What was before the Big Bang. (Part II)

  What was before the Big Bang. (Part II)

"Our universe could be the mirror image of an antimatter universe extending backwards in time. Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin. Physicists in Canada propose that our universe could be a reflection of an antimatter universe that existed before the Big Bang." (CREDIT: Getty Images)" The brighter side, Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin)

The antiuniverse or antiverse is the model. That is based on the supernova explosion model. When a large star explodes, that event forms a so-called time-glass nebula. So, could the Big Bang event have formed the two universes? The idea is that when two giant whirls. That spin was opposite. Those giant whirls formed the spark, or the explosion that sent two universes into different directions. If those proto-anti-universe and the proto-universe impacted. That could form the universe and the anti-universe. 

This question is one of the most interesting, because it helps researchers to calculate the values of the particles.  When a particle travels through the universe. Energy and quantum fields touch it. Those touches leave marks on those particles. And that helps to get information from distant galaxies. But this is not possible. If researchers don’t know the strength of those energy fields. This means that modeling the Big Bang makes it possible to calculate changes in the energy levels in an expanding universe. 

  

What energy should be in those particles that exist in the modern universe? 

And if researchers can calculate. What kind of energy should those particles have? They can search for differences between theoretical and real values. That gives data about the fields. That the particle faced. During its journey.  But it’s impossible to calculate theoretical values without knowing the beginning values. 

Was there some kind of energy flow that formed two opposite rotating whirls that were positive and negative (+ and -) universes? And was the Big Bang some kind of spark between those giant whirls?  That doesn’t mean that antiversum and universe require material. They require opposite fields that cause a similar reaction to the antimatter-matter annihilation. 

In some models, the energy arrow that traveled through the field formed two giant whirls. Those whirls can be the anti-universe and the universe. Or, those whirls were the positive and negative whirls. If those two positive and negative proto-universes act like matter and antimatter. They can pull each other together. 

Above: Time glass nebula. 

So can the antiverse explain the Big Bang? 

In this case, we should rather talk about the antiverse. As a mirror universe. Or, mirror protouniverse . Where there was some kind of material. We could say that in the case of the proto-universe, the antiversum was rather the whirl where energy fields rotate in the opposite direction. Than the other universe that we can call the “normal universe”. If the proto-universe and proto-anti-universe were oppositely rotating whirls in the energy field or in free gravitational wave movement. We can think that those whirls pulled each other together like antimatter and matter. Pulled each other together. 

It’s possible that those extremely large rotational whirls impact each other, and they formed the lightning or the spark. That spark could be like a shortcut between positive and negative fields, and that spark could be the thing that we can call the universe. When the Big Bang happened. Energy was homogenously spread through the entire universe. Then the universe's expansion made holes. In that homogenous energy field. And that caused situations where energy started to fill those holes. 

Could dark energy or some part of dark energy form when quarks or gluons collide with their antimatter pairs? That thing can mean that this kind of thing can put energy into moving. 

Can black holes’ relativistic jets be formed from new fermions in the universe? When we talk about black holes and their relativistic jets, they can form fermion-anti-fermion pairs. That means that effect condenses energy fields into the form of matter. That means if Schwinger effect forms matter in the modern universe, that thing forms fermion-antifermion pairs. And those particle-antiparticle pairs can annihilate, transforming into energy. So could dark energy’s source be in the quark and anti-quark annihilation? Or in some more exotic particles, annihilation, like the gluon-antigluon annihilation. 

This can mean that energy, or wave movement that travels into those energy holes, is stated to fill those holes, and the Schwinger effect could form material in those whirls. Some of those whirls could be so strong that the wave movement formed different-sized primordial black holes. The question is always. Do black holes' relativistic jets form new particles in the universe? Relativistic jets are the most powerful things in the universe. Because black holes also interact with dark matter and dark energy. That means a black hole can form two relativistic jets, visible and dark energy jets.    

When dark energy jets travel through the universe, they can turn dark energy fields into some kind of particles. The changes in dark energy could form. When dark energy turns into some kind of particles. When we think about the nature of energy, matter is one of the forms of energy. Particles are energy packages. When energy binds itself into matter or particles, that means that energy is away from its environment. 

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/groundbreaking-research-suggests-that-our-universe-has-an-antiuniverse-twin/

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.amp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

Futuristic journey to the Proxima Centauri system.

Futuristic journey to the Proxima Centauri system. 

A hypothetical journey to Alpha Centauri, or actually to Proxima Centauri, will be the thing that changes our view of the universe and ourselves. The film introduces three types of spacecraft. The Millennium ship, the cryostatic ship, and the WARP ship. The WARP ship is not yet possible. In some models, the unmanned, small-sized WARP probes use miniature black holes as a power source and for quantum communication. Those systems travel first to other solar systems to search for a possible habitable planet. 

The next step is the cryostatic crew. That travels to the targeted solar system as a vanguard. Whose mission is to prepare the base for the main group of colonists who travel to that solar system in the generation ships. Those generation ships are the giant metal cathedrals that can reach a speed. Of about 2-5% of the speed of light. The WARP system is the only thing. That can take the crew back from the Alpha Centauri system while their sender is alive. The journey to Alpha Centauri takes hundreds of years. 

The biggest problem with the journey to Alpha Centauri is that when we send crew to that mission, they cannot return. That means those people are gone forever. The cryoship reaches 20-50% of the speed of light. That speed is very slow in the universe, and that means, even if we make a cryoship, we would send those people on the mission. where we don’t meet those people again. The cryostatic system denies aging, and those people can return from their mission, but the Earth has changed while they were on their journey. And there is no one left from the team that sent those operators on their journey. 

AI-made inspiration details about the hypothetical  Proxima B base. That base looks like the Moonbase. Its mission would be to protect the crew against the Proxima superflares, extreme weather, and possible. micro-organisms. Because there is always an epidemiological risk. Those structures must be separated. The bubble protects the crew against superflares. The base could be underground, and that thing could be the airlock and observation station. 

The generation ship will be the thing that transports the main groups of colonists. That craft needs generations to travel to Alpha Centauri. Those colonists who arrive at the Alpha Centauri system will never see Earth. That means Earth is a distant thing to those colonists. When we think about a situation where the generation ship is an artificial world. That slowly travels between solar systems; there is a big difference between that artificial world and a real planet. The environment in the artificial world is fully controlled. There are very carefully controlled microbes and temperatures on board the generation ship. Those systems are urgent because their mission is to deny. The artificial ecosystem's collapse. 

When colonists land on Proxima Centauri B or some other planet in that planetary system. There are artificial wombs and advanced nanotechnology that allow the creation of artificial DNA. And those systems create artificial people who could operate at the surface of Proxima Centauri B or other planets in that solar system. 

There is the natural environment. Winds, rain, and sunlight. There can also be natural microbes on that strange world. When that crew lands on that planet, they must live in the bubble. The base is isolated from the environment. The base’s mission is to protect those colonists against the Proxima super flares, storms, and the heat or extreme low temperature on that locked planet. Those colonists require protective suits if they travel on that planet. Because superflares raise the temperature very fast. The base can be in underground tunnels. That protects the colonists better. The Proxima would always be in the same position, because the planet is locked. 

Time and the Big Bang theory.

  Time and the Big Bang theory. 

Maurits Escher's portrait "Ascending and Descending" can introduce a situation where particles move between energy levels. When another particle moves up, that pushes another particle to move into a lower energy level. If two particles move up and one particle is between them, they move that one particle back or to a lower energy level faster. 

So if the case is this. When one particle moves one energy step up. The neighbour particle must move one step down.. And, if that particle is between two particles that move one step up. That particle that goes down should move two steps down. 

The reason for that is this: when one particle moves into an upper energy level, it gets that energy from the particle that moves to the lower energy level. And if the particle "wants" to push two particles to the upper energy level, it must release twice as much energy as one particle requires. In the same way, if two particles step down in the energy level and there is a particle between them, that causes a situation where those two particles release energy. They push the particle between them two steps higher. 

In one dark energy model. The reason for dark energy is that some particles just release their energy too fast. The idea is similar to the waterfall. When water drops from the slopes, it forms a sound when it hits the bottom. That sound forms when water releases its energy. The fact is that water releases part of its energy into the air. While water molecules travel in the air, they form friction. 

And that friction means that water released some part of its kinetic energy. Transforms into thermal energy. But what if water falls in the vacuum? In that case, falling water would not release its kinetic energy to the air. That means water transfers more kinetic energy to the bottom. And that means water would be at a higher energy level than it would be if it traveled through the air. 

Energy requires a place where it can move. When a particle travels through the universe, it interacts with its environment. That means a particle receives or releases energy. If a particle cannot transfer its energy to somewhere, like another particle or a quantum field, it remains higher energy than it should be. 

Can that thing be the evidence of the wormholes? The wormhole would not let the particle release its energy. And that can explain why some particles are at a higher energy level than calculated. The reason for that higher energy level can be that the particle traveled across the magnetic storm. And that tells us that the sun's magnetic storms can load more energy into particles than they should carry. 

But when a particle comes out from that magnetic effect, it causes a situation where energy flows faster from those particles than it should. In the same way, when particles come out of the hypothetical wormhole, that means they are at a higher energy level than they should be. And that causes a similar situation. The particle releases its energy faster than it should. That kind of effect can rip particles into pieces. 

Above: "A depiction of a universe-antiuniverse pair. Credit: Wikipedia, CC" (Phys.org, New model suggests partner anti-universe could explain accelerated expansion without the need for dark energy)

The Big Bang was an event, or a series of events. Big Bang released into time. The idea of that model is this. There are four dimensions: three in space and two in time. The Schwinger effect formed matter straight from wave movement. Before the Big Bang, there was wave movement. Or, some quantum points, or quantum dots, in that spacetime. It's possible that those quantum dots were small whirls in the starting field. Then those quantum dots started to assemble a wave movement around them.

It's possible that the event that formed the universe actually formed two universes. There is a formed universe where we live. And the universe, there at least, is the mirror. So, in the anti-universe, the matter is antimatter, but some cosmologists believe that time also moves oppositely. 

The Universe formed from a starting field that could be the gravitational wave movement fields. When we think about a model, the Schwinger effect or quantum whirls form the universe. We can think of a situation. There was a fast-moving energy impulse, or energy arrow, that traveled through the starting field. That energy arrow should form two arrows. And this model supports the antiverse model. 

Or in some other models, the quantum dots moved away. From each other because of some quantum mechanical impact. That thing moved quantum fields away from each other. And then they tried to fill that hole. This means that the starting field started to form. A tower-type structure, and sooner or later, that field couldn't keep the tower in its form. That collapse was the thing. Called the Big Bang.  Or it started a series of events that we call the Big Bang. 

There is a model that the spacetime is actually formed of the internally traveling time arrows. Time moves forward at the outer layer of that time arrow. The internal structure of the time arrow moves backward in time. The idea is that. We live in the third dimension, and the material's base energy level. At the quantum state is a 2D material. This forms the second dimension. Energy travels out from the material. 

Above: Waterfall. The sound of falling water forms when water releases its kinetic energy. (Pinterest)

This means. The material turns into a "flat" form. Or the material turns into a 2D form.  So the form of the universe can be a giant sobrero. There is a similar structure. Like a plasma impact wave that surrounds our solar system, we cannot get information from outside the universe. That shockwave formed during the Big Bang travels at the forward edge of the universe. And it denies getting information from outside the universe. There can also be a gravity wave traveling ahead of the Universe, that closes the universe inside the gravity sphere. And it also denies gravity observations from outside the universe. 

But let's go back. The internal time arrows. The idea is this. When the time arrow, or arrow of time, moves forward, it pushes things around it back in time. There is a possibility that the universe or material is the structure that acts as a hollow time arrow. The hollow time arrow forms when the edges of the structure travel forward in time. And they push their internal structures back in time. 

This model can work with the 3D spacetime model. If there is a structure, then the outer edge pushes energy into the middle of it, which means that the energy falls straight into the second dimension. That causes an effect where energy starts to spread around. But because there is a structure that transports energy into that point, the structure forms the standing wave into the second dimension. That means. There forms the structure. That looks like a volcano. Energy falls in the middle of it. 

That wave movement releases energy. That energy impacts the energy that comes outside, which starts to raise the structure's energy level. And because that field travels up those fields, it binds energy into them. The outside energy impacts the inner structure, which transmits energy to the second dimension. And that forms the energy trap or standing wave around the structure. The standing wave's energy level rises outward, or the inward field gives in and falls on the structure. 

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.html

https://scitechdaily.com/what-if-the-big-bang-wasnt-the-beginning-supercomputers-search-for-clues/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

Dark dwarfs can erase dark matter. And get energy from that reaction.

 Dark dwarfs can erase dark matter. And get energy from that reaction.  

"A newly proposed type of stellar object, called a dark dwarf, may be hiding in the heart of our galaxy. These faint, low-mass stars could be powered not by fusion, but by the annihilation of dark matter particles, possibly revealing the elusive nature of one of the universe’s greatest mysteries. (Artist’s concept). Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (These Strange Stars Could Reveal the True Nature of Dark Matter)

If dark energy can form a soliton, that soliton can transform dark energy into visible energy. 

The dark dwarfs could be mysterious substellar objects that can destroy dark matter and convert it into energy. When those objects erase dark matter. That means that dark dwarves transform hypothetical dark matter particles into wave movement. That wave movement can also form in cases where dark matter particles impact each other. Or those hypothetical particles can also aim wave movement into the dark dwarves and turn dark energy visible. In that case, the dark energy waves can form a soliton. If dark energy is extremely short-wave radiation. 

And, if dark energy starts to create a soliton. That soliton grows so high that its wavelength matches the observable wave movement. That causes interaction between dark and visible energy, or wave movement. 

So, a dark dwarf can form a soliton that acts as a tensor between dark and visible energy. The problem is how to pack dark energy into a soliton. The base element in this model is that. Dark matter is at least one of the sources of dark energy. The idea is that because dark matter is invisible, it sends a wave movement in the wavelength that we cannot see. 

"Artistic representation of a dark dwarf. Credit: Image created by Sissa Medialab staff with Adobe Illustrator"  (These Strange Stars Could Reveal the True Nature of Dark Matter)

Or if those dark matter particles impact, that sends a wave movement. And that means that wave movement can be a dark energy. And if dark energy forms when something erases dark matter, that means the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI, observations support that model. If dark matter turns into a wave movement. That makes holes in dark matter. Because there is less dark matter in the universe. That causes a change in scattering in dark energy. 

So, if black holes are a dark energy source, can the dark dwarf be a tensor that can transform dark energy into visible energy? 

Dark dwarves are hypothetical objects that the dark matter or energy, which is composed of dark matter particles, such as hypothetical weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, can release when that strange object turns dark matter into wave movement or energy. The dark dwarf is like a tensor that transforms energy, from which WIMPs are released when they annihilate. 

The energy that the dark dwarf glows can form when WIMPs impact in the middle of it. There is also another explanation for how dark matter can cause the dark dwarf glow. The idea is that a dark dwarf can turn hypothetical axion particles into the same position. In that model, the axions are fast-spinning particles that are like sticks. 

Those sticks will turn their head to the dark dwarves. And then they harness energy and aim it into the dark dwarf nucleus. This could be possible if the star is in a very stable position outside the galaxy. Even a low mass object can cause large-scale effects, because there is no interference around it. That effect can pull the stick-shaped particles into the standing position.

 Or the gravitational effect can pull dark matter into the nucleus of the dark dwarf. Those particles impact and turn, or release the wave movement. The third way can be connected to the black hole. When a dark dwarf is near a supermassive or smaller black hole, that black hole pulls energy and dark matter into it. A dark dwarf can pull a small amount of dark matter to whirl around it. Then those dark matter particles collide with the particles that travel to the black hole. That causes energy impulses. That raises those objects' temperatures. If dark dwarves really can erase dark matter and turn it into visible energy, that thing can rewrite the fate of the universe. 

https://scitechdaily.com/these-strange-stars-could-reveal-the-true-nature-of-dark-matter/

https://scitechdaily.com/the-universes-engine-is-changing-desi-hints-dark-energy-isnt-what-we-thought/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Universum-size Coriolis effect and black hole’s lost hair cause questions.

 Universum-size Coriolis effect and black hole’s lost hair cause questions. 

The Coriolis effect and the spinning galaxies raise a question: do we live in a black hole? 

A black hole’s hair means energy eruptions that form near the black hole. So, we could call those things black holes’ flares. Researchers didn’t find them, but theoretically, those things could form when the Coriolis effect, also known as the Coriolis force, at the black hole’s event horizon forms a whirl in the black hole’s gravity field. And then that opens the hole in the gravity field. But there is no evidence about those events. A black hole is an extreme object with a powerful gravity field. Natural laws exist. And affect those objects. So there must be a Coriolis effect at its fast-spinning singularity, but that requires the singularity’s existence in a black hole. Or that the Coriolis effect could have an effect on the extremely powerful, or dense gravity, and the other three fundamental interaction fields. 

So the Coriolis force can make whirls in the wave movement, and that is one thing that makes that force interesting. Earth's atmosphere's Coriolis force causes a situation. That tropical hurricanes spin in the right at north from the equator. And to the opposite direction on the south side. On Earth Coriolis effect affects the large-scale movements. But near a black hole, the spacetime is much denser, and all interactions are far stronger than on Earth. That means there should be a very strong Coriolis effect. It can turn electromagnetic fields into whirling. And turn those whirls in a certain direction. And the directions should be similar to they are on Earth. 

The Coriolis effect is a virtual force. that makes gases and liquids create whirls that rotate in a certain direction. The Coriolis effect is visible on the spinning objects. The whirls that this virtual force forms always spin in the same direction. On extreme objects. The Coriolis effect is stronger than it is on Earth. And on neutron stars and other extremely dense objects, that virtual force can stretch. And turn even steel into whirls. And finally, that Corialis effect around the black holes can turn even gravity fields into whirls. 

That makes some JWST telescope observations very interesting. Most galaxies rotate clockwise. And that causes the idea. There is some kind of layer at the edge of the universe. If those long-distance galaxies rotate clockwise, that tells us that there can be an enormous plasma wall. That connects those galaxies on the extreme ball-shaped spinning object. Another version is this. Maybe we live in a black hole. If galaxies form near this hypothetical black hole event horizon, the Coriolis effect can make this event true. That is one of the most fundamental observations that forms one of the most exciting theories in the history of cosmology. 

Astrophysicists didn’t find hairs on black holes. 

But then we can go back to the black hole’s hair. The black hole’s flares, or energy tornadoes or energy beams, destroy structures when they fall into the black hole. But can a black hole have those hairs anyway? The black hole’s structure, which could be like a gravitational soliton, can explain why those researchers cannot see that hair. There are three possible ways that a black hole can hide its hair. 

1) A black hole can have “Samurai-style hair”. In that model, those hairs can form only around the black hole’s spin axis. So in that case, the relativistic jet that goes out from the black hole forms around the black hole’s hair. 

2) A black hole has thick hair. In that case, the black hole’s hair is thick around the event horizon. That means the black hole has slick back hair. 

3) Soft hair means that there are only a few of those flares. 

4) A black hole can have black hair. That means the black hole’s hair is a flare-type gravitational wave eruption from the black hole. 

The gravitational flares can also be destructive. Traveling gravity waves or gravity tornadoes can collect electromagnetic fields around it. That forms a high-energy area around those whirls. The thing is that the fast-spinning electromagnetic field. And, if there is some kind of string-shaped energy beam that travels in the middle of it. 

Can form a situation where the structure acts as a gravity center. The string in the middle of that tornado acts like a thermal pump that transports energy out from the middle of the beam. Because energy always travels to lower energy areas, that means there comes replacing energy from the environment. And that packs energy around that energy tornado. 

The relativistic jet can form in cases where high-energy radiation interacts with an electron cloud. That makes electromagnetic shadows on the opposite side of those electrons. Those shadows can connect together, and that collects energy from around that energy beam. But the electromagnetic string that can transport energy out from the beam faster than the shell moves can also create a situation that forms a high-power energy beam. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/astrophysicists-find-no-hair-on-black-holes-20250827/

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/james-webb-space-telescope-reveals-that-most-galaxies-rotate-clockwise-180986224/

Image: Qaunta magazine

Dark energy could be something incredible.

 Dark energy could be something incredible. 

"The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument is mounted on the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Nicholas U. Mayall 4-meter Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory—a program of NSF NOIRLab—in Arizona. Credit: KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/B. Tafreshi" (ScitechDaily, The Universe’s Engine Is Changing: DESI Hints Dark Energy Isn’t What We Thought)

Can black holes be the source of dark energy? 

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, DESI, uncovers dark energy, and those observations reveal that dark energy can be something nobody expected. DESI’s observations suggest that black holes may be a source of dark energy. That means, there is a structure near the event horizon or in some energy fields near the black hole that transforms material or wave movement into dark energy. Dark energy could form when some structure pushes energy fields. Like some kind of rotating propeller. Or, we can say that the structure in the black hole or its environment just changes the wavelength of the radiation or visible energy so short that we cannot see that wavelength. Black holes are bright gamma- and X-ray objects. 

There is a possibility that this bright high-energy radiation covers dark energy below it. The main question in this transformation model is simple. What is the wavelength that turns into dark energy? Does dark energy form when spinning structures interact with gamma-rays?  Gamma-rays have the highest known energy level and the shortest known wavelength. So, can that interaction, with gravitation radiation, transform high-energy radiation into dark energy? 

This model suggests that when high-power gravitational waves come out from the black hole. It changes  the energy fields near the black hole. So, what are gravity waves? They are like energy potholes in the universe. They can form in situations when some shortwave wave movement travels against energy fields. That shortwave radiation pulls energy out from those fields, forming a ditch that pulls particles and other objects to the gravity center. That radiation or wave movement causes changes in the wavelengths of other radiation. 

If black holes are the dark energy sources, that would be a more fundamental observation. Than nobody expected. Dark energy forms when some structure in the black hole pushes fields that fall into the gravitational center. A black hole's spinning binds energy into it. But the expansion of the universe causes a situation. Where that black hole loses its mass all the time. Laws of physics determine that energy cannot just vanish. It can turn into materia. And matter can turn into energy. That means the source of the dark energy can be in the black hole’s evaporation. When a black hole turns into radiation. That means it turns its mass into energy. 

Could there be two versions of gravity? 

1) Gravity that forms when a particle vaporizes or turns into wave movement. That vaporization or reaction where matter turns into energy or wave movement pulls energy to that particle. The evaporation makes an object a gravity center, which pulls particles into it. When a particle or any object, including a black hole, sends a wave movement, it releases energy, or wave movement. And that wave movement binds energy from other energy fields. 

2) Another version of gravity can happen when fast-spinning black holes pull energy to the event horizon and near it. That energy travels to the spin axle, there it travels through the space. This thing means that the gravity center acts like a giant thermal pump. And if we think that the energy waves that travel in a relativistic jet are the string-shaped structure, those strings can bind energy from around them. That can mean that dark matter beams can be the source of dark matter, the mysterious gravity effect. 

So can fast-moving thin energy fields, or energy waves, be the source for dark matter? That means when an energy beam travels in the universe very fast, it binds energy into itself. Or the string binds energy into its head. Then energy travels back in that string and pushes fields away from it. But first, that string’s energy level must turn so high that it can make that thing. 

That model can explain why a long energy string, or a superstring, can be hot and cold at the same time. When a superstring collects energy into it, and if its speed is high enough, that can form an effect where energy travels out from the string from its back. So the string itself is not visible. But the energy field that it packs around it glows. And if that string can move energy in some direction in an extremely short-wave form, that means that the string packs energy from around it and turns its wavelength. When energy travels around those fast-moving strings, it forms a situation that looks like gravity.  

Can the dark energy source be in the hypothetical dark matter particles interaction. Dark matter particles like weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, and axions are hypothetical particles. There is a possibility that fast-spinning particles can turn into string-shaped structures. So, the fast spin movement stretches those particles into the shape that seems like a superstring. 

Another explanation for dark energy is that. Hypothetical dark matter particles. Or impacting gravitational waves, can form dark energy. Near black hole conditions are extreme. That means if there are dark matter particles or wave movement impacts. And maybe those impacting waves can form a wave movement that we cannot see. But the most exciting versions of those theories suggest that dark energy can form in gravitons. Those still hypothetical gravitational transpoting particles could be so-called quantum-size singularities or quantum-size black holes. 

The model goes like this. Those particles will not actually form dark energy. They just transform other energy forms. Or wavelength, into dark energy. This happens when a particle affects a fundamental force’s wavelength. We know four fundamental forces. Those forces are gravity, electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force. Today, we call those four fundamental forces “fundamental interactions”. Every single fundamental interaction has a unique wavelength. 

That wavelength depends on the size of its transportation particle, called bosons. Energy cannot form from nowhere, but it can change its form. When energy changes its form, that means its wavelength changes. So, theoretically is possible to transform gravity waves into electromagnetic energy. But the problem is this: we don’t have tensors that can make this thing. 

That means that. The graviton simply moves wave motion to another place. So the gravity center acts like a thermal pump. The idea is that the energy travels. To the spin axle of the graviton. There, it moves out from the particle as a very thin energy string. And if gravitons form black holes, that means black hole transports energy to their poles. And then sends that energy as a string or a thin energy beam into the space. So when that happens, the reaction can look like gravitation. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-universes-engine-is-changing-desi-hints-dark-energy-isnt-what-we-thought/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Energy_Spectroscopic_Instrument

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Spacetime’s two faces can look similar, but they are not the same.

 Spacetime’s two faces can look similar, but they are not the same. 

"This animation of DESI's 3D map of the large-scale structure in the Universe, the largest such map to date, was created with the intention of studying dark energy and its possible evolution. However, although they found evidence for dark energy evolving, that's likely due to the assumption that it's dark energy's evolution that's causing the discrepancies in the data compared to our standard cosmological model. This is not necessarily the case." (BigThink, Ask Ethan: Is dark energy no longer a cosmological constant?)

Can the dark energy be some kind of cosmic constant? 

There is one thing that can interact with dark energy. That is another dark energy wave package. When those wave packages impact, that thing can form the shockwaves. That can increase the dark energy’s energy level. But if De Sitter space impacts with anti-De Sitter space, can that image also introduce that thing? 

One of the key elements in quantum models is this: when something goes in a certain direction. Somewhere, something moves in the opposite direction. That is the model of the Arrow of time. And if we want to expand that model in the superstring theory, we can think that when energy moves in the hollow superstring, that means energy moves in the opposite direction on that string’s shells. That forms wave movement in that string’s shell. Those waves form a quantum vacuum. Behind those waves. And can that vacuum be the mysterious negative energy? And can that thing be the negative energy? Or maybe the dark energy? 

The energy level and density of the object determine the strength of the dark energy interaction with visible particles and energy. That means dark energy is not homogeneous. There is a model that black holes can transform matter into dark energy. That explains cosmic hickups. This means dark energy can interact with matter, like gravity interacts with particles. That could mean that the dark energy is the mythic negative energy.   

The question should be: Can the interaction between dark energy be stronger in some places than in others? Near objects with high density, dark energy might have higher interaction than in places where density is low. The high energy level means that energy density is higher. Than in low-energy places. In a high-energy area, dark and visible energy interaction should be stronger. Near black holes, dark energy should have the strongest possible interaction. 

However, in very dense and hot objects, visible energy is obscured by dark energy under it. That means we should know how much energy material that falls into the black hole forms. And then we should calculate visible energy, or wave movement into that energy level. And if we measure higher energy levels, that means the dark energy produces that extra energy. Practically, that is very hard to make. 

Dark energy should be denser in some areas than in other places. Black holes should pack that energy into a denser form. Gravity centers also pull dark matter inside them. That means there are axions or WIMP collisions . And that should create wave movement. It could be that the dark energy source is the dark matter particle collisions. But those hypothetical WIMPs and axions are theoretical particles. Maybe dark energy interacts more strongly near high-energy objects.

The universe is part of spacetime. That means there should be an antiverse. The place where everything goes oppositely. When something moves in some direction, that means that thing’s mirror image or particle should move in the opposite direction. The idea of the anti-universe and the universe is taken from the supernova explosions. Those explosions from the time glass-shaped structures. And that means the Big Bang should create two universes.Same way, when a superstring moves in the space-time, it moves things around it in the opposite direction.  

“In mathematical physics, n-dimensional de Sitter space (often denoted dSn) is a maximally symmetric Lorentzian manifold with constant positive scalar curvature. It is analogue of an n-sphere, with a Lorentzian metric in place of the Riemannian metric of the latter.” (Wikipedia, De Sitter space)

“The main application of de Sitter space is its use in general relativity, where it serves as one of the simplest mathematical models of the universe consistent with the observed accelerating expansion of the universe. More specifically, de Sitter space is the maximally symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's field equations in which the cosmological constant” (Wikipedia, De Sitter space)

So if there is a so-called Anti-De Sitter universe or anti-De Sitter space, that thing can pull De Sitter space into it. In that case, impacting De Sitter and anti-De Sitter forms the parabolic or hyperbolic curves. When those curves impact. That impact can form a wave movement across the spacetime. The idea is that mirror-spaces also pull each other together. And they act like matter and antimatter. 

“In theoretical physics, the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence (frequently abbreviated as AdS/CFT) is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) that are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory. On the other side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) that are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang–Mills theories that describe elementary particles” (Wikipedia, AdS/CFT correspondence)

There is a possibility that there are two universes. Those universes might look similar, but their interactions are opposite. Same way, if negative energy exists. That energy can cause a similar interaction with the visible energy. Positive energy pushes things away. Negative energy pulls positive energy to it. The negative energy can look like positive energy, but its interaction is opposite. That is the energy dualism. Or energy has two faces. Those faces look the same. But they are not the same. Spacetime might have two faces. Spacetime is the space where we live. 

The nature of dark energy causes discussions. That means dark energy can be something very extraordinary to us. Can dark energy be so-called negative energy? Could that thing be true? The idea is that the negative energy could be the quantum vacuum that forms behind the superstrings? When superstrings travel through the universe, that thing is like all other strings. There should form a small quantum low region behind that thing. 

There is a theory about the universe and the anti-universe. In that theory, when something goes forward in the quantum world, something goes opposite in some other place. When time moves forward. In our universe, in another universe. Time moves backward. If we think about string theory and the model of hollow superstrings, we must realize that when energy moves in some direction in the superstring, that means the energy moves in the opposite direction at the string shell. This is the idea of the time arrow. And that can be the key also to dark energy. 

If we follow that model, the negative energy can seem like regular energy. If negative energy moves as pulses, that means. Its interaction looks like a visible energy interaction. When energy or wave movement travels in the universe, energy moves to those waves that are like strings. That means the string sends its extra energy to the environment. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/dark-energy-no-longer-constant/

https://www.livescience.com/mirror-universe-explains-dark-matter

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/black-holes-that-transform-matter-into-dark-energy-could-solve-cosmic-hiccups-mystery/ar-AA1L7eEL?ocid=BingNewsSerp

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-two-faces-of-space-time-20240925/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-de_Sitter_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle