The black holes, and what is their relationship with eternity?

Could the Schwinger effect in black holes be the source of mysterious Hawking radiation? 

Is there some outcoming radiation that comes out from the black hole? And could that thing turn the event horizon invisible? Could that outcoming radiation be the thing called "dark energy"? If that strange wave motion is coming from the fourth dimension. That radiation is invisible to detect. There is the possibility that dark energy tunnels through superstrings that are forming all elementary particles. 

There is a theory that black holes are particles. That is in the fourth dimension. The idea is that when a particle jumps to the fourth dimension or otherways saying energy level that means the fourth dimension. It leaves a hole behind it. That hole is the channel where the radiation from that fourth dimension comes from that super-high energy level. 

And the reason why we cannot see the singularity is that there is some kind of counter-radiation or wave motion that will pull energy from incoming radiation. In that case, the gravitational waves or Hawking radiation that impacts other wave motion near the event horizon acts like a counter-wave from the beach. 

The counter wave pulls energy out from the impacting radiation. So the radiation that comes from the black hole must be very high-frequency. But the height of those hypothetical waves is very low. And that means the effect of that radiation could be visible only extremely close to the event horizon. 

So if that Hawking's radiation is coming inside the black hole there is one reason that could explain this thing. And that is this. There is some kind of Schwinger effect in black holes. The rotation speed of the black hole is extremely fast. And that can cause the Schwinger effect. Where wave motion turns particle-antiparticle pairs. Could there be some kind of Schwinger effect in the black hole?

The universe is material. And the material is one form of energy. Energy is the thing that determines how long the universe can exist as a material entirety. 

The dimension is the energy level where particles can interact with each other. We are living in the third dimension. And the thing that separates the fourth and third dimensions is the energy level. 

The energy level of the four-dimensional particle is so high that it cannot interact with three-dimensional particles. But the fact is that time will travel in the same direction in the fourth dimension as it travels in three-dimensional space. 

Term time dilation means that time moves slower on the particles that travel at a very high speed. Or another thing that can cause time dilation is the energy pumping to the particle. 

So if we will think that the particles are hairy things and the hair is forming when the superstrings erupt from particles. That thing is called quantum vaporization. The reason for that vaporization is the expansion of the universe. 

All energy and particles are involved in the universe. And when the size of the universe increases. That causes the material and energy relation with space decreases. That thing is called "Cosmic inflation". 

Cosmic inflation causes that material never to reach the minimum energy level that is the same as space. And that thing means the vaporization of the material accelerates all the time. Quantum vaporization or "vaporization" means that the material sends wave motion. And that wave motion is the thing that decreases the mass of the particle. 

Energy cannot form from emptiness. Particle turns to wave motion because the material is one form of energy. So when energy or wave motion targets the particle. It gets the lost energy back. And that energy increases the mass of the particle. 

But the problem is that when we return the particle's "youth" the energy level of the universe decreases. And that means the energy difference between the particle and its environment increases. So when the energy pump to the particle ends. It starts to release energy faster. 

And the wave motion that is left from the particle can pull a warp bubble or electromagnetic vacuum around it. That causes a situation. Where the wave motion that travels out from the particle rips it to superstrings. 

The thing that destroys the particle is not the energy pump. The end of the energy pump and too fast energy movement out from particles is the thing that destroys single particles. 

Dimension is energy level. If energy levels between two objects are too far from each other those particles cannot interact. 

The energy level is the thing that determines the third and fourth dimensions. The dimension that is at a higher energy level is always smaller than the previous one that is at a lower energy level. But the upper (higher energy) dimensions are denser than the lower energy dimensions. The energy travels from higher energy level dimensions to lower energy level dimensions. And that energy flow is the thing why it's so hard to reach those invisible dimensions. 

When the particle jumps to the fourth dimension. Its energy level rises very high. And that thing makes it possible that particles can keep their particle form longer than the universe exists. When the particle's energy level turns high enough, we could say that it jumps to the fourth dimension. It loses its ability to interact with other particles. 

Sooner or later that particle will lose so much energy that it returns to the third dimension. But if some particle makes that thing it keeps its particle form longer than the universe. The reason for that is that the energy level of that particle is so high, that energy in it will remain longer than in other particles. 

And when we are thinking about cosmic inflation and the aging of particles. We can say that this particle in a hyper-high energy level follows other particles in the aging process. That thing is called time dilation. There is a possibility to restore or return the youth of the particle simply by stressing them with electromagnetic radiation. 

Can some particle someday reach eternity?

That thing depends on how we describe eternity. If we say that the universe's lifetime is the limit of the existence of material. We must remember that information never vanishes. And the reason for that is when the wave motion reaches its final and smallest form. The universe reaches a stable form. The energy level of the system reaches its minimum level. 

For the first time in its history, the form of the material doesn't change any more. So that means the superstrings that formed the universe after the Big Bang cannot split into smaller parts. But when the material reaches its final form. Greek philosophers called that form the "Atomos" form. 

Material cannot take any smaller or lower energy form. But the fact is that those strings still exist. And the existence of the universe never ends. 

But could some particles keep their particle form forever? We can say that the end of the universe is the end of material existence as particles. When all particles are turned to wave motion that thing could describe the end of the universe. But there is a possibility to create a particle that lives longer than the universe. 

Time is one form of energy. And the thing that causes that material to turn to wave motion is the end of energy. When energy ends that thing causes a situation where the superstring that forms the particle turns open. 

But there is a possibility that the particle energy level is so high, that its energy level is so high that energy cannot release during the lifetime of the universe. The energy level of this sub-atomic particle would be so high that we cannot see it. 

Or the quantum field of that particle in the hyper-high energy level just pushes other wave motion around it. And that outcoming radiation denies that particle's ability to interact. The radiation just travels around the particle. And that radiation makes it hard to detect. That wave motion will just make that particle act like some kind of stealth material. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Could dark energy be the pushing and dark matter pulling gravitational effect?

The dark interaction and antigravitation. 

The standing gravitation wave that makes impacting gravitational waves reflect can be the key to antigravitation or pushing gravitational effect. 

Are dark matter and dark energy two-way interactions of gravitation? So could dark energy be antigravitation and dark matter be gravitation in the form we know it? If that thing is true that means gravitation has similar two-way interaction. 

All other fundamental forces have two-way interaction and they push and pull particles. So why the dark energy cannot be the hypothetical antigravitation or pushing gravitation? And dark matter could be the regular pulling gravitation. 

*Dark energy is energy that rips the universe into pieces. 

*Dark matter is the mysterious gravitational effect that keeps dwarf galaxies in one structure. Nobody has seen dark matter. And the only known interaction between dark matter and visible matter is gravitation. 

*So the name of the dark matter should be dark gravitation. Nobody even knows if dark matter existed. 

*Or could the reason for that unknown effect be the virtual particles? And one virtual particle type is a standing gravitational wave. 

*If a standing gravitational wave is possible, that thing could make antigravitation possible. 

*The idea is that the energy level of that standing gravitational wave is higher than impacting gravitational waves that cause gravitational reflection. 

*And maybe that thing makes antigravitation or pushing gravitational effect possible. 

*So, could dark energy and dark matter be antigravitation and gravitation? 

Dark energy is a strange force that rips the universe into pieces. And dark matter is the gravitational effect that pushes particles away from each other. Dark energy and dark matter are forming a thing that we can call "dark interaction". 

So dark energy is pushing. And dark matter or dark gravitation is pulling particles together. Does that mean there is a question are they part of the same force? In some of the most fundamental speculations, dark energy and dark matter is the gravitation that is turned upside down. Is it possible? Can gravitation turn its mirror effect? 

Gravitation is radiation or wave motion. So gravitation can put travel to focus like all other radiation. And there is a possibility that while the gravitation travels across that focus. They are turning to their mirror waves. And that thing makes it possible that somewhere in the universe the gravitational effect turns to the opposite. 

There is a possibility. That some kind of gravitational loop or gravitational lensing is turning the gravitation to its mirror effect. In that kind of theoretical situation, coherent gravitational waves are traveling through the gravitational lens. And that lens forms the focus where gravitational waves are turning to the opposite. But could that effect cause that gravitation turns to its opposite force? 

While gravitational waves are traveling in space they will turn very weak. And if another side of the gravitational wave is at a higher energy level. That thing means that the gravitational wave can turn upside down. 

When quantum entanglement breaks. And the particles are starting to travel in different directions. We are always forgetting to explain how that thing happens. Before quantum entanglement is formed the particles must take superposition. That means that two elementary particles start to oscillate with the same frequency. 

Then if the energy level of those particles is different. There is forming an energy bridge between them. When the energy level of those particles is turning to the same level that pushes those particles away. 

When the quantum entanglement reaches energy stability. That breaks the structure. Wave motion that source is in both particles impacting in that energy channel it forms the virtual particle or energy bubble. And then the energy that reflects from that virtual particle pushes those particles at both ends of the quantum entanglement away. 

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Quantum entanglement and the expansion of the universe

There is a small possibility that the universe's expansion is the reason for the cloud of extremely small particles that are superpositioned and entangled. Those particles could be gravitons, the hypothetical transportation particles of gravitation. There is a possibility that the graviton involves all particles that have mass. 

If the size and energy level of those yet unknown particles are precise same the quantum entanglement that forms between them is starting to push those particles away from each other. 

If that thing is true. That hypothetical extremely small, yet unknown particle is in every single quark that thing explains the dark energy, and the reason why we cannot observe that energy is simple. Dark energy is virtual energy. 

*When we research material and its smallest particles. We are facing one interesting thing. There must be the "final particle" the form or the thing that is involved in all particles. 

*If there is quantum entanglement between those particles there is a possibility that the energy levels of those particles are identical. And that destroys quantum entanglement. That thing pushes those particles away from each other. 

*If the energy level of those particles is different the quantum entanglement is stable. But if that particle is an inside quark. That thing causes the information that travels in quantum entanglement blows particles from each other like the wind. 

That thing can be the superstring. Or that thin could be some kind of extremely small black hole. If the energy levels of those particles are at the same level. And there is forming quantum entanglement between those particles they can push other particles out from each other. 

Because those hypothetical particles are far smaller than quarks or maybe they are smaller than gluons that cause the situation where the affected area of that quantum entanglement is so small that researchers cannot detect it. And the quantum gravitation between quarks and leptons covers the existence of those energy channels. 

But even if the quantum entanglements between those particles are stable it requires that the energy level between the ends of that thing is not the same. That thing can cause an effect where information blows those particles away from each other. The information that travels in this hypothetical quantum entanglement acts like the wind that is blowing the particle, or the superstring in that particle that acts like a sail. 

This theory requires that there is an identical particle in all other structures. And that thing can explain why dark energy is impossible to see. 

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Wormholes could explain dark energy and dark matter.

When we think that the hypothetical graviton particle is a quantum size black hole. That thing can also explain dark energy and dark matter. If a mysterious and still hypothetical graviton particle is a quantum-size black hole that quantum-size black hole is acting like all other black holes. 

The time is inverse also in the quantum-size black holes. And that thing could pull superstrings inside it. So the quantum size black hole will transfer superstrings to the point in spacetime, where it formed. And that thing can explain why we cannot see dark matter. 

*If graviton is the quantum-size black hole. That can explain dark energy and dark matter. 

*Quantum-size black holes are similar to regular black holes. They are time loops. 

When escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light. Time starts to run backward. And black hole brings the material to the point, where it was born. 

*The dark energy could be like Hawking radiation. In that case, quantum-size black holes send (Hawking) radiation. That has a different wavelength than Hawking radiation. That comes out from regular black holes. 

*And dark matter is material that travels in wormholes. 

If dark matter is material that travels in the wormholes and the black hole is the wormhole itself. That thing can explain why we cannot see dark matter or dark energy. 

The black hole is a time loop. 

When escaping velocity is the same as the speed of light time stops. And when escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light. Time turns to run backward. 

So black hole takes the material to the point in spacetime where it is formed. When the material is in a wormhole or a black hole. It cannot interact straight. But black holes can send Hawking Radiation, which means. 

That there is interaction also outwards from the singularity. And that thing causes one question. Is the dark energy some kind of Hawking radiation? There is the possibility that a quantum-size black hole is sending (Hawking) radiation that has a different wavelength than regular-size black holes. 

String theory explains material is formed of 2D superstrings that can explain dark energy and maybe dark matter. Maybe superstrings are the thing called "information". And that tells that superstrings have mass. The mass of the superstrings is minimal. 

A large number of those things can explain dark energy and dark matter. If the form of all particles is a yarn ball that is formed of flat superstrings that explains why those superstrings are so hard to detect. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/wormholes-may-already-have-been-detected-physicists-say

https://www.siliconrepublic.com/innovation/wormhole-travel-possible

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Researchers may find the wormhole. But they cannot recognize it.

There are three main requirements for stable wormholes.

*The black holes must superposition and make quantum entanglement between them. 

*Energy level between those black holes must be different. If one black hole is at a higher energy level than the other that makes energy flow in a wormhole possible. 

*And the energy level of energy that travels in the wormhole must be higher than its environment. The coherent wave motion inside the wormhole keeps it open. 

The wormhole is open until the wave motion that comes outside breaks it. This is why stable wormholes are possible only between two black holes. 

Image II Cosmic web

Could dark matter be material that travels in wormholes? And could wormholes form the cosmic web? 

Could the wormholes be the effect behind the cosmic web? In some theories, the so-called cosmic web is forming around wormholes. And there is the possibility that dark matter is matter that travels in wormholes. Because wormholes isolate material that travels in it. This makes the material invisible to us. 

The black hole itself is the wormhole or time loop.

The black hole itself is the wormhole or time loop. The reason for that is that the escaping velocity in that object is higher than the speed of light. And because the dropping speed of the material is the same as with escaping velocity. When the speed of the particle reaches the speed of light time stops. And when escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light the time should turn to travel backward.  And when material drops in a black hole it should come out from the point in spacetime where the black hole formed. 

It's possible that researchers just don't recognize the wormhole. 

There is a possibility that the first wormhole or Einstein-Rose bridge has already been found, but researchers don't recognize it. That could be one version of the problem in science. There are lots of phenomena that exist, but confirmation of those things is difficult. And until researchers get confirmation the thing is theoretical. 

The shape of the wormhole is simple. Its two superpositioned and entangled black holes. So it's the extreme version of quantum entanglement. And the next question is: can information travel in a wormhole? 

The answer is yes. The requirement that information can travel in a wormhole is that another side of the quantum entanglement is at a higher energy level than the other. And the wormhole is one of the quantum entanglement. 

The thing that keeps the wormhole open is the energy that travels inside it. If the outside energy causes the collapse of the wormhole that requires that outcoming energy has a higher level. 

And also another side of the wormhole must be at a higher energy level. If the energy level of both black holes is the same that causes the impact of the wave motion in the middle of that energy channel. And that destroys the quantum entanglement. 

We know that wormhole is possible. Laser and maser rays are energy channels through the universe. 

They are electromagnetic wormholes. The wormhole is the channel where is no crossing electromagnetic wave motion. 

Or that wave motion is coherent. So if an object travels in a wormhole it rides with that wave motion. The thing that makes wormholes possible is the electromagnetic tornado. The wave motion closes the channel inside it. And that electromagnetic tornado denies the outcoming wave motion's effect on that channel. Then wave motion that travels in that channel keeps it open. 

The reason why stable wormholes can form only between two black holes is that black holes are the highest energy objects in the universe. If we think that wormhole collapses because of outcoming energy the energy level of that radiation must be higher than the energy level of the radiation or wave motion that keeps the wormhole open. If that energy level is lower. It causes the collapse of the wormhole. 

 https://www.livescience.com/63847-facts-about-the-milky-way.html

https://www.sciencealert.com/wormholes-may-already-have-been-detected-physicists-say

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Could graviton be one or two quantum-size black holes?

Another model that could explain why gravitation is so special. 

Above this text is an image of the black hole. But that image could be the image of a quark. In some scenarios, the graviton is a small black hole inside the quantum field. The quantum tornado forms the point where that radiation pushes the quantum field away. So there is the electromagnetic vacuum that pulls the quantum field to the ball-shaped form. But there is also another version of the graviton and its interactions. 

The hypothetical graviton particle that should transport gravitation may be two quantum size black holes. That thing causes a quantum field whose shape is similar to the magnetic field that forms around a rod magnet. Those quantum-size black holes would be the south pole against the north pole. And there is forming a quantum tornado around those two black holes. 

Then the quantum fields are forming the lightning structure or superstring structure. That is looking like a whisk. When those black holes that size is smaller than quarks are starting to make the quantum fields or quantum lightning around them the outcoming radiation makes those flashes of lightning stronger. Because that structure starts to rotate, it turns to look like a ball. And maybe that thing is the quark. Maybe that kind of thing could explain gravitation. 

Another model of gravitation or graviton particle is that gravitation is the force that is forming around the fast-spinning particle. The idea is that when a particle spins. It creates the effect where wave motion travels to the poles or the axle of the spinning particle. And because the particle is extremely small. 

There forms a small quantum vacuum bubble to its poles because those waves impact each other just above the quantum field of that spinning particle. That bubble starts to pull wave motion to the axle of the particle. So when wave motion travels at the surface of the particle. 

Those waves are transporting the wave motion that hits the particle to its poles. So that means the particle that is making the effect of gravitation is like a neutron star or black hole. When a particle spins at an extremely high speed. It transfers wave motion to its poles like neutron stars or black holes are transferring. 

What makes gravitation interesting? That is that the graviton is missing. There is the possibility that a graviton is a quantum-size black hole or so-called black photon. The form of the graviton is one of the most important things in the gravitation theory. 

The thing is that things like neutron stars or black holes are not forming energy from nothingness. They are like generators. Generators are transforming motion into electromagnetism. The thing that neutron stars and black holes are doing the same thing. They are transforming electromagnetic fields into powerful energy beams. 

Or otherways saying they are transferring the frequency of the radio waves to X- and gamma rays. In similar ways, the Casimir effect doesn't make energy from nothingness. When Casimir plates are taken very close to each other electron cores form the quantum bridge over that hole. Then the outcoming radiation will inject energy into those bridges. And that thing loads the energy to the Casimir circuit. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

Could gravitation form when quarks are moving back and forth?

There is one forgotten version of the gravitation theory. The idea in this theory is gravitation forms when particles inside protons and neutrons oscillate. When the size or the distance of those particles changes. That thing forms an effect that is like a pump. So the gravitational effect forms when quarks are moving back and forth inside their quantum field. If that movement forms gravitation, it will explain things like gravitational waves. 

When the distance of quarks inside protons and neutrons expands, that motion forms quantum low pressure between those particles. That low pressure causes the electromagnetic- or quantum fields are dropping between those particles. So could that thing be gravitation? That explains why planets are the gravitational centers. 

There are lots of protons and neutrons. And when the quarks that form those particles are moving back and forth that thing causes an electromagnetic pumping effect where the force of the quantum field between those particles changes. 

When those quarks are closing each other they are forming a standing quantum wave between them. And in that case that virtual particle will send wave motion or gravitational waves to the universe. That thing explains gravitational waves. 

The mystery of gravitation is an interesting thing. There is a possibility that mysterious gravitons are only oscillating quantum fields. When the size of the particles is turning smaller. That thing also causes the position where escaping quantum field forms the electromagnetic low-pressure zone that pulls quantum fields to that particle. 

The pulling effect of the gravitation forms. When the particle rides with wave motion that falls to the gravitational center that model is true. The gravitation effect is similar to other fundamental forces. 

That means electromagnetic wave motion travels through a hole that is in the middle of those three quarks. That means those waves are traveling in and out from three quarks. And the incoming electromagnetic field or radiation forms the cone that causes scattering to the outcoming electromagnetic field. 

The idea is that when the distance between those quarks increases that pulls the quantum field through it. That quantum field continues its journey. And the same effect happens on both sides. There is the possibility that the impacting electromagnetic or quantum fields are forming a quantum bubble in the middle of those quarks. 

That bubble pushes radiation away from it. Around that bubble is forming an area that is at a lower energy state than the quark. And that forms bridges or gluons between those quarks. The outcoming energy can travel between those bridges. And maybe that is one form of gravitation. 

The thing that might make photons unique is that they are somehow slight. Maybe the thing that explains the photon's speed is that the particle's quantum field somehow pulls energy inside it as much as it delivers. The interesting thing is that the speed of light is lower in the medium can be explained in this way. 

The medium pulls the energy away from the photon faster than a vacuum. But fast-moving particle replaces the lost energy. In a vacuum, the photon travels at the same speed as wave motion. So because quantum fields cannot fly out from photons. That means those particles' speeds will not decrease. 

Pauli Exclusion Principle. And the universe's existence.

Could Pauli's Exclusion Principle explain dark energy? Could that wave motion be the interaction of identical particles? There should be no identical fermions in the entire universe. But when particles are reaching the minimum energy level they cannot transform anymore. 

Pauli's Exclusion Principle means that there are no two identical fermions in the same quantum system. And the universe is one quantum system. We are part of that quantum system. 

But there is one place where two fermions can turn identical. That place is the minimum energy level. And if some electrons reach the absolute minimum energy level of the system. They turn identical. That causes the effect where those electrons push each other away from the system. 

Or otherwise thinking the superstrings can form a similar interaction as fermions or every other particle in the world. And there is a possibility that if there are superstrings at minimum energy level those superstrings are starting to repel each other. 

What happens if all particles in the universe reach the same energy level? That thing destroys the entire universe. The reason for that is that when two particles are closing the same energy level they start to repel each other. 

In cosmic inflation, space expands in comparison to the material. That means the particle's energy levels or quantum states are closing each other and particles are turning much more like each other. And that thing means that the particles are pushing themselves away from each other. 

When two electrons or some other similar fermions like quarks reach the minimum energy level of the system they will become identical. And that means the wave motion of those particles pushes them away. 

The same thing happens when the quantum entanglement's energy level turns stable. When the energy level of the quantum entanglement turns stable. That thing forms wave motion that pushes the particles away from each other. 

The reason for that is that when the wave motions of the particles are impacting they form standing wave motion. And sooner or later the energy level of standing wave motion turns higher than outcoming wave motion. So the reflection from that virtual particle pushes those particles away from each other. 

And the question is could the dark energy be the interaction of the particles that are in the minimum energy level? When two electrons are reaching the minimum energy level they turn identical. And then the wave motion that leaves from those particles would push them away. 

The Pauli Exclusion Principle means that there are no similar fermions in the same quantum state. That means as an example electrons must have different energy levels. And there are not two identical fermions in the entire universe. 

That thing is one of the base principles that are keeping quantum systems as one entirety. If there would be identical fermions or two similar fermions in the same quantum state. That means they have absolutely the same energy level they would form wave motion that has the same wavelength, height, and frequency. When that wave impacts another similar wave. 

That causes the standing wave. That thing would push all particles away from each other. That means two similar particles would destroy the entire system. Quantum entanglement will be broken when two particles have the same energy level. Or actually, the quantum entanglement will be broken when the energy level of superpositioned and entangled particles are closing each other. 

That means when the wave motion that is leaving from those particles is sliding to an identical form. They are starting to push particles away from each other. 

The Pauli Exclusion Principle means that some fermions are at higher energy levels than others. And that thing leaves energy space to flow from the higher energy particles to lower energy particles. 

When those particles' energy levels are closing each other that causes the quantum states of particles are closing each other. And that thing means that the particles are turning closer to each other that thing causes the wave motion that pushes particles away from each other. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

The impossible triangle and energy flow make quantum armor possible.

 

Penrose's impossible triangle is the model of the problem of information travel in quantum systems. The energy must always travel to the side where the energy level is lower. And if we think that time is one of the quantum systems the reason why it's so difficult to receive information from the future is that future has a lower energy level than the past. 

So for traveling to the past. There must be a system that rises the information's energy level higher than the energy level at a certain point in the past. That allows the information to travel back in time. In this model time is one of the quantum systems. 

The particle or object travels in the three quantum systems. The distance to the particle is horizontal travel. The energy level is vertical travel. And then the object travels in time. So time is one of the quantum systems. 

Forms of photons such as wave motion and particles are one of the most interesting things in the world. That means photon travels in the form of a superstring. And energy cannot escape from the photon. That causes that time stands on that particle. 

Superstrings can also connect two quantum systems. Or two quantum systems can exchange information because they are part of a larger quantum system. The requirement that energy travels between two quantum systems are that those systems are connected. The connector can be the larger quantum system, where those two systems belong. 

If the energy level of participants of quantum systems is the same, that thing destroys the system. The reason for that is when wave motion that has the precise same forms (energy level and wavelength) impacts with other wave motion that pushes particles away from each other.

So there is needed a quantum system between those main systems. That increases the transmitter's energy level to higher than the receiver's. That thing makes time travel so difficult. The energy level must rise so that way it would not break information. The fact is that the information cannot vanish. It can break into pieces or be encrypted in a new form. 

This information helps to make stronger structures. If the energy level of all particles in a quantum cube (material) has the same energy level energy impact on that structure destroys it immediately. In quantum armors, there could be a network of the things like noble-gas atoms at the fullerene structure. In that structure middle of those noble-gas atoms is atom chains. That are forming quantum antennas between those atoms.

When energy impact hits those noble-gas atoms they send extra energy to those nano-antennas. The requirement for working nano-antennas is that the energy level at their top is lower than other structures. That allows energy to flow to those antennas and out to the system. 

The idea is similar when a particle slides from conditional space to absolute space. When energy starts to stress the structure the quantum antennas are transferring it out from the system. There is the possibility that the counterwaves are making the impacting energy weaker than it should be. When incoming radiation hits counter radiation it loses part of its energy. 

And that decreases energy stress on the structure.  Or in some other models, every particle in the quantum structure can have individual energy levels. That allows energy to fall to those lower energy particles in the case of energy stress. 

The thing that we must realize. That the end of the energy stress causes the wave motion. That breaks the structure. If there is space that allows the energy stress to rise without causing the wave motion that makes the structure more sustainable against the EM stress. If some particles in quantum structure have lower energy levels than others they can form cups where energy can flow when particles are sending electromagnetic impulses. 

If there are holes in the quantum entirety where energy can fall. That thing gives extra strength to that structure. In the case that the energy level of the system's participants is not the same. There are not forming identical waves that push particles away from each other. 

If some particles in entirety have lower energy levels than others. That offers the possibility that those lower energy particles can receive the energy impact. In the case that every participant of the quantum system has an individual energy level, the energy can travel to lower energy particles when those particles are sending the wave motion. 

Those lower energy particles offer holes where the wave motion can drop when energy stress to particles drops. Another way to minimize the effect of energy impact is to cover the most out layer of the quantum structure by using some other particles than another part of the structure. 

When energy impact hits those particles. They send energy impulses. And if that energy impulse travels through the rest of the structure. Without interaction. That makes the structures stronger against things like em-impulses. 

The particle travels in horizontal space where its distance increases. It travels at a vertical level which is the energy level. And then it travels in time. So time is one of the dimensions. But can we think of time as a quantum system? If time is the quantum system it allows information transfer to the future. But the problem is that the energy level of the information must rise. And the decoding of information can make that thing at least very difficult. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Populists and democracy: What is ordinary people's responsibility to their elections?

Ordinary people select people who are using power in parliaments. That means. Also, ordinary people have a responsibility to the state and its policy. Electors should listen to the candidates. Especially the entirety of the candidate's agenda should interest electors. So that they know who they will elect. The electors should elect a person who makes the best decisions. But who decides what is best for the nation? 

There is the possibility that some solution or decision is good for us. But that solution can cause catastrophe for the next generations. And that thing causes problems when we make decisions about the person who earns our trustworthy? And could that person be our election to parliament? We must realize that person who represents us in parliament makes decisions about how to use our money.

When some person represents us in parliament. That person would be in that position the next sessional period. And in that period. The parliament makes many more than just one decision. So don't look at only one statement. 

People should look at the agenda's entirety. And ask what that person wants to give to people. And what is that person's position on that agenda? 

People should know that parliamentary elections are not jokes. These people are selecting their representers to parliament for use of tax-payers money for a certain time. The problem is that there are no perfect candidates. All candidates have some things that do not please everybody. So whenever an elector makes choices they must make compromises. 

If good things >Bad things the candidate is positive. 

They must calculate Good things (minus) Bad things. And if good things win the elector chooses that person. If there is no candidate with more good things. And that thing is dangerous. If the candidate promises too much. That causes disappointment to electors. 

But also promises are compromises. The candidate must promise something to the main group of the constituency. And in some cases, the main group in the entire state is different than in the candidate's constituency. 

Individual constituencies may be home to unusually large numbers of super-rich people. And this can cause the candidate to have to please this minority. The candidate must therefore be in parliament as a representative of an economic minority. Every state always has a larger group of cleaners than managers. But in small constituencies, there could be more managers than cleaners.

 

In the world of the Internet, information travels faster than ever before. And that thing also causes problems with democracy. Populists are good to use social media platforms to deliver their agenda. They are offering lots of candies for people. And that makes them interesting in the eyes of other people. Also, some governments are using media as their tools. So in those states, the role of media is to support the people in power. 

When somebody promises lots of candies, we must ask how long people will live if they eat only candies. For living person must sometimes eat something else than just some candies. That means in working life. We must sooner or later do something that is not pleasing us.

Media plays a key role when information is brought to people. Of course, people like journalists have their own opinions. And in some cases, people like Secret Police agents are acting as journalists. 

In those cases, the information that is delivered can be propagandist. And the purpose of that news is just to support the political agenda of the people who are using power in some nations. 

The thing that can change information on one side or even propagandistic is self-censorship or the ability to black out other data that supports us or pleases us. When people are reading only things that please them that thing has a similar effect to propaganda. Self-censorship means that people read only things that please them. Those things are things that support their political opinions. 

We are wrong if we think that things like where companies make power or what power source those power plants use are not political decisions. Everything that used public money is politics. And we select representatives who represent us in parliament.

People argue that rulers have their responsibilities. But ordinary people also have their roles. In a democracy, they elect the people who make the decisions. The problem with the Internet is that people only choose the information that interests or pleases them. To get balanced information people have to listen to everything else that pleases them. And the ability to choose only things that seem pleasant to them makes information monotonous. People who deliver information have their supporters. And there are many ways to see things, that seem clear. 

 

There are four main types of governments 

• Closed autocracies
• Electoral autocracies
• Autocratic democracies
• Liberal democracies

Closed autocracies are nations like North Korea where the head of state doesn't even play democracy. 

In electoral autocracies is elections. But some non-democratically selected organization keeps the final control. Those nations are like Iran. There are parliaments but there are limits to the parliament's freedom to make laws. In those nations, the MPs or members of parliaments must follow strict roles in their work. 

In autocratic democracies is free elections. But things like the social environment and the common narrow attitudes make some people's life difficult. In those democracies, criticism against the parliament is not allowed during its sessional period. 

In autocratic democracies, people who criticize the parliament or government would be persecuted by media that support the party. That is in command. Criticizing the government can cause consequences like the loss of military rank. That kind of government is under the control of high-class populists. 

In liberal democracies, people are allowed to criticize governmental actors. That thing is so-called real democracies. In those things, the problem is that populists are using those systems for supporting their agenda. 

The problem is this. What if some solution that seems good in a short period turns or can predict to turn against people? What if the best for people requires sacrifices? Things like climate change are one thing that requires compromising on one's comforts like leaving the car to home. But those things are difficult because many people used to drive to work using cars. And changing attitudes is difficult because the car has an image of freedom and independence. 

But the car is also telling about social position. And public transport has the image of poor people's transportation system, which is used by people who cannot buy their car. The things like the high price of gasoline and energy crises. Along with the loss of capacity of parking areas are causing that we must re-estimate the role of public transportation. 

The science itself is not democratic. Scientific facts like Galilean moons are not following votes or elections. We can make as many votes as we want. But that thing doesn't affect those moons' trajectories. If we believe that democracy is turning science to state that it gives answers or solutions that please everybody we are wrong. We cannot transfer things like the planet's trajectory to please us by voting about them. 

But when we are thinking about the worst threat to democracy, we can say that is democracy itself. Populists are people who give great and simple promises. And if electors are not using critical ways to think. They would fall into the trap of populists. 

The best fellow for democracy is truth and a critical way to think. When we are seeing people who give simple and good-looking promises, we should ask at least a couple of questions about things that those people promise.

• If we make some decision, what happens after that? 
• What is those people's position in the new system? 
• Where do they get money for those projects?
• And then we should ask, why do those people want that change?
• And who introduced those things to those people? Or where do those people get their ideas?
• If we think of things like loan money from foreign lands. That requires that the state must pay the loan back.
•  Of course, the state can say that it will not pay that money back. But then the problem is how to get the next loan. 
• And if the multinational corporations are leaving the country. That causes problems with taxes. 
• If the country nationalizes that property, what happens to trust in that government? 
• Would somebody sell things like weapons to that nation? Or does the deliverer of the highly advanced weapon system allow the country to use its systems?  
• If the state nationalizes the property of an example U.S citizen? Is the use of GPS possible in that case? 
• And finally, if something changed, what is the thing that replaces the old thing? Where the investments that the old thing required will aim in the new system?

Sometimes people say that the media should ban far-right from the media. But censorship can cause those politicians to turn more fascinating than they are without censorship. 

And if those far-wing radicals are banned from the media. That gives them a chance to turn the focus from their political agenda. In those cases, discussions are turning into fights. And while people yell at each other. Nobody can ask about those participants' political agendas. 

They can say that other people do not give them a chance to talk or finish their speech. So then they can start to argue with others in some symposiums. And their agendas will not come to public knowledge. But people will know that those politicians are banned. 

And that thing is what they want. If the person is banned it allows that person can avoid questions of political agendas. They can discuss things and why they are not allowed to talk freely. That allows them to avoid critical questions. 

Can a cat be dead and alive at the same time?

 

Image Wikipedia:Scrödinger's cat

If information ever exists. It cannot either vanish. If something vanishes it requires that at least information about that object exists. If something never exists. It cannot either vanish because vanishing requires existence...

The reason for that is simple. Only existing things can vanish. 

If we are thinking about Schrödinger's cat. And the box where that cat is put where the cat is in a position where it cannot release without killing it, we can say that at the same time cat is dead and alive. But the fact is that the answer to the question is the cat is dead or is it alive requires another type of logic. The particle can be in two places at the same time. Because of quantum superposition. But the particle can have only one existence if it will have existed. 

In logical quantum mechanics, the superposition means that the particle is in two places horizontally. But the energy level of those particles can be different. And that means the particles can be vertically at different levels. 

But if the particle is dead. It doesn't have existence. And that means the particle is meaningless. 

In information theory, the information cannot vanish. But if the observer doesn't have information. That makes information non-existent. Getting information makes it existent. But if the observer doesn't never get information about the things like a cat. The cat is dead.

 Because information never existed. It cannot either vanish. 

Information can change its form. in system theory, this means. The cat that carries information is living. And when the cat delivers its information it is dead. So if the cat serves some system as the messenger which carries some USB stick between two computer centers. That means the cat lives until it delivers the USB stick. 

If we think like that anything that means something to the system is alive. And if the cat doesn't have a message or it just walks on the streets it's dead. So living means that things have some kind of meaning to other actors. 

But information theory describes the existence that an object doesn't have the form of to subject before the subject sees that object. So the cat is dead for a person until that actor gets knowledge about the cat's existence. We all know that in our house can be a cat. But we cannot see it and because the cat doesn't cause any actions to us or it doesn't give any markings to our calendars that means the cat is dead. 

That way thinking only things that we know and things that causes interactions are alive. The form of the information can be virtual. That means even if the cat. That someday carried messages but then escaped and the observer never sees it again the cat is alive in its virtual form. Observers can discuss the missing cat. And that makes the cat still alive. Even without straight contact with the observer. The cat remains alive in the virtual mode in the memories of those people. 

So the cat's living or existence can be stronger or weaker. It depends on how often we see it, and how often we talk about that thing. Maybe we will tell stories of the lost cat to our grandchildren. And that keeps it alive in our memories or the virtual world if we want to call memories virtual projection. But memories are forming of real things. That means those tales about that cat are weaker existence than seeing a cat straight. Or touching it. 

Being alive=Being exists. 

Being exist= actor can measure an object. 

And then the actors know the object. 

Knowledge brings the object to reality. 

That means until we measure or touch the cat. It would not turn into reality. 

That is one interesting thing. Before a person sees a cat it is dead because it is not part of reality. That means the cat or particle can be at the same time in two states but those states cannot be too far from each other. The cat cannot be alive and dead at the same time. That is a paradox as I wrote earlier. 

But a cat can be alive in virtual and physical existing modes. We can see the cat and tell about it to our mate, who stands near us. That means the cat has two states virtual and real to the system. But for individual actors, the cat can have only one state. They see cats and measure or they cannot see them. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/reality-doesn-t-exist-until-we-measure-it-quantum-experiment-confirms

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. 

Conditional state>>>>>Information spreds>>>>>>>>>>Absolute state

Conditional state

Individuals of the entirety get information about the cat. 

Information spreads

In absolute state, every participant of entirety knows about the cat. 

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. When the cat or information is between the states. It can have this conditional state. But sooner or later, the information must reach a stable state. Or if the cat falls between states it has the absolute state. The fall means that the absolute state changes very fast. But when the cat reaches the floor. It would reach the minimum energy level or state. 

"Being alive" for an object means that the actor can know about it. The knowledge of the actor turns it alive. 

"Maybe mode" is the mode where the same time cat is alive and dead at the same time. But when information spread in the system the system turns to Yes/No mode. 

That thing requires that there are multiple independent actors in the system. The system slides from the conditional state to the absolute model. 

When the first actors in entirety get knowledge of the cat's existence. There is the medium where the entirety has at the same time two states. But then the system will slide from the conditional mode or state to the absolute mode. When the system is in its absolute state form, the cat is dead or alive not dead and alive. 

An actor can be an individual. Or it can be a group of individual actors. 

All systems contain multiple actors. And if we think that group of people is searching for the cat and one sees it. Then that individual tells that thing to another participant that thing causes that cat to have two states virtual and physical in the system where are multiple actors. But the individual actor the cat is real or virtual. Or the actor doesn't know the existence of the cat. And that means the cat is dead. 

The actor can have three forms. Two of them are where the observer realizes its existence. And one form where observers don't know the existence of the actor. That is the dark mode that is hidden from actors. 

*Virtual form

*Physical form

*If nobody knows the existence of the actor, he's dead. 

The knowledge makes the object dead or alive. Being dead and alive are black and white. The actor can know the existence of the cat. Or the actor doesn't know that thing so the cat is dead. If the actor hears about the cat that thing makes it alive in virtual mode. When a person sees cats' traces. That will bring the knowledge of its existence stronger. And that will turn it more existing and more living than just talking about it. 

But a cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. When people are talking about cats it turns alive. Because existing things are living things. The cat's existence can be virtual when somebody just describes the cat to others. Or it can be physical when the actor touches the cat. But in both cases cat is alive. The reason for that is that requirement for a thing's existence is that the observer becomes conscious of its existence. If a person doesn't know about its existence the thing is dead. The existence means that the cat is alive. 

When we think that a cat is dead or alive. We must say that for the system that is the entirety of multiple actors. The cat can be dead or alive. The individual actors can have different knowledge about the existence of the cat. In that stage, the system is in maybe mode. But when information about that cat's existence spreads. That system will turn to the mode. That allows it to get knowledge about the existence of the cat. 

The term dead cat means a cat whose existence is not known. Knowing the existence of the cat makes it alive. The cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. The reason for that is simple we know that cat exists or we don't know a cat's existence. We cannot know and not know the existence of the cat at the same time. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/dont-let-yourself-get-tangled-up-by-these-4-quantum-mechanics-misconceptions