Lorentz’s Strange Attractor and discussions between complex quantum systems.

“Illustration showing photon emission from a nanodiamond and light directed by a bullseye antenna. Credit: SciTechDaily.com, inspired by Boaz Lubotzky” (ScitechDaily, Record-Breaking “Sparkle”: Scientists Unlock Diamond’s Quantum Potential)

Diamond’s new quantum potentials. 

Diamond can have multiple new potentials. And one of them is that. The nanodiamond can act as a quantum switch. That can share information with the quantum receivers. This kind of system. Works like this. The transmitter sends information into the diamond, using the TCP/IP style networking protocol. Each of those data packages has a serial number. And when the quantum system sends those data packages. The nanodiamond transmits those data packages to the quantum receiver circle, which surrounds this diamond. 

The system eliminates overlaying data packages and transports them to the receiver using different routes. That makes it possible to create a quantum network, or even a quantum computer, that can operate at room temperature. The system uses the diamond. To share optical information with the receivers that are around it. The diamond must be put. Into the position. Where its corners are aligned with those small-sized photovoltaic cells. Then those photovoltaic cells transform photonic information. Into the electric information.  There is also a possibility that the system forms the Lorentz Strange Attractor around those nanodiamonds. That is one way to make them discuss with each other. 

There is a possibility that nanodiamonds can make material invisible by aiming all radiation at a 90-degree angle to the material layer. And if that layer can conduct that energy in one direction, or below it, that makes the material invisible to an observer who looks at the layer from above. That thing means that. Diamonds aim all reflections in a direction that the reflection cannot reach the observer. 

“Artist’s impression of two nuclear spins, remotely entangled via the geometric gate applied via the electron. Credit: Tony Melov / UNSW Sydney” (ScitechDaily, “Like Talking on the Telephone” – Quantum Breakthrough Lets Individual Atoms Chat Like Never Before). That means electrons travel around two atoms, making the structure. That looks like Lorentz’s Strange Attractor. The new thing could be that the quantum strings could surround two atoms. And that turns their quantum fields into a superposition. In this experiment, the quantum information exchange can happen between an atom’s nuclei. But if the system could make the superpositions. Over the electron shells. That would be an even bigger breakthrough. 

“Lorenz's Strange Attractor” (Wikipedia) 

And a new experiment made atoms discuss with each other. 

The new way to make superposition between complex, or atom-scale systems, is based on Lorenz’s Strange Attractor. (Also Lorenz Attractor (Lorenz System), in this text, Strange Attractor, or Attractor)The system makes a superposition between the quantum fields that surround atoms. And that is one of the biggest things. In the history of quantum computing. Or, if we are sharp, that test made the atoms exchange information. The Lorentz Strange Attractor is the thing that could make it possible to create new types of data storage. 

Those Strange Attractors can also make it possible to create the quantum superposition in the vacuum. But at high temperature. There are two ways to adjust the energy level of the Lorentz Strange Attractor. First is. To push outside energy to the Strange Attractor. The second way is to push the Attractor in the smaller form. If there is no place where that energy can go. That means the energy turns denser. 

Theoretically, information can be surrounded by the Strange Attractor forever if there is no power loss. The Lorentz Strange Attractor means a system.  We can call a quantum perpetual motion machine. In this text, Lorentz Strange Attractor, Strange Attractor, and Attractor mean the same thing.

The Lorentz Strange Attractor can harness energy from around it. And if an attractor cannot realease its energy, its power increases. The thing that makes the Butterfly Effect is that the butterfly that flaps its wings creates a hurricane. In a situation where the system cannot release its energy. This situation forms around those whirls that the butterfly forms. The outside wind cannot fill those whirls. Because there is a particle flow surrounding them. 

Can the Lorenz’s Strange Attractor create a situation where a butterfly that flaps its wings creates a hurricane? That thing is possible in very stable systems. The requirement is that the wind. That which surrounds the whirl must have a high energy level, so that outside energy cannot break the whirl. So if a butterfly flaps its wings in a calm morning, when the energy level in the atmosphere is very low, it can create a situation where the airflow from around it cannot break the wind that moves around the whirl. The low pressure in the middle of the whirl keeps it in form. 

And the whirl gets its energy from sunlight. When that whirl forms, the requirement for the butterfly effect is that the whirl must start to release its energy from the middle of it. If that energy flow goes up. And below the airflow that keeps the whirl in its shape. If that energy reflects to the whirl with energy that is too powerful, the flow that surrounds the whirl can’t keep it in. And that thing breaks the whirl.

One of the examples of the force of Lorentz’s Strange Attractor is the black hole. There, the gravity field forms the Strange Attractor. Along with the material that surrounds the center of the black hole.  The outside matter, radiation, and quantum fields push the attractor in its form. That means. The black hole’s gravity field may look like number eight. This means the outside energy cannot crush the gravity field. This means that when the black hole forms, its gravitational field turns small and dense. Then it starts to feed things into itself. 

There is a possibility that all quantum fields look like a Lorentz Strange Attractor. Those fields travel through their center. And if that thing is true. All particles are surrounded by the field. Which looks like eight. That field drives information into the particle, but it also throws that field away from the center. The name of that field depends on which fundamental interaction it transmits.  This means that the fundamental interactions. Gravity, strong, and weak nuclear forces, and electromagnetism form the “eight”-shaped field. This thing means that the Strange Attractor explains things like gravitational waves. 

Sometimes, the far side of the Attractor releases wave movement. The Strange Attractor packs energy into the crossing point. And another interesting thing is that. Will the field pull or push, depending on the energy flow in the Attractor? When energy flöow crosses an attractor, it can form a soliton. If energy travels in very thin wave packets that don’t touch each other, the soliton will not form. The soliton is the thing. That can pack the entire Attractor into one point. Or the soliton can also break the Attractor. But if the soliton forms the whirl inside it, and it can collect energy into a kinetic form, that can keep the Attractor in its form. The existence of the Attractor depends, in that case, on the Solitons ' or spinning standing waves’ ability to bind energy into it. 

https://scitechdaily.com/record-breaking-sparkle-scientists-unlock-diamonds-quantum-potential/

https://scitechdaily.com/like-talking-on-the-telephone-quantum-breakthrough-lets-individual-atoms-chat-like-never-before/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_system

It’s possible that a wormhole opened in the universe for ten milliseconds.

"The most massive binary black hole merger. This graphic shows a still from a numerical relativity simulation consistent with GW190521. The ripples illustrate the spacetime curvature and gravitational waves produced by the pair of merging black holes. The bottom shows the gravitational wave signal as a function of time. The left shows representations of the black hole event horizons for GW190521 and other massive black hole binaries detected by LIGO/Virgo. (Credit: D. Ferguson, K. Jani, D. Shoemaker, P. Laguna, Georgia Tech, MAYA Collaboration). (Phys.org, Study shows that the GW190521 event could be explained by primordial black holes)

Do you know what gravitational wave  GW190521 is? Researchers think. This gravitational wave formed. In a primordial black hole merger. That means those primordial black holes can bring information from the time before the universe existed or formed. Maybe it’s evidence of the wormholes, energy bridges across the universe. In models, the wormhole. The Einstein-Rosen bridge forms between two black holes that oscillate at the same frequency. That means the wormhole is the superposition and entangled black holes, or the superposition’s “Einstein’s spooky action at a distance” between black holes. And that means the wormhole is the black hole. Or the extreme version of quantum entanglement. 

If the gravitational wave GW190521 was formed when a wormhole opened in the universe, the gravitational wave GW190521 uncovers the most interesting phenomena in the universe. That thing proves that Einstein was right, and the Einstein-Rosen bridge is true. 

There is also other, so-called non-straight evidence of the wormhole. When black holes merge, they produce a larger event horizon than both of them had. There is a possibility that when black holes collide, they pull the wormhole open. And that wormhole, if it exists, pushes energy into black holes. In that model, all black holes are connected to the wormhole. When black holes merge, those wormholes are separated from the singularity and bring more energy into the event horizon. That bulges like a balloon. In some models, the singularity is actually like a ring. When black holes spin, the extremely strong force pulls the hole into that extremely dense structure. 

“The cosmic web is part of the universe's large-scale structure. It is composed of dark matter, gas, and galaxies. A frame from the Illustris Simulation shows a massive galaxy cluster at the center. Red, orange, and white colors show hot gas, while the blue and purple filaments depict a cosmic framework of dark matter. Credit: Illustris Collaboration” (Astronomy, What is the cosmic web made of?)

"A wormhole visualized as a two-dimensional surface. Route (a) is the shortest path through normal space between points 1 and 2; route (b) is a shorter path through a wormhole." (Wikipedia, Wormhole)

The wormhole also explains dark energy. When a particle travels in the wormhole, it cannot turn older. Otherwise, we can say that the particle cannot release its energy. When a particle comes out of the wormhole, it suddenly releases the energy that is stored in it. Because the future is lower energy than the past, the particle is at a higher energy level than it should be. In the same way, the radiation that travels in the wormhole has a higher energy than the radiation outside the wormhole. 

There is a possibility that  ion whirls can form a wormhole if the speed of that whirl is high enough. In that case, the ion whirl pumps energy to the object inside it. The idea is transformed from the Tipler Cylinder. There, the fast-spinning cylinder stops or dilates time inside it. The idea is that the wormhole locks energy in the object, and that stops time inside it. 

There is also evidence that not all black holes are spinning. The thing is that the black hole's spin is relative to other black holes. And if two black holes spin with the same speed, and they are just in line, they might look frozen. Or their spin is impossible to see if we observe that black hole pair. So if black holes are in a chain and all of them spin in the same direction with the same speed, those black holes look static if we compare them with other black holes in the chain. 

The thing. That supports the wormholes. Or their existence, at least in some form, is the intergalactic material flows. In those cases, in those extremely large megastructures, there must be some kind of channel or structure that pulls material around them. The structure is a combination of dark matter, galaxies, and ions, but the main question is what pulls these structures together. Into the form. That looks like a slime mold. There is something that pulls dark- and visible matter into the network-shaped structure. 

This means that the so-called cosmic web can be the wormhole network. This is one way. To see things. We are made of acoustic and electromagnetic wormholes. But. Confirming the gravitational wormholes would be the most fundamental event in physics. This thing can also bring evidence of the multiverse. 

https://www.astronomy.com/science/what-is-the-cosmic-web-made-of/

https://phys.org/news/2021-03-gw190521-event-primordial-black-holes.html

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/09/scientists-detected-a-signal-from-another-universe-wormhole-opened-for-10-milliseconds-while-physics-community-panics-about-parallel-worlds/

https://www.sciencealert.com/unusual-gravitational-wave-may-be-sign-of-wormhole-linking-universes

https://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-discover-colossal-cosmic-bridge-linking-galaxies-across-space/

https://scitechdaily.com/einstein-was-right-again-ripples-in-space-time-confirm-century-old-theory/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GW190521

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipler_cylinder

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

What was before the Big Bang?

“Our entire cosmic history is theoretically well-understood, but difficult to depict in a static, 2D image. The Universe’s present expansion rate and energy composition are related, which is why most modern illustrations of our cosmic history have a tube-like shape: where they often (dubiously) depict an initial singularity, a period of inflation, and then a slower expansion that changes with time while our Universe evolves. No one diagram encodes all of these details correctly, including the one shown here, which seems to maintain a constant “size” for the Universe, disagreeing with reality.” (BigThink. The strongest evidence for a Universe before the Big Bang)

Can the source of dark energy be in particles that go out from the universe and evaporate in that extremely low-energy place? When a particle or black hole travels out of the universe. The outside quantum field cannot keep the particle in its form. In the universe, the outside energy field presses the particle. And slows its energy transfer to its environment. Particles are condensed versions of energy. And when those particles release their energy very fast, that means they turn into a wave movement. And if the energy level around them is zero, that means those particles detonate. They send those waves into the universe. But they send waves that also impact outside the universe. 

Even before the Big Bang, the universe or spacetime was not really empty. There were fields and wave movement. That formed material and the universe where we live. The big question has always been where those waves and fields came from. Also, those fields. Must have some kind of source. 

The fact is that matter cannot form from emptiness. So there must be some kind of wave movement. And one suggestion is that. There were gravity waves before the Big Bang. Or the event that formed our universe. But was there a universe before our universe? This question remains open. The thing that we call the universe is a structure. Where matter and energy have a certain form or shape. And that means we should ask if there was a structure before our universe, where matter and energy had similar shapes, as they have in our universe, or the universe where we live. The new model goes like this. The gravity waves that were the only existing thing before our universe started to form were impacted and started to condense into gravitons. And then those gravitons could form the massive kugelblitz black hole, which detonated. That could even look like a series of explosions, because when that massive object released its outermost shell, its size increased. 

At that point, the gravity waves that this object sent pushed other gravity waves away. When we think about that very first black hole, we must remember that this object formed in a very different universe than the one we live in. That object was the only gravity center in the universe. And that means its effect was larger scale than the gravity centers have in the modern universe. When we think about the first magnetic fields. They were not more powerful than the human EEG; we must remember. That energy level is always relative to its environment. The universe was very hot and dense, and those electromagnetic fields formed into a place. 

“The density fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) provide the seeds for modern cosmic structure to form, including stars, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, filaments, and large-scale cosmic voids. But the CMB itself cannot be seen until the Universe forms neutral atoms out of its ions and electrons, which takes hundreds of thousands of years, and the stars won’t form for even longer: 50-to-100 million years.” (BigThink. The strongest evidence for a Universe before the Big Bang)

“Regions of space that are slightly denser than average will create larger gravitational potential wells to climb out of, meaning the light arising from those regions appears colder by the time it arrives at our eyes. Vice versa, underdense regions will look like hot spots, while regions with perfectly average density will have perfectly average temperatures.” (BigThink. The strongest evidence for a Universe before the Big Bang)

“The quantum fluctuations that occur during inflation do indeed get stretched across the Universe, and later, smaller-scale fluctuations get superimposed atop the older, larger-scale ones. These field fluctuations cause density imperfections in the early Universe, which then lead to the temperature fluctuations we measure in the cosmic microwave background, after all the interactions between dark matter, normal matter, and radiation occur prior to the formation of the first stable, neutral atoms.” (BigThink. The strongest evidence for a Universe before the Big Bang)

“The quantum fluctuations inherent to space, stretched across the Universe during cosmic inflation, gave rise to the density fluctuations imprinted in the cosmic microwave background, which in turn gave rise to the stars, galaxies, and other large-scale structures in the Universe today. This is the best picture we have of how the entire Universe behaves, where inflation precedes and sets up the Big Bang. Unfortunately, we can only access the information contained inside our cosmic horizon, which is all part of the same fraction of one region where inflation ended some 13.8 billion years ago.” (BigThink. The strongest evidence for a Universe before the Big Bang)

“If you look farther and farther away, you also look farther and farther into the past. If the number of galaxies, the densities and properties of those galaxies, and other cosmic properties like the temperature and expansion rate of the Universe didn’t appear to change, you’d have evidence of a Universe that was constant in time; that is not what we see.” (BigThink, Even before the Big Bang, space wasn’t truly empty)

Where there were no other electromagnetic fields. Electrons were just formed. The suggestion of how those fields formed, or which was the formation order of those fields, is that first were strong nuclear interaction fields, because those fields are radiation or wave movement that formed in the quark gluon plasma. Those high-energy particles condensed from the whirls in the gravity field. Then we must remember. Electromagnetic fields form in electron interactions. The weak nuclear interaction forms between protons and neutrons. That model mean. Electromagnetic fields formed before the weak nuclear interaction, because the weak nuclear interaction requires baryons that can form only if quarks can form protons and neutrons.  

So the four fundamental forces formed in the next order. 

1) Gravity

2) Strong nuclear interaction

3) Electromagnetism

4) Weak nuclear interaction. 

When we talk. About the force formation. We talk about. The situation, the environment, and the force that. Takes the form that makes their interaction possible. 

That means energy that existed before the Big Bang formed the universe. But where does that energy or wave movement come from? The logical explanation can be. The origin of that field or gravity waves could be another universe. The existence of other universes is logically possible. That model mean. That universes form structures like galaxies and galaxy clusters. But if we observe those kinds of theorems. We face one reality. If another universe exists and some particle travels between that universe and our universe, that hypothetical particle must travel through an extremely low-energy space. This means that there is no energy that can press the quantum field. 

That particle evaporates or turns into a wave movement. This would happen. Even if our universe were alone. This means that the dark energy’s origin can be in the space outside the universe. When a particle turns into a wave movement, it sends an energy impulse around it. Or it releases energy that condensed into that particle. This energy travels back to the universe. In the same way, a black hole that travels  out of the universe detonates. Every day, particles flow out from the universe, and that means there can be multiple energy sources outside the universe. If energy travels out from another universe, that low-energy spacetime will stretch that wave so long that it's hard or even impossible to detect. 

But then back to the Big Bang. The question is, where does the first universe get its existence? That is the question that makes the multiverse theory quite hard to control. Where did the first universe get the wave movement that formed it?

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/evidence-universe-before-big-bang/

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-wasnt-empty-before-big-bang/

https://scitechdaily.com/universes-first-magnetic-fields-were-as-weak-as-human-brain-waves/

New theory suggests that dark matter is an extremely high-energy form of gravitons.

“Dark matter’s nature has long eluded scientists, but new theoretical and experimental advances are pointing to an unexpected candidate: superheavy, electrically charged gravitinos. (Artist’s concept). Credit: SciTechDaily.com”(ScitechDaily, The Hunt for Dark Matter Has a New, Surprising Target)

“Superheavy charged gravitinos may be the long-sought answer to dark matter.” (ScitechDaily, The Hunt for Dark Matter Has a New, Surprising Target)

“Dark Matter remains one of the biggest mysteries in fundamental physics. Many theoretical proposals (axions, WIMPs) and 40 years of extensive experimental search have not explained what Dark Matter is. Several years ago, a theory that seeks to unify particle physics and gravity introduced a radically different possibility: superheavy, electrically charged gravitinos as Dark Matter candidates.”(ScitechDaily, The Hunt for Dark Matter Has a New, Surprising Target)

The shape of dark matter is a mystery. But the fact is that dark matter is predicted to form particles called weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs. The new theory suggests that the WIMPs are gravitons, which are on a higher energy level than they should be. The problem is that nobody has seen the gravito. The theoretical gravitation transportation particle. Then we can ask the question: Why is dark matter invisible? The answer can be that those particles spin so fast that they push energy waves around them. And that means there is no reflection about those particles. 

In that model, the graviton is the electromagnetic shadow of some spinaxle particles that moves the wave. In some other models, the graviton is a miniature black hole that could exist in all particles. But there are more exotic models about the shape of the graviton and dark matter. In this model, dark matter forms when a neutrino goes into another neutrino. In that model, two internal neutrinos start to spin oppositely. 

That means an internal particle that can be something other than a neutrino spins in the opposite direction to the particle that forms the shell of this double particle. The macro-effect of this thing can be found in magnetars. If the neutron star’s shell spins oppositely to its core, that forms the most powerful magnetic field in the universe. So what if another neutrino traps another neutrino inside it, and those internal neutrinos start to spin in opposite directions? That thing means that the double particle can form an extremely strong quantum gravity field. 

“New simulations of neutron star mergers reveal that the mixing and changing of tiny particles called neutrinos impacts how the merger unfolds, including the composition and structure of the merger remnant as well as the resulting emissions. This image depicts the density of neutrinos within the remnant as varying textures, and the colors represent energy densities of different neutrino flavors. Credit: David Radice research group / Penn State” (ScitechDaily, First-Ever Simulations Reveal Ghost Particles Shapeshifting in Violent Neutron Star Mergers)

“New simulations show that neutrino flavor transformations change both the composition and the signals left behind after neutron star collisions.” (ScitechDaily, First-Ever Simulations Reveal Ghost Particles Shapeshifting in Violent Neutron Star Mergers)

“When two neutron stars collide and merge, the result is one of the most energetic events in the universe. These cataclysms generate multiple kinds of signals that can be detected from Earth.” (ScitechDaily, First-Ever Simulations Reveal Ghost Particles Shapeshifting in Violent Neutron Star Mergers)

When we think about neutron star collisions, there is a possibility that high-energy neutrinos are affected in that process. Normally, neutrinos are weakly interacting particles. Those particles can travel through even entire planets without interaction. In neutron star collisions, very many neutrinos. And the environment where those neutrinos interact with other particles is much denser than in the case of planets. Neutrinos will interact with quarks and other particles more often than in the normal universe. 

When neutrinos take an extremely high energy level. And when the energy level around them decreases, those neutrinos can realease that energy. When that extremely thick neutrino cloud releases its extra energy, that energy can rip a neutron star into pieces. 

That thing can explain the hypothetical case where a neutrino could trap another neutrino. Or maybe the particle that traps the neutrino inside it could be a quark or an electron. When neutrino and other elementary particles travels at very high speeds, and their mutual speed is almost the same. The energy level around those particles is extremely high, and that can push neutrinos. into each other. Or that energy can push a quark inside another quark. That can form particles that are unknown to us. 

https://scitechdaily.com/first-ever-simulations-reveal-ghost-particles-shapeshifting-in-violent-neutron-star-mergers/

https://scitechdaily.com/the-hunt-for-dark-matter-has-a-new-surprising-target/

Maybe mysterious little red dots at the edge of the universe are black hole stars.

   Maybe mysterious little red dots at the edge of the universe are black hole stars. 

"Artist’s impression of a black hole star (not to scale). Mysterious tiny pinpoints of light discovered at the dawn of the universe may be giant spheres of hot gas that are so dense they look like the atmospheres of typical nuclear fusion-powered stars; however, instead of fusion, they are powered by supermassive black holes in their center that rapidly pull in matter, converting it into energy and giving off light. Credit: T. Müller/A. de Graaff/Max Planck Institute for Astronomy" (ScitechDaily, Mysterious “Universe Breaker” Red Dots Could Be Black Holes in Disguise)

The little red dots at the edge of the universe could be so-called black hole stars. If that thing is true, those red dots would be the most fundamental things in the world. The black hole stars, or so-called quasi stars, would be the most interesting things in the universe. The quasi-star could form around the small back hole. In the early universe, those black holes could form when the so-called Schwinger effect formed a material point. 

That formed a singularity. And then those black holes started to pull material into them. There is a possibility that black holes pull particles they forming a stellar-shaped structure around the event horizon. Those hydrogen atoms are locked around the black hole. Those hydrogen atoms can form a spinning layer in the distance where the escaping velocity is the same as that atom’s speed.

The quasi-star, or black hole star, is like other stars if we see them outside. But they could be far larger than regular stars. If those famous red dots are quasi-stars that help to calculate other black holes and black hole-based structures. Things like extremely small black holes that can hide in ball-shaped asteroids are waiting for their finder. The quasi-stars will help to fill in the puzzle about the black holes. Those things will not be fundamental, and intermediate mass black holes are not fundamental. But they will confirm theories and models of back holes and their formation. 

The quasi-stars would not exist in our universe. The thing that forms the structure is the interaction between layers that form that object. The energy from inner structures interacts with the outer structure. Those structures push each other away. When those structures' temperatures turn lower, that breaks the quasi-star. 

"An illustration shows the JWST in space next to its observations of some of the earliest galaxies ever seen, the so-called "little red dots." (Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Dale Kocevski (Colby College)/ Robert Lea (created with Canva))" (Space.com, James Webb Space Telescope sees little red dots feeding black holes: 'This is how you solve a universe-breaking problem') 

If those little red dots (LRD) are black holes that formed before galaxies or even material that could mean that first were so-called “Kugelblitz”-black holes that formed straight from wave movement. Then those kugelblitz black holes formed galaxies around them. That means it’s possible that black holes formed before matter. 

"Size comparison of a hypothetical quasi-star to some of the largest known stars."(Wikipedia, Quasi-star)

“As a quasi-star cooled over time, its outer envelope would become transparent, until further cooling to a limiting temperature of 4,000 K (3,730 °C). This would mark the end of the quasi-star's life since there is no hydrostatic equilibrium at or below this limiting temperature. It would then dissipate without a supernova, leaving behind an intermediate-mass black hole. These intermediate-mass black holes are theorized as the progenitors of modern supermassive black holes, and would help explain how supermassive black holes formed so early in the history of the universe.” (Wikipedia, Quasi-star)

The energy that this quasi-star shines is energy that forms in the black hole’s material disk, and in the case that the back hole pulls that radiation’s wavelength longer. The extreme gravity causes a virtual redshift because gravity stretches light. That means quasi-stars should be red. The massive gravitational redshift will pull all radiation longer than it should be. Or to the red side of the electromagnetic spectrum. 

So the black hole can pull X-rays. And gamma-ray wavelengths turn longer. And that thing causes an interesting model. That can make a black hole invisible because extreme gravity pulls electromagnetic radiation’s wavelength so long. If the gravity is strong enough, that thing can turn even gamma-rays into radio waves. 

That means that there is a possibility that black holes’ gamma- and X-rays are also a result of some, yet unknown, radiation’s wavelength stretch.  A black hole's environment has a wavelength longer than it should. This means that the black hole seems to be at a longer distance than it actually is. Otherwise, if those objects are on the other side of the universe, the redshift would be strong anyway. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mysterious-universe-breaker-red-dots-could-be-black-holes-in-disguise/

https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-little-red-dots-galaxies-black-hole-growth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-star

Hawking was right. Black holes’ event horizons cannot withdraw.

Hawking was right. Black holes’ event horizons cannot withdraw.

“Computer simulation of the black hole binary system GW150914 prior to merging. Credit: SXS” (Universe Today)

It’s possible that all black holes spin. 

Hawking was right about black holes. Their event horizon cannot withdraw.  When two black holes collide, their event horizons’ size is as big as both of those black holes before they collide. When black holes collide, they send a gravitational wave. And that wave is an energy impulse that forms when those black holes collide, meaning a small portion of their mass is converted into energy that is released as gravitational waves. But why does the size of those black holes' event horizon not decrease? 

The reason for that is in the nature of the spacetime and the universe. The thing that keeps a black hole in its form is the material and energy that forms a whirl around it. As the universe expands, the quantum fields and material pressure against the black hole weaken. That means that. The energy that keeps the black hole in its form turns weaker. When a black hole sends gravitational waves, it sends its event horizon’s “shell” away from it. The idea is that decreasing the energy level of the whirl around the black hole sucks energy out from the event horizon. 

In that model, the gravitational wave forms. When the whirl around the black hole jumps out of it. When the energy level in the whirl around the black hole decreases, that whirl jumps out from the black hole. The Schwarzschild radius is the singularity’s distance to the point at which the escaping velocity reaches the speed of light. That distance depends on the mass of the singularity. The Schwarzschild radius doesn’t depend on the whirl that surrounds the black hole. Actually, the Schwarzschild radius depends on the black hole’s mass and energy relation with its environment. 

The idea is that when we are in the middle of the quantum system. And we face a global change. That affects all particles. When a black hole loses its mass, the universe or space around it loses its energy in the same relation. That means the relation with the black hole and its environment is the same. We cannot see global changes in the system if we are in it. 

All mass in a black hole is in the structure called a singularity, where material, energy, and time are connected together. In this model, gravity waves form in the black hole’s gravity field. In that process, the black hole loses a photon. 

The interaction between the black hole and its environment is complicated. Materia is one energy form. It’s like a pack of energy. You can imagine what energy level is stored in a singularity, where an entire star, whose mass is many suns, is pressed into a size that is smaller than an atom. That is a lot of energy packed in a very compact space. Otcoming energy keeps that structure in its form. And without that energy that comes from outside, the energy  stored in that structure is released. So, the mass is relative to its environment. When a black hole binds energy from its environment, its own energy level rises. That process happens because a black hole spins. Without that spin, the black hole, or its singularity, cannot bind energy that travels against it. 

Above: A Spiral galaxy is a whirl around a supermassive black hole.(Wikipedia)

The singularity must bind more energy than travels into it because its energy level must turn lower than the energy that comes from the environment. The sigularity stores energy. If the energy level that the singularity can release turns higher. Than its environment. That thing starts to evaporate. So the question is not about how much energy is stored in the singularity. The question is about. How much energy can it release? When singularity releases its energy, it must have a higher energy level than the whirl it brings into it. Energy and material continue their spiral-shaped trajectory behind the event horizon. So the whirl around the event horizon continues behind the event horizon, and that spiral structure turns tighter and tighter. Without that whirl, the black hole will detonate. 

That spinning movement forms the whirl around it. And we see those whirls. Around supermassive black holes. As a spiral galaxy. This means that it's possible that the only existing black holes are spinning black holes. This spinning movement forms an energy transition in the singularity. Without that spin, the black hole would release energy. And that causes detonation. This means gravity forms when spinning particles bind energy, or quantum fields into them. That energy transports particles to those gravity centers. 

The mass is also relative to its environment and the gravitational field. Energy levels in energy fields are relative. To other energy fields, energy levels. Even if a black hole loses its mass, its environment loses its energy. And that means the black hole’s mass compared to its environment is stable. 

When we say that black holes oscillate, we mean that black hole sends gravitational waves. That doesn’t mean that the event horizon moves backward. The interaction means that the environment sucks those waves away from the event horizon. That means the point where the event horizon was before the gravity waves stays stable. 

The event horizon is the locked energy that surrounds. Something inside that structure. The distance of the event horizon from the core of the black hole is the Schwarzschild radius. Black holes spin, and that spin binds energy from around that thing. A black hole binds energy from its environment. And transforms it into kinetic energy. This process is one of the forms of gravity. The whirl, or the transition disk around the black hole, keeps that structure in its form. The whirl pushes energy to the black hole. Without that, the black hole detonates. When the universe expands, energy in that whirl turns lower. And that allows the black hole to send a gravitational wave. 

And then another layer in the event horizon takes the place of the shell that was left out of the event horizon. The idea in that model is that. The structure in the event horizon forms layers, which means the gravitational structure in the event horizon. Looks like an onion. The Schwarzschild radius is the distance to the point where the escape velocity reaches the speed of light from the singularity that exists in the center of the event horizon. Because the Schwarzschild radius is static until the singularity starts to lose its mass, the gravitational wave doesn’t decrease the black hole’s mass. The time that the whirl is separated from the event horizon is so short that this interaction has no time to reach the black hole’s core. But if that whirl is gone and the black hole cannot get energy. This causes the black hole to evaporate. And if a black hole is in a cosmic void, we would see that event as a detonation. 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/event-horizon-black-hole

https://as.cornell.edu/news/hawkings-black-hole-theorem-observationally-confirmed

https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/quantum-physics/stephen-hawking-s-black-hole-radiation-paradox-could-finally-be-solved-if-black-holes-aren-t-what-they-seem

https://news.mit.edu/2021/hawkings-black-hole-theorem-confirm-0701

https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Black_hole_merger_provides_strongest_evidence_yet_for_Hawking_area_law_999.html

https://www.universetoday.com/articles/black-hole-merger-provides-clearest-evidence-yet-that-einstein-hawking-and-kerr-were-right

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius

What was before the Big Bang. (Part II)

  What was before the Big Bang. (Part II)

"Our universe could be the mirror image of an antimatter universe extending backwards in time. Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin. Physicists in Canada propose that our universe could be a reflection of an antimatter universe that existed before the Big Bang." (CREDIT: Getty Images)" The brighter side, Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin)

The antiuniverse or antiverse is the model. That is based on the supernova explosion model. When a large star explodes, that event forms a so-called time-glass nebula. So, could the Big Bang event have formed the two universes? The idea is that when two giant whirls. That spin was opposite. Those giant whirls formed the spark, or the explosion that sent two universes into different directions. If those proto-anti-universe and the proto-universe impacted. That could form the universe and the anti-universe. 

This question is one of the most interesting, because it helps researchers to calculate the values of the particles.  When a particle travels through the universe. Energy and quantum fields touch it. Those touches leave marks on those particles. And that helps to get information from distant galaxies. But this is not possible. If researchers don’t know the strength of those energy fields. This means that modeling the Big Bang makes it possible to calculate changes in the energy levels in an expanding universe. 

  

What energy should be in those particles that exist in the modern universe? 

And if researchers can calculate. What kind of energy should those particles have? They can search for differences between theoretical and real values. That gives data about the fields. That the particle faced. During its journey.  But it’s impossible to calculate theoretical values without knowing the beginning values. 

Was there some kind of energy flow that formed two opposite rotating whirls that were positive and negative (+ and -) universes? And was the Big Bang some kind of spark between those giant whirls?  That doesn’t mean that antiversum and universe require material. They require opposite fields that cause a similar reaction to the antimatter-matter annihilation. 

In some models, the energy arrow that traveled through the field formed two giant whirls. Those whirls can be the anti-universe and the universe. Or, those whirls were the positive and negative whirls. If those two positive and negative proto-universes act like matter and antimatter. They can pull each other together. 

Above: Time glass nebula. 

So can the antiverse explain the Big Bang? 

In this case, we should rather talk about the antiverse. As a mirror universe. Or, mirror protouniverse . Where there was some kind of material. We could say that in the case of the proto-universe, the antiversum was rather the whirl where energy fields rotate in the opposite direction. Than the other universe that we can call the “normal universe”. If the proto-universe and proto-anti-universe were oppositely rotating whirls in the energy field or in free gravitational wave movement. We can think that those whirls pulled each other together like antimatter and matter. Pulled each other together. 

It’s possible that those extremely large rotational whirls impact each other, and they formed the lightning or the spark. That spark could be like a shortcut between positive and negative fields, and that spark could be the thing that we can call the universe. When the Big Bang happened. Energy was homogenously spread through the entire universe. Then the universe's expansion made holes. In that homogenous energy field. And that caused situations where energy started to fill those holes. 

Could dark energy or some part of dark energy form when quarks or gluons collide with their antimatter pairs? That thing can mean that this kind of thing can put energy into moving. 

Can black holes’ relativistic jets be formed from new fermions in the universe? When we talk about black holes and their relativistic jets, they can form fermion-anti-fermion pairs. That means that effect condenses energy fields into the form of matter. That means if Schwinger effect forms matter in the modern universe, that thing forms fermion-antifermion pairs. And those particle-antiparticle pairs can annihilate, transforming into energy. So could dark energy’s source be in the quark and anti-quark annihilation? Or in some more exotic particles, annihilation, like the gluon-antigluon annihilation. 

This can mean that energy, or wave movement that travels into those energy holes, is stated to fill those holes, and the Schwinger effect could form material in those whirls. Some of those whirls could be so strong that the wave movement formed different-sized primordial black holes. The question is always. Do black holes' relativistic jets form new particles in the universe? Relativistic jets are the most powerful things in the universe. Because black holes also interact with dark matter and dark energy. That means a black hole can form two relativistic jets, visible and dark energy jets.    

When dark energy jets travel through the universe, they can turn dark energy fields into some kind of particles. The changes in dark energy could form. When dark energy turns into some kind of particles. When we think about the nature of energy, matter is one of the forms of energy. Particles are energy packages. When energy binds itself into matter or particles, that means that energy is away from its environment. 

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/groundbreaking-research-suggests-that-our-universe-has-an-antiuniverse-twin/

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.amp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

Futuristic journey to the Proxima Centauri system.

Futuristic journey to the Proxima Centauri system. 

A hypothetical journey to Alpha Centauri, or actually to Proxima Centauri, will be the thing that changes our view of the universe and ourselves. The film introduces three types of spacecraft. The Millennium ship, the cryostatic ship, and the WARP ship. The WARP ship is not yet possible. In some models, the unmanned, small-sized WARP probes use miniature black holes as a power source and for quantum communication. Those systems travel first to other solar systems to search for a possible habitable planet. 

The next step is the cryostatic crew. That travels to the targeted solar system as a vanguard. Whose mission is to prepare the base for the main group of colonists who travel to that solar system in the generation ships. Those generation ships are the giant metal cathedrals that can reach a speed. Of about 2-5% of the speed of light. The WARP system is the only thing. That can take the crew back from the Alpha Centauri system while their sender is alive. The journey to Alpha Centauri takes hundreds of years. 

The biggest problem with the journey to Alpha Centauri is that when we send crew to that mission, they cannot return. That means those people are gone forever. The cryoship reaches 20-50% of the speed of light. That speed is very slow in the universe, and that means, even if we make a cryoship, we would send those people on the mission. where we don’t meet those people again. The cryostatic system denies aging, and those people can return from their mission, but the Earth has changed while they were on their journey. And there is no one left from the team that sent those operators on their journey. 

AI-made inspiration details about the hypothetical  Proxima B base. That base looks like the Moonbase. Its mission would be to protect the crew against the Proxima superflares, extreme weather, and possible. micro-organisms. Because there is always an epidemiological risk. Those structures must be separated. The bubble protects the crew against superflares. The base could be underground, and that thing could be the airlock and observation station. 

The generation ship will be the thing that transports the main groups of colonists. That craft needs generations to travel to Alpha Centauri. Those colonists who arrive at the Alpha Centauri system will never see Earth. That means Earth is a distant thing to those colonists. When we think about a situation where the generation ship is an artificial world. That slowly travels between solar systems; there is a big difference between that artificial world and a real planet. The environment in the artificial world is fully controlled. There are very carefully controlled microbes and temperatures on board the generation ship. Those systems are urgent because their mission is to deny. The artificial ecosystem's collapse. 

When colonists land on Proxima Centauri B or some other planet in that planetary system. There are artificial wombs and advanced nanotechnology that allow the creation of artificial DNA. And those systems create artificial people who could operate at the surface of Proxima Centauri B or other planets in that solar system. 

There is the natural environment. Winds, rain, and sunlight. There can also be natural microbes on that strange world. When that crew lands on that planet, they must live in the bubble. The base is isolated from the environment. The base’s mission is to protect those colonists against the Proxima super flares, storms, and the heat or extreme low temperature on that locked planet. Those colonists require protective suits if they travel on that planet. Because superflares raise the temperature very fast. The base can be in underground tunnels. That protects the colonists better. The Proxima would always be in the same position, because the planet is locked. 

Time and the Big Bang theory.

  Time and the Big Bang theory. 

Maurits Escher's portrait "Ascending and Descending" can introduce a situation where particles move between energy levels. When another particle moves up, that pushes another particle to move into a lower energy level. If two particles move up and one particle is between them, they move that one particle back or to a lower energy level faster. 

So if the case is this. When one particle moves one energy step up. The neighbour particle must move one step down.. And, if that particle is between two particles that move one step up. That particle that goes down should move two steps down. 

The reason for that is this: when one particle moves into an upper energy level, it gets that energy from the particle that moves to the lower energy level. And if the particle "wants" to push two particles to the upper energy level, it must release twice as much energy as one particle requires. In the same way, if two particles step down in the energy level and there is a particle between them, that causes a situation where those two particles release energy. They push the particle between them two steps higher. 

In one dark energy model. The reason for dark energy is that some particles just release their energy too fast. The idea is similar to the waterfall. When water drops from the slopes, it forms a sound when it hits the bottom. That sound forms when water releases its energy. The fact is that water releases part of its energy into the air. While water molecules travel in the air, they form friction. 

And that friction means that water released some part of its kinetic energy. Transforms into thermal energy. But what if water falls in the vacuum? In that case, falling water would not release its kinetic energy to the air. That means water transfers more kinetic energy to the bottom. And that means water would be at a higher energy level than it would be if it traveled through the air. 

Energy requires a place where it can move. When a particle travels through the universe, it interacts with its environment. That means a particle receives or releases energy. If a particle cannot transfer its energy to somewhere, like another particle or a quantum field, it remains higher energy than it should be. 

Can that thing be the evidence of the wormholes? The wormhole would not let the particle release its energy. And that can explain why some particles are at a higher energy level than calculated. The reason for that higher energy level can be that the particle traveled across the magnetic storm. And that tells us that the sun's magnetic storms can load more energy into particles than they should carry. 

But when a particle comes out from that magnetic effect, it causes a situation where energy flows faster from those particles than it should. In the same way, when particles come out of the hypothetical wormhole, that means they are at a higher energy level than they should be. And that causes a similar situation. The particle releases its energy faster than it should. That kind of effect can rip particles into pieces. 

Above: "A depiction of a universe-antiuniverse pair. Credit: Wikipedia, CC" (Phys.org, New model suggests partner anti-universe could explain accelerated expansion without the need for dark energy)

The Big Bang was an event, or a series of events. Big Bang released into time. The idea of that model is this. There are four dimensions: three in space and two in time. The Schwinger effect formed matter straight from wave movement. Before the Big Bang, there was wave movement. Or, some quantum points, or quantum dots, in that spacetime. It's possible that those quantum dots were small whirls in the starting field. Then those quantum dots started to assemble a wave movement around them.

It's possible that the event that formed the universe actually formed two universes. There is a formed universe where we live. And the universe, there at least, is the mirror. So, in the anti-universe, the matter is antimatter, but some cosmologists believe that time also moves oppositely. 

The Universe formed from a starting field that could be the gravitational wave movement fields. When we think about a model, the Schwinger effect or quantum whirls form the universe. We can think of a situation. There was a fast-moving energy impulse, or energy arrow, that traveled through the starting field. That energy arrow should form two arrows. And this model supports the antiverse model. 

Or in some other models, the quantum dots moved away. From each other because of some quantum mechanical impact. That thing moved quantum fields away from each other. And then they tried to fill that hole. This means that the starting field started to form. A tower-type structure, and sooner or later, that field couldn't keep the tower in its form. That collapse was the thing. Called the Big Bang.  Or it started a series of events that we call the Big Bang. 

There is a model that the spacetime is actually formed of the internally traveling time arrows. Time moves forward at the outer layer of that time arrow. The internal structure of the time arrow moves backward in time. The idea is that. We live in the third dimension, and the material's base energy level. At the quantum state is a 2D material. This forms the second dimension. Energy travels out from the material. 

Above: Waterfall. The sound of falling water forms when water releases its kinetic energy. (Pinterest)

This means. The material turns into a "flat" form. Or the material turns into a 2D form.  So the form of the universe can be a giant sobrero. There is a similar structure. Like a plasma impact wave that surrounds our solar system, we cannot get information from outside the universe. That shockwave formed during the Big Bang travels at the forward edge of the universe. And it denies getting information from outside the universe. There can also be a gravity wave traveling ahead of the Universe, that closes the universe inside the gravity sphere. And it also denies gravity observations from outside the universe. 

But let's go back. The internal time arrows. The idea is this. When the time arrow, or arrow of time, moves forward, it pushes things around it back in time. There is a possibility that the universe or material is the structure that acts as a hollow time arrow. The hollow time arrow forms when the edges of the structure travel forward in time. And they push their internal structures back in time. 

This model can work with the 3D spacetime model. If there is a structure, then the outer edge pushes energy into the middle of it, which means that the energy falls straight into the second dimension. That causes an effect where energy starts to spread around. But because there is a structure that transports energy into that point, the structure forms the standing wave into the second dimension. That means. There forms the structure. That looks like a volcano. Energy falls in the middle of it. 

That wave movement releases energy. That energy impacts the energy that comes outside, which starts to raise the structure's energy level. And because that field travels up those fields, it binds energy into them. The outside energy impacts the inner structure, which transmits energy to the second dimension. And that forms the energy trap or standing wave around the structure. The standing wave's energy level rises outward, or the inward field gives in and falls on the structure. 

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.html

https://scitechdaily.com/what-if-the-big-bang-wasnt-the-beginning-supercomputers-search-for-clues/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

Dark dwarfs can erase dark matter. And get energy from that reaction.

 Dark dwarfs can erase dark matter. And get energy from that reaction.  

"A newly proposed type of stellar object, called a dark dwarf, may be hiding in the heart of our galaxy. These faint, low-mass stars could be powered not by fusion, but by the annihilation of dark matter particles, possibly revealing the elusive nature of one of the universe’s greatest mysteries. (Artist’s concept). Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (These Strange Stars Could Reveal the True Nature of Dark Matter)

If dark energy can form a soliton, that soliton can transform dark energy into visible energy. 

The dark dwarfs could be mysterious substellar objects that can destroy dark matter and convert it into energy. When those objects erase dark matter. That means that dark dwarves transform hypothetical dark matter particles into wave movement. That wave movement can also form in cases where dark matter particles impact each other. Or those hypothetical particles can also aim wave movement into the dark dwarves and turn dark energy visible. In that case, the dark energy waves can form a soliton. If dark energy is extremely short-wave radiation. 

And, if dark energy starts to create a soliton. That soliton grows so high that its wavelength matches the observable wave movement. That causes interaction between dark and visible energy, or wave movement. 

So, a dark dwarf can form a soliton that acts as a tensor between dark and visible energy. The problem is how to pack dark energy into a soliton. The base element in this model is that. Dark matter is at least one of the sources of dark energy. The idea is that because dark matter is invisible, it sends a wave movement in the wavelength that we cannot see. 

"Artistic representation of a dark dwarf. Credit: Image created by Sissa Medialab staff with Adobe Illustrator"  (These Strange Stars Could Reveal the True Nature of Dark Matter)

Or if those dark matter particles impact, that sends a wave movement. And that means that wave movement can be a dark energy. And if dark energy forms when something erases dark matter, that means the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI, observations support that model. If dark matter turns into a wave movement. That makes holes in dark matter. Because there is less dark matter in the universe. That causes a change in scattering in dark energy. 

So, if black holes are a dark energy source, can the dark dwarf be a tensor that can transform dark energy into visible energy? 

Dark dwarves are hypothetical objects that the dark matter or energy, which is composed of dark matter particles, such as hypothetical weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, can release when that strange object turns dark matter into wave movement or energy. The dark dwarf is like a tensor that transforms energy, from which WIMPs are released when they annihilate. 

The energy that the dark dwarf glows can form when WIMPs impact in the middle of it. There is also another explanation for how dark matter can cause the dark dwarf glow. The idea is that a dark dwarf can turn hypothetical axion particles into the same position. In that model, the axions are fast-spinning particles that are like sticks. 

Those sticks will turn their head to the dark dwarves. And then they harness energy and aim it into the dark dwarf nucleus. This could be possible if the star is in a very stable position outside the galaxy. Even a low mass object can cause large-scale effects, because there is no interference around it. That effect can pull the stick-shaped particles into the standing position.

 Or the gravitational effect can pull dark matter into the nucleus of the dark dwarf. Those particles impact and turn, or release the wave movement. The third way can be connected to the black hole. When a dark dwarf is near a supermassive or smaller black hole, that black hole pulls energy and dark matter into it. A dark dwarf can pull a small amount of dark matter to whirl around it. Then those dark matter particles collide with the particles that travel to the black hole. That causes energy impulses. That raises those objects' temperatures. If dark dwarves really can erase dark matter and turn it into visible energy, that thing can rewrite the fate of the universe. 

https://scitechdaily.com/these-strange-stars-could-reveal-the-true-nature-of-dark-matter/

https://scitechdaily.com/the-universes-engine-is-changing-desi-hints-dark-energy-isnt-what-we-thought/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Universum-size Coriolis effect and black hole’s lost hair cause questions.

 Universum-size Coriolis effect and black hole’s lost hair cause questions. 

The Coriolis effect and the spinning galaxies raise a question: do we live in a black hole? 

A black hole’s hair means energy eruptions that form near the black hole. So, we could call those things black holes’ flares. Researchers didn’t find them, but theoretically, those things could form when the Coriolis effect, also known as the Coriolis force, at the black hole’s event horizon forms a whirl in the black hole’s gravity field. And then that opens the hole in the gravity field. But there is no evidence about those events. A black hole is an extreme object with a powerful gravity field. Natural laws exist. And affect those objects. So there must be a Coriolis effect at its fast-spinning singularity, but that requires the singularity’s existence in a black hole. Or that the Coriolis effect could have an effect on the extremely powerful, or dense gravity, and the other three fundamental interaction fields. 

So the Coriolis force can make whirls in the wave movement, and that is one thing that makes that force interesting. Earth's atmosphere's Coriolis force causes a situation. That tropical hurricanes spin in the right at north from the equator. And to the opposite direction on the south side. On Earth Coriolis effect affects the large-scale movements. But near a black hole, the spacetime is much denser, and all interactions are far stronger than on Earth. That means there should be a very strong Coriolis effect. It can turn electromagnetic fields into whirling. And turn those whirls in a certain direction. And the directions should be similar to they are on Earth. 

The Coriolis effect is a virtual force. that makes gases and liquids create whirls that rotate in a certain direction. The Coriolis effect is visible on the spinning objects. The whirls that this virtual force forms always spin in the same direction. On extreme objects. The Coriolis effect is stronger than it is on Earth. And on neutron stars and other extremely dense objects, that virtual force can stretch. And turn even steel into whirls. And finally, that Corialis effect around the black holes can turn even gravity fields into whirls. 

That makes some JWST telescope observations very interesting. Most galaxies rotate clockwise. And that causes the idea. There is some kind of layer at the edge of the universe. If those long-distance galaxies rotate clockwise, that tells us that there can be an enormous plasma wall. That connects those galaxies on the extreme ball-shaped spinning object. Another version is this. Maybe we live in a black hole. If galaxies form near this hypothetical black hole event horizon, the Coriolis effect can make this event true. That is one of the most fundamental observations that forms one of the most exciting theories in the history of cosmology. 

Astrophysicists didn’t find hairs on black holes. 

But then we can go back to the black hole’s hair. The black hole’s flares, or energy tornadoes or energy beams, destroy structures when they fall into the black hole. But can a black hole have those hairs anyway? The black hole’s structure, which could be like a gravitational soliton, can explain why those researchers cannot see that hair. There are three possible ways that a black hole can hide its hair. 

1) A black hole can have “Samurai-style hair”. In that model, those hairs can form only around the black hole’s spin axis. So in that case, the relativistic jet that goes out from the black hole forms around the black hole’s hair. 

2) A black hole has thick hair. In that case, the black hole’s hair is thick around the event horizon. That means the black hole has slick back hair. 

3) Soft hair means that there are only a few of those flares. 

4) A black hole can have black hair. That means the black hole’s hair is a flare-type gravitational wave eruption from the black hole. 

The gravitational flares can also be destructive. Traveling gravity waves or gravity tornadoes can collect electromagnetic fields around it. That forms a high-energy area around those whirls. The thing is that the fast-spinning electromagnetic field. And, if there is some kind of string-shaped energy beam that travels in the middle of it. 

Can form a situation where the structure acts as a gravity center. The string in the middle of that tornado acts like a thermal pump that transports energy out from the middle of the beam. Because energy always travels to lower energy areas, that means there comes replacing energy from the environment. And that packs energy around that energy tornado. 

The relativistic jet can form in cases where high-energy radiation interacts with an electron cloud. That makes electromagnetic shadows on the opposite side of those electrons. Those shadows can connect together, and that collects energy from around that energy beam. But the electromagnetic string that can transport energy out from the beam faster than the shell moves can also create a situation that forms a high-power energy beam. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/astrophysicists-find-no-hair-on-black-holes-20250827/

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/james-webb-space-telescope-reveals-that-most-galaxies-rotate-clockwise-180986224/

Image: Qaunta magazine

Dark energy could be something incredible.

 Dark energy could be something incredible. 

"The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument is mounted on the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Nicholas U. Mayall 4-meter Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory—a program of NSF NOIRLab—in Arizona. Credit: KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/B. Tafreshi" (ScitechDaily, The Universe’s Engine Is Changing: DESI Hints Dark Energy Isn’t What We Thought)

Can black holes be the source of dark energy? 

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI, uncovers dark energy, and those observations reveal that dark energy can be something nobody expected. DESI’s observations suggest that black holes may be a source of dark energy. That means, there is a structure near the event horizon or in some energy fields near the black hole that transforms material or wave movement into dark energy. Dark energy could form when some structure pushes energy fields. Like some kind of rotating propeller. Or, we can say that the structure in the black hole or its environment just changes the wavelength of the radiation or visible energy so short that we cannot see that wavelength. Black holes are bright gamma- and X-ray objects. 

There is a possibility that this bright high-energy radiation covers dark energy below it. The main question in this transformation model is simple. What is the wavelength that turns into dark energy? Does dark energy form when spinning structures interact with gamma-rays?  Gamma-rays have the highest known energy level and the shortest known wavelength. So, can that interaction, with gravitation radiation, transform high-energy radiation into dark energy? 

This model suggests that when high-power gravitational waves come out from the black hole. It changes  the energy fields near the black hole. So, what are gravity waves? They are like energy potholes in the universe. They can form in situations when some shortwave wave movement travels against energy fields. That shortwave radiation pulls energy out from those fields, forming a ditch that pulls particles and other objects to the gravity center. That radiation or wave movement causes changes in the wavelengths of other radiation. 

If black holes are the dark energy sources, that would be a more fundamental observation. Than nobody expected. Dark energy forms when some structure in the black hole pushes fields that fall into the gravitational center. A black hole's spinning binds energy into it. But the expansion of the universe causes a situation. Where that black hole loses its mass all the time. Laws of physics determine that energy cannot just vanish. It can turn into materia. And matter can turn into energy. That means the source of the dark energy can be in the black hole’s evaporation. When a black hole turns into radiation. That means it turns its mass into energy. 

Could there be two versions of gravity? 

1) Gravity that forms when a particle vaporizes or turns into wave movement. That vaporization or reaction where matter turns into energy or wave movement pulls energy to that particle. The evaporation makes an object a gravity center, which pulls particles into it. When a particle or any object, including a black hole, sends a wave movement, it releases energy, or wave movement. And that wave movement binds energy from other energy fields. 

2) Another version of gravity can happen when fast-spinning black holes pull energy to the event horizon and near it. That energy travels to the spin axle, there it travels through the space. This thing means that the gravity center acts like a giant thermal pump. And if we think that the energy waves that travel in a relativistic jet are the string-shaped structure, those strings can bind energy from around them. That can mean that dark matter beams can be the source of dark matter, the mysterious gravity effect. 

So can fast-moving thin energy fields, or energy waves, be the source for dark matter? That means when an energy beam travels in the universe very fast, it binds energy into itself. Or the string binds energy into its head. Then energy travels back in that string and pushes fields away from it. But first, that string’s energy level must turn so high that it can make that thing. 

That model can explain why a long energy string, or a superstring, can be hot and cold at the same time. When a superstring collects energy into it, and if its speed is high enough, that can form an effect where energy travels out from the string from its back. So the string itself is not visible. But the energy field that it packs around it glows. And if that string can move energy in some direction in an extremely short-wave form, that means that the string packs energy from around it and turns its wavelength. When energy travels around those fast-moving strings, it forms a situation that looks like gravity.  

Can the dark energy source be in the hypothetical dark matter particles interaction. Dark matter particles like weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, and axions are hypothetical particles. There is a possibility that fast-spinning particles can turn into string-shaped structures. So, the fast spin movement stretches those particles into the shape that seems like a superstring. 

Another explanation for dark energy is that. Hypothetical dark matter particles. Or impacting gravitational waves, can form dark energy. Near black hole conditions are extreme. That means if there are dark matter particles or wave movement impacts. And maybe those impacting waves can form a wave movement that we cannot see. But the most exciting versions of those theories suggest that dark energy can form in gravitons. Those still hypothetical gravitational transpoting particles could be so-called quantum-size singularities or quantum-size black holes. 

The model goes like this. Those particles will not actually form dark energy. They just transform other energy forms. Or wavelength, into dark energy. This happens when a particle affects a fundamental force’s wavelength. We know four fundamental forces. Those forces are gravity, electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force. Today, we call those four fundamental forces “fundamental interactions”. Every single fundamental interaction has a unique wavelength. 

That wavelength depends on the size of its transportation particle, called bosons. Energy cannot form from nowhere, but it can change its form. When energy changes its form, that means its wavelength changes. So, theoretically is possible to transform gravity waves into electromagnetic energy. But the problem is this: we don’t have tensors that can make this thing. 

That means that. The graviton simply moves wave motion to another place. So the gravity center acts like a thermal pump. The idea is that the energy travels. To the spin axle of the graviton. There, it moves out from the particle as a very thin energy string. And if gravitons form black holes, that means black hole transports energy to their poles. And then sends that energy as a string or a thin energy beam into the space. So when that happens, the reaction can look like gravitation. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-universes-engine-is-changing-desi-hints-dark-energy-isnt-what-we-thought/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Energy_Spectroscopic_Instrument

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle