army to make those plans true. And if those independence activists meant to win the war, they must train their army in somewhere. The British army would ever let anybody train military forces in their area. And that’s why the army must be trained in somewhere, where the British military would not attack against the rising force. If the military forces would not be ready, when the real fighting begins, there would be problems in battle. So where the rebels got the skills to find the way to win British army in that area?


In the world were not many men, who dare to train the military forces, who would resist British empire. So where those men trained their military for tactics, what can be effective against British. One possibility is that those men were trained somewhere in Russian forests. But who was trained those men? I sometimes ask one very silly question: could those trainers were been Swedish or Russian officers? This is only the thinking about the independence war of the United States, there will be no document about the truth of these things except John Paul Jones’s strike in England. One question about J.P Jones is, why he changed the country, and began Russian admiral? I sometimes think that was John Paul Jones actually Henry Morton?


And if Morton was from Finnish area, was he the link between the willing trainers and Americans? In this model, only the leaders of the rebel army would be trained at out of British area, and then they would train rest of the army. When we are thinking the famous attack to Whitehaven, England on April 22, 1778, what was made by John Paul Jones. Maybe that attacking role was to evacuate the men, who were working in sabotage role in the land of Great Britain. In this cases, those saboteurs were sent to Britain from the direction, what nobody ever suspected.


If the spies would become from the Atlantic direction, they were been suspected as Americans. Maybe the purpose of that strike only demonstrated that Americans were attacked in Britain. And of course, British officers were scared that some Americans could slip in Britain during this battle. If there were American fighters in the British land, they could even kill the head of army if they wanted. And the personal threat, what is targeted to the head of state would be more effective than thousands of soldiers died in somewhere behind the Atlantic.


So where were you would bring those men to the British Isles? If the saboteurs would bring from Swedish area, they would not be suspected. So was that strike, what J.P Jones made was accomplished because that was covered the existence of American independence cell in England.  There is also some more things in the independence of America what might seem like very strange. One of the strangest things was the paper, what is known as the declaration of independence. Men who signed that paper were in danger, and then we must say one thing. They were very proud men, but how dare they to give their signatures for that paper? How they knew that they would not arrest, and hung as rebels.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Paul_Jones

http://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/american-revolution-history

Picture 1

http://img.dotmsr.com/2017/11/large-d_2841205497097680897.jpg

https://sites.google.com/view/thoughtsofamericanrevolution/etusivu

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Reselling the weapons is the problem in the international weapons trade

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/reselling-weapons-is-problem-in.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/reselling-weapons-is-problem-in.html