Spacetime’s two faces can look similar, but they are not the same.

 Spacetime’s two faces can look similar, but they are not the same. 

"This animation of DESI's 3D map of the large-scale structure in the Universe, the largest such map to date, was created with the intention of studying dark energy and its possible evolution. However, although they found evidence for dark energy evolving, that's likely due to the assumption that it's dark energy's evolution that's causing the discrepancies in the data compared to our standard cosmological model. This is not necessarily the case." (BigThink, Ask Ethan: Is dark energy no longer a cosmological constant?)

Can the dark energy be some kind of cosmic constant? 

There is one thing that can interact with dark energy. That is another dark energy wave package. When those wave packages impact, that thing can form the shockwaves. That can increase the dark energy’s energy level. But if De Sitter space impacts with anti-De Sitter space, can that image also introduce that thing? 

One of the key elements in quantum models is this: when something goes in a certain direction. Somewhere, something moves in the opposite direction. That is the model of the Arrow of time. And if we want to expand that model in the superstring theory, we can think that when energy moves in the hollow superstring, that means energy moves in the opposite direction on that string’s shells. That forms wave movement in that string’s shell. Those waves form a quantum vacuum. Behind those waves. And can that vacuum be the mysterious negative energy? And can that thing be the negative energy? Or maybe the dark energy? 

The energy level and density of the object determine the strength of the dark energy interaction with visible particles and energy. That means dark energy is not homogeneous. There is a model that black holes can transform matter into dark energy. That explains cosmic hickups. This means dark energy can interact with matter, like gravity interacts with particles. That could mean that the dark energy is the mythic negative energy.   

The question should be: Can the interaction between dark energy be stronger in some places than in others? Near objects with high density, dark energy might have higher interaction than in places where density is low. The high energy level means that energy density is higher. Than in low-energy places. In a high-energy area, dark and visible energy interaction should be stronger. Near black holes, dark energy should have the strongest possible interaction. 

However, in very dense and hot objects, visible energy is obscured by dark energy under it. That means we should know how much energy material that falls into the black hole forms. And then we should calculate visible energy, or wave movement into that energy level. And if we measure higher energy levels, that means the dark energy produces that extra energy. Practically, that is very hard to make. 

Dark energy should be denser in some areas than in other places. Black holes should pack that energy into a denser form. Gravity centers also pull dark matter inside them. That means there are axions or WIMP collisions . And that should create wave movement. It could be that the dark energy source is the dark matter particle collisions. But those hypothetical WIMPs and axions are theoretical particles. Maybe dark energy interacts more strongly near high-energy objects.

The universe is part of spacetime. That means there should be an antiverse. The place where everything goes oppositely. When something moves in some direction, that means that thing’s mirror image or particle should move in the opposite direction. The idea of the anti-universe and the universe is taken from the supernova explosions. Those explosions from the time glass-shaped structures. And that means the Big Bang should create two universes.Same way, when a superstring moves in the space-time, it moves things around it in the opposite direction.  

“In mathematical physics, n-dimensional de Sitter space (often denoted dSn) is a maximally symmetric Lorentzian manifold with constant positive scalar curvature. It is analogue of an n-sphere, with a Lorentzian metric in place of the Riemannian metric of the latter.” (Wikipedia, De Sitter space)

“The main application of de Sitter space is its use in general relativity, where it serves as one of the simplest mathematical models of the universe consistent with the observed accelerating expansion of the universe. More specifically, de Sitter space is the maximally symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's field equations in which the cosmological constant” (Wikipedia, De Sitter space)

So if there is a so-called Anti-De Sitter universe or anti-De Sitter space, that thing can pull De Sitter space into it. In that case, impacting De Sitter and anti-De Sitter forms the parabolic or hyperbolic curves. When those curves impact. That impact can form a wave movement across the spacetime. The idea is that mirror-spaces also pull each other together. And they act like matter and antimatter. 

“In theoretical physics, the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence (frequently abbreviated as AdS/CFT) is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) that are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory. On the other side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) that are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang–Mills theories that describe elementary particles” (Wikipedia, AdS/CFT correspondence)

There is a possibility that there are two universes. Those universes might look similar, but their interactions are opposite. Same way, if negative energy exists. That energy can cause a similar interaction with the visible energy. Positive energy pushes things away. Negative energy pulls positive energy to it. The negative energy can look like positive energy, but its interaction is opposite. That is the energy dualism. Or energy has two faces. Those faces look the same. But they are not the same. Spacetime might have two faces. Spacetime is the space where we live. 

The nature of dark energy causes discussions. That means dark energy can be something very extraordinary to us. Can dark energy be so-called negative energy? Could that thing be true? The idea is that the negative energy could be the quantum vacuum that forms behind the superstrings? When superstrings travel through the universe, that thing is like all other strings. There should form a small quantum low region behind that thing. 

There is a theory about the universe and the anti-universe. In that theory, when something goes forward in the quantum world, something goes opposite in some other place. When time moves forward. In our universe, in another universe. Time moves backward. If we think about string theory and the model of hollow superstrings, we must realize that when energy moves in some direction in the superstring, that means the energy moves in the opposite direction at the string shell. This is the idea of the time arrow. And that can be the key also to dark energy. 

If we follow that model, the negative energy can seem like regular energy. If negative energy moves as pulses, that means. Its interaction looks like a visible energy interaction. When energy or wave movement travels in the universe, energy moves to those waves that are like strings. That means the string sends its extra energy to the environment. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/dark-energy-no-longer-constant/

https://www.livescience.com/mirror-universe-explains-dark-matter

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/black-holes-that-transform-matter-into-dark-energy-could-solve-cosmic-hiccups-mystery/ar-AA1L7eEL?ocid=BingNewsSerp

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-two-faces-of-space-time-20240925/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-de_Sitter_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Dark dwarfs can get their energy from dark matter.

    Dark dwarfs can get their energy from dark matter. 

"Mysterious “dark dwarfs” may glow eternally by burning invisible dark matter — and spotting them could finally crack one of the universe’s greatest mysteries. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com"(ScitechDaily, These Stars Don’t Burn – They Annihilate Dark Matter)

Astronomers may have discovered a whole new type of star — mysterious “dark dwarfs” that could glow forever by feeding on dark matter, the invisible substance thought to make up most of the universe. Unlike ordinary stars that burn nuclear fuel, these strange objects might be powered by annihilating dark matter particles, creating an eternal source of light. (ScitechDaily, These Stars Don’t Burn – They Annihilate Dark Matter)

In some hypotheses, Dark matter particle collisions are a dark energy sources. The gravitational center can collect those particles, but the object must have a certain density so that it can bind that dark energy. Another version is that the energy density in dark energy must be high enough. It can interact with visible material. Dark matter has a gravitational interaction. With visible matter. That means the gravity center can collect dark matter into them. And that can make those objects shine. 

And if dark dwarfs or dark stars annihilate dark matter, that means they form dark energy. Or change dark matter particles, hypothetical Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, WIMPs, or axions into dark energy. 

Dark Dwarfs are hypothetical forms of brown dwarfs. That kind of object can pull dark matter inside it. And start to get its energy from hypothetical dark matter particle impacts. There is a possibility that dark dwarfs can get their energy from dark matter. And if those things exist, they can be the eternal glow in the universe. But could those dark dwarves exist forever? That depends on one thing: does dark matter exist, depending on the visible matter, and visible particles? Or is dark matter formed in some independent process? 

Dark dwarfs are things that can form from brown dwarfs. Those brown dwarfs can pull dark matter particles into their core. All known gravitational centers can pull dark matter inside them. But how dense the object must be that it can start to glow because of dark energy. Hypothetical dark matter particles can form dark energy. When they collide with each other. The object must be very dense so that it can harness dark energy. 

Or could dark matter exist even before the visible matter formed in the event, or series of events, called the Big Bang? If dark matter formed in the Big Bang, that means its existence depends on the visible universe. But then, if we think about those hypothetical dark dwarfs, we face a situation where the small brown dwarf can start to pull dark matter particles, hypothetical axions, or WIMPS into its core. There, those WIMPs or axions interact with other WIMPs and axions. 

That causes annihilation or some kind of fusion between those particles. And then that makes those dark dwarves shine. Another question is this: can the dark matter annihilation form dark energy, or could the product of that reaction be the visible energy? That means dark matter fusion. or annihilation or WIMP impacts form dark energy. But then. We can think about cases like black holes. Near black holes, the dark energy density can be high enough. It can start interacting with visible particles or wave movement. 

And maybe dark energy and dark matter give at least part of the black hole’s energy. There is one way to transform dark energy into visible energy, and that method is to create a dark energy soliton. The dark energy soliton would be like all other solitons. It packs wave movement. Into one point. That increases the wave movement energy level and, in the same way, raises the wave height. And that means the dark energy solitons can also interact with their environment. Could some dark matter particles be some kind of solitons?  That explains why we cannot see those objects. 

https://www.durham.ac.uk/news-events/latest-news/2025/07/mysterious-dark-dwarfs-may-be-hiding-at-the-heart-of-the-milky-way/

https://scitechdaily.com/these-stars-dont-burn-they-annihilate-dark-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Gravity and the quantum realm.

 Gravity and the quantum realm. 

"The Earth’s gravity, manifested as curvature in space and time, is expected to alter the rules of standard quantum theory. An experiment consisting of three quantum computers at different elevations can reveal the interplay between gravity and quantum mechanics. Credit: The Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign" (ScitechDaily, Earth’s Gravity Might Be Warping Quantum Mechanics, Say Physicists)

Even Earth's gravity can affect quantum mechanics.  Albert Einstein realized that gravity affects photons. And their trajectories. That makes a gravitational lens possible. But when we think about a situation where gravity affects fields and their interactions with particles, we might first think about things like black holes. But actually, we don’t know how strong the gravitational field must be, so that it affects things like quantum mechanics and qubits. When a qubit travels in the quantum channel, there is a risk that it touches the quantum channel’s walls. And that thing destroys the information that the qubit transports. There is a possibility that gravity interacts with quantum fields. 

And turns them into waves. This form asymmetry and entropy in the quantum fields. There is a possibility that we must not care about small anomalies. But. There is always a possibility that the anomalies and unpredictable things accumulate in the system. We know that one moving water molecule might be harmless. But when trillions of water molecules form things like tsunamis, that breaks the system. When there is a lower energy point in the middle of the system. That thing can glue objects together strongly. That same thing can cause an effect where too much energy starts to travel at that point. That happens if that energy pothole is too deep. The problem is that all systems collect energy also from their environment. 

"A new study reveals that even small differences in elevation between quantum computers—just one kilometer apart—can allow Earth’s gravity to measurably affect quantum systems, challenging one of the foundational principles of quantum mechanics. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Earth’s Gravity Might Be Warping Quantum Mechanics, Say Physicists)

There is one model that nobody mentioned about dark matter. That model is that dark matter can be a particle. Within other particles. What if another electron travels inside another electron? That makes the particle super heavy. 

Can dark energy be energy that travels in a hollow superstring in the opposite direction from the superstring’s shell? In that model, a hollow superstring can cause reflection when it hits another quantum field. That reflection causes energy to travel in the opposite direction along the superstring, or energy tube. To the superstring’s shell travels. 

So the core and shell travel in different directions. And the shell of the superstring pumps energy to that wave, which forms the superstring’s core. Even if two wave packages travel in opposite directions, the outer wave package pumps energy into the inner wave package that goes through it. That means the maser effect also affects the superstrings. That means outside energy can press those waves into coherent form. And that energy that travels in superstrings keeps it open.. 

Energy always travels to the lower level. The thing that makes energy devastating is not energy itself. It's an energy movement. When energy moves, there must be some space where energy goes. Energy cannot just vanish. If a small amount of energy travels into a very large space, that doesn’t mean that energy vanishes. It just spreads into a very large area. Energy or information, which is another name for wave movement, still exists. But its wavelength is changed. And that means information or energy can be positioned into the original form. Pressing those waves from their ends. Normally, that is very hard to make. Energy, or information, can take solid form. 

We call this solid form as materia. If we follow the rule that energy can only transform its shape, we could expand that model to the material. And that means the material should turn from visible to dark. But it cannot make that thing straight. The matter should turn into wave movement before it can turn into dark matter. Same way, we cannot transform a cube-shaped stone into a ball-shaped stone. We must melt that stone first. There is only one possible exception. That requires one interesting vision: Could dark matter be a particle that is inside another particle? What if another electron is inside another electron? That turns this hypothetical particle into a super-heavy form of electron. 

https://scitechdaily.com/earths-gravity-might-be-warping-quantum-mechanics-say-physicists/

Uranus’ new moon and suspicion of Planet Y.

 Uranus’ new moon and suspicion of Planet Y. 

“James Webb has revealed Uranus’ smallest moon yet, a six-mile-wide world hidden near its inner rings. This discovery pushes the planet’s moon count to 29 and shows how Webb can uncover secrets Voyager 2 never saw. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, M. El Moutamid (SwRI), M. Hedman (University of Idaho)” (ScitechDaily, Uranus Has a Tiny New Moon and It’s Only Six Miles Wide)

JWST found a new moon called S/2025 U 1 near Uranus. Did the Uranus planet capture its tiny, newfound moon after the Voyager 2 flyby in 1986? The width of that moon is about 6 miles. And it is hidden in Uranus' inner rings. 

Researchers noticed the new moon that orbits Uranus. That tiny moon is interesting. Because Earth-based instruments found it. That new Uranus moon is not a very big object.  But it's remarkable, and the interesting thing. But I think that researchers should have found that moon before. So, could that small moon have made a transit movement to orbit the Uranus planet in the near past? That means something pulled that moon out from the Kuiper Belt.

In this hypothesis, that is the new moon for that gas giant. Something in the Kuiper Belt pushed that thing out from its trajectory. That new moon called S/2025 U 1 is the new moon for the Uranus moon family. And that tiny moon, which is only six miles wide, orbits near that planet. The Voyager spacecraft should have found that tiny moon during its flyby in 1986. So that supports the model that Uranus captured that moon after the Voyager flyby.

“A new SwRI-led JWST survey discovered S/2025 U 1 (approximate location indicated in yellow), a tiny moon orbiting Uranus between the satellites Bianca and Ophelia. If it has an albedo comparable to other nearby moons, this object is probably around six miles in diameter, by far the smallest moon in the Uranus system to date. The solid ellipses indicate rings, while the dotted lines show the orbits of many of the inner moons. Credit: Public Domain” (SwRI), M. Hedman (University of Idaho)” (ScitechDaily, Uranus Has a Tiny New Moon and It’s Only Six Miles Wide)

Forget planet X, there might be a planet Y in the Kuiper Belt. 

Above: Why is there no dust on the white snow area on Pluto? That tells us that the white snow area is born recently. Or something pulls particles out from that. 

Some people believe that there is a planet X, or the ninth planet, somewhere, outside Pluto’s orbit. Planet 9 is a very well-known theory. There is a suggestion that Planet 9 is about three to seven times as massive as Earth. And that orbits the sun at the edge of the solar system’s gravitational pool. There can be something smaller, an Earth-size icy world hiding in the Kuiper Belt. Or outside it. Planet Y is not such a well-known theory. Than the Planet 9. 

The white area on Pluto’s surface can be a cryovolcano or a result of the recent cryovolcanism-type seismic effect. That thing can form because of the Charon-moon gravity. But there is another possibility. Something far stronger than the gravity effect can cause tidal waves that activate the cryovolcanism. The thing. What makes that white area interesting is that. There seems to be no dust in that area. That means it formed quite recently. Pluto is far lighter than Earth. And that means Charon’s tidal forces are far stronger on that dwarf planet’s surface than they would be on Earth. 

"Three years after NASA's New Horizons spacecraft gave humankind our first close-up views of Pluto and its largest moon, Charon, scientists are still revealing the wonders of these incredible worlds in the outer solar system. Marking the anniversary of New Horizons' historic flight through the Pluto system on July 14, 2015, mission scientists released the highest-resolution color images of Pluto and Charon. These natural-color images result from refined calibration of data gathered by New Horizons' color Multispectral Visible Imaging Camera (MVIC). (Wikipedia, Charon)

The processing creates images that would approximate the colors that the human eye would perceive, bringing them closer to “true color” than the images released near the encounter. This image was taken on July 14, 2015, from a range of 46,091 miles (74,176 kilometers). This single color MVIC scan includes no data from other New Horizons imagers or instruments added. The striking features on Charon are clearly visible, including the reddish north-polar region known as Mordor Macula." (Wikipedia, Charon)

Pluto has five known moons, and that makes the new Uranus moon very interesting. But could those moons common gravity effect be strong enough? To hover those particles out from Pluto's surface? Charon itself is grey, and it can be covered by cosmic dust. But was that moon once in the middle of the cosmic dust flow? And why do those particles not reach Pluto?

The problem is: why is there no visible cryovolcanism or cyoseismic effect in the images? Which New Horizons tool during its flyby? If that cryovolcanic effect happened only once. That would cause interesting thoughts. 

Researchers are finding tips that the large, maybe, Earth-mass planet can hide in the Kuiper Belt. That planet can be more interesting than Planet 9. Planet Y can give some answers to the Early solar system formation. But researchers need more evidence. To confirm the existence of this icy Earth. Maybe the Vera Rubin Observatory can give an answer for that question.  The researchers can use the accumulation of the dust and gas around hiding objects that could hide at the edge of the solar system. 

The problem is that those objects are very cold. And if they used their internal thermal source, those big planets can turn invisible to the IR sensors. But their gravitational effect can disturb their moons. Big and heavy objects capture smaller objects around them. And maybe the tidal forces can form the cyovolcanism in those small objects. The Kuiper Belt is a very stable environment. If there are big planets, their trajectories can be so far away from the Sun and other planets that they can escape from our solar system. 

https://dailygalaxy.com/2025/08/planet-y-haunting-space-beyond-neptune/

https://www.earth.com/news/planet-y-signs-of-a-world-hiding-in-our-solar-system/

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2493480-there-might-be-a-planet-y-hiding-in-the-outer-solar-system/

https://scitechdaily.com/uranus-has-a-tiny-new-moon-and-its-only-six-miles-wide/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charon_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planets_beyond_Neptune

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

Wormholes: how to make them?

Wormholes: how to make them?

The wormhole is the thing that can solve the quantum network’s biggest problem. How to move particles between two places and protect that information from outside effects. If we want to use things. Like laser beams to make the quantum channel, we face another problem. A regular laser beam leaves particles inside it. And the key element is to remove those particles from the quantum channel. So, the answer can be the series of quantum fields that melted into one entirety. Then the system pushes those particles out. From that quantum tube. 

In this text, the key is in acoustic and electromagnetic wormholes. Wormholes are channels between two points. The wormhole is a synonym for a quantum channel, the tunnel through the quantum fields. Otherwise, we can say that an acoustic wormhole is a channel. Through gas or liquid. When we want to make a wormhole through air or some liquid. We must realize that the wormhole can be like a tornado through the medium. An acoustic wormhole can be made by spinning two fullerene or benzene molecules in a medium. Those molecules are opposite each other. 

And then they can start to form the tornado through that condensed liquid. Then, some acoustic beam or particle will push that molecular tornado empty. Then the system must only keep the coustic tornado open using the higher energy acoustic waves that deny the channel collapse. 

An electromagnetic wormhole forms when the laser or some other energy beam pushes an atom’s or other particle’s quantum fields into one form. The idea is that the energy beam stretches the quantum fields around atoms or other particles. When those quantum fields touch each other. The system can push those atoms away from that quantum channel. The energy ray that the system aims. Through that channel. Begins to keep the quantum channel in its form. And deny its collapse. If that system can really be created. It can open new views into quantum communication. 

The system works like this. The first quantum system creates a series of superpositioned and entangled atoms. The EM wormhole forms those atoms or their nuclei that are quantum entangled. And then those particles can start to form a quantum tornado between them. The system creates an electromagnetic shadow using a beam that hits the particle pair from the back of the transmitting particle. To create a channel between those atoms. The system must only push those particles out from the channel to form the quantum tube; there is no electromagnetic resistance. 

The key question is: can the system to create a hovering, or empty quantum tube by using a laser, or a particle beam as the virtual atoms in the middle of that tube? It could be possible. To remove the atom nucleus from the quantum field and make the field sustain using a virtual particle. That kind of empty field can be a powerful tool 

Then it pushes those atoms away from that quantum channel, and then the radiation pressure of the laser or particle beams. That denies that tunnel collapse. The energy beam acts like a water flow. That causes counter-pressure that keeps the wormhole open. The electromagnetic and acoustic wormholes are tools that allow researchers to create a quantum network. The electromagnetic wormhole forms in the acoustic wormhole. This allows the system to transport qubits or particles that carry information through the air. If something touches information that carrier particles carry, it destroys the information. 

The new solution turns universal quantum computing closer.

   The new solution turns universal quantum computing closer. 

"Artist’s impression of the entangled logic gate built by University of Sydney quantum scientists. Credit: Emma Hyde/University of Sydney"(ScitechDaily, Scientists Unlock Quantum Computing Power by Entangling Vibrations in a Single Atom)

"Physicists at the University of Sydney have achieved a breakthrough in quantum computing by creating a universal logic gate inside a single atom." (ScitechDaily, Scientists Unlock Quantum Computing Power by Entangling Vibrations in a Single Atom)

The ability to control and entangle a single atom’s internal vibrations makes the next-generation quantum gates possible. That makes it possible to create identical data flows in the quantum gates. 

Researchers created an entangled quantum gate between complex systems. And that can be the key to the new universal quantum computing. Researchers had one problem with quantum computers. That is how to create the quantum gate that controls the information in the qubit. The difference between quantum computers and binary computers is that. Information is connected with particles in quantum computers. That means in the quantum channel, particle-form photons transport information. 

And that makes it hard to create the gate for the system. The gate, or logic gate, is the base element in computing. It uses diodes and transistors to make Boolean functions. The problem with the quantum gate is that. The system should handle data. That is connected to particles. 

Regular diodes and transistors cannot handle particles. That makes those systems very complicated. Quantum gate must handle data. That travels in the quantum bridge between superpositioned and entangled particles. So if the system pulls the quantum bridge through the system that uses quantum transistors and diodes. One version is that the quantum diodes and quantum transistors can store information that a superpositioned and entangled particle sends to the receiver. Then the system creates another superpositioned and entangled particle pair. But that requires time. 

“The general definition of a qubit as the quantum state of a two-level quantum system.” (Wikipedia, qubit)

Another problem is the error control in the quantum computer. “Using a powerful error-correcting system known as the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) code — often called the “Rosetta Stone” of quantum computing — they managed to entangle vibrations of a trapped ion. This achievement drastically reduces the number of physical qubits needed, tackling one of the biggest hurdles in scaling quantum computers and bringing practical, large-scale quantum machines closer to reality.” (ScitechDaily, Scientists Unlock Quantum Computing Power by Entangling Vibrations in a Single Atom)

Entangled quantum gates are things that offer a solution to that problem. The idea is that the system splits a qubit into two parts. 

Then those entangled gates transport information into two separate quantum channels. If those channels get the same solution. That means the answer is more probable, right than wrong. If those channels get a different solution, the other answer is wrong. The key element in that process. Data that travels in those channels must be identical. There is always a possibility that an error in the data form occurs at the input stage, where the system writes data to the qubit. Detection of that kind of problem is difficult. 

The qubit can have multiple states or levels. Every single state of the qubit can be put into superposition and entanglement separately. 

 And if we think of the superposition. With 20 states, we can share information between those states. The information can be doubled, and the edge can be between states 1-10 and 11-20. Then the system splits the qubit into two parts.  Those states can turn into the strings that transport information in binary form. So, in every state, the qubit still has values 0 and 1. That means a quantum gate is basically similar to an electronic gate. But it must handle data. That is stored in the quantum states. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottesman%E2%80%93Kitaev%E2%80%93Preskill_code

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_gate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_logic_gate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit

Can dark matter transform planets or red dwarfs into a black hole?

     Can dark matter transform planets or red dwarfs into a black hole? 

"Black hole inside? Exoplanet observations could provide a new way to search for superheavy dark matter. (Courtesy: NASA/JPL-Caltech)" (Physics world, Exoplanets suffering from a plague of dark matter could turn into black holes)

Theoretically, any object in the universe can transform into a black hole. That means dark matter can form a black hole like visible matter. Dark matter can also play a role in cases where small red dwarfs or planets turn into black holes. There are no observations about those planetary-sized black holes. But they can exist. 

Theoretically, black holes' relativistic jets. Or supernova explosions can turn a planet’s atmosphere into super-high temperatures. And this can cause energy to flow into the planet’s or a small star’s core. And if the gravity field travels to the front of the shockwave, that can cause a situation where the object just vanishes. 

Dark matter that travels into the small object’s core can pull that core into form. There, the self-sustaining nuclear fusion can begin. The mass of the star should be high enough that the whirls and entropy cannot break the fusion core. If the star is too light and fusion starts, it blows the star’s shell out. And that pulls the fusion core larger, causing energy loss. 

If a star is too heavy, the fusion that starts in the middle of it can be too strong. And that blows the star’s shell outside. The loss of energy causes a different situation. Gravity pulls the shell back into its form. And then the star turns into a black hole, immediately when its fusion begins. In the cases of the heaviest nebulae, the nebula can fall straight into the black hole. 

When we think about the possibility that dark matter can transform a planet into a black hole, that can happen in two ways.

1) The dark matter can move into the planet’s core and pull it into a black hole. 

2) Dark matter can form a plague on the planet’s shell. In that case, dark matter annihilation, or other interactions, can form dark energy. That dark energy that travels into the planet’s core can cause an implosion, where a small reflecting wave can make a small vacuum in the planet’s core. The idea is that dark matter doesn’t let energy travel out from that object. That can cause the planet to fall into a form. That we call a black hole. 

When a star forms, the energy level in its shell must be higher than in the core. Then that outside energy pushes particles into the form that fusion can begin. If that fusion is too strong, it detonates the star. When fusion ignites, the star blows a little bit of its mass away, and that forms rings around stars. That forms the asteroid belts around our sun. And that flash can form the situation that some other stars around that star also ignite. 

New theory suggests that dark matter can transform planets into black holes. In the original text, only giant planets are mentioned. Maybe dark matter particles can also transform less massive objects into black holes. The idea is simple. Dark matter interacts with other dark matter particles or “units”. We don’t know what dark matter is, so we could use the word “unit” to describe the dark matter centers. In this text, 'dark matter particles' refers to the same concept as the 'dark matter units”. 

We must realize that the electromagnetic fields near the gravity center are weaker than the outer shell of that field. And that makes the energy travel into the gravity center, taking particles with it. So, the idea is that dark matter units or particles can make the group or cloud. If the massive dark matter cloud travels into the planet’s core, that thing can cause the planet to collapse into a black hole. Dark matter can be massive particles that can cause a situation where the planet falls into a black hole. 

But what is dark matter, or some kind of condensed material impacts things like red dwarfs? That kind of condensed material can pull lots of energy out from that star. There is a possibility that a red dwarf will follow the route of the dark matter beam that travels to the black hole. That dwarf star can collect the dark matter in its core. And that can cause a fall into the black hole. Another scenario can be that. 

Condensed material can pull lots of energy out from a red dwarf. That can cause a situation where the red dwarf turns into a very low-energy form. If the red dwarf loses its energy production and its core turns into a too-low-energy form, the red dwarf can fall like all other stars. But can its mass and energy turn that object into a black hole? In that case, the object cannot explode if the nuclear fusion doesn’t ignite during the fall. 

The idea is that the dark matter can increase the weight of the planet’s core. Then the energy increases the planet’s atmospheric energy level. The super-hot atmosphere put energy to travel into the middle of the planet. Another model is that a planet or a small star can lose its core’s energy level. And that makes energy and matter fall into the middle of the planet. In the same way, extreme conditions near the center of Milky Way-type galaxies can cause a situation where even red or brown dwarfs start to glow hotter than they should. In that model, the density of the dark energy can cause a situation where Dark energy can make small stars glow hotter than they should. 

Can dark matter be the thing that makes the smallest known M-type stars create self-sustaining nuclear fusion? 

The dark matter interaction can also explain. Why some of the smallest known red dwarfs can maintain nuclear fusion. The idea is that the small protostar can pull dark matter into its nucleus, and that thing pulls the nucleus. And starts the nuclear fusion. 

Conditions near the galaxy center or near black holes are extremely. When a planet or a red dwarf loses energy from their core and their atmosphere turns into very high energy, that thing can push those objects into black holes. We know that dark matter is not homogeneously spread throughout the universe. There are points where the dark matter forms denser structures than at other points. So if the planet or red dwarf travels into the dark matter cloud. It can start to pull dark matter into it. 

Dark matter behaves like regular material, and that means it positions itself into a planet’s core, or a red dwarf's core. That can cause a situation where that planet or a small star collapses into a black hole. The thing that can press even a small planet into a black hole can be a situation where a condensed photon beam takes all the energy from the planet’s core. Then the high-energy shell and atmosphere press the planet into the singularity. 

https://physicsworld.com/a/exoplanets-suffering-from-a-plague-of-dark-matter-could-turn-into-black-holes/

https://scitechdaily.com/can-dark-matter-turn-giant-planets-into-black-holes/

Gravitational waves and quantum models II

   Gravitational waves and quantum models II

So what put the gravitational field into motion? That is one of the most interesting things in the universe. When the gravitational center sends gravitational waves, those G-waves transport energy out from the field near the gravitational center. We can simply think that the energy fields are weaker near the gravitational center than at a longer distance. So stronger energy fields travel into the gravitational center. The gravitational center can bind other fields around it. Every time the gravitational center sends a gravitational wave, it makes space for other fields to travel into the gravitational center. 

Another way is that the gravitational center simply transports gravitational fields in a certain direction. In that model. Some string that can travel through the gravitational center can pull that field into one direction. The fact is this as long as a particle evaporates, that causes a gravitational effect. But when the particle’s evaporation ends. That causes the gravitational field will not pull particles and fields to the particle. When a particle evaporates or turns into a wave movement. It leaves space to other fields that try to fill that hole. That makes energy and particles travel to that gravity center. 

If we think that dark matter is the strange gravitational effect, we can think that there is some kind of lower energy point in those gravitational centers. That gravitational center can form when some kind of skyrmion, or some other thing, forms the lower energy point. Another thing that can form the strange gravitational effect called dark matter can be the skyrmion series. That can form around the quantum-sized black hole’s relativistic jet or relativistic string. Those skyrmions can move the quantum field like a piston. That can form an electromagnetic shadow behind those skyrmions. That means that other fields around those shadows or lower energy points start to fall into those electromagnetic vacuums. That thing makes a similar effect to gravity. 

And that point can be unbelievable. There is a possibility that free gravitons or free axions can form dark matter. But it is also possible that the dark matter is the condensed particles that are colder than 3K, or maybe those particles are colder than the energy minimum in the universe. That requires that those particles come from outside the universe. Or, that is the only explanation that could explain this hypothesis. 

See also

Gravitons

Skyrmions

Gravitational waves and quantum models.

 Gravitational waves and quantum models. 

Gravitational waves are a wave movement or radiation. That moves gravitational fields. The problem with gravitational waves is how they can pull particles into the gravitational center. The answer can be that small strings can form those gravitational waves. Those small strings can spin in one direction, and that thing drives fields that the gravity wave penetrates to the gravity center. There is also a possibility that if the superstring theory is right, the waves or small skyrmions that travel at the superstring’s shell push those particles to the gravitational centers. Which one is the correct answer? 

That depends on the gravitational wave or wave structure’s position. If those waves are horizontally crossing the object, those strings can push fields through that structure that could look like a little bit of an egg cutter, where wires cut the egg in bites. In the second model, the string goes lengthwise through the object. In that case, when a black hole or the gravity center sends a gravity wave, it evaporates. In that case, the structure that evaporates pulls those strings into it. 

The gravity wave itself is like an energy ditch. That travels in space-time. The energy ditch forms when the G-(Gravity)field travels through other energy fields. That gravity field takes other fields with it. So the idea is similar to how some strings travel through the wave. If the string goes through the wave in the opposite direction, it pulls the wave energy into it. And if there is enough time, that string will turn wave backward. The gravity wave is a ditch in the energy field that travels to the gravity center. 

That makes energy travel faster to the gravity center. So how can energy travel in the wrong direction? The gravity wave is actually a stronger point in the gravity field. When the gravity center pulls other fields around it. Those fields pull particles with them. A gravitational wave is a space-time phenomenon. That which the field travels faster or carries particles stronger than otherwise. Or actually, gravity is waves. And gravity waves travel all the time across the universe. But sensors see only the strongest gravity waves. Those waves form when black holes collide. 

The Answer is in the field interaction. Every single fundamental interaction (electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force, gravity) is a wave movement. Otherwise, we can say that each fundamental interaction is like radiation. Every fundamental interaction has a unique wavelength in that radiation, or wave movement. So, when the black hole, or some other gravity center, sends gravity waves, it sends G-field waves. When those waves push the gravity field away. That causes the effect that other energy fields try to fill that hole. This thing causes an effect that we call gravity. 

Our knowledge of black holes is expanding.

Our knowledge of black holes is expanding.

 

"Researchers believe that an odd pair of merging black holes first detected in 2019 were "dancing" around a third supersized singularity that was lurking in the background. (Image credit: CNAS/SHAO)" (LiveScience, Scientists think they detected the first known triple black hole system in the universe — and then watched it die)

       

Researchers believe. They found the first triple black hole system. And if that is true. It proves that black holes can form similar systems. To “regular”stars form. In some visions, black holes can form entire galaxies. Those three black holes are going to their end. There is one supermassive and two smaller black holes.  Black holes can hijack each other. Or massive stars in the same star system can form a group of black holes. A black hole’s relativistic jet can also press things like planets into black holes. There are no observations about that kind of black hole. But theoretically, high-energy jets can raise the energy level in the planet’s atmosphere so high that the energy in its atmosphere can press it into one entirety.     

Our understanding of black holes is continually expanding. Due to new observation models and fundamental mathematical and computational tools, such as quantum computers and AI, we can develop new models of the most fascinating phenomena in the universe. In the past, we thought that black holes were only destroyers. When information fell into a black hole. That means the information is gone forever. But today we think differently. The key element in quantum mechanics is that information cannot just vanish. Information can only change its form. A black hole  rolls information into it. In the yarn ball model, a black hole rolls information into its event horizon like the strings or wires. Those wires store information that the black hole releases as wave movement. 

When we look at the black hole’s event horizon, we would see that thing waving. When those waves move up and down, they send waves to space. When the wave pushes the quantum field around the event horizon and falls back, it leaves a small quantum vacuum between the event horizon. And the quantum field around it. That pulls energy or information out from the black hole. When a black hole's event horizon separates from the whirl around it, it allows it to send a wave burst. The black hole is an interaction. If the outside whirl that includes quantum fields and material is removed, the black hole will be destroyed. 

The black hole’s evaporation causes a similar effect to what ice makes when we transport it into the room. When a black hole evaporates, energy field. That comes from outside, try to fill that space. So what if black hole’s evaporation ends? What if a black hole sometimes reaches energy stability with space around it? That can cause a situation where energy or a quantum field don’tt move to the black hole. Or out of it. That thing can turn a black hole completely invisible. And that causes a wild theory that maybe dark matter could be black holes that almost reach energy stability with their environment. 

Black holes are like gravitational solitons. They are packed gravitational wave packages. Like impacting, identical laser beams or identical acoustic waves can form solitons. Gravitational waves that impact with each other can form a gravitational soliton. 

Today, we think that the black hole evaporates. In that process black hole releases information that is stored in the form of Hawking radiation. Or, in the form of gravitational waves. So can the black hole have hair? Maybe a black hole has so-called soft hair, or maybe it’s partially bald. The black hole’s hair means strings that transport information out from that structure. The black hole is not completely smooth. There are small hills and valleys in its structure. If a black hole were to be completely smooth, that means that it could not touch the fields around it. Those small hills and valleys would play an important role in black hole interactions. 

Those small hills and valleys form when a black hole forms. And supernova energy presses those particles into one entirety. Called a singularity. Electrons that orbit atoms will be smashed against the atom's nucleus. And they leave at the shell of that thing as the quantum-sized hills and valleys. There are also models where there are no singularities. Singularities can explain some black holes. Things like the Kugelblitz theory suggest. Black holes can form from the energy fields or wave movement. In that case, something starts to transport energy out from a certain point. And then energy or wave movement that comes from around tries to fill that point. This thing could prove superstring theory. 

That means black holes are like gravitational solitons. When gravity fields start to travel against each other. That effect locks wave movement in the gravitational wave soliton. Can that soliton be stable? That depends on the energy that whirls around it. If that gravitational soliton can form a whirl that is large enough that it cannot let energy or wave movement travel out from that soliton, that makes it stable. Maybe not all black holes are similar. Some of them might have a singularity. And some of them might not have that thing. Black holes are not destroyers. 

They store information in them. In new models, there can even be universes inside black holes. And in wildest models, our universe exists in a black hole. In this model, we cannot see the black hole’s event horizon because it's too far away. In some models, there is also a shockwave inside the event horizon that covers the event horizon itself. And when information travels through that event horizon, it stretches those waves. And anyway, the black hole is surrounded by a material disk. That covers things that are outside that thing. 

There is a possibility that our universe formed when a black hole from the previous universe detonated. Those new models are tools that can open the biggest mystery in the universe. Black holes can offer a solution for information paradoxes. And answer how the universe formed. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton

Why are people who work with quantum systems interested in quasiparticles?

  

Why are people who work with quantum systems interested in quasiparticles? 

“Scientists found that adding a once-dismissed particle, the “neglecton,” allows Ising anyons to perform universal quantum computing. What was once seen as mathematical garbage may hold the key to the future of computation. Credit: SciTechDaily.com” (ScitechDaily, Lost Particle Resurfaces As the Key to Universal Quantum Computing)

Neglectons look like photons. Both of them are donut-shaped particles. And that raises a question: could a photon be some kind of skyrmion? More about these topics at the end of this text. 

Quasiparticles are electromagnetic fields and quantum phenomena that act like a “real particle”. There are many types of quasiparticles, and the thing that makes them interesting in quantum computing is that those particles are extremely rare. Quasiparticles don’t exist for a long time. And there are no long-term versions of those things. That means the wave movement that comes from other particles doesn’t disturb quasiparticles as it does other particles. Because quasiparticles are so-called unique particles, they can create quantum entanglement without causing quantum noise. 

Same way. When a quasiparticle sends a wave movement, that wave movement causes resonance in a similar way to a receiving quasiparticle. And because there are no other particles that send wave movement with a similar wavelength as those quasiparticles, that thing makes it easier to transmit information. In other particles. Like quarks or fermions, the wave movement that reflects from other similar particles can disturb the data transmission. 

Anyons and neglectons are the most interesting quasiparticles from the point of view of quantum computing. 

“In physics, an anyon is a type of quasiparticle so far observed only in two-dimensional systems. In three-dimensional systems, only two kinds of elementary particles are seen: fermions and bosons. Anyons have statistical properties intermediate between fermions and bosons. In general, the operation of exchanging two identical particles, although it may cause a global phase shift, cannot affect observables. Anyons are generally classified as abelian or non-abelian. Abelian anyons, detected by two experiments in 2020, play a major role in the fractional quantum Hall effect.” Wikipedia, Anyons)

Sometimes, frozen anyons are introduced as a solution for quantum entanglement problems in quantum computing. 

“Among the leading candidates for building such a computer are Ising anyons, which are already being intensely investigated in condensed matter labs due to their potential realization in exotic systems like the fractional quantum Hall state and topological superconductors,” said Aaron Lauda, professor of mathematics, physics and astronomy at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and the study’s senior author.”(ScitechDaily, Lost Particle Resurfaces As the Key to Universal Quantum Computing)

“On their own, Ising anyons can’t perform all the operations needed for a general-purpose quantum computer. The computations they support rely on ‘braiding,’ physically moving anyons around one another to carry out quantum logic. For Ising anyons, this braiding only enables a limited set of operations known as Clifford gates, which fall short of the full power required for universal quantum computing.” (ScitechDaily, Lost Particle Resurfaces As the Key to Universal Quantum Computing)

Neglectons are the previously overlooked quasiparticles. Those quasiparticles look like a donut, and that makes them essential for data transmission in the quantum computer. The neglecton can spin ahead of the data transmitter. And if the system can spin it, that allows the laser to send information to that particle. Ot the laser beam, or information carrier that travels through those neglectons. And that thing acts as a quantum gate where information can travel between two superpositioned and entangled neglecton particles that are positioned into graphene or some other 2D structures. Which turns bits  into qubits.

So what if a photon is a skyrmion? 

We can say that the neglecton is something that looks like a skyrmion or photon. The thing that makes frozen anyons problematic is that they can form only in the condensed material. The condensed material means that the particle is in its minimum energy level. That makes energy travel to those particles. And that forms a skyrmion around it. The skyrmion is the impact wave that forms when energy travels to those particles. The neglectons shape causes an idea that maybe the photon is also some kind of skyrmion. So could there be some kind of thing in the middle of the photon that makes the wave movement travel into it. That it make a skyrmion that we know as a photon? 

Skyrmions form around an object when energy jumps back from some structure. And the outside energy interacts with those reflecting waves. That forms a ring-shaped structure around the object. So, if a photon is some kind of skyrmion, that makes this model interesting. 

There are two versions of things. That could make that kind of skyrmion. The first one is the dot-shaped object.  Another one is the stick-shaped object. That means the hypothetical graviton, the hypothetical particle that transmits gravitation, could be in the center of that donut-shaped structure. Or another thing is that. The hypothetical superstring can travel through the photon. Those things are a good explanation for the photon's interesting donut-shaped structure. 

https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/meet-the-neglectons-previously-overlooked-particles-that-could-revolutionize-quantum-computing

https://phys.org/news/2025-08-discarded-particles-dubbed-neglectons-universal.html

https://scitechdaily.com/lost-particle-resurfaces-as-the-key-to-universal-quantum-computing/

https://today.usc.edu/mathematicians-use-neglected-particles-that-could-rescue-quantum-computing/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anyon

A quantum computer's biggest problem may have been solved.

   A quantum computer's biggest problem may have been solved. 

"Illustration of a new strategy to create materials with robust quantum properties, by harnessing magnetic interactions (represented by the red and blue arrows). The small green spheres represent sites where electrons can reside and move along the chain. Special magnetic atoms (purple spheres with arrows) interact with the electrons at certain sites, shown by the blueish clouds. These interactions create protected edge states (green cloud) that could help make quantum computers more stable and less sensitive to noise. Credit: Jose L. Lado" (ScitechDaily, Scientists May Have Just Cracked Quantum Computing’s Biggest Problem)

The biggest problem is how to adjust energy levels in quantum entanglement. The transmitting-side particle's energy level must be higher. Than the energy level in the receiving particles. When those particles in superposition and entanglement reach the same energy level, they form a standing wave and destroy the quantum entanglement. Swedish and Finnish researchers noticed that a magnetic field can adjust energy levels. In the superpositioned and entangled particles. When the system creates a quantum entanglement, it pumps energy to another transmitting particle. That energy forms an electromagnetic shadow or tube between the transmitting and receiving particles. 

That tube pulls the quantum field of the transmitting particle to the receiving particle. And then the quantum bridge or quantum string starts to travel in that tube. Normally system makes superpositions between photons. Things like electrons are very sensitive to magnetic fields. Atoms are too complicated things to have superposition and entanglement. The system can make multiple quantum strings. Because every quantum state. At superpositioned and entangled particle pairs. Makes a single quantum string, or quantum bridge. Each of those strings has two positions that are 0 and 1. 

******

So, basically, the room-temperature quantum computer requires only a large number of light cables. That system mimics human neurons. In human neurons, protein bunches or protein strings act.  In a similar way to how the quantum string acts in superpositioned and entangled particle pairs. That makes neurons act like quantum processors. 

******

For making that superposition and entanglement, the transmitting and receiving particles must reach the same oscillation sequence. That thing allows the quantum bridge to form in that quantum tube. Information travels in those quantum bridges or quantum strings in the form of a wave. That raises a question: can information travel faster than light in quantum entanglement? 

The answer is that. The wave can travel at a speed. That's the same as the speed of light in that quantum tube. If there is another wave forming ahead of the wave that transports information, that can destroy the quantum bridge. The wave that forms in front of the information carrier causes destruction. Basically, information can travel in quantum entanglement faster than light travels outside the quantum tube. Or theoretically, if somebody can create a straight wave and push that wave back and forth, that makes those things transmit information faster than light transports it. 

The straight wave acts like a stick that moves back and forth. So those systems can transmit data from Alpha Centauri faster than radio waves. But they are useful only for long distances. If they are possible someday in the future. 

Another thing that researchers must remove is the quantum noise. When energy travels in a system, it jumps between particles. And other actors. Causing echoes and wave movement that is hard to predict. The energy impulses that travel between particles destroy the system. The problem is that in quantum systems is impossible to aim energy flows completely to other particles without causing overflow. That overflow is the wave movement that forms entropy, which destroys the system. 

Another thing is that the waves from receiving and transmitting particles. That acts like sound waves destroy the quantum bridge. That transports information. Or they make the quantum tube leak. That also destroys information. The problem is that those quantum entanglements are made. Using very low-energy level photons or some other particles. When a particle’s temperature is very low, it makes energy travel to it. 

That makes the weak skyrmion around the particle. And that thing causes a standing wave. When a quantum string transports information, it also transmits energy to that skyrmion. And sooner or later, the energy level in the skyrmion and particle will rise so high that the standing wave between those particles destroys that quantum entanglement. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-may-have-just-cracked-quantum-computings-biggest-problem/

Researchers split a photon into two pieces.

Researchers split a photon into two pieces. 

"By splitting a single photon, scientists confirmed that angular momentum is always conserved — a billion-to-one experiment that reinforces the foundations of quantum physics. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Split a Single Photon. Here’s What They Found)

The image above introduces a situation. The wave movement impacts a photon. That thing makes the photon oscillate and send a wave movement. That thing can also split a photon into two pieces. When a photon travels in a quantum network. Transporting information. The system must store information about that photon. 

And after that, the system must also download information from that photon. The very thin wave bites could act like the needle of the gramophone. The system scans the depth of the waves that are on the photon’s surface. The quantum system stores information in those waves. And the number of waves determines how many states the qubit can have. Another determinant is the depth of those waves. 

Researchers at the University of Tampere split a photon into two photons. That thing proved that even photons follow one of the basic rules in physics: the conservation of angular momentum. So, if the system can make photons act like a gyroscope. And keep those photons in the same position, which makes a new advance in photonics and quantum computing. A series of superpositioned and entangled photons can transport information in nanotube-based systems. 

"Schematic of a single photon with zero angular momentum (green) splitting into two photons (red) with either zero or opposite angular momenta (sketched through the spatially varying color), which adds up to zero confirming the fundamental angular momentum conservation law. Credit: Robert Fickler / Tampere University"(ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Split a Single Photon. Here’s What They Found)

Splitting a photon into two photons by aiming a laser beam, or a wave movement through it. It is one of the things that can make quantum networks closer to reality. In a quantum network, information is stored in particles, like photons.  In a quantum network, particles travel and transport information. In a regular network, wave movement acts as an information transporter. 

The problem with the quantum network is this. Those particles that travel in that network. Should not touch anything unexpected. Any field or unexpected error in the quantum network causes a situation. There is information that particle transport can be damaged. The problem with error detection is this. The system cannot detect errors that happen in some quantum line. 

The answer for error detection is to send information using two separate lines. If those lines create identical solutions, the answer is ” probably closer, right than wrong”. In reasonable circuits. The system makes all calculations backward. And if the answer is the original values, the system gives the right answer. But if the system transports information into two lines, it must split that thing into two routes. 

In a quantum network. That requires that the system must create two identical information packs. So, the ability to split photons can be a tool for quantum routers. But the system can use this technology in quantum computers. Splitting photons and putting them into superposition and quantum entanglement is one thing that can make the quantum chips closer to everyday reality. The information that photon also follows the principle of angular momentum is the thing. That can be important for quantum technology. If the system knows when photons “fall” in quantum entanglement, that can improve the quantum system's effectiveness. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-split-a-single-photon-heres-what-they-found/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum

Photons and Schrödinger’s cats.

   Photons and Schrödinger’s cats. 

The problem is: Why do photons have no medium? Where is its Schrödinger’s cat state where it has both wave and particle forms at the same time? Logically, thinking the particle that goes from one extreme state to another one should travel through the state where the particle has both extreme states. But can that particle travel through that Schrödinger cat state so fast that we cannot detect it? 

Einstein was wrong. A photon cannot simultaneously have particle and wave forms. We can observe either a particle or a wave form in photons. So, if we observe a photon. It can have separate wave and particle forms. But those states or forms are always separated; they never exist at the same time. Or that time is very short. And we cannot detect it. The normal principle in quantum mechanics is this. An observer cannot measure the precise place of a particle and the particle’s movement at the same time. If particle comes to us, we cannot see that particle moves without triangular measurement. We see that the particle grows. 

That is known as Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle. Or simpler uncertainty principle. 

“The uncertainty principle, also known as Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle, is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. It states that there is a limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties, such as position and momentum, can be simultaneously known. In other words, the more accurately one property is measured, the less accurately the other property can be known.” (Wikipedia, Uncertainty principle)

And could the researchers apply that principle to other things? Like changes in the energy states? Or can the uncertainty principle explain why we can see either particle form, photon, or wave movement form in light? So, is it possible that we just cannot measure wave and particle forms in a photon? At the same time? Or does the photon have the ability to transform its state from the wave to a particle and particle to wave, without the medium state? 

In the most accurate  double-slit experiment in history, MIT used two ultra-cold atoms to prove. That means we can measure a photon's dual-state nature. But at the same time, we cannot see those states. Those states are always separated, and that means the uncertainty principle is useful in some other situations than just measuring the particle’s place or movement. In those other cases. A particle moves between quantum states or energy states and levels. When a particle receives or releases energy, it moves between energy states. And that thing is one way to introduce movement. The movement happens between states, frequencies, or energy levels. 

"Schematic of the MIT experiment: Two single atoms floating in a vacuum chamber are illuminated by a laser beam and act as the two slits. The interference of the scattered light is recorded with a highly sensitive camera depicted as a screen. Incoherent light appears as background and implies that the photon has acted as a particle passing only through one slit. Credit: Courtesy of the researchers." (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“MIT physicists have performed the most precise version of the famous double-slit experiment, using ultracold atoms and single photons to reveal the strange dual nature of light as both wave and particle.”(ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“This quantum balancing act—long debated by Einstein and Bohr—was tested without traditional “spring” components, instead relying on atomic “fuzziness” to confirm Bohr’s view: you can’t observe both properties at once. The experiment not only showcases the subtleties of quantum mechanics but also revisits and resolves a historic scientific rivalry.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

The photon can have two states. That we can see. Those two states are wave and particle states. And if we follow the path that Niels Bohr introduced, we cannot see those states simultaneously. We can see a wave, or a particle form in a photon. And those states are always separated. But then we can think that when a photon’s state transforms from the particle to the wave, the photon stretches. That means the photon turns longer. So there should be a medium between those states. But we cannot see that medium. Or Scrödinger’s cat state in photons. That means there is a possibility that the photon goes through that state so fast. That we cannot see that state. Or maybe a photon does not have that medium state. But there is no sense in that possibility. We all know that when a particle, or substance, travels from one extreme state to another extreme state, that transformation must happen through the medium state. The medium state is Schrödinger’s cat state. 

Therefore, for example, a photon should have a state that is both a wave and a particle. But that state is not seen. Another thing is something more incredible. Could the photon be flat? Is it possible that a photon is somehow a flat, donut-looking structure? When researchers stop the photon. That stopped photon should release its energy and turn into a wave movement. But the photon’s particle form remains. That means there should be some internal movement in that particle. Is it possible that a photon is a group of string-shaped waves that form a particle called a photon? When we say that a photon has no time, we are right and wrong. A photon travels at the speed of light. And that means time should be stopped there, but then we can rethink that thing. 

Time is stopped on a photon, but a photon is bound in the universe’s existence. If the universe exists, the photon should take the wave form. But otherwise, it could keep its particle form. If we think that electromagnetic shadow behind the photon pulls it to a straight form, that means it could mean that when the quantum fields turn weaker. The electromagnetic shadow. Or electromagnetic low-pressure will not form behind the photon. And in that case, the photon could also keep its particle form. And that causes an idea: can there be a state of space where there is no cosmic speed limits? When a photon changes its state from a particle to a wave. It turns longer. 

Or stretches to form that looks like spaghetti. In that case, the nose of that spaghetti-shaped particle takes energy into that particle. When a particle travels in a quantum field, it makes a similar shockwave or cone around it like a supersonic aircraft. And there is quantum low-pressure between that cone and the particle. So energy travels to space between that shockwave and the particle. Because the area that delivers energy is larger than the nose, this causes the situation. The particle starts to deliver more energy than it gets. And in that case, the acceleration stops. Acceleration can continue until the particle starts to deliver as much energy as it gets from the environment. Quantum gravity means the particle binds quantum fields into it and turns those fields into kinetic energy. When the field grips the particle. 

Outside field comes to that point. At the same time, the field transports other particles closer to that particle. The photon has no weight or mass because it cannot bind quantum fields to it. Or it releases as much energy as it gets. That means. The photon has energy stability. When quantum fields turn weaker, the speed of light rises. But the reason why we cannot see that thing is that. When we are in the middle of the quantum systems, we cannot observe their changes as we should. We could make measurements only if we were outside the system. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mit-just-proved-einstein-wrong-in-the-most-famous-quantum-experiment/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

Quantum echo in a superconductor can improve quantum technologies.

  Quantum echo in a superconductor can improve quantum technologies. 

"A surprising “Higgs echo” discovered in a superconductor reveals hidden quantum behaviors, offering tantalizing possibilities for future quantum technologies. Credit: Ames National Laboratory" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Discover Mysterious “Quantum Echo” in Superconductors)

Quantum echo in a superconductor can improve quantum technologies. 

In the image above, the text is the situation where the particle. Which is like a sombrero in its quantum field, faces the ring-shaped quantum field faces the ring-shaped quantum field. If that energy hill is in the ring-field. There is a possibility of transmitting waves into that ring-shaped field. And if there are two “almost” identical ring fields, the system can make superposition and entanglement using those fields. The fact is that the field should not be smooth. The “hills” and “valleys” over it form the gear. There are those “hills” and “valleys” that are things. 

That grabs the quantum field. And anchor it to the shell of the particle. Without those things, the field cannot connect to the particle. And the field just slides over it. 

Making it roll around the particle or field. If the field is absolutely smooth, that means that a quantum wire or any quantum field cannot grab that field. So, that causes the idea. Dark energy can be a smooth field. This could be the reason why it doesn’t interact with other fields like it should.  X-rays and gamma-rays are “smoother” waves because their wavelength is so short. That makes those waves tunnel through extremely thick walls.

In the same way, other smooth fields can tunnel themselves through the walls. In those cases, the field just pushes other fields from around it. And then that gives them the possibility to travel through the thick lead walls. 

The mysterious quantum echo in superconducting opens new visions in quantum systems. And their control. If we want to control a system. We must have knowledge of all its abilities. If there is an unknown actor. That destroys our ability to control that system. When researchers found an unknown quantum echo from superconductors. Their knowledge of the quantum field interaction grew. The origin of the quantum echo can be in the interaction between two superconducting fields that transport electricity. 

In models, the superconductivity forms when atoms in the electric wires are in extremely low energy levels. That turns them into the Bose-Einstein state. And in that state, quantum fields that surround those atoms turn into a united entirety. So there are no gaps between those quantum fields. And that makes the quantum field around the wire homogeneous and smooth. There, the wave travels without resistance. Normally, electricity travels above the shell of the wire in the form of wave movement. 

Atom oscillations cause the atoms’ quantum fields where the wave travels is non-homogeneous. Resistance forms when electricity jumps over those connection points of quantum fields. In that case. There form the counter wave forms in the receiving quantum field. And the electricity should cross the standing wave between those atoms. That means the system must raise the power all the time that it gets an electric signal to travel through the wire. 

In superconductors. The quantum fields are melted into a single entirety. That means there are no holes between those atoms’ quantum fields. Or those gaps are very small. But the quantum echo can form in situations where superconductivity is not complete. There can be small gaps between atoms. And in very low temperatures, standing waves between those atoms, or, otherwise saying, resistance is hard to measure. 

Information that travels in the superconductor’s quantum field is a wave. That means the wave just interacts with the field around it. This means that the quantum echo can form. When another superconducting wire sends a weak wave movement to another quantum field. If superconducting wires are close to each other and the electricity travels in opposite ways, a thing can form a quantum whirl between those superconducting wires. 

Those things can be useful in quantum memory solutions and quantum computers. There is a possibility that the system can use those quantum whirls to load information into superpositioned and entangled particles.  

Or maybe those whirls can make the superposition and entanglement themselves. Those whirls can form if the quantum fields around the superconducting wires can create a similar effect to what the air makes when tropical hurricanes are formed. Different ways traveling fields create similar whirls as air molecules create if two air flows travel in opposite directions.  Those whirls can also be used to transport atoms and other particles on the nanotechnical lattices. That thing can revolutionize quantum and nanotechnology. 

The waves in the superconducting fields can also make it possible to create new sensors. Those sensors are tools that can scan extremely smooth surfaces. And those systems can be the new and powerful detectors that can detect other quantum fields from long distances. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-discover-mysterious-quantum-echo-in-superconductors/